Author(s):
Rizka Firdaus Rosidin, Ratna Nurlia Alfiandini, Ida Bagus Narmada, I G. A. W. Ardani
Email(s):
ida-b-n@fkg.unair.ac.id
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00494
Address:
Rizka Firdaus Rosidin, Ratna Nurlia Alfiandini, Ida Bagus Narmada, I G. A. W. Ardani
Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 16,
Issue - 6,
Year - 2023
ABSTRACT:
Bracket bonding in tooth enamel with total-etch material is a general practice procedure. The researchers combine etchant and bonding procedures in one application or called self-etch. This procedure is a solution for timesaving in bonding procedures and minimizing enamel damage without degrading the ability to sustain bond strength during the application of an orthodontic appliance. The aim of this research is to know the comparison between shear strength, ARI value, and enamel crack length between total-etch and self-etch adhesive material. Eighteenth teeth are divided into three groups which are K-1 as a control group without etchant application, K2 as the self-etch material group, and K-3 as the total etch material group. All teeth practiced shear strength test by Universal Testing Machine Autograph. After bracket removal, an Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) test was performed and followed by cleaning the adhesive remnant with tungsten carbide burs and continued by enamel crack test by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). According to the OneWay Anova result, there is a difference between shear strength, ARI value, and significant enamel crack length (p<0.05) between the control group, self-etch group, and total-etch group. Total etch material has higher shear strength, higher ARI value, and higher enamel crack length number than self-etch material.
Cite this article:
Rizka Firdaus Rosidin, Ratna Nurlia Alfiandini, Ida Bagus Narmada, I G. A. W. Ardani. Comparison between Shear Strength in Total Etch and Self Etch Adhesive material in Bonding of Stainless-steel Brackets. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2023; 16(6):2991-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00494
Cite(Electronic):
Rizka Firdaus Rosidin, Ratna Nurlia Alfiandini, Ida Bagus Narmada, I G. A. W. Ardani. Comparison between Shear Strength in Total Etch and Self Etch Adhesive material in Bonding of Stainless-steel Brackets. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2023; 16(6):2991-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00494 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2023-16-6-72
REFERENCES:
1. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, Huang GJ. Orthodontics: Current Principles And Techniques. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2017.
2. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
3. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics: The Art and Science. Arya (Medi) Publishing House; 2004. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=LRTbNwAACAAJ
4. Khan H, Mheissen S, Iqbal A, Jafri AR, Alam MK. Bracket Failure in Orthodontic Patients: The Incidence and the Influence of Different Factors. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5128870. doi:10.1155/2022/5128870
5. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent. Published online 2001:119-144. Meerbeek_2001_Operative
6. Yamada R, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(6):558-564. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072<0558:EOUSEP>2.0.CO;2
7. Kenneth J. Anusavice DMD, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=gzUeKDhP-KQC
8. Paschos E, Westphal J-O, Ilie N, Huth KC, Hickel R, Rudzki-Janson I. Artificial saliva contamination effects on bond strength of self-etching primers. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(4):716-721. doi:10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0716:ASCEOB]2.0.CO;2
9. Chigira H, Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Wakumoto S, Hayakawa T. Effect of the self etching dentin primers on the bonding efficacy of a dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J. 1989;8(1):86-92124. doi:10.4012/DMJ.8.86
10. Singh G. Textbook of Orthodontics. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Limited; 2015. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=MsIHCgAAQBAJ
11. Vicente A, Molina S, Ortiz AJ, Bravo LA. Influence of food-simulating liquids on bond strength of brackets bonded with a HEMA-free and HEMA-containing self-etching primer. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):346-350. doi:10.2319/032711-216.1
13. Rajagopal R, Padmanabhan S, Gnanamani J. A comparison of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of conventional, moisture-insensitive, and self-etching primers in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(2):264-268. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0264:ACOSBS>2.0.CO;2
14. Santos BM, Pithon MM, De Oliveira Ruellas AC, Sant’Anna EF. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded with hydrophilic and hydrophobic bond systems under contamination. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(5):963-967. doi:10.2319/022310-113.1
15. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, De Stefano Dorigo E, Ferrari M. Adhesion to Intraradicular Dentin: A Review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(7-8):1053-1083. doi:10.1163/156856109X440957
16. Arnold RW, Combe EC, Warford JHJ. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel with a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2002;122(3):274-276. doi:10.1067/mod.2002.125712
17. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, De Angelis M, Scribante A, Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2003;123(6):633-640. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00198-7
18. Dorminey JC, Dunn WJ, Taloumis LJ. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a modified 1-step etchant-and-primer technique. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2003;124(4):410-413. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00404-9
19. Zeppieri IL, Chung C-H, Mante FK. Effect of saliva on shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive used with moisture-insensitive and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2003;124(4):414-419. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00405-0
20. Robles-Ruíz JJ, Arana-Chavez VE, Ciamponi AL, Abrão J, Kanashiro LK. Effects of sandblasting before orthophosphoric acid etching on lingual enamel: in-vitro roughness assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2015;147(4 Suppl):S76-81. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.023
21. Mhatre AC, Tandur AP, Reddy SS, Karunakara BC, Baswaraj H. Enamel Surface Evaluation after Removal of Orthodontic Composite Remnants by Intraoral Sandblasting Technique and Carbide Bur Technique: A Three-Dimensional Surface Profilometry and Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. J Int oral Heal JIOH. 2015;7(Suppl 2):34-39.
22. Shetty V, Shekatkar Y, Kumbhat N, Gautam G, Karbelkar S, Vandekar M. Bond efficacy of recycled orthodontic brackets: A comparative in vitro evaluation of two methods. Indian J Dent Res Off Publ Indian Soc Dent Res. 2015;26(4):411-415. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.167635
23. van Waveren Hogervorst WL, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2000;117(1):20-26. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70244-7
24. Toroglu MS, Yaylali S. Effects of sandblasting and silica coating on the bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2008;134(2):181e1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.05.012
25. Buyukyilmaz T, Usumez S, Karaman AI. Effect of self-etching primers on bond strength--are they reliable? Angle Orthod. 2003;73(1):64-70. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0064:EOSEPO>2.0.CO;2
26. Karan S, Kircelli BH, Tasdelen B. Enamel surface roughness after debonding. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(6):1081-1088. doi:10.2319/012610-55.1
27. Naini FB, Gill DS. Tooth fracture associated with debonding a metal orthodontic bracket: a case report. World J Orthod. 2008;9(3):e32-6.