Rasha Saad Aldoury, Ali Yousif Nori, Sarah Ahmed Khalid
email@example.com , firstname.lastname@example.org , email@example.com
Rasha Saad Aldoury1, Ali Yousif Nori2, Sarah Ahmed Khalid3
1Radiology Techniques Department- Al Salam University College.
2Department of Pharmacy, AlMustafa Private University College, Baghdad, Iraq.
3College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Volume - 16,
Issue - 2,
Year - 2023
Hydronephrosis describes a urinary tract abnormality where hydrostatic dilatation of the renal pelvis and calyces exists and considered as a hallmark for obstruction to urine flow downstream. Detecting the pathologic hydronephrosis cases along with the cause using the least invasive techniques is a matter of interest since ages especially in pediatric community. In the Iraqi healthcare practice, many cases are referred for advanced urology imaging tests without clear rational. This study aims to evaluate the rational of referring hydronephrosis pediatric cases to renal scintigraphy studies by comparing the results with the ultrasonography using particular parameters. A cross-sectional observational study involved prospective measurement of a number of variables via two main radiology techniques; sonography and scintigraphy was carried on in Baghdad, Iraq. Classical US and dynamic renal MAG-3 were performed on the same day for each of 35 children aged between 1-5 years presumed or suspected to have obstructive type of hydronephrosis by earlier US work-up. Results revealed a clear statistical significance between normal differential renal function and the good quality of renal drainage of Mag-3 test with the undilated PCS category (p-value 0.028) when measured by our team using the sonography technique. Other results of the calyceal dimension (CD) and the parenchymal thickness (PT) have failed to obtain a statistical significant difference when compared with the categories of the three variables of MAG-3. This study supports the inference of assessing renal function based on sensitive parameters of evolutionary sonography. Each radiologist/nephrologist/urologist should evaluate the measurement of reliable parameters of sonography especially the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvicalyceal system (APD of PCS) at the hilum area and the parenchymal thickness (PT) in millimeters and set the pediatric patient for logical follow-up before recommending the dynamic scintigraphy tests.
Cite this article:
Rasha Saad Aldoury, Ali Yousif Nori, Sarah Ahmed Khalid. Comparative Study between some Parameters in Ultrasonography and Renal Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Hydronephrosis among Iraqi Paediatric patients. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2023; 16(2):733-9. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00125
Rasha Saad Aldoury, Ali Yousif Nori, Sarah Ahmed Khalid. Comparative Study between some Parameters in Ultrasonography and Renal Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Hydronephrosis among Iraqi Paediatric patients. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2023; 16(2):733-9. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00125 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2023-16-2-44
1. Capolicchio J-P, Braga LH, Szymanski KM. Canadian Urological Association/Pediatric Urologists of Canada guideline on the investigation and management of antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2018; 12(4): 85-92. doi:10.5489/cuaj.5094
2. Akshay G, Rutuja S, Shreya P, Prajakta K. Polycystic ovary syndrome: An Overview, Diagnosis and Treatment of PCOS. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 10(4): 265-272. DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2020.00044.6
3. Kohno M, Ogawa T, Kojima Y, Sakoda A, Johnin K, Sugita Y, et al. Pediatric congenital hydronephrosis (ureteropelvic junction obstruction): Medical management guide. International Journal of Urology. 2020; 27(5): 369-376. doi: 10.1111/iju.14207.
4. Nguyen HT, Herndon CD, Cooper C, Gatti J, Kirsch A, et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2010; 6(3): 212-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.02.205.
5. Karnak I, Woo LL, Shah SN, Sirajuddin A, Kay R, Ross JH. Prenatally detected ureteropelvic junction obstruction: clinical features and associated urologic abnormalities. Pediatric Surgery International. 2008; 24(4): 395-402. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2112-1
6. Pawar PP, Phadtare DG. Acoustic Mediated Drug Delivery System. Research Journal of Pharmacy Dosage Form. and Technology. 2016; 8(1): 55-65.
7. Thorup J, Jokela R, Cortes D, Nielsen O. The results of 15 years of consistent strategy in treating antenatally suspected pelvi‐ureteric junction obstruction. BJU International. 2003; 91(9): 850-852.
8. Frizzell JP. Introductory Concepts and Clinical Perspectives. . Pathophysiology. T. Capriotti. Philadelphia. 2016
9. Kulchenko NG, Kostin AA, Chibisov SM, Eremina IZ, et al.. Modern Principles of Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10(3): 696-698. DOI:10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00130.5
10. Viteri B, Calle-Toro JS, Furth S, Darge K, Hartung EA, Otero H. State-of-the-Art Renal Imaging in Children. Pediatrics. 2020; 145(2): e20190829. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0829.
11. Alphonsa Pascal, Anitta Mariam Mathew, Biffy Ann Philip, Elena Sebastian, Simi Mariyam Sibi, Jasmine P.V. A Study to assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on knowledge regarding prevention of Urinary Tract Infection among Adolescent girls in selected schools at Kollam District. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2019; 9(3): 391-394. doi: 10.5958/2349-2996.2019.00084.3
12. Ucar AK, Kurugoglu s. Urinary ultrasound and other imaging for ureteropelvic junction type hydronephrosis (UPJHN). Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2020; 8: 546. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00546.
13. Ranga P, John JJ. Evaluation of the thickness of facial anterior gingiva and posterior palatal mucosa by transgingival probing. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015; 8(5): 565-570. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00094.3
14. Choudhari S, Thenmozhi MS. Occurrence and Importance of Posterior Condylar Foramen. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(8):1083-1085. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00206.7
15. Luo HYS, Wu X, Yang H, Zhang BB, Bleyer M, Chen G. Computed tomography angiography with 3D reconstruction in diagnosis of hydronephrosis cause by aberrant renal vessel: A case report and mini review. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology. 2018; 26(1): 125-131. doi: 10.3233/XST-17343.
16. Swapna Mary A, Maheswari Jaikumar. Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme Regarding Risk Factors and Prevention of Renal Failure among Adults in Selected Hospitals at Bangalore, Karnataka. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2018; 8(1): 149-151. DOI:10.5958/2349-2996.2018.00031.9
17. Dhull RS, Joshi S, Saha A. Nuclear imaging in pediatric kidney diseases. Indian Pediatrics. 2018; 55(7): 591-597
18. Banks KP, Farrell MB, Peacock JG, Costello M, Gordon LL. Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy: The State of Practice and a Potential Opportunity for Standardization. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2021; 18(11): 1556-1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.011.
19. Damasio MB, Bodria M, Dolores M, Durand E, Sertorio F, Wong MCY, et al. Comparative Study Between Functional MR Urography and Renal Scintigraphy to Evaluate Drainage Curves and Split Renal Function in Children With Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT). Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2020; 7: 527. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00527.
20. Ouda ZA, Kaloub AN, Ali AK. Assessment of DNA Damage in Lymphocytes of RadiationWorkers at Al-Tuwaitha Site using Nuclear Division Index and Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(7): 2855-2858. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00526.7
21. Błaszczyk M, Cichocki P, Bieńkiewicz M, Dąbrowski J, Płachcińska A, Kuśmierek J. Assessment of the relation between pelvicalyceal dilatation in ultrasound and features of obstructive uropathy in dynamic renal scintigraphy. Nuclear Medicine Review. 208; 21(2): 96-99. doi: 10.5603/NMR.a2018.0021.
22. Botros, SM, Ali AH. Transverse Comparisons Between Ultrasound and Radionuclide Parameters in Children with Pelvi-Ureteric Junction Obstruction. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018; 72(5): 4543-4550. DOI: 10.21608/EJHM.2018.9542
23. Li B, McGrath M, Farrokhyar G, Braga LH. Ultrasound-based scoring system for indication of pyeloplasty in patients with UPJO-like hydronephrosis. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2020; 8: 353. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00353.
24. Kadioglu, A. Renal measurements, including length, parenchymal thickness, and medullary pyramid thickness, in healthy children: what are the normative ultrasound values? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2010; 194(2): 509-515. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2986.
25. Duong HP, Piepsz A, Khelif K, Collier F, De Man K, Damry N, et al. Transverse comparisons between ultrasound and radionuclide parameters in children with presumed antenatally detected pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2015; 42(6): 940-946. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2965-6.
26. Sivakumar VN, Indiran V, Sathyanathan BP. Dynamic MRI and isotope renogram in the functional evaluation of pelviureteric junction obstruction: A comparative study. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2018; 44(1): 45-50. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.08365.
27. Dibyajyoti S, Milan H, Mayukh J, Suprodip M, Utpal J. Radiopharmaceuticals and Radio Opaque Contrast Media: Practice, Prospects and Potentials. Asian Journal Research of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 1(1): 4-8.
28. Erdman L, Skreta M, Rickard M, McLean C, Mezlini A, et al. Predicting obstructive hydronephrosis based on ultrasound alone. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer. 2020; 12263.
29. Tondeur M, Nogarède C, Donoso G, Piepsz A. Inter-and intra-observer reproducibility of quantitative renographic parameters of differential function and renal drainage in children. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2013; 73(5): 414-421. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2013.797597.
30. Braga LH, McGrath M, Farrokhyar F, Jegatheeswaran K, Lorenzo AJ. Society for Fetal Urology Classification vs urinary tract dilation grading system for prognostication in prenatal hydronephrosis: a time to resolution analysis. The Journal of Urology. 2018; 199(6): 1615-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.077.
31. Nitin M, Ifthekar S. Nephroprotective activity of Vigna mungo (Linn.) Hepper on gentamicin-induced renal damage in albino rats. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2012; 4(5): 299-303.
32. Nogarède C, Tondeur M, Piepsz A. Normalized residual activity and output efficiency in case of early furosemide injection in children. Nuclear medicine communications. 2010; 31(5): 355-358
33. Carmody JB, Carmody RB. Question from the clinician: management of prenatal hydronephrosis." Pediatric Review. 2011; 32(12): e110-112
34. Alsubhi MH, Alghanmi AA, Alzabidi YH, Bafail AK, Bafaraj SM. A correlation study of the effectiveness of renal scintigraphy and sonography in the detection and evaluation of renal disorders. 2022; 10(6): 56-65. DOI: 10.4236/jbm.2022.106005