Author(s): SM. Biradar, C Vineeth Kumar, K Sainadh, NS Vinay Kumar, P Avinash, AP. Ambali, Shashidhar Devaramani, Akram Naikwadi, Abhishek B, SR. Awasthi, Prashanth Jorapur

Email(s): smbiradar@rediffmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00057   

Address: SM. Biradar1*, C Vineeth Kumar1, K Sainadh1, NS Vinay Kumar1, P Avinash1, AP. Ambali2, Shashidhar Devaramani2, Akram Naikwadi2, Abhishek B1, SR. Awasthi1, Prashanth Jorapur1.
1Department of Pharmacy Practice (PharmD), BLDEA’s SSM College of Pharmacy and Research Centre, Vijayapur - 586103.
2Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Shri B M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE University, Vijayapura - 586103.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 17,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2024


ABSTRACT:
Around 4 million deaths each year are caused by respiratory disorders worldwide. These diseases are a persistent threat to India as well; the number of people in India who suffer from COPD and asthma has been estimated to be 14.84 million and 17.23 million, respectively.In the present prospective and observational study, a total of 120 patients were enrolled, among 38 patients were diagnosed with Asthma and 82 were COPD patients. All the patients were trained with breathing exercises and inhalation techniques. The patients who have been prescribed with DPI and MDI inhalation devices were checked for their correct usage. The checklist score (DPI and MDI) for Asthma patients, before trainingwas 2.9 and after training was 8.1(<0.001***) and checklist score for COPD patients, before training was 2.8 and after training was 8.5(<0.001***).The results indicate that there is a significant increase (<0.001***) in correct usage after training session, which influences the inspiratory flow rate on Respirometer. Asthma Patient’s QoLwas measured by using ACT score, before training was 9.3 and after training was 19.7(<0.001***) and AQLQ score before training was 35.6 and after training was 74.1 (<0.001***). For COPD Patient’s QoLwas measured by using CAT score, before training was 33.2 and after training was 12.1(<0.001***) and MMRC score before training was 3.6 and after training was 1.4(<0.001***). In the present study breathing exercises increases inhalation capacity and hands on training for inhalation techniques improves the efficacy of drugs, together influences the patient’s Quality of Life (QoL) which reduces the number of days of hospitalization and socio-economic burden.


Cite this article:
SM. Biradar, C Vineeth Kumar, K Sainadh, NS Vinay Kumar, P Avinash, AP. Ambali, Shashidhar Devaramani, Akram Naikwadi, Abhishek B, SR. Awasthi, Prashanth Jorapur. Impact of Breathing exercise and Inhalation Technique on patient’s Quality of Life among Asthma and COPD patients. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(1):368-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00057

Cite(Electronic):
SM. Biradar, C Vineeth Kumar, K Sainadh, NS Vinay Kumar, P Avinash, AP. Ambali, Shashidhar Devaramani, Akram Naikwadi, Abhishek B, SR. Awasthi, Prashanth Jorapur. Impact of Breathing exercise and Inhalation Technique on patient’s Quality of Life among Asthma and COPD patients. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(1):368-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00057   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-1-57


REFERENCES:
1.    Saxena M. Khan M. Sharma A. Assessment of inhalation technique among patients attending a tertiary-care hospital. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2016; 5(9): 1916-9.doi: 10.5455/ijmsph.2016.04022016388.
2.    Capstick TGD. Clifton IJ. Inhaler technique and training in peoplewith chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2012; 6(1): 91-103.doi: 10.1586/ers.11.89.
3.    Gomieiro LTY. Nascimento A. Tanno L K. Agondi R. Kalil J. Giavina-Bianchi P.Respiratory exercise program for elderly individuals with asthma. Clinics. 2011; 66(7): 1165-9.doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000700007.
4.    Mathers CD. Loncar D. (2006). Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLOS Medicine, 2006: 3(11); e442.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442.
5.    Chorão P. PereiraAM. Fonseca JA.Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD - An assessment of inhaler technique and patient preferences. Respiratory Medicine. 2014; 108: 968-75.doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.019.
6.    Leiva-Fernández F. Leiva-Fernánde J. Zubeldia-Santoyo F. García-Ruiz A. Prados-Torres D. Barnestein-Fonseca P. Efficacy of two educational interventions about inhalation techniquesin patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). TECEPOC:study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial (preference trial). Trials. 2012; 13(64): 1-8.doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-64.
7.    Thomas M. Bruton A. Breathing exercises for asthma. Breathe. 2014; 10(4): 312–22.doi: 10.1183/20734735.00841.
8.    Gosselink R.Breathing techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Chronic Respiratory Diseases. 2004; 1: 163-172.doi: 10.1191/1479972304cd020rs.
9.    Mahler DA. Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate as a Criterion for Dry Powder Inhaler Use in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Thoracic Society. 2017; 14(7): 1103-7.doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-156PS.
10.    Muniz JB. Padovani, CR. Godoy I. Inhaled medication for asthma management: evaluation of how asthma patients, medical students, and doctors use the different devices. Journal of Pneumolgia. 2003; 29(2): 75-81.doi:10.1590/S0102-35862003000200006.
11.    Román-Rodríguez M.,Pardo MG. López LG. Ruiz AU. Van Boven JFM. Enhancing the use of Asthma and COPD Assessment Tools in Balearic Primary Care (ACATIB): a region-wide cluster-controlled implementation trial. Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. 2016; 16003: 1-6.doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.3.
12.    Juniper EF. Guyatt GH. Cox FM. Ferrie PJ. King DR. Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. EurRespir J. 1999; 14: 32–8.doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available