Author(s):
Minal Harde, Sameer Lakade, Ujwala Wasnik, Shejal Wakade, Komal Doifode, Kamlesh Palandurkar, Shrikant Joshi, Laxman Ingole
Email(s):
minalresearch@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00802
Address:
Minal Harde1*, Sameer Lakade2, Ujwala Wasnik3, Shejal Wakade1, Komal Doifode1, Kamlesh Palandurkar4, Shrikant Joshi5, Laxman Ingole1
1Modern College of Pharmacy, Sector No. 21, Yamuna Nagar, Nigdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
2RMD Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
3Taywade College of Pharmacy, Koradi, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
4Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
5Department of Pharmacology, Maliba Pharmacy College, Maliba-Mahuva Road, Tarsadi, Dist- Surat, Gujrat, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 17,
Issue - 11,
Year - 2024
ABSTRACT:
Background: The current investigation explains the validation of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) technique for quantification of Ruxolitinib in active ingredient and marketed tablet dosage form. For assessment of Ruxolitinib, a specific column chromatographic method has been developed using UV detection. Methods: The chromatographic elution was executed on ODS Phenomenex analytical column (250mm × 4.6mm, 5µm particle size). The solvent ratio utilized was methanol: water (pH 3.5 adjusted with OPA) (70:30 V/V). A constant ratio of eluting phase flow rate 1.0ml/min was used to detect RTB at 236nm. Results: The developed method was justified using various variables such as accuracy, limit of detection, precision, specificity, robustness, limit of quantification. The retention time for Ruxolitinib was obtained at 8.59 min. The designed method was detected linear within 20 to 120µg/ml range. Correlation coefficient (r2) of the regression equation was found to be 0.9999. Detection and quantitation limit achieved was 0.1496 and 0.4483 respectively. The accuracy of the method was determined using recovery study. The % recovery obtained was in the range of 98.68 – 99.80%. All system suitability factors like tailing factor, retention factor, number of theoretical plates were obtained within acceptance range. The obtained result demonstrates that the presented method is reliable, precise, and economical. Conclusion: The specified method was effectively authenticated as per guidelines of ICH in practice and can be claimed successful for the determination of Ruxolitinib in commercial formulation.
Cite this article:
Minal Harde, Sameer Lakade, Ujwala Wasnik, Shejal Wakade, Komal Doifode, Kamlesh Palandurkar, Shrikant Joshi, Laxman Ingole. ICH Guideline in Practice for Quantification of Ruxolitinib by applying Validated RP-HPLC Method on Commercial Tablet Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(11):5242-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00802
Cite(Electronic):
Minal Harde, Sameer Lakade, Ujwala Wasnik, Shejal Wakade, Komal Doifode, Kamlesh Palandurkar, Shrikant Joshi, Laxman Ingole. ICH Guideline in Practice for Quantification of Ruxolitinib by applying Validated RP-HPLC Method on Commercial Tablet Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(11):5242-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00802 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-11-10
REFERENCES:
1. Randhawa J. Ostojic A. Vrhovac R. Atallah E. Verstovsek S. Splenomegaly in myelofibrosis-new options for therapy and the therapeutic potential of Janus kinase 2 inhibitors. J Hematol Oncol. 2012; 5: 1-7. doi:10.1186/1756-8722-5-43
2. Mesa RA. Cortes J. Optimizing management of RTB in patients with myelofibrosis: The need for individualized dosing. J Hematol Oncol. 2013; 6(1): 1-7. doi:10.1186/1756-8722-6-79
3. Arya R. Sethiya NK. Bisht R, Rashid M. Kumar D. Singh A, Gupta R. Rana V. An Overview on Chemical Features and Metabolism of Synthetic and Natural Product-Based Medicine for Combating COVID-19. Res J Pharm Technol. 2023; (16)2; 908-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00153
4. Wade R. Hodgson R. Biswas M. Harden M. Woolacott N. A Review of RTB for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis: A Critique of the Evidence. Pharmaco-economics. 2017; 5(2): 203-13. doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0447-3
5. Selva B. Leyla K. Esen BA. Ali S. Sibel A. Ozkan. A novel electrochemical sensor based on magnetic Co3O4 nanoparticles/carbon recycled from waste sponges for sensitive determination of anticancer drug RTB. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2022; 367, 127-132. doi 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132127
6. JackR. Bennett D. Blennow K. CarrilloC. Dunn B. HaeberleinS. Holtzman D. JagustW. Jessen F. Karlawish. J. and Liu E. HHS Public Access. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2018; 14(4): 535-562. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2016.10.012
7. Charlier B. Marino L. Dal Piaz F. et al. Development and Validation of a Reverse-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection (RP-HPLC-FL) Method to Quantify RTB in Plasma Samples. Anal Lett. 2019; 52(8): 1328-1339. doi:10.1080/00032719.2018.1537283
8. Vinyas M. Velivela S. Yadav G. Pati NB. Gupta VRM. Analytical method development and validation of alogliptin by RP-HPLC method. Res J Pharm Technol. 2016; 9(7): 775-778. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00148.7.
9. Merienne C. Rousset M. Ducint D. et al. High throughput routine determination of 17 tyrosine kinase inhibitors by LC–MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018; 150: 112-120. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.060
10. Rood JJM. Schellens JHM. Beijnen JH. Sparidans RW. Recent developments in the chromatographic bioanalysis of approved kinase inhibitor drugs in oncology. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016; 130: 244-263. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2016.06.037
11. Koller D. Vaitsekhovich V. Mba C. et al. Effective quantification of 11 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and caffeine in human plasma by validated LC-MS/MS method with potent phospholipids clean-up procedure. Application to therapeutic drug monitoring. Talanta. 2020; 208(August): 120450. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120450
12. Biswal S. Mondal S. Mondal P. A New Stability Indicating High Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Estimation of RTB in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form. Pharm Methods. 2019; 10(2): 53-57. doi:10.5530/phm.2019.2.10
13. Häkkinen MR. Heinosalo T. Saarinen N. et al. Analysis by LC–MS/MS of endogenous steroids from human serum. plasma. endometrium and endometriotic tissue. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018; 152: 165-172. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2018.01.034
14. Veeraraghavan S. Thappali S. Viswanadha S. et al. Simultaneous quantification of RTB and nilotinib in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS: Application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014; 94: 125-131. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2014.01.040
15. Koller D. Vaitsekhovich V. Mba C. et al. Effective quantification of 11 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and caffeine in human plasma by validated LC-MS/MS method with potent phospholipids clean-up procedure. Application to therapeutic drug monitoring. Talanta. 2020; 208(August): 120450. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120450
16. Satyanarayana P. Madhavi A. et al. A novel RP-HPLC method for the quantification of RTB in formulations. J. At. Mol. 2012. 2: 223–231. jamonline. 2012
17. Mondal P. Rani S. Ramakrishna R. Novel Stability Indicating Validated RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Artemether and Lumefantrine in Bulk and Tablet. Curr Pharm Anal. 2014; 10(4): 271-278. doi:10.2174/1573412910666140701183927
18. Thangabalan B. Salomi M. Sunitha N. Babu SM. Development of validated RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Itraconazole in pure and pharmaceutical dosage form. Asian J Pharm. 2013; 3(4): 119-123.
19. Agrahari V. Bajpai M. Nanda S. Essential concepts of mobile phase selection for Reversed phase HPLC. Res J Pharm Technol. 2013; 6(5): 459-464.
20. Swetha Sri R. Bhavya Sri K. Mounika C. A review on comparative study of HPLC and UPLC. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020; 13(3): 1570-1574. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00284.
21. Biswas B. Kumar M. Sharma JB. Saini V. Bhatt S. Method development and validation for estimation of teneligliptin in tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020; 13(4): 1774-1778. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00320.0
22. Savic I. Nikolic V. Savic I. Nikolic L. Stankovic M. Development and validation of HPLC method for the determination of amygdalin in the plant extract of plum kernel. Res J Chem Environ. 2012; 16(4): 80-86. doi:10.3390/molecules26082253
23. Biswas B. Kumar M. Sharma JB. Saini V. Bhatt S. Method development and validation for estimation of teneligliptin in tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020; 13(4): 1774-1778. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00320.0
24. ICH: Q2 (R1), 2005. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology. Available from: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1__Guideline.pdf
25. Raul SK. Padhy GK. Mahapatra AK. Charan SA. An overview of concept of pharmaceutical validation. Res J Pharm Technol. 2014; 7(9): 1081-1090.
26. Tripathy SK. Pharmaceutical validation: A quality maintaining tool for pharmaceutical industry. Asian J Pharm Res. 2020; 10(4): 307-311. doi:10.5958/2231-5691.2020.00052.0
27. Mohammad AS. Devidi S. Fatima N. et al. An Overview of Validation and Basic Concepts of Process Validation: Quality Assurance View Point. Asian J Pharm Technol. 2016; 6(3): 169. doi:10.5958/2231-5713.2016.00024.6
28. Pandharmise PN. Shahzad N. Kamble A. Bhagat MP. Cleaning validation for oral solid dosage form and its importance in pharma industry. Res J Pharm Technol. 2011; 4(9): 1449-1454.
29. Shubhangi V. Sutar, Veerendra C. Yeligar. Degradation Kinetic Study of Melatonin in Alkaline and Acidic Medium by Validated Stability Indicating HPTLC Method. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(2): 523-528. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00099.2
30. V. Jayashree, Malarkodi Velraj. HPTLC Fingerprinting Profile and GC-MS Analysis of Aqueous extract of Alstonia scholaris Linn. Bark. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(12): 5706-5710. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00987.9
31. Sattwik Das, Shailendra Lariya, Sunil Mistry. Chromatographic Finger Print analysis of Dryopteris cochleata by HPTLC technique. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(10): 1394-1398. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00250.4