Author(s):
Sonali A Patil, Anagha M Joshi, Manasi J. Wagdarikar
Email(s):
sonalipatil5586@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00258
Address:
Sonali A Patil1, Anagha M Joshi1, Manasi J. Wagdarikar2
1Indira College of Pharmacy, Pune
Niramay, New, Mumbai Hwy, Tathawade, Pune, Maharashtra 411033. (Affiliated to Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune)
2Indira University’s School of Pharmacy, Maharashtra 411033.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 19,
Issue - 4,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
This research introduces a thorough analytical technique for measuring Fulvestrant, an estrogen receptor antagonist utilized in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Fulvestrant functions by competing with natural estrogen for attachment to estrogen receptors, leading to the downregulation and degradation of these receptors, thereby inhibiting the growth of cancer cells. Although it holds clinical importance, there are only few reported analytical methods for its measurement. This research fills that void by creating and validating a dependable stability-indicating HPLC method for the precise and sensitive quantification of Fulvestrant, including the characterization of its degradants through LC-MS. The method development adhered to ICH Q1A (R2) guidelines, including degradation studies conducted under acidic, basic, oxidative, UV light and thermal stress conditions to guarantee the effective separation of Fulvestrant from its degradation products. The optimized chromatographic conditions utilized a JASCO PU2080 plus HPLC system equipped with a HiQSil C18 Column (250mm ? 4.6mm, 5µm), with detection performed at 225nm. The method displayed excellent linearity across the 2-12µg/ml range, achieving a correlation coefficient of 0.9983. High precision was observed in the method (%RSD< 2), along with accuracy reflected by mean recoveries ranging from 99.98% to 100.485%, with LOD and LOQ values recorded at 0.210µg/ml and 0.636 µg/ml, respectively. Fulvestrant was found to be vulnerable to acid and alkaline hydrolysis, oxidation, and thermal stress but remained stable when exposed to photodegradation.
Cite this article:
Sonali A Patil, Anagha M Joshi, Manasi J. Wagdarikar. Stability Indicating HPLC Method Development for Fulvestrant using QbD Approach Followed by LC-MS. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(4):1806-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00258
Cite(Electronic):
Sonali A Patil, Anagha M Joshi, Manasi J. Wagdarikar. Stability Indicating HPLC Method Development for Fulvestrant using QbD Approach Followed by LC-MS. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(4):1806-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00258 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-4-47
REFERENCES:
1. Kabos P. Borges VF. Fulvestrant: a unique antiendocrine agent for estrogen-sensitive breast cancer. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2010; 1(5): 807-16. doi: 10.1517/14656561003641982
2. Atila A. Yilmaz B. Kadioglu Y. Stability indicating HPLC method for the determination of fulvestrant in pharmaceutical formulation in comparison with linear sweep voltammetric method. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research: Iran J Pharm Res. 2016; 15(3): 369-378 PMID: 27980572
3. Nekkalapudi AR. Veldi VG. Pippalla S. A novel RP-HPLC method for estimating fulvestrant, benzoyl alcohol, and benzyl benzoate in injection formulation. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2022; 3(7): 229-40. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2022.137016
4. Dongala T. Palakurthi AK. Vytla Y. Katari NK. A novel UPLC-PDA isocratic method for the quantification fulvestrant in oil-based pre-filled syringe injection matrix formulations. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology. 2019; 10: 12. doi:10.1186/s40543-019-0171-7
5. Gumustas M. Sengel‐Turk CT. Hascicek C. Ozkan SA. Optimization of a validated stability‐indicating RP‐LC method for the determination of fulvestrant from polymeric based nanoparticle systems, drugs and biological samples. Biomedical Chromatography. 2014; 28(10): 1409-17. DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3183
6. Thummaluru RM. Gurrala S. Development and validation of HPLC-UV method for the estimation of fulvestrant in bulk drug. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2016; 10(1): 21-4.
7. Alegete P. Kancherla P. Albaseer SS. Boodida S. A validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method for the estimation of fulvestrant in human plasma. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2017; 33(3): 1146. doi.org/10.13005/ojc/330312
8. Sunandamma Y. Kumar VP. A Novel RP-HPLC Method for the Quantification of Fulvestrant in Formulations. Pakistan Journal of Chemistry. 2013; 3(2): 51-55. doi:10.15228/2013.v03.i02.p02
9. Balaram VM. Parmar D. Teja BB. Rathnam S. Rao JV. Dasandi B. Sensitive and rapid high‐performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for estimation of fulvestrant in rabbit plasma. Biomedical Chromatography. 2010; 24(8): 863-7. DOI: 10.1002/bmc.1378
10. Kul D. Doğan-Topal B. Özkan SA. Uslu B. Differential pulse voltammetric determination of fulvestrant in pharmaceutical dosage forms and serum samples. International Journal of Electrochemistry. 2011; 2011(1): 941583. doi.org/10.4061/2011/941583
11. Liu Z. Gu G. Xia H. Liu Q. Pang Z. Jiang X. Chen J. Determination of Fulvestrant in rat plasma by LC–MS–MS: Application to a pharmacokinetic study. Chromatographia. 2011; 74: 227-34. doi: 10.1007/s10337-011-2071-x
12. ICH Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures, Text and Methodology; 2005.
13. ICH. Q1A. (R2): Stability Testing of new drug substances and products, International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva. 2003.
14. Arous B. Al-Mardini MA. Ghazal H. Al-Lahham F. Stability-Indicating Method for the Determination of Rivaroxaban and its Degradation Products using LC-MS and TLC. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(1): 212-220. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00040.9
15. Manasa M. Aanandhi VM. Stability Indicating Method Development and Validation of Semaglutide by RP-HPLC in Pharmaceutical substance and Pharmaceutical Product. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2021; 14(3): 1385-1389. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00247X
16. Maruthi R. Chandan RS. Tengli A. LC-MS/MS and NMR Characterization of impurities in Epalrestat. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(1): 11-13. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00003.2
17. Patel RA. Patel MP. Hasumati R. Shah N. Development and Validation of Stability Indicating high performance liquid chromatographic Method for Indapamide. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2015; 5(3): 158-164. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5713.2015.00023.9
18. Chaube PH. Gandhi SV. Deshpande PB. Kulkarni VG. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Analysis of Paracetamol and Etoricoxib in Spiked Human Plasma. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2011; 4(8): 1303-1306.
19. Gandhi SV. Khairnar PL. Chaudhari AP. Application of Multivariate Calibration Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Drugs in Fixed Dose Combination. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2018; 8(1):01-06. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5675.2018.00001.7
20. Gandhi SV. Sonawane PS. Chemometric–Assisted UV Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Cefixime Trihydrate and Cloxacillin Sodium in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Asian J. Research Chem. 2018; 11(4): 705-709. doi.org/10.5958/0974-4150.2018.00124.4
21. Sengar MR. Gandhi SV. Rajmane V. Patil UP. Gandhi BB. Simultaneous Determination of Cefuroxime Axetil and Potassium Clavulanate in Tablet Dosage Form by Spectrophotometry. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2010; 3(1): 251-253.
22. Gaikwad NV. Deshpande PB. Gandhi SV. Khandagale KK. High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Determination of Spironolactone and Torsemide in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2010; 3 (4): 1106-1108.
23. Bhavnani VS. Deshpande PB. Gandhi SV. Pawar Prajakta. Gaikwad AK. “High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Determination of Metoprolol Succinate and Olmesartan in Combined Capsule Dosage Form” Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 2012; 5 (11): 1461-1464.
24. Dhiware AD. Deshpande PB. Gandhi SV. Nair S, Vanjari S. A Simple and Sensitive RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Atorvastatin Calcium, Ezetimibe and Fenofibrate in Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2013; 6(10): 1085-1088.
25. Singh A, Dwivedi J, Gandhi SV. Development and Validation of Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Metoprolol Succinate and Olmesartan Medoxomil in Bulk and in Formulation. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2014; 7(12): 1368-1373.
26. Gandhi SV. Patil D. Baravkar.AA. Comparison of Chemometric assisted UV Spectrophotometric and RP-HPLC Method for the simultaneous determination of Ofloxacin and Tinidazole in their Combined dosage form. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(11): 5713-5718. doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00993
27. Chauhan JS. Gajre R. Analytical method development and validation for Estimation of Calcium Dobesilate and Docusate Sodium in Pharmaceutical dosage form with QbD approach. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2021; 13(3): 213-231. doi.org/10.52711/0975-4377.2021.00038