Author(s): Dilip Maheshwari, Sunil Kumar, Sanjay Kumar

Email(s): dgmaheshwari@ljinstitutes.edu.in , sunil.phd20@ljku.edu.in

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00133   

Address: Dilip Maheshwari*1, Sunil Kumar2, Sanjay Kumar3
1Principal and Professor, L. J. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lok Jagruti Kendra University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
2Research Scholar, Lok Jagruti Kendra University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
3Associate Professor, Magadh Institute of Pharmacy, Bihar University of Health Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 19,      Issue - 2,     Year - 2026


ABSTRACT:
The concept of Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) extends the principles of Quality by Design (QbD) to ensure analytical methods are robust and fit for their intended purposes. An important aspect of this approach is the emphasis on a scientific, risk-based methodology, which examines the method's performance characteristics and their influences. In contrast to traditional approaches, which heavily rely on validation and testing, the AQbD approach integrates quality into the design phase of analytical procedures. Critical analytical attributes (CAAs) and critical method parameters (CMPs) are the core of AQbD. Analytical methods must accurately measure CAAs, whereas CMPs are variables that can influence these measurements. In order to establish a method's design space—a defined range in which the method performs reliably—an analyst can systematically examine the relationships between CMPs and CAAs. As part of the AQbD process, an analytical target profile (ATP) is defined, risk assessments are conducted, design of experiments (DOE) are used to explore method parameters, and multivariate data analysis is used to optimize the performance of the method. Through this approach, robust methods can be developed that deliver consistent, accurate, and reliable results. Many advantages can be gained by implementing AQbD in the development of analytical methods, including increased robustness, improved regulatory compliance, and greater operational flexibility. By including quality considerations from the start, AQbD ensures that analytical procedures are not only efficient and reliable, but also flexible to changing conditions. This eventually leads to improved control over product quality and consistency in pharmaceutical manufacturing, which aligns with the industry's purpose of delivering safe and effective medicines.


Cite this article:
Dilip Maheshwari, Sunil Kumar, Sanjay Kumar. Systematic Approaches in Analytical Quality by Design: Enhancing Method Reliability and Compliance. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(2):939-5. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00133

Cite(Electronic):
Dilip Maheshwari, Sunil Kumar, Sanjay Kumar. Systematic Approaches in Analytical Quality by Design: Enhancing Method Reliability and Compliance. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(2):939-5. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00133   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-2-62


REFERENCES:
1.    International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Q8 (R2) Pharmaceutical Development. ICH. 2009. https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines
2.    International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Q9 Quality risk management. ICH. 2005. https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines
3.    International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Q10 Pharmaceutical quality system. ICH. 2008. https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines
4.    Dipti G. Phadtare, Pawar Amol R, R.B. Saudagar. A Brief Review on Quality by Design and Process Analytical Technology. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2016; 6(2): 122-130.
5.    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical development. FDA. 2009. https://www.fda.gov/media/71537/download
6.    Praveen Radhakrishnan, Shinu Chacko. Risk Management in Pharmaceutical Development: A Short Review. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2018; 8(3): 185-190
7.    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: Q9 Quality risk management. FDA. 2006. https://www.fda.gov/media/72246/download
8.    A. Suneetha, B. Chandra Sekhar, K. Sudheer Babu. DOE Assisted RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Estimation of L-Cysteine and Cystine with Dansyl Chloride derivatization in Presence of Amino Acid Mixture. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(1): 35-2.
9.    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: Q10 Pharmaceutical quality system. FDA. 2009. https://www.fda.gov/media/71539/download
10.    European Medicines Agency (EMA). Guideline on quality by design for drug substance and drug product. EMA. 2009. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-quality-design-drug-substance-drug-product_en.pdf
11.    Prerana Musale, S. D. Mankar. Quality by Design Approch Based in Analytical Method Validation. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(3): 190-6.
12.    Nash R, Wachter JD. Pharmaceutical process validation: An international validation guide. CRC Press; 2003. ISBN: 9780849304694.
13.    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: Analytical procedures and methods validation for drugs and biologics. FDA. 2015. https://www.fda.gov/media/87801/download
14.    Harris DC. Quantitative chemical analysis. W.H. Freeman and Company; 2015. ISBN: 9781319110145.
15.    Kirkland JJ, Boulanger B, Dagnall R, et al. Method development and validation for the pharmaceutical industry. CRC Press; 2015. ISBN: 9780367335353.
16.    Teng W, Huang X, Liu S, et al. Application of Quality by Design (QbD) in analytical method development. J Pharm Sci. 2013; 102(9): 3114-3131. doi:10.1002/jps.23555
17.    Pallavi M. Patil, Vitthal V. Chopade, Surbhi C. Gupta. Analytical Quality by Design (QbD) Approach for Development and Validation of HPLC Method for Acyclovir: Application Degradation Kinetics. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(8): 3691-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00607 
18.    Bhupendra Shrestha, Hema Basnett, P Mohan Raj, Sita Sharan Patel, Mrinmay Das, Neelesh Kumar Verma. Process Analytical Technology: A Quality Assurance Tool. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2009; 2(2): 225-227. 
19.    Cameron R, Mehta M. Quality by Design for analytical methods: Implementation of QbD principles in analytical method development and validation. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015; 105: 44-51. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.11.014
20.    Yogita M. Kolekar. Understanding of DoE and its advantages in Pharmaceutical development as per QbD Approach. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2019; 9 (4): 271-275.
21.    Yogita M. Kolekar. Understanding of DoE and its advantages in Pharmaceutical development as per QbD Approach. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2019; 9 (4): 271-275.
22.    Desai PM, Moffat AC, Wells T. Recent advances in Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) and its applications in method development. Anal Chem. 2016; 88(20): 10452-10460. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03064
23.    Ashu Mittal, Shikha Parmar, Sadaf Jamal Gilani, Syed Sarim Imam, Mohamad Taleuzzaman. Optimization and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Citicoline and Piracetam in bulk and tablet formulations using RP-HPLC method: Analytical quality by design approach. Asian J. Research Chem. 2017; 10(2): 198-205.
24.    Deng X, Cai J, Wang H, et al. Application of Quality by Design (QbD) principles to analytical method development. Anal Chim Acta. 2017; 985: 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.040
25.    Paz R, Morin S, Baisden R, et al. Quality by Design (QbD) for analytical methods: A practical approach. Pharm Res. 2017; 34(2): 406-420. doi:10.1007/s11095-017-2248-8
26.    Singh S, Kapoor V, Saini N. Principles of Quality by Design in analytical method development. Pharm Technol Eur. 2018; 30(6): 42-50. https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/articles/principles-quality-design-analytical-method-development/
27.    Ghorbani M, Chang R, Davison R, et al. Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD): From theory to practice. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2018; 44(9): 1472-1481. doi:10.1080/03639045.2018.1489397
28.    Pérez A, Saurina J. Application of design of experiments (DOE) in analytical method development: A case study. J Chromatogr A. 2019; 1608: 460-470. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460027
29.    Sk.Mastanamma, P. Saidulu. B. Srilakshmi, N. Ramadevi, D. Prathyusha, M. Vidya Rani. Analytical Quality by Design Approach for the Development of UV-Spectophotometric method in the Estimation of Tenofovir Alafenamide in bulk and its Laboratory Synthetic Mixture. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(2): 499-503. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00091.4
30.    Khan MF, Ali M, Patel S. Risk-based approach to method validation: The role of AQbD in analytical method development. Pharm Dev Technol. 2020; 25(3): 381-391. doi:10.1080/10837450.2020.1837265
31.    Gonzalez J, Fernandez L, Ramirez P. The role of Quality by Design in the development of analytical methods. J Pharm Innov. 2021;16(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/s12247-021-09586-5
32.    Miller GA, Jankowski T. Understanding the impact of AQbD on analytical method lifecycle management. Qual Assur J. 2021; 27(4): 413-426. doi:10.1002/qaj.407
33.    Kumar V, Sharma A. Challenges in implementing Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) in pharmaceutical industry. Pharm Ind Rev. 2022; 12(2): 38-47. https://www.pharmaindustryreview.com/article/challenges-implementing-aqbd-pharmaceutical-industry
34.    Jaiswal A, Gupta P, Singh S. Advancements in Quality by Design for analytical methods: A comprehensive review. Curr Pharm Anal. 2022; 18(1): 1-16. doi:10.2174/15734137226662107151357
35.    Bishop R, Brown C, Yoon H. Case studies in AQbD: Implementation and regulatory perspectives. Regul Aff J. 2022; 32(3): 185-195. https://www.regulatoryaffairsjournal.com/case-studies-aqbd
36.    Sharma P, Patel S. Future directions in Analytical Quality by Design: Emerging trends and technologies. J Pharm Sci. 2023; 112(3): 987-1000. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.01.002
37.    Hema B, Anjali Nayak, Sangeetha G, Rosita ruth Carlota, Maria Danish Alwin, Paramita Das. A new RP-HPLC Method Development, Validation and Stability-Indicating Studies of Epalrestat in Bulk Drug by Analytical Quality by Design Approach. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(9): 4437-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00685
38.    Amitkumar J. Vyas, Nilam M. Visana, Ajay I. Patel, Ashok B. Patel, Nilesh K. Patel, Sunny R. Shah. Analytical Quality by Design in Stress Testing or Stability - Indicating Method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(2): 170-8. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2021.00029 
39.    Lee J, Kim J, Park H. Application of design space and risk management in AQbD: A review of recent advances. Pharm Res. 2023; 40(1): 123-134. doi:10.1007/s11095-023-03826-6
40.    Patel MK, Singh R, Mehta A. Regulatory considerations in Analytical Quality by Design: A global perspective. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2023; 14(2): 212-225. doi:10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(2).212-25
41.    Nguyen TH, Smith R. Integration of AQbD into pharmaceutical quality systems: Best practices and challenges. Qual Manag J. 2023; 30(4): 255-268. doi:10.1080/10686967.2023.2213574  

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available