Author(s): Danaboyina Tanuja, D. Bheemalingeswara Rao, Rama Krishna Alla, Y. Manikyamba, Suresh Sajjan MC., M. Dhanasri

Email(s): rkdentalbiomaterials@gmail.com , ramakrishna.a@vdc.edu.in

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00442   

Address: Danaboyina Tanuja1, D. Bheemalingeswara Rao2, Rama Krishna Alla3*, Y. Manikyamba4, Suresh Sajjan MC.2, M. Dhanasri1
1Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
3Professor, Department of Dental Materials, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
4Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 17,      Issue - 6,     Year - 2024


ABSTRACT:
This study evaluated the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC) incorporated with different concentrations (0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 5.0% by wt.) of L-Arginine nanoparticles. GIC powder was mixed with various concentrations of L-Arginine and mixed with its corresponding polyacrylic acid and a total of 150 specimens were made. The specimens were divided into 3 groups for evaluating compressive strength, shear bond strength and microhardness, with 50 in each. The fifty specimens from each group were further divided into 5 subgroups with 10(n=10) in each, based on the concentrations of nanoparticles. The shear bond strength samples were tested on the universal testing machine, The load was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute until the specimen was debonded from the tooth. Compressive strength the sample was placed on the compression grip of the universal testing machine and the load was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm per minute until the specimen fractured. The microhardness of the specimen was measured using the Vickers Hardness Tester. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. GIC modified with 0.5% L-Arginine demonstrated high Shear bond strength (6.76±0.89 MPa), Compressive strength (117.11±24.8 MPa), and Vickers hardness (67.46±4.51VHN) compared to the other modified and control groups. One-way ANOVA showed significant differences (p<0.001) in SBS, CS, and SH among the groups. The addition of 0.5wt% L-Arginine into glass ionomer cement demonstrated an increase in the shear bond strength, compressive strength, and Vickers hardness.


Cite this article:
Danaboyina Tanuja, D. Bheemalingeswara Rao, Rama Krishna Alla, Y. Manikyamba, Suresh Sajjan MC., M. Dhanasri. Evaluation of Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement incorporated with L-Arginine nanoparticles: An in vitro Study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(6):2819-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00442

Cite(Electronic):
Danaboyina Tanuja, D. Bheemalingeswara Rao, Rama Krishna Alla, Y. Manikyamba, Suresh Sajjan MC., M. Dhanasri. Evaluation of Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement incorporated with L-Arginine nanoparticles: An in vitro Study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(6):2819-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00442   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-6-61


REFERENCES:
1.    International Standards Organization. Dentistry–water‐based cements–Part 1: Powder/liquid acid‐base cements 2007-10; 23.
2.    Forss H, Widström E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004; Jan 1; 62(2): 82-6.
3.    Dang MH, Jung JE, Lee DW, Song KY, Jeon JG. Recovery of acid production in Streptococcus mutans biofilms after short-term fluoride treatment. Caries Res. 2016; 50(4): 363-71.
4.    Wang SP, Ge Y, Zhou XD, Xu HH, Weir MD, Zhang KK, Wang HH, Hannig M, Rupf S, Li Q, Cheng L. Effect of anti-biofilm glass–ionomer cement on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Int JOral Sci. 2016 Jun; 8(2): 76-83.
5.    Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007; Mar 1; 23(3): 343-62.
6.    Mylonas P, Zhang J, Banerjee A. Conventional glass-ionomer cements: a guide for practitioners. Dent Update. 2021; Sep 2; 48(8): 643-50.
7.    Freire PL, Stamford TC, Albuquerque AJ, Sampaio FC, Cavalcante HM, Macedo RO, Galembeck A, Flores MA, Rosenblatt A. Action of silver nanoparticles towards biological systems: cytotoxicity evaluation using hen's egg test and inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Int JAntimicrob Agents. 2015; Feb 1; 45(2): 183-7.
8.    Khan AS, Ur Rehman S, AlMaimouni YK, Ahmad S, Khan M, Ashiq M. Bibliometric analysis of literature published on antibacterial dental adhesive from 1996–2020. Polymers. 2020; Nov 29; 12(12): 2848.
9.    Mount GJ. An atlas of glass-ionomer cements: a clinician's guide. CRC Press. 2001; Oct 25.
10.    Freire PL, Stamford TC, Albuquerque AJ, Sampaio FC, Cavalcante HM, Macedo RO, Galembeck A, Flores MA, Rosenblatt A. Action of silver nanoparticles towards biological systems: cytotoxicity evaluation using hen's egg test and inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Int JAntimicrobAgents. 2015; Feb 1; 45(2): 183-7.
11.    Khan AS, Ur Rehman S, AlMaimouni YK, Ahmad S, Khan M, Ashiq M. Bibliometric analysis of literature published on antibacterial dental adhesive from 1996–2020. Polymers. 2020; Nov 29; 12(12):2848.
12.    Chen LI, Suh BI, Yang J. Antibacterial dental restorative materials: A review. Am J Dent. 2018; Nov 15; 31(Sp Is B): 6B-12B.
13.    Nakamura Y, Takahashi K, Shimetani A, Sakagami H, Nishikawa H. Cytotoxicity of direct current with antibacterial agents against host cells in vitro. J Endod. 2005; Oct 1; 31 (10):755-8.
14.    Qasim SS, Nogueria LP, Fawzy AS, Daood U. The effect of cross-linking efficiency of drug-loaded novel freeze gelated chitosan templates for periodontal tissue regeneration. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2020; Jul; 21(5): 1-9.
15.    Bijle MN, Ekambaram M, Lo EC, Yiu CK. The combined enamel remineralization potential of arginine and fluoride toothpaste. J Dent. 2018; Sep 1; 76: 75-82.
16.    Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006; 14: 10-3.
17.    Bijle MN, Ekambaram M, Lo EC, Yiu CK. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of arginine-containing glass ionomer cements. Dental Materials. 2020; Sep 1; 36(9): 1226-40.
18.    Saridena US, Sanka GS, Alla RK, AV R, MC SS, Mantena SR. An Overview of Advances In Glass Ionomer Cements. International Journal of Dental Materials. 2022; Dec 31; 4(4): 89-94.
19.    Jaiswal S, Pusarapu K, Alla RK, Guduri V, AV R, MC SS. Solubility of Glass Ionomer Cement in Various Acidic Beverages at Different Time Intervals: An in vitro Study.  Int J Dent Mater. 2022; Dec 31; 4(3): 78-81.
20.    Das D, Patro D, Mohanty D. A Broad Review On Arginine And Its Application In Dentistry. Eur JMolClin Med. 2021; Feb 4; 8(2): 1358-67.
21.    Zheng X, He J, Wang L, Zhou S, Peng X, Huang S, Zheng L, Cheng L, Hao Y, Li J, Xu J. Ecological effect of arginine on oral microbiota. Scientific Reports. 2017; Aug 3; 7(1): 7206.
22.    Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Neeraja G, Pillai S. Does addition of propolis to glass ionomer cement alter its physicomechanical properties? an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017; 41(1): 62-5
23.    Fritz UB, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 1996; May 1; 12(3): 161-6.
24.    Alla RK, Dental Material Science, 1st edition, Jaypee, New Delhi, 2013; 235-47.
25.    Silva RC, Zuanon AC, Esberard RR, Candido MS, Machado JS. In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements. Journal of Materials Science: Mater Med. 2007; Jan; 18(1): 139-42.
26.    Ferreira CJ, Leitune VC, de Souza Balbinot G, Degrazia FW, Arakelyan M, Sauro S, MezzomoCollares F. Antibacterial and remineralizing fillers in experimental orthodontic adhesives. Mater. 2019; Feb21; 12(4): 652.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available