Author(s):
Manikandan Arumugam, KM Noorulla, Mohd Yasir, Manish Kalwaniya, Hemalatha Siva
Email(s):
shemalatha.phe@iitbhu.ac.in
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00870 
Address:
Manikandan Arumugam1, KM Noorulla2, Mohd Yasir3, Manish Kalwaniya4, Hemalatha Siva5*
1Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Oromia, Ethiopia.
3Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella, Oromia, Ethiopia.
4School of Public Health, Indian Institute of Health Management and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
5Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 17,
Issue - 12,
Year - 2024
ABSTRACT:
Introduction: In India, the financial burdens of pregnancy are closely tied to socioeconomic, and demographic factors, healthcare policies, and out-of-pocket costs. Health expenditure in India is around 3.2% of GDP, with public health spending making up less than half of the total expenditure. Several socioeconomic, and demographic factors significantly impact the financial burdens of pregnancy, particularly for women in vulnerable groups. Income, education, and geographical location strongly influence these costs. This study aims to investigate the socioeconomic, and demographic determinants of out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPE) during pregnancy and childbirth in the Agra district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Methods: The study utilized a cross-sectional mixed-methods design and collected data from participants through surveys and semi-structured interviews, involving different delivery locations among a diverse group of women who have given birth. The analysis focused on participants' socioeconomic, and demographic characteristics, direct and indirect expenditures, with contributing factors for OOPE and suggestions for reducing OOPE. Results: The study revealed impactful correlations between socioeconomic, and demographic factors and out-of-pocket costs during pregnancy, highlighting varying healthcare utilization patterns across delivery settings. Participants from diverse backgrounds experienced financial burdens in maternity-related care, with home deliveries showing minimal expenses but poorer healthcare access. Key factors contributing to impaired service utilization and strategies for reducing financial burdens were identified, underscoring the importance of targeted policies to enhance maternal healthcare access and affordability. Conclusion: The study's comprehensive analysis of socioeconomic, and demographic factors and out-of-pocket costs during pregnancy and childbirth provides crucial insights into the financial burdens faced by expectant mothers across diverse backgrounds. These findings underscore the necessity of targeted interventions to alleviate financial strain and improve maternal and child health outcomes through equitable access to essential care. Despite potential limitations like self-reporting bias and regional constraints, this research contributes significantly to understanding the financial aspects of pregnancy and underscores the need for supportive policies to alleviate the financial burden on expectant families.
Cite this article:
Manikandan Arumugam, KM Noorulla, Mohd Yasir, Manish Kalwaniya, Hemalatha Siva. Financial burdens of Pregnancy: Understanding Socioeconomic, Demographic correlates and Out-of-pocket costs. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2024;17(12):5713-3. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00870
Cite(Electronic):
Manikandan Arumugam, KM Noorulla, Mohd Yasir, Manish Kalwaniya, Hemalatha Siva. Financial burdens of Pregnancy: Understanding Socioeconomic, Demographic correlates and Out-of-pocket costs. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2024;17(12):5713-3. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00870 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-12-7
REFERENCE:
1. World Health Organization. Global spending on health: rising to the pandemic’s challenges. World Health Organization. 2022; Dec 6.
2. OECD, Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1787/ae3016b9-en.
3. Taylor K et al. Financial hardship among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States, 2013 to 2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(10): e2132103-e2132103.
4. Yee MM et al. A brief review on pregnancy risk reasoned to COVID-19. Res J Pharm Technol. 2022; 15: 424–8.
5. Scorgie F et al. “I get hungry all the time”: experiences of poverty and pregnancy in an urban healthcare setting in South Africa. Global Health. 2015; 11: 1-12.
6. Cahn J et al. The Association of Childbirth with Medical Debt in the USA, 2019–2020. J Gen Intern Med. 2023; 38(10): 2340-2346.
7. Senkyire EK et al. Socio-economic factors associated with adolescent pregnancy and motherhood: Analysis of the 2017 Ghana maternal health survey. PLoS One. 2022; 17(12): e0272131.
8. Maqbool M et al. Universal health coverage policy and practice framework in India: a review. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019; 12: 4045–51.
9. Backes EP, Scrimshaw SC, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Systemic Influences on Outcomes in Pregnancy and Childbirth. In: Birth Settings in America: Outcomes, Quality, Access, and Choice. National Academies Press (US); 2020.
10. Rahman M et al. Pregnancy costs with commercial insurance. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2022; 35(25): 10143-10151.
11. Sarowar MG et al. Calculation of costs of pregnancy-and puerperium-related care: experience from a hospital in a low-income country. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010; 28(3): 264.
12. Jeong W et al. The effect of socioeconomic status on all-cause maternal mortality: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(12): 4606.
13. Borde MT et al. Financial risk of seeking maternal and neonatal healthcare in southern Ethiopia: a cohort study of rural households. Int J Equity Health. 2020; 19: 1-16.
14. Jeong I et al. Development of Financial Support Program for High-Risk Pregnant Women. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016; 7(3): 141-148.
15. Yang Y, Yu M. Disparities and determinants of maternal health services utilization among women in poverty-stricken rural areas of China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 115.
16. Sanogo NA, Yaya S. Wealth Status, Health Insurance, and Maternal Health Care Utilization in Africa: Evidence from Gabon. Pabelick C, ed. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020: 4036830. doi:10.1155/2020/4036830.
17. Emori Y et al. Relationship of socioeconomic status with psychological state and the number of weeks of pregnancy at the time of a first prenatal examination among perinatal women. General Medicine. 2014; 15(1): 34-42.
18. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. John Wiley and Sons; 1977.
19. Levy PS, Lemeshow S. Sampling of populations: methods and applications. John Wiley and Sons; 2013 Jun 7.
20. Goli S et al. Out-of-pocket expenditure on maternity care for hospital births in Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Econ Rev. 2018; 8: 1-16.
21. Alvis-Zakzuk NJ et al. Substantial out-of-pocket health expenditure on prenatal check-ups: estimates from a sample of pregnant women in Cartagena, Colombia. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. Published online 2022: 51-60.
22. Sosnowski DW et al. Financial stress as a mediator of the association between maternal childhood adversity and infant birth weight, gestational age, and NICU admission. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1): 606.
23. Ramalho AA et al. Food insecurity during pregnancy in a maternal–infant cohort in Brazilian Western Amazon. Nutrients. 2020; 12(6): 1578.
24. Krishnamoorthy Y et al. Costs incurred and determinants of out‐of‐pocket payments for child delivery care in India: Evidence from a nationally representative household survey. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020; 35(1): e167-e177.
25. Taylor AK et al. Women’s health care utilization and expenditures. Women’s health Issues. 2006; 16(2): 66-79.
26. Simkhada B et al. Why do costs act as a barrier in maternity care for some, but not all women? A qualitative study in rural Nepal. Int J Soc Econ. 2014; 41(8): 705-713.
27. Ouedraogo CT et al. Out-of-pocket costs and time spent attending antenatal care services: a case study of pregnant women in selected rural communities in Zinder, Niger. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21: 1-17.
28. Sriram S, Khan MM. Effect of health insurance program for the poor on out-of-pocket inpatient care cost in India: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Services Research. 2020; Dec; 20: 1-21.
29. Rejikumar G et al. Pharmaceutical marketing: Directions for customer orientation. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018; 11: 3283–9.
30. Sekandari MO et al. The Role of Pharmacists in Providing Pharmaceutical Services in Selected Government Hospitals in Kabul. Res J Pharm Technol. 2024; 17(2): 820-826.
31. Tura AJ et al. Expiry of medicine in public health facilities of Arsi Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: a quantitative and qualitative study. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences. 2022; 35(1): 27-33.