Author(s): Dion Sandro Satrya, Andra Rizqiawan, Indra Mulyawan, Muhammad Subhan Amir

Email(s): r@fkg.unair.ac.id

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00271   

Address: Dion Sandro Satrya, Andra Rizqiawan*, Indra Mulyawan, Muhammad Subhan Amir
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 17,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2024


ABSTRACT:
Surgeons face problems in reconstructing the facial profile after mandibular resection aesthetically and practically. The stereolithographic method was used in the 3D virtual reconstruction program for preoperative planning. This study aims to document the use of 3D printed models in the reconstruction of mandibular ameloblastoma patients under general anesthesia after segmental resection with non-vascularized autogenous costal bone grafts arranged in double-barrel sequence at Airlangga University Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia. A single ameloblastoma from an anterior mandibular patient undergoing segmental mandibular resection is reported here. Autodesk Fusion 360 was used preoperatively to simulate anatomical markers, surgical margins, and plate morphology to create 3D models used for plate pre-bending. The graft used for reconstruction is a non-vascularized autogenous costal bone graft which is then stacked with an anteroposterior double-barrel. The patient did not show any severe complications associated with the surgery. Stereolithographic helps determine the extent of the lesion in the mandible. 3D printing improves graft viability by enabling optimal planning of the template, reduces operating room time by pre-bent screw plates, and increases procedural precision. The photo was taken a long time to process using virtual reconstruction software, but it put the surgeon at ease.


Cite this article:
Dion Sandro Satrya, Andra Rizqiawan, Indra Mulyawan, Muhammad Subhan Amir. Mandibular Reconsctruction using Double Barrel Costal Non Vascularized Bone Graft with Stereolitographic Three Dimensional Printed Models. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2024; 17(4):1711-5. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00271

Cite(Electronic):
Dion Sandro Satrya, Andra Rizqiawan, Indra Mulyawan, Muhammad Subhan Amir. Mandibular Reconsctruction using Double Barrel Costal Non Vascularized Bone Graft with Stereolitographic Three Dimensional Printed Models. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2024; 17(4):1711-5. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00271   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-4-45


REFERENCES:
1.    Abou-ElFetouh A, Barakat A, Abdel-Ghany K. Computer-guided rapid-prototyped templates for segmental mandibular osteotomies: a preliminary report. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7: 187–192. doi.org/10.1002/rcs.387
2.    Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi–Kanno N, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med. 2014; 10: 45.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-45
3.    Mayorga J, Castellón L, Alister JP, Martinovic G. Mandibular reconstruction in pediatric patients using stereolitographic models: report of cases. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011; 40: e27.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.07.1000
4.    Kumar MD. Anatomical Measurement of Presence, Horizontal Distance and Vertical Distance of Submandibular Fossa. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8: 1096–1098. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00191.2
5.    Lin C-H, Kudva A. Simultaneous Reconstruction of Mandibular and Maxillary Defects Using the Single Free Fibular Osseocutaneous Flap: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2021; 86: 428–433. doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002436
6.    Al-Anee AM, Al-Jarsha M. Outcome Assessment for Surgical Reconstruction of Mandibular Continuity Defects. J Craniofac Surg. 2021; 32: e635–e638. doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007606
7.    Reid D, Park D, Viswanath A, Finkelman M, Magnuson B, Oreadi D. Outcomes analysis of non-vascularized bone graft and free flap in mandibular reconstruction. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019; 48: 147. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.454
8.    Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Herten M, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 243–250.
9.    Gomez J, Bergamo E-T, Tovar N, et al. Microtomographic reconstruction of mandibular defects treated with xenografts and collagen-based membranes: A pre-clinical minipig model. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021; 26: e825–e833.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24811
10.    Succo G, Berrone M, Battiston B, et al. Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 272: 1491–1501.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3078-3
11.    Marechek A, AlShare A, Pack S, Demko C, Quereshy FA, Baur D. Nonvascularized Bone Grafts for Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects: Is Length of Graft a Factor of Success? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019; 77: 2557–2566. doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.05.008
12.    Satwik A, Naveed N. Third Molar Impaction-Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2014; 7: 1498–1500.
13.    S S, Anbuselvan A, S P, Priya G. A Review on 3D Printing Techniques and Scaffolds for Auricular Cartilage Reconstruction. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11: 4179–4186. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00767.9
14.    Bachelet J-T, Bourlet J, Château J, et al. Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3: e565. doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000544
15.    Shen Y, Guo X, Sun J, et al. Double-barrel vascularised fibula graft in mandibular reconstruction: a 10-year experience with an algorithm. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66:364–371.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.10.005
16.    Morrison A, Brady J. Mandibular reconstruction using nonvascularized autogenous bone grafting. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 18: 227–231. doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32833a46ed
17.    Hao S, Wang J, Wang F, Liu Z, Liu J, Wang Y. A case of 3D mirror and printing technology in the aid of resection and reconstruction of an adult mandibular ameloblastoma. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2019; 12: 4392–4397.
18.    Della Bona A, Cantelli V, Britto VT, Collares KF, Stansbury JW. 3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review. Dental Materials. 2021; 37: 336–350. doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.030
19.    Schrag C, Chang Y-M, Tsai C-Y, Wei F-C. Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection. J Surg Oncol. 2006; 94: 538–545.doi.org/10.1002/jso.20491
20.    Patturaja K, Krishnamoorthy K. Treatment and management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis-A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9: 1668–1670. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00336.X
21.    Ganapathi A, Thenmozhi MS. To Study The Location, Shape and Morphological Relations of Mandibular foramen and Mandibular lingula in Dry mandibules of South India. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9: 893–897. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00170.0
22.    Louvrier A, Marty P, Barrabé A, et al. How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 118: 206–212. doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2017.07.002
23.    Przhedetsky YV, Borlakov AV, Przhedetskaya VY. Ways to Improve the Aesthetic and Functional Results of Reconstruction Mammoplasty in Cancer Patients. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11: 1207–1213. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00223.8
24.    Toro C, Robiony M, Costa F, Zerman N, Politi M. Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction. Head Face Med. 2007; 3: 5. doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-3-5
25.    Kumta S, Kumta M, Jain L, Purohit S, Ummul R. A novel 3D template for mandible and maxilla reconstruction: Rapid prototyping using stereolithography. Indian J Plast Surg. 2015; 48: 263–273. doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.173123
26.    Subhadharsini S. Prevalence of Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders in Chennai, India: A Cross Sectional Survey. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8: 1107–1108.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00193.6
27.    Mathews L, Babu KY. Estimation of Stature from Mandibular Width. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8: 1147–1149. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00204.8
28.    Chin DS, Lim CSY, Nordin F, Arifin N, Jun TG. Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Through Natural Killer(NK) Cells: Unlocking NK Cells for Future Immunotherapy. CPB. 2022; 23: 552–578. doi.org/10.2174/1389201022666210820093608
29.    Siram K, Habibur Rahman SM, Balakumar K, Duganath N, Chandrasekar R, Hariprasad R. Chapter 4 - Pharmaceutical nanotechnology: Brief perspective on lipid drug delivery and its current scenario. Biomedical Applications of Nanoparticles. 2019: 91–115.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816506-5.00005-X
30.    Pramono C. Mandibular reconstruction using non-vascularized autogenous bone graft applied in decorticated cortical bone. Italian Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2011; 22:47–56.
31.    Moura LB, Carvalho PH de A, Xavier CB, et al. Autogenous non-vascularized bone graft in segmental mandibular reconstruction: a systematic review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016; 45:1388–1394. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.004
32.    Mertens F, Dormaar JT, Vander Poorten V, Vranckx JJ. Objectifying growth of vascularized bone transfers after mandibular reconstruction in the pediatric population. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2021; 74: 1973–1983. doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.010
33.    Flint RL, Kushner GM, Alpert B. Immediate Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects with Non-Vascularized Bone Grafts. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2019; 128: e22.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.02.251
34.    Horiuchi K, Hattori A, Inada I, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using the double barrel fibular graft. Microsurgery. 1995; 16:450–454. doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920160704
35.    Kim D-K, Geon-Park, Yu J-H. The Effect of Protein Supplementation Improve Quadriceps Muscle Strength with ACL Reconstruction. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10: 2871–2874. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00506.6
36.    S J, M D. Non-Surgical Treatment for Tempromandibular Joint Disorder- A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10: 917–922. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00170.6
37.    Chana JS, Chang Y-M, Wei F-C, et al. Segmental mandibulectomy and immediate free fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap reconstruction with endosteal implants: an ideal treatment method for mandibular ameloblastoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 80–87. doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000097719.69616.29

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available