Author(s):
Kavitha A N, Monica C
Email(s):
kavithareddykcp@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00637
Address:
Kavitha A N1*, Monica C2
1Professor, Department of Quality Assurance, Krupanidhi College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
2Department of Quality Assurance, Krupanidhi College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru - 560035, Karnataka, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 19,
Issue - 10,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Adoption of Novel Drug Delivery System approaches to make therapeutically viable formulation of BCS class 2 & 4 is most followed approach. In this work the Etravirine (ETV) is formulated as a SMEDDS formulation in a lean QbD approach and it was characterized by conventional In-vitro methods further augmented by Insilco approaches as well. The Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) drawn from the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) were coded into the Extreme Vertices Mixture Design (EVMD) and the factors that would return with the required responses were identified and optimized. The optimized formulation method was characterized by In-vitro methods and also was further augmented with the application of Insilco prediction methods to understand the In-vivo performance characteristics of the formulation. The ETV drug showed Papp value of zero and was considered to have poor permeability. Whereas, SMEDDS formulation of ETV exhibited a Papp value of 2.63X10-6cm/s. The cell line study confirms the enhancement in the permeability of BCS Class 4 drug through dissolution enhancement of drug, and increased mucosal permeability due to the presence of lipoidal excipients in the formulation. The Monte Carlo population simulation predicted the Cmax and Tmax of 0.57729ug/ml and 3.9624h respectively for ETV-SMEDDS. The percentage bioavailability was predicted at 91.67% for the formulation. The research work confirms the better identification of formulation problems with minimal resources commitment and also develops a robust scalable process with knowledge to design space transition.
Cite this article:
Kavitha A N, Monica C. Formulation of Etravirine Loaded Self-micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery System and its In-vitro CACO-2 cell line Studies and In-silico Characterization for its Performance Attribute. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(10):4581-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00637
Cite(Electronic):
Kavitha A N, Monica C. Formulation of Etravirine Loaded Self-micro Emulsifying Drug Delivery System and its In-vitro CACO-2 cell line Studies and In-silico Characterization for its Performance Attribute. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(10):4581-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00637 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-10-13
REFERENCES:
1. Kavitha AN, Janakiraman K, RAMAN D. Quality by design-based development of etravirine self-micro emulsifying drug delivery system. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2021; 7: 103-11. doi.org/10.22159/ijap.2021v13i3.40488
2. Aktas Y, Celik Tekeli M, Celebi N. Development and characterization of exendin-4 loaded self-nanoemulsifying system and in vitro evaluation on Caco-2 cell line. Journal of Microencapsulation. 2020; 37(1): 41-51. doi.org/10.1080/02652048.2019.1692945
3. Siddheshwar SS. An Alternative Approach to Improve Brain Bioavailability of Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 13(4): 307-14. doi.org/10.52711/2231-5713.2023.00055
4. Alsafar ZF, Al-Lami MS. Current and Developing In vitro and Ex vivo models for assessing medication permeability into the gut produce a Systemic effect. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(5): 2492-8. doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00410
5. Hussain A, Shakeel F, Singh SK, Alsarra IA, Faruk A, Alanazi FK, Christoper GP. Solidified SNEDDS for the oral delivery of rifampicin: Evaluation, proof of concept, in vivo kinetics, and in silico GastroPlusTM simulation. International journal of pharmaceutics. 2019; 566: 203-17. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.05.061
6. Jadhav PD, Pawar AR, Patil VV, Patil PS. Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Quality Risk Management Strategies and Tools. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2025; 18(4): 251-4. doi.org/10.52711/0974-4150.2025.00039
7. Pramod K, Ansari SH, Ali J. Assessment of phase diagrams by cut and weigh method: a technical note. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2013; 3(3): 102-4. DOI: 10.5958/2231–5713
8. Kadam VR, Patil MP, Pawar VV, Kshirsagar S. A review on: Quality by design (QbD). Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017; 7(4): 197-204. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5659.2017.00030.3
9. Kakuda TN, Schöller-Gyüre M, Hoetelmans RM. Pharmacokinetic interactions between etravirine and non-antiretroviral drugs. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2011 Jan;50(1):25-39. doi.org/10.2165/11534740-000000000-00000
10. Khan AA, Atiya A, Akhtar S, Yadav Y, Qureshi KA, Jaremko M, Mahmood S. Optimization of a cefuroxime axetil-loaded liquid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system: Enhanced solubility, dissolution and Caco-2 cell uptake. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):1-15. doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14040772
11. Vyas AK, Mishra SB, Patel AB, Patel NK, Shah SR, Sheth DB. A brief review on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/LCMS and its application. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022;12(3):203-10. doi.org/10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00034
12. Satyanarayana L, Naidu SV, Rao MN, Priyadarshini D. The Estimation of Etravirine in Tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2011 Oct 1;4(10):1649-51.
13. Morakul B, Teeranachaideekul V, Limwikrant W, Junyaprasert VB. Dissolution and antioxidant potential of apigenin self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) for oral delivery. Scientific Reports. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):1-13. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59617-z
14. N. Politis S, Colombo P, Colombo G, M. Rekkas D. Design of experiments (DoE) in pharmaceutical development. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2017 Jun 3;43(6):889-901. doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2017.1291672
15. Namazi NI. Self-Nano-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System (Snedds) For Cyproterone Acetate: Formulation, Characterization and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation. Results in Chemistry. 2025 Mar 1; 14:1-9. doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102118
16. Gurudutta P, Parmar JU, Sajid AM, Tahir AM. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: An attempt to improve oral absorption of poorly soluble drugs. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2010;2(3):206-14.doi.org/ 10.5958/0975-4377
17. Patil P, Mahajan VR. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS): a brief review. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2014;6(2):134-9.doi.org/ 10.5958/0975-4377
18. Saxena S, Jain S. A review on biopharmaceutical classification system. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;9(4):267-70. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5713.2019.00044.8
19. Singh AK. Water-DMSO co—solvent effect and kinetics of acid catalyzed hydrolysis of butyl formate and influence on activation parameters. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2023;16(2):159-62. doi.org/10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00026
20. Venkatasubramanian R, Al-Maghrabi PM, Alavi O, Lind T, Sassene PJ, Kirkensgaard JJ, Mota-Santiago P, Rades T, Müllertz A. Design, evaluation, and in vitro–in vivo correlation of self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems to improve the oral absorption of exenatide. Journal of Controlled Release. 2025 Mar 10;379:440-51. doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.013
21. Verma S, Singh SK. LC-ESI-MS/MS estimation of loratadine-loaded self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems in rat plasma: pharmacokinetic evaluation and computer simulations by GastroPlus™. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2016 May 30;124:10-21. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.02.008
22. Verma S, Singh SK, Verma PR. Solidified SNEDDS of loratadine: formulation using hydrophilic and hydrophobic grades of Aerosil®, pharmacokinetic evaluations and in vivo–in silico predictions using GastroPlus™. RSC advances. 2016;6(4):3099-116. doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2016.02.008
23. Shah YR, Prajapati PM, Patel RN, Patel UY, Sen DJ. Caco-2 cell–A new vision in cell world. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2011 Apr 28;3(2):51-4. doi.org/10.1039/C5RA21796B
24. Yu LX. Pharmaceutical quality by design: product and process development, understanding, and control. Pharmaceutical research. 2008 Apr;25(4):781-91. Doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1
25. Yun TS, Na YG, Baek JS, Lee HK, Cho CW. Increased cellular uptake and proteasome inhibition of carfilzomib through the optimized self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2025; 190: 1-13 Doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118368
26. Zhang X, Zhu Z, Zhang C. Multi-stage differential evolution algorithm for constrained D-optimal design. AIMS Mathematics. 2021 Jan 1;6(3):2956-69. doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118368
27. Kashmar SA, Abou Assi R, Alhijjaj M, Chan SY. Development and Validation of a Simultaneous HPLC Stability-Indicating Method for Atorvastatin and Apigenin in a Novel SMEDDS Formulation Using Quality by Design (QbD) Approach. Processes. 2025; 13(9): 1-28. doi.org/10.3934/math.2021179