Author(s): Tutiek Purwanti, Tristiana Erawati, Anissya Rizqi Widitya, Habshoh Prameswari, Dewi Melani Hariyadi

Email(s): dewi-m-h@ff.unair.ac.id

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00007   

Address: Tutiek Purwanti1,2,3, Tristiana Erawati1,2,3, Anissya Rizqi Widitya1, Habshoh Prameswari1, Dewi Melani Hariyadi1,2,3,4*
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Campus C Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
2Pharmaceutics and Delivery Systems for Drugs, Cosmetics and Nanomedicine (Pharm-DCN) Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Campus C Mulyorejo, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
3Centre of Excellent (PUIPT) Skin and Cosmetic Technology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115 Indonesia.
4Inter-University Center of Excellence (IUCoE) of Health Autonomy-Drug Discovery, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 18,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2025


ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study was to determine characteristics and release of quercetin microspheres with a matrix of sodium alginate-chitosan combination by studying the effect of chitosan concentration. The ability of the drug to release from the microsphere matrix is one of the factors that influence its effectiveness as an immunomodulator. Therefore, a drug release test was carried out for 8 hours at a pH of 6.0, which is the intestinal pH where quercetin is maximally absorbed. The method of producing microspheres is ionotropic gelation aerosolization technique, and characterization includes particle size, entrapment efficiency, drug loading and release study. Three formulas were created each with a Na-Alginate concentration of 2 % and a chitosan concentration of F1 (0 %), F2 (0.5%), and F3 (1.0%) with a 0.5M CaCl2 cross-linking solution. Results of particle size of F1 (2.67± 0.09) µm, F2 (2.72±0.06) µm, F3 (3.02±0.11)µm, entrapment efficiency of F1 (87.32 ± 0.78)%, F2 (89.01± 2.50)%, F3 (94.70±0.78) %, drug loading of F1 (8.21±0.31)%, F2 (6.14 ± 0.26)%, F3 (4.73±0.35)%, and swelling index at the 1st hour in pH 6 of F1 (628.76±41.51)%, F2 (614.44 ± 55.53)%, F3 (310.43±32.50)%. Increased chitosan concentrations (0%, 0.5%, and 1.0%) resulted in a compact and spherical microsphere with a smooth surface, increasing particle size and entrapment efficiency, but the drug loading value decreased. Increased chitosan concentrations (0%, 0.5%, and 1.0%) resulted in increasingly compact, spherical quercetin microspheres with smooth surfaces, increasing particle size, increasing yield value, moisture content, entrapment efficiency, but lowering drug loading. The swelling process lasts longer and the release time is extended.


Cite this article:
Tutiek Purwanti, Tristiana Erawati, Anissya Rizqi Widitya, Habshoh Prameswari, Dewi Melani Hariyadi. Characterization and Release of Quercetin from Microspheres with Sodium Alginate-Chitosan Combination Matrix. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(1):44-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00007

Cite(Electronic):
Tutiek Purwanti, Tristiana Erawati, Anissya Rizqi Widitya, Habshoh Prameswari, Dewi Melani Hariyadi. Characterization and Release of Quercetin from Microspheres with Sodium Alginate-Chitosan Combination Matrix. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(1):44-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00007   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-18-1-7


REFERENCES:
1.    Yadav B, Kaur J, Kumar N, et al. Quercetin as an important nutraceutical and medicinal agent. Plant Archives. 2020; 20: 2537-2547.
2.    Wang W, Sun C, Mao L, et al. The biological activities, chemical stability, metabolism and delivery systems of quercetin: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016; 56: 21-38. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.07.004
3.    Chondrogianni N, Kapeta S, Chinou I, Vassilatou K, Papassideri I, Gonos ES. Anti-ageing and rejuvenating effects of quercetin. Exp Gerontol. 2010; 45(10): 763-771. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2010.07.001
4.    Al-Kubaisi Z, Al-Shmgani H, Salman M. Evaluation of in vivo and in vitro protective effects of quercetin on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and cytotoxicology. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020;13:3897. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00690.3
5.    Ahmed H, Aglan H, Elsayed G, Hafez H, Eskander E. Quercetin offers chemopreventive potential against breast cancer by targeting a network of signalling pathways. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021; 2829-2839. doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00499
6.    Paul M, Keerthy H, Sharma M, Patel P, TP S. A review on microspheres as controlled release drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Res. 2023; 163-168. doi:10.52711/2231-5691.2023.00031
7.    Kshirsagar DS, Saudagar R. Microsphere: a review. Res J Top Cosmet Sci. 2016; 7(1): 27-37.
8.    Hariyadi D, Purwanti T, Wardani D. Stability of freeze-dried ovalbumin-alginate microspheres with different lyoprotectants. Res J Pharm Technol. 2016; 9:20. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00005.6
9.    Hariyadi D, Islam N. Current status of alginate in drug delivery. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci. 2020; 2020: 1-16. doi:10.1155/2020/8886095
10.    Ganguly S, Satapathy KB. Improved production of gluconic acid by Gluconobacter oxydans GPM60 entrapped in calcium alginate beads. Asian J Res Pharm Sci. 2014;4(1):5-6.
11.    Zhang Y, Wei W, Lv P, Wang L, Ma G. Preparation and evaluation of alginate-chitosan microspheres for oral delivery of insulin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011; 77(1): 11-19. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.09.016
12.    Abdelwahed W, Degobert G, Stainmesse S, Fessi H. Freeze-drying of nanoparticles: formulation, process and storage considerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006; 58(15): 1688-1713. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.017
13.    Garcia-Amezquita J, Welti-Chanes J, Vergara-Balderas F, Bermúdez-Aguirre D. Freeze-drying: The basic process. In: Encyclopedia of Food and Health. 2015: 104-109.
14.    Karzar Jeddi M, Mahkam M. Magnetic nano carboxymethyl cellulose-alginate/chitosan hydrogel beads as biodegradable devices for controlled drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 135: 829-838. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.210
15.    Patil J, Kamalapur M, Marapur S, Kadam D. Ionotropic gelation and polyelectrolyte complexation: The novel techniques to design hydrogel particulate sustained, modulated drug delivery system: a review. Dig J Nanomater Biostructures. 2010;5.
16.    Putra I, Purwanti T, Hariyadi D. Characterization of microspheres in alginate-gelatin matrix with ionotropic gelation method and aerosolization technique. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020; 13: 4239. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00748.9
17.    Purwanti T, Soeratri W, Zainudin M. Characterization of Nisin microspheres with combination matrix sodium alginate - gelatin. Int J Pharma Res Health Sci. 2018; 6(6): 2838-6465.
18.    Balagani PK, Chandiran I, Bhavya B, Manubolu S. Microparticulate drug delivery system: a review. Indian J Pharm Sci Res. 2011; 1: 19.
19.    Sari R, Tunggadewi S, Paramanandana A, Yusuf H. Preparation and physical characterization of andrographolide-chitosan-alginate microparticles prepared by ionic gelation-freeze drying. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019; 12: 553. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00098.2
20.    Boufas S, Benhamza ME, Ben Seghir B, Ferdenache H. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan/carrageenan/hydroxyethyl cellulose blended gels. Asian J Res Chem. 2020; 13: 209-215. doi:10.5958/0974-4150.2020.00040.1
21.    Lawrie G, Keen I, Drew B, et al. Interactions between alginate and chitosan biopolymers characterized using FTIR and XPS. Biomacromolecules. 2007; 8(8): 2533-2541. doi:10.1021/bm070014y
22.    Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012; 37(1): 106-126. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003
23.    Shan L, Tao EX, Meng QH, et al. Formulation, optimization, and pharmacodynamic evaluation of chitosan/phospholipid/β-cyclodextrin microspheres. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016; 10: 417-429. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S97982
24.    Kondrin MV, Pronin AA, Brazhkin VV. Crystallization and vitrification of ethanol at high pressures. J Chem Phys. 2014; 141(19): 194504. doi:10.1063/1.4902059
25.    Patil JS, Kamalapur MV, Marapur SC, Shiralshetti SS, Kadam DV. Ionotropically gelled chitosan-alginate complex hydrogel beads: Preparation, characterization and in-vitro evaluation. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2012; 46: 248-252.
26.    Chuang JJ, Huang YY, Lo SH, Hsu TF, Huang WY, Huang SL, Lin YS. Effects of pH on the shape of alginate particles and its release behavior. Int J Polym Sci. 2017; 2017: 1-9. doi:10.1155/2017/3902704
27.    Sinha P, Udhumansha U, Rathnam G, Ganesh M, Jang HT. Capecitabine encapsulated chitosan succinate-sodium alginate macromolecular complex beads for colon cancer targeted delivery: in vitro evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018; 117: 840-850. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.181
28.    Rosita N, Nailufa Y, Hariyadi DM. Characteristics, stability and activity of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)-chitosan microspheres: Effect of polymer concentration. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020; 13(5): 2303-2309.
29.    Ahmad S, Singh V, Kushwaha S. Gastro retentive drug delivery system: A review. Asian J Res Chem. 2023; 453-458. doi:10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00075
30.    Thai H, Nguyen C, Thach L, et al. Characterization of chitosan/alginate/lovastatin nanoparticles and investigation of their toxic effects in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 909. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-57666-8
31.    Ramachandran S, Sathyamoorthy N, Dhanaraju MD. Formulation and characterization of glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan biodegradable microspheres loaded with famotidine. Trop J Pharm Res. 2011; 10: 309-316. doi:10.4314/tjpr.v10i3.13
32.    Hazra M, Dasgupta Mandal D, Mandal T, Bhuniya S, Ghosh M. Designing polymeric microparticulate drug delivery system for hydrophobic drug quercetin. Saudi Pharm J. 2015; 23(4): 429-436. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2015.01.007
33.    Mamata GN, Smita AS, Ravindra SB. A review on oral osmotically controlled release drug delivery system. Asian J Pharm Res. 2016; 6(1): 49-55.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available