ABSTRACT:
Objective(s): To evaluate the effect of tooth brushing and mouth rinsing after bleaching with 16% carbamide peroxide (16% CP) on the surface roughness and solubility of newer self-blending resin composite. Materials and Methods: About 70 specimens were fabricated with Estelite sigma-quick composite resin and subjected to bleaching using custom-tray with 16%CP gel for 6hours except 10 samples to serve as control group and divided into seven groups (n=10) as follows: group 1: no bleaching (control), group 2: 16% CP, group 3: brushing, group 4: brushing+Listerine mouth rinse, group 5: brushing +Colgate Plaxmouth rinse, group 6: Listerine, group 7: Colgate Plax. Electric tooth brushing was done using toothpaste slurry for 3min, immersed in mouth-rinse of respective groups for 1min and placed in artificial saliva for 24hrs. This was done for a total period of 21 days followed by surface roughness and solubility testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tuckey tests (p<0.05). Results: Group 4 (Brushing + Listerine) showed greater surface roughness and solubility followed by group 6 (Listerine). No significant difference was found between group1 with group3 and group 5. Conclusion (s): Along with brushing, Listerine mouth rinse has a determining effect on surface roughness and solubility of newer self-blending composite resin following bleaching with 16% Carbamide peroxide.
Cite this article:
Rahul Halkai, Sameena Naaz, Kiran. R. Halkai Ayshathul Aneesha. Y.. Evaluation of the Surface Roughness and Solubility of Newer Self-blending Composite Resin following Home-bleaching and Brushing-mouth Rinsing Cycle. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(8):3892-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00604
Cite(Electronic):
Rahul Halkai, Sameena Naaz, Kiran. R. Halkai Ayshathul Aneesha. Y.. Evaluation of the Surface Roughness and Solubility of Newer Self-blending Composite Resin following Home-bleaching and Brushing-mouth Rinsing Cycle. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(8):3892-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00604 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-8-52
REFERENCES:
1. Navimipour EJ, Ajami AA, Oskoee SS, Kahnamou MA, Bahari M, Chaharom ME, Shojaei SM. Surface Roughness of Different Composite Resins after Application of 15% Carbamide Peroxide and Brushing with Toothpaste: An In-Vitro Study. Frontiers in Dentistry. 2019; 16: 55-61. DOI:10.18502/fid.v16i1.1109.
2. Hajizadeh H, Ameri H, Eslami S, Mirzaeepoor B. The effect of bleaching on toothbrush abrasion of resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16:17-20. DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.105292.
3. Gehlot PM, Sudeep P, Manjunath V, Annapoorna BM, Prasada LK, Nandlal B. Influence of Various Desensitizing Mouthrinses and Simulated Toothbrushing on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: An In Vitro Study and Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis. Eur. J. Dent. 2022; 16: 820-827. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739547.
4. An JS, Son HH, Qadeer S, Ju SW, Ahn JS. The influence of a continuous increase in thickness of opaque-shade composite resin on masking ability and translucency. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71: 120-129. DOI:10.3109/00016357.2011.654250.
5. Karishma Ravinthar, Jayalakshmi. Recent Advancements in Laminates and Veneers in Dentistry. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11: 785-787. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00148.8.
6. L. Sri Varsha. Recent Advances in Preventive Resin Restoration (PRR). Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12: 382-384. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00069.6
7. Leonard RH, Sharma A, Haywood VB. Use of different concentrations of carbamide peroxide for bleaching teeth: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 503-507.
8. Prado V, Santos K, Fontenele R, Soares J, Vale G. Effect of over-the-counter mouthwashes with and without alcohol on sorption and solubility of bulk fill resins. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2020; 12: 1150-1156. DOI:10.4317/jced.57234.
9. Ortengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behaviour of three composite resin materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2001; 29: 35-41. DOI:10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00055-5.
10. Kimyai S, Bahari M, Naser-Alavi F, Behboodi S. Effect of two different tooth bleaching techniques on microhardness of giomer. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2017; 9: 249-253. DOI:10.4317/jced.53290.
11. Hada YS, Panwar S. Comparison of the fracture resistance of three different recent composite systems in large Class II mesio-occlusal distal cavities: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22: 287-291.DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_225_18.
12. Rocha AC, Lima CS, Santos MD, Montes MA. Evaluation of surface roughness of a nanofill resin composite after simulated brushing and immersion in mouthrinses, alcohol and water. Materials Research. 2010; 13: 77-80.DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392010000100016.
13. Voltarelli FR, Santos-Daroz CB, Alves MC, Cavalcanti AN, Marchi GM. Effect of chemical degradation followed by toothbrushing on the surface roughness of restorative composites. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2010; 18: 585-590. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000600009.
14. Silva da EM SD. CU, Dias DA, Silva da S., Amaral CM, Guimaraes JG Effect of toothbrushing-mouthrinse-cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014: 39: 521-529. DOI: 10.2341/13-199-L
15. Penugonda B, Settembrini L, Scherer W, Hittelman E, Strassler H. Alcohol-containing mouthwashes: effect on composite hardness. J Clin Dent. 1994; 5: 60-62.
16. Ozer S, Sen Tunc E, Tuloglu N, Bayrak S. Solubility of two resin composites in different mouthrinses. BioMed research international. 2014; Doi:10.1155/2014/580675.
17. Almeida GS, Poskus LT, Guimaraes JG, Silva EM. The effect of mouthrinses on salivary sorption, solubility, and surface degradation of a nanofilled and a hybrid resin composite. Oper. Dent. 2010; 35: 105-111.DOI: 10.2341/09-080-L
18. Wang L, Francisconi LF, Atta MT, Dos Santos JR, Del Padre NC, Gonini-Junior A, Fernandes KB. Effect of bleaching gels on surface roughness of nanofilled composite resins. Eur. J. Dent. 2011;5: 173-179.
19. Jyothi K, Crasta S, Venugopal P. Effect of five commercial mouth rinses on the microhardness of a nanofilled resin composite restorative material: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2012; 15: 214-217. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.97938.
20. Trauth KG, Godoi AP, Colucci V, Corona SA, Catirse AB. The influence of mouthrinses and simulated tooth brushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin. Brazilian Oral Research. 2012; 26: 209-214. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000300005.
21. Yilmaz E, Mujdeci A. The effect of mouthrinses on surface roughness of two nanohybrid resin composites. Brazilian Dental Science. 2021; 24. DOI:10.14295/bds.2021.v24i2.2265.
22. Leal JP, da Silva JD, Leal RFM, Oliveira-Júnior CDC, Prado VLG, Vale GC. Effect of Mouthwashes on Solubility and Sorption of Restorative Composites. Int J Dent. 2017; 2017: 5865691. Doi:10.1155/2017/5865691.