Author(s): Devangi Agravat, Lisma Patel, Pradip N. Jadav, Navneet Kumar Singh, Rachna Zala, Hiteshkumar Patel

Email(s): hvphitesh@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00217   

Address: Devangi Agravat1, Lisma Patel2, Pradip N. Jadav3, Navneet Kumar Singh4 , Rachna Zala1, Hiteshkumar Patel1
1Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Shri A. N. Patel PG Institute of Science and Research, Anand - 388 001 (Gujarat)
2Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, M. B. Patel Science College, Sardar Patel University, Anand - 388 001 (Gujarat)
3Rhythm Hospital, Lal Darvaja, Khambhat – 388620 (Gujarat)
4Department of Paramedical Sciences, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara - 391760. (Gujarat)

*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 18,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2025


ABSTRACT:
The viral infection has become an important issue for public health within India. It is the foremost common mosquito-borne viral infection in people due to elevated mortality as well as morbidity rates caused by dengue. Hence, it is crucial that a laboratory diagnosis of dengue be carried out early and as quickly as possible. This study examined the possible application of IgM and IgG antibodies, as well as the dengue NS1 antigen, for their sensitivity in the early detection of dengue. All patients with fevers lasting less than four days who visited a medical OPD between April and November 2023 are included in the study. Out of which 155 subjects were positive for the dengue virus were included in the present study. IgM, IgG, and NS1 antigen were measured in the collected specimens by immunochromatographic testing (card test). All samples were subjected to detection of NS1 Ag by ELISA. In all positive cases, dengue-specific parameters like NS1, IgM, and IgG were compared against platelet counts. This study included 155 cases, of which 82 (52.9%) were males and 73 (47.10%) were females. The positive detection rates of combined IgM antibody and NS1 antigen, NS1 antigen alone, and antibody (IgM/IgG) were 69.67%, 16.77%, and 13.56%, respectively. When only NS1 was considered, the sensitivity and specificity of rapid test kits compared to ELISA were 92.06% and 82.76%, respectively. NS1 antigen detection was the most highly sensitive in the early days of infection, but in the latter stages, IgM detection was more sensitive. In the current investigation, NS1 positivity (69.6%) was more commonly associated with the occurrence of thrombocytopenia than the antibodies IgG and IgM (30.43%). For diagnosing dengue, the most economical and sensitive method is to combine the rapid test of NS1 antigen with the IgM/IgG antibody test. It is recommended to combine the NS1 antigen card test with the ELISA assay for the most reliable diagnosis of dengue fever.


Cite this article:
Devangi Agravat, Lisma Patel, Pradip N. Jadav, Navneet Kumar Singh , Rachna Zala, Hiteshkumar Patel. The Combined Antigen and Antibody Testing Approach Improved the Sensitivity of Early Detection of Dengue Virus Infection. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(4):1515-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00217

Cite(Electronic):
Devangi Agravat, Lisma Patel, Pradip N. Jadav, Navneet Kumar Singh , Rachna Zala, Hiteshkumar Patel. The Combined Antigen and Antibody Testing Approach Improved the Sensitivity of Early Detection of Dengue Virus Infection. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(4):1515-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00217   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-18-4-8


REFERENCES:
1.    Shanmugapriya E, Ravichandiran V, Aanandhi MV. Molecular docking studies on naturally occurring selected flavones against protease enzyme of Dengue virus. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(7): 929-932. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00178.5
2.    Adane T, Getawa S. Coagulation abnormalities in Dengue fever infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2021; 15(8): e0009666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009666.
3.    Shinde SS, Frew T. Dengue Fever: A Review. International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management. 2016; 4(2): 161-163. doi: 10.5958/2454-2652.2016.00036.6.
4.    Yuan K, Chen Y, Zhong M, Lin Y, Liu L. Risk and predictive factors for severe dengue infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2022; 17(4): e0267186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267186.
5.    Wang WH. et al. Dengue hemorrhagic fever – A systemic literature review of current perspectives on pathogenesis, prevention and control, Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2020; 53(6): 963-978. doi:10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.007.
6.    Ansori ANM. et al. In Vitro antiviral activity of Pinus merkusii (Pinaceae) stem bark and cone against Dengue Virus Type-2 (DENV-2). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(7): 3705-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00641
7.    Patidar J. et al. A Study to assess the effectiveness of planned health teaching program on knowledge regarding use of papaya leaf in Dengue fever among people of selected rural community area of Mehsana. International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management. 2022; 10(1): 47-9. doi: 10.52711/2454-2652.2022.00012.
8.    Dehghani R, Kassiri H. A Review on epidemiology of Dengue viral infection as an emerging disease. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(4): 2296-1. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00406
9.    Wahala WM, Silva AM. The human antibody response to dengue virus infection. Viruses. 2011; 3(12): 2374‐95. doi: 10.3390/v3122374
10.    Ikegbunam MN. et al. Comparison of four diagnostic tests methods for the detection of Dengue Virus Non-Structural-1 antigen and IgM/IgG antibodies. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines 2022; 10:179-190. doi: 10.4236/jbm.2022.105016.
11.    Kumarasamy V. et al. Evaluation of a commercial dengue NS1 antigen-capture ELISA for laboratory diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection. Journal of Virological Methods. 2007; 140(1-2): 75-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.11.001.
12.    Lam SK, Devine PL. Evaluation of capture ELISA and rapid immunochromatographic test for the determination of IgM and IgG antibodies produced during dengue infection, Clinical and Diagnostic Virology. 1998; 10(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0197(98)00002-6.
13.    Annan E, Treviño J, Zhao B, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Haque U. Direct and indirect effects of age on dengue severity: The mediating role of secondary infection. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2023; 17(8): e0011537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011537.
14.    Kaushik S. et al. In vitro and in silico Anti-dengue activity of Supercritical extract of medicinal plants against Dengue serotype-2. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(11): 5895-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.01025.
15.    Golia S, Hittinahalli V, Sujatha K, Reddy M, Kamath AS. Serodiagnosis of Dengue using NS1 antigen, dengue IgM, dengue IgG antibody with correlation of platelet count. International Journal of Health and Clinical Research. 2012; 1(2): 112-17.
16.    Kassim FM, Izati MN, TgRogayah TA, Apandi YM, Saat Z. Use of dengue NS1 antigen for early diagnosis of dengue virus infection. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2011; 42(3): 562-9.
17.    Casenghi M, Kosack C, Li R, Bastard M, Ford N. NS1 antigen detecting assays for diagnosing acute dengue infection in people living in or returning from endemic countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018; 2018(5): CD011155. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011155.pub2.
18.    Chen HR, Lai YC, Yeh TM. Dengue virus non-structural protein 1: a pathogenic factor, therapeutic target, and vaccine candidate. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2018; 25: 58. doi: 10.1186/s12929-018-0462-0.
19.    Schilling S, Ludolfs D, Van An L, Schmitz H. Laboratory diagnosis of primary and secondary dengue infection. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2004; 31(3): 179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.03.020.
20.    Sang CT, Hoon LS, Cuzzubbo A, Devine P. Clinical evaluation of a rapid immunochromatographic test for the diagnosis of dengue virus infection. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 1998; 5(3): 407-9. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.5.3.407-409.1998.
21.    Mata VE. et al. Diagnostic parameters and reliability of four rapid immunochromatographic tests for dengue 4. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020; 24(1): 58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.12.004.
22.    Balakrishnan A, Shetty A, Vijaya C. Estimation of platelet counts: auto analyzer versus counts from peripheral blood smear based on traditional and platelet: red blood cell ratio method. Tropical Journal of Pathology & Microbiology. 2018; 4(5): 389-395.
23.    Wang SM, Sekaran SD. Evaluation of a commercial SD dengue virus NS1 antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit for early diagnosis of dengue virus infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2010; 48(8): 2793-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02142-09.
24.    Hermann LL. et al. Evaluation of a dengue NS1 antigen detection assay sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014; 8(10): e3193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003193.
25.    Thant Z, Tengku MA, Azmi H, Norizhar K. Dengue Virus Infections: Global scenario, classification, and clinical manifestations– A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(1): 83-90. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00014.7.
26.    Yacoub S, Wills B. Dengue: an update for clinicians working in non-endemic areas. Clinical Medicine (Lond). 2015; 15(1): 82-5.
27.    Khosavanna RR. et al. Clinical symptoms of Dengue infection among patients from a Non-endemic area and potential for a predictive model: A multiple logistic regression analysis and decision. Tree. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2021; 104(1): 121-129. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0192.
28.    Baheerati MM. Natural therapy for Dengue fever. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2014; 7(2): 269-271.
29.    Zuroidah N. et al. Comparison of diagnostic tests for detection of Nonstructural-1(NS1) antigen Dengue virus using Immunochromatography and Fluorescence Immunoassay Methods. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(4): 1494-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00248.
30.    Unissa R. et al. Dengue. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018; 8(4): 192-202. doi: 10.5958/2231-5659.2018.00033.4
31.    Suzuki K. et al. Evaluation of novel rapid detection kits for dengue virus NS1 antigen in Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 2017. Virology Journal. 2019; 16(1): 102. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1204-y.
32.    Yadav P, Victor A, Berlin Grace VM, Vani C. Dengue: A Survey Report. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 10(4): 279-284. doi: 10.5958/2349-2988.2018.00039.6
33.    Luvira V. et al. Diagnostic performance of Dengue NS1 and antibodies by serum concentration technique. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023; 8(2): 117. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8020117.
34.    Blacksell SD. et al. Evaluation of six commercial point-of-care tests for diagnosis of acute dengue infections: the need for combining NS1 antigen and IgM/IgG antibody detection to achieve acceptable levels of accuracy. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2011; 18(12): 2095-101. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05285-11.
35.    Chakravarti A, Siddiqui O, Malik S, Uppal B. Use of dried blood blotted on filter paper to detect dengue IgM antibody and dengue NS1 antigen. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2013; 44: 226–231.
36.    Pothapregada S, Kamalakannan B, Thulasingam M, Sampath S. Is Reactive Dengue NS1Antigen Test a Warning Call for Hospital Admissions? Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016; 10(4):SC04-SC07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16178.7636.
37.    Suleman M. et al. NS1 antigen: A new beam of light in the early diagnosis of dengue infection. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2016; 9(12): 1212-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.10.007.
38.    Pal S. et al. Evaluation of dengue NS1 antigen rapid tests and ELISA kits using clinical samples. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11): e113411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113411.
39.    Naidu AP, Saikumar C, Swarnalatha G, Sulthana S, Meenigaet S. Comparison of NS - 1 antigen detection by RDT and ELISA and its correlation with RT PCR for early diagnosis of Dengue and detection of concurrent serotypes DENV-1, 2, 3 in Ananthapuramu District. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2022; 9(9): 24.
40.    Buonora SN. et al. Increased sensitivity of NS1 ELISA by heat dissociation in acute dengue 4 cases. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017; 17(1): 204. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2306-z.
41.    Rajeshwari KG. Comparative analysis of NS1 antigen card test and ELISA in clinically suspected dengue fever patients at a tertiary hospital. MedPulse International Journal of Microbiology. 2021; 19(1): 19-22.
42.    Mohan S, Dutta R, Singh AK. Association of serological parameters and platelet counts in dengue fever: A hospital-based study. International Journal of Health and Allied Science. 2019; 8: 164-7. doi: 10.4103/ijhas.IJHAS_88_18.
43.    Kulkarni RD. et al. Association of platelet count and serological markers of dengue infection- importance of NS1 antigen. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2011; 29(4): 359-62. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.90159.
44.    Badave GK, Swaroop PS, Rao NP. Importance of NS1 antigen detection and its association with platelet count for early diagnosis of dengue infection. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 2015; 4(3): 779-784.





Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available