Author(s): Muhiba Barakzai, Brishna Dawlaty

Email(s): muhiba.barekzai6@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00348   

Address: Muhiba Barakzai1, Brishna Dawlaty2
1Pharm D, Junior Teaching Assistant, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul, Afghanistan.
2MD, M.Sc., Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul Afghanistan.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 17,      Issue - 5,     Year - 2024


ABSTRACT:
Background: Salivary physical and chemical property is important for caries control. Unstimulated salivary flow rate is important for protection of oral cavity. Salivary pH correlated to buffer capacitythat neutralizes pH after exposure to acidic or basic condition so protects the teeth from demineralization which ends to caries. In this study changes of buffer capacity and flow rate according to age and gender was investigated to have assumption on age related changes on oral health. Material and Methods: This is a cross sectional study conducted on 250 volunteers on Biochemistry Department of Kabul University of Medical Sciences. Unstimulated saliva was calculated in milliliter per minute.pH was calculated using pH meter and buffer capacity was measured by hydrochloric acid titration. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 21. Mann Whitney U test was used for comparison of variables. Result: In this study among 250 volunteers there were 130 female, 120 male and 165 were between 18-30 years old, while 85 were between age 31-65 years old. Flow rate and buffer capacity decreased after age 30 years and female had lower flow rate and lower buffer capacity than males. There was no change in pH between females and males and two age groups. Weak positive correlation exists between flow rate and buffercapacity. Conclusion: It can be concluded that female’s salivary flow rate and buffer capacity is lower than men that is suggestive of more caries risk in females.


Cite this article:
Muhiba Barakzai, Brishna Dawlaty. Study of Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity in Normal Adults. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(5):2213-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00348

Cite(Electronic):
Muhiba Barakzai, Brishna Dawlaty. Study of Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate, pH and Buffer Capacity in Normal Adults. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(5):2213-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00348   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-5-44


REFERENCES:
1.    L. Forcella, C. Filippi, T.Waltimo, A. Filippi. Measurement of unstimulated salivary flow rate in healthy children aged 6 to 15 years. Research and Science. 2018,128 (12):962-967.
2.    Jyothi.S, Karthikeyan Murthykumar, Anupama Deepak,  Dhanraj, Noorul Aneesa, Sowndarya Baskar et al. Drugs Inducing Xerostomia. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016 May; 9(5). DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00113.X.
3.    Thirumalaisamy V, Gajendran P. Role of Salivary Interleukin 1 in Chronic Periodontitis: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(1): 390-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00071.9
4.    Indrawati R, Diyatri I, Rezkita F, Humaidy RS. Quantification molecular weight of human beta defensin-2 and human beta defensin-3 from saliva of caries patient.Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(10): 4599-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00810.0
5.    Agarwal R, Lakshmi T. Salivary enzymes as biomarkers for periodontitis–an update. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2014; 7(1): 98-100.
6.    Nandakumar DG, Gheena S. Cortisol in Saliva of Uncontrolled Diabetes Patients and Adrenal Stress index. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(10): 1788. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00361.9
7.    Ajmal Mir, Reyaz Farooq, Amir Purra and Fayaz Ahanger. Evaluation of impact of hypertension on salivary pH, salivary flow and buffering capacity: A retrospective analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine. 2021; 3 (2): 411-414
8.    P.L.F. Bonda, K. Brilli, F. Pattarino, A. Foglio-Bonda. Salivary flow rate and pH in patients with oral pathologies. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Science. 2017; 21: 369-374.
9.    Sareen A, Tandon S, Ramachandran A, Srimathi R. Saliva as A Diagnostic Tool for Detection of the Viruses: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(10): 4739-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00863.6
10.    A. Mohiti, F. Eslami, M.R Dehestani. Does Hypertension affect Saliva Properties?. J Dent Shiraz University Medical Science.  2020; 21(3): 190-194
11.    A. A. Pratha, J. Prabakar. Comparing the effect of Carbonated and energy drinks on salivary pH- In Vivo Randomized Controlled Trial. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00809.6
12.    Shetty SS, Wen LY, Dass W, Kaur G, Venugopal H, Hamzah MR, Leong SJ. Effects of green tea and black tea on salivary pH and flow rate in healthy individuals. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(2): 627-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00119.5
13.    F. Bechir, M. Pacurar, A. Tohati and S. Maria Bataga. Comparative Study of Salivary pH, Buffer Capacity, and Flow in Patients with and without Gastro esophageal Reflux Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19(1): 201.
14.    Y.S.Wimardhani, Y.W.Kusuma, H. Sasanti, Anzany Tania DWI Putri Baringbin. G. P.Subita, A. S.Sarsito S.A Pradono, A. I. Soegyanto, F. Rahmayanti, I. Wardhany, A. T. DWI Putri Baringbing. Salivary profile of recovering drug users in Indonesia. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2016; 9(1): 50-54.
15.    F. S. AlHudaithi and D. Ali Alshammery. Screening of biochemical parameters in the orthodontic treatment with the fixed appliances: A follow-up study. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021; 28(12): 6808–6814.
16.    I. Taraboanta , Simona Stoleriu , Gianina Iovan, A. C. Ghiorghe, Irina Nica1e, Andra C. Taraboantan Gamen et al.Evaluation Of The Salivary Parameters In Facial Mask Wearers During Covid-19 Pandemic. Stoma Edu J. 2021; 8(4): 233-238.
17.    A.Hosseini Yekani, A. Nadjarzadeh, M. Vossoughi, J. Zavar Reza, Ali Golkari. Relationship between Physicochemical Properties of Saliva and Dental Caries and Periodontal Status among Female Teachers Living in Central Iran. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2018; 8(1): 48-55. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_391_17
18.    Majdy Idrees, Mohammad-Zakaria Nassani, Omar Kujan. Assessing the association between unstimulated whole salivary flow rate (UWSFR) and oral health status among healthy adult subjects: A cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018; 23(4): 384-90.
19.    A. A. Alkhateeb, Lloyd A. M. Richard B. Presland, Marilynn L. R. Donald L.Chi. Unstimulated Saliva-Related Caries Risk Factors in Individuals with Cystic Fibrosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Unstimulated Salivary Flow, pH, and Buffering Capacity. Caries Res. 2017; 51: 1–6.
20.    B. Dawlaty, S. Rahim. Study of unstimulated salivary flow rate, total protein, albumin concentration and estimated albumin globulin ratio changes in normal adults according to age and gender. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2022; 15(7). DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00534
21.    A. E. González-Aragón Pineda1, A. García Pérez1 and F. García-Godoy. Salivary parameters and oral health status.amongest adolescents in Mexico. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1): 190
22.    D. P. Antunes, R.M. M. Marinho, M.C. Valera Garakis, E. Bresciani. Buffer Capacity of Saliva as a Function of Time after Consumption of Sugary, Sugar-Free and Probiotic Chewing Gums. Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic. 2015; 5 (1): 153-161.
23.    Rubbaey YA. Oral health status and caries experience among a group of asthmatic patients in Al-Najaf Al-Ashraf. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12(9): 4099-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00706.6
24.    Isamu Kado, Ryo Kunimatsu, Yuki Yoshimi, Cynthia Concepcion Medina,Sakura Yamada1 and Kotaro Tanimoto. Surveillance of salivary properties of pre‑orthodontic patients in relation to age and sex. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 6555.
25.    R.A. Grace Pushpass et al. Altered Salivary Flow, Protein Composition, and Rheology Following Taste and TRP Stimulation in Older Adults. Forniters in Physiology. 2019; 10: 652.Doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00652
26.    H.Khaldoun Al-Tamimi and N. Aftan Al-Rawi.Age-Related Changes with Selected Salivary Physical Properties and Caries Experience among Healthy Adult Men. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Science. 2018; 7(9): 52-58.
27.    Ana Carolina Mosca et al. How are macronutrient intake, BMI, ethnicity, age, and gender related to the composition of unstimulated saliva? A case study. Journal of Texture Studies. 2019; 50 (1): 53–61. DOI: 10.1111/jtxs.12362
28.    A. Hadi Faha, Raed F. Al Huwaizi,Yamama A. A. Rubbaey and A. Falhuwaizi. Salivary pH, flow rate and Streptococcus mutants count in relation to oral health status among colored Eye Adolescent in Baghdad/Iraq. Biomedical and Pharmacology. 2018; 11(4).
29.    Karishma S Halageri, Aruna C N, Padma K Bhat, Subodh Kumar. Comparison of salivary pH, flow rate and oral clearance rate between packaged fruit drink and fresh fruit juice in young adults: A comparative study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2020; 8 (7).
30.    M. R.Malekipour, M. Messripour and F. Shirani.Buffering Capacity of Saliva in Patients with Active Dental Caries. Asian Journal of Biochemistry. 2008; 3: 280-283.
31.    F. A. Motamayel, P. Falsafi, M. T.Goodarzi, J.poorolaja. Comparsion of salivary pH, buffering capacity and alkaline phosphatase in smokers and healthy nonsmokers. Sultan Qaboos University Med J. 2016, 16(3): 317-321.
32.    A.Almeslet, Alnamlah S, Alanzan L, Aldriwesh R, AlWehaiby S.Role of Salivary Biomarkers in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5818840. PMID: 35097122; PMCID: PMC8791744.
33.    Katie P Wu , Jyh-Yuh Ke, Chia-Ying Chung, Chia-Ling Chen, Tsong-Long Hwang, Ming-Yen Chou, Alice M K Wong et al. Relationship between unstimulated salivary flow rate and saliva composition of healthy children in Taiwan.Chang Gung Med J. 2008; 31(3): 281-6.
34.    C. Fenoll-Palomares, J.V. Muñoz Montagud, V Sanchiz, B Herreros, V. Hernández, M. Minguez, A Benages. Unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH and buffer capacity of saliva in healthy volunteers. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004; 96(11) : 773-783.
35.    Egija Zaura, Bernd W Brandt, Andrei Prodan, Maarten Joost Teixeira de Mattos,Sultan Imangaliyev, Jolanda Kool et al. On the ecosystem network of saliva in healthy young adults. The ISME Journal. 2017; 11(5): 1218–1231.
36.    V.T. Hemalatha, Sivaranjini. P, Mani Sundar. N, .Julius. A, V. Aarthi Nisha, Sankar Narayanan R.A. Comparative Study Of Salivary Protein Concentration, Flow Rate, Buffer Capacity And pH Among Young And Elderly Subjects With Gingivitis And Periodontitis A Biochemical Study. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2022; 6(3): 3756 –3766.
37.    Vijaya Lakshmi Bolla, Surendra R. Munnangi, Manoj Kumar MG, U. Kumar Chowdary, Pradeep Koppulu and Lingam Amara Swapna. Correlation between the pH of saliva, plaque and buffering capacity of saliva. International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 2017; 3(4): 48-50.


Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available