Author(s): Vinod Nautiyal, Amit Roy, Ram Kumar Sahu

Email(s): vnautiyal@gkv.ac.in , wakratund@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00351   

Address: Vinod Nautiyal1, Amit Roy2*, Ram Kumar Sahu3
1Columbia Institute of Pharmacy, Tekari, Raipur - 493111, Chhattisgarh, India.
2Chhatrapati Shivaji Institute of Pharmacy, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.
3Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University (A Central University), Chauras Campus, 249161, Tehri Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 19,      Issue - 6,     Year - 2026


ABSTRACT:
Background: Cichorium intybus is a potent remedial plant used by local inhabitants to treat different types of diseases. It is adulterated with different plant parts looking similar, which affects the potency of the plant. Aim: Hence, pharmacognostic and physicochemical investigations on Cichorium intybus were planned to be performed for their proper authentication. Methods: The micromorphology, microscopy, and physicochemical study, namely loss on drying, ethanol doable extractive, total ash, acid insoluble ash, water soluble ash, sulfated ash, foaming index, and fluorescence analysis of root and stem of Cihcorium intybus, were performed using standard methods. Results: The morphological and microscopic study of the root and stem of Cichorium intybus demonstrated specific features of the root and stem. The physicochemical investigation of root exhibited loss on drying (14.37%), moisture content (8.34%), water-soluble extractive (1.24%), ethanol soluble extractive (0.56%), total ash (5.320%), acid insoluble ash (3.24%), water soluble ash (0.4605%), sulphated ash (0.4605%), and foaming index (142.857). Similarly, physicochemical investigation of aerial part provides loss on drying (16.87%), moisture content (10.50%), water-soluble extractive (0.87%), ethanol soluble extractive (0.865%), total ash (3.20%), acid insoluble ash (2.115%), water-soluble ash (0.312%), sulphated ash (0.312%), and foaming index (166.667). When treated with different reagents, root and stem powder showed clear and distinctive fluorescent color under daylight and UV light. Conclusion: The findings of the pharmacognostic and physicochemical studies help to correctly authenticate Cichorium intybus in its raw form and protect it from adulterations that preserve the potency of the plant.


Cite this article:
Vinod Nautiyal, Amit Roy, Ram Kumar Sahu. Pharmacognostic and Physicochemical Assessment of Cichorium intybus a Potential Hypoglycemic Herb. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2445-1. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00351

Cite(Electronic):
Vinod Nautiyal, Amit Roy, Ram Kumar Sahu. Pharmacognostic and Physicochemical Assessment of Cichorium intybus a Potential Hypoglycemic Herb. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2445-1. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00351   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-6-8


REFERENCES:
1.    Taha S. EI-Alfy, Hesham I. EI Askary, Sahar Abd EI-Tawab, Shaimma M. Kamel. Pharmacognostical study of Cichorium intybus L. herb growing in Egypt. Bull. Fac. Cairo Univ.  2009; 47(2): 77-99.
2.    Kharel M, Dahal BM, Raut N. Good agriculture practices for safe food and sustainable agriculture in Nepal: A review. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2022; 10: 100447 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100447.
3.    P. Bigoniya, C. S. Singh, B. Shrivastava. Pharmacognostical, physico-chemical and phyto-chemical standardization of Cichorium intybus L. seed. Research Journal of  Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2013; 5(3): 133-138.
4.    Upadhyay P, Joshi BC, Sundriyal A, Mukhija M. Pharmacognostic standardization and physicochemical evaluation of Caesalpinia crista L. root for quality control assessment. Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine.  2019; 2(3): 135-40 https://doi.org/10.4103/JNSM.JNSM_61_18.
5.    Rupani R, Chavez A. Medicinal plants with traditional use: Ethnobotany in the Indian subcontinent. Clinics in Dermatology. 2018; 36(3). 306-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.03.005.
6.    Rajkumari, Vidhu Aeri, Meenakshi Sharma. Preliminary Pharmacognostical and Phytochemical Evaluation of stem of Cichorium intybus Linn. (Chicory). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(9): 4078-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00684
7.    Roohi Zaman, Sadiya Noorul Basar. A review article of Beekhe Kasni (Cichorium intybus) its traditional uses and pharmacological actions. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013; 2(8): 1-7 ().
8.    Street RA, Sidana J, Prinsloo G. Cichorium intybus: Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology. Evidence‐based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013; 2013(1): 579319 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/579319.
9.    Duda Ł, Kłosiński KK, Budryn G, Jaśkiewicz A, Kołat D, Kałuzińska-Kołat Ż, Pasieka ZW. Medicinal Use of Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2024; 92(2): 31 https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm92020031.
10.    Perović J, Saponjac VT, Kojić J, Krulj J, Moreno DA, García-Viguera C, Bodroža-Solarov M, Ilić N. Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as a food ingredient–Nutritional composition, bioactivity, safety, and health claims: A review. Food Chemistry. 2021; 336: 127676 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127676.
11.    Adom E, Ekuadzi E, Boakye-Gyasi E, Amponsah IK. Pharmacognostic evaluation of three Apocynaceae plants that share the same West African local names. Phytomedicine Plus.  2022; 2(1): 100157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phyplu.2021.100157.
12.    Khan SA, Ibrar M, Barkatullah B. Pharmacognostic evaluation of the leaf OF Rhus succedanea Var. Himalaica. J. D Hooker. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 2016; 13(6): 107-20.
13.    Batra Neha, Jain Honey, Bairwa Ranjan, Bachwani Mukesh. Pharmacognostical and preliminary phytochemical investigation of Acorus calamus linn. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Research. 2012; 2(1): 39-42.
14.    Bruce SO, Onyegbule FA, Ezugwu CO. Pharmacognostic, physicochemical and phytochemical evaluation of the leaves of Fadogia cienkowski Schweinf (Rubiaceae). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy. 2019; 11(3): 52-60 https://doi.org/10.5897/JPP2019.0552.
15.    Swati Paul, Dibyajyoti Saha, Srikanta Chowdhury. Pharmacognostic Studies on Aerial Part of Methanolic Extract of Mimosa Pudica. Asian J. Pharmcy and Technology. 2012; 2(3): 101-103.
16.    Sneha Mali, Sonam Bendre, Shital Patil. Overview of Pharmacognostical and Pharmacological properties of Moringa oleifera. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 12(1): 77-3. doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2022.00013
17.    Stellaa Robertson, Narayanan N. Pharmacognostical and Antimicrobial Studies of the Stem Barks of Prosopis cineraria (L) Druce. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2009; 1(3): 227-231.
18.    Dibyajyoti Saha, Swati Paul. Pharmacognostic Studies of Aerial Part of Methanolic Extract of Alpinia conchigera Griff. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2012; 2(2): 46-48.
19.    Dhanya Rajan, Jisna. K, Anas Hamza, Fathimathul Rishana. Comparative Review on Pharmacognostical and Pharmacological activities of Ocimum Species. Research. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020; 12(1): 37-46
20.    Majid N, Nissar S, Raja WY, Nawchoo IA, Bhat ZA. Pharmacognostic standardization of Aralia cachemirica: a comparative study. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021; 7: 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-021-00181-y.
21.    Lana Yousif Mutalib. Comparative physicochemical, phytochemical and biological study of botanically related species from Brassicaceae family grown in Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Asian Journal of  Research in Pharmceutical Science. 5(3): 168-174.
22.    Practical Pharmacognosy, Kokate C.K Vallabh Prakashan GT Karnal Road, Delhi, India. Vol. 13, pp.123-124 (2009)
23.    Practical Pharmacognosy and Phytomedicine Thapliyal S, Nautiyal, PK Publishers, New Delhi, Vol. I, pp. 60-70 (2022)

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available