Author(s):
Janani Saravana L, Vikram E N T, Arunadevi R, Logamanian M, Balagurusami K
Email(s):
30aruna@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00819 
Address:
Janani Saravana L1, Vikram E N T2, Arunadevi R2, Logamanian M3, Balagurusami K1
1Sri Velumailu Siddha Medical College and Hospital, Sriperumpudur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Captain Srinivasa Murthy Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Arumbakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
3National Institute of Siddha, Tambaram Sanitorium, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 16,
Issue - 11,
Year - 2023
ABSTRACT:
Kodiveli Churnam is a traditional Siddha formulation made up of Plumbago zeylanica, Pongamia pinnata, Chukrasia tabularis, Piper longum, Brassica juncea, Nigella sativa, Zingiber officinalis and Terminalia chebula. The formulation has been studied using the macroscopic, microscopic, TLC/HPTLC techniques. The pharmacognostical studies revealed the presence of specific characteristic features of the raw drugs. The HPTLC fingerprinting was derived using a specific solvent system which could capture majority of the phytoconstituents of this drug. It is concluded that the formulation of Kodiveli churnam, the HPTLC fingerprinting and microscopic characteristics can be used to validate the preparation and authenticity of the formulation.
Cite this article:
Janani Saravana L, Vikram E N T, Arunadevi R, Logamanian M, Balagurusami K. Phytochemical and Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Kodiveli Churnam - A Polyherbal Siddha Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(11):5058-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00819
Cite(Electronic):
Janani Saravana L, Vikram E N T, Arunadevi R, Logamanian M, Balagurusami K. Phytochemical and Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Kodiveli Churnam - A Polyherbal Siddha Formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(11):5058-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00819 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2023-16-11-13
REFERENCES:
1. Kuppuswamy. Siddha Vaithya Thirattu. 2nd ed. Chennai: Department of Indian system of Medicine and Homeopathy; 2006.
2. Shukla B et.al. Phytochemistry and pharmacological studies of Plumbago zeylanica L.: a medicinal plant review. Clin Phytoscience. 2021;7:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-021-00271-7.
3. Al Muqarrabun LMR et.al. Medicinal uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre: A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013; 150: 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.08.041.
4. Rajbir K, Saroj A. Chemical constituents and biological activities of Chukrasia tabularis A. Juss. - A review. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2009; 3(4), 196-216.
5. Gani HMO, Hoq MO, Tamanna T. Ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Piper longum (Linn). Asian J Med Biol Res. 2019; 5: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v5i1.41038.
6. Tian Y, Deng F. Phytochemistry and biological activity of mustard (Brassica juncea): a review. CYTA - J Food 2020; 18: 704–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2020.1833988.
7. Ali BH, Blunden G. Pharmacological and toxicological properties of Nigella sativa. Phyther Res. 2003; 17: 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1309.
8. Ali BH et.al. Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A review of recent research. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:409–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.085.
9. An H, Gupta PC. Biological and pharmacological properties of Terminalia chebula Retz. (Haritaki) – An overview. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016, 4(3), 62-68.
10. Anonymous. 2001. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. I. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi.29.
11. Anonymous. 1999. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. II. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi. 79-80.
12. Anonymous. 2004. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. IV. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi. 91-92.
13. Anonymous. 2001. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. III. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi. 193-194.
14. Anonymous. 2001. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. I. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi. 119.
15. Anonymous. 2001. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. I. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi. 103-104.
16. Anonymous. 2001. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, Part I, Vol. I. Govt. of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dept. of Indian Systems of Medicine, New Delhi. 47-48.
17. R Parthasarathy, R Ilavarasan, CM Karrunakaran. Pharmacognostical Studies on Thespesia populnea Bark. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2009; 1(2): 128-131.
18. Ashish Vaishnav, Anish Chandy, Deenanath Jhade , Sudhish Rai. Pharmacognostical and Preliminary Phytochemical Studies on Moringa olifera Leaves. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2011; 3(6): 272-274.
19. K. Venkata Ramana, M. Himaja Trivedi, P. Rama Krishna Reddy, T. L. Kalyani, K. Haritha Reddy, S. Mohana Lakshmi. Pharmacognostical Studies on Ficus nervosa Heyne Ex Roth Leaves. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2014; 6(2): 84-87.
20. M Prathapa Reddy, T R Shantha, V Rama Rao, G Venkateshwarlu. Pharmacognostical and Physicochemical Evaluation on the Flowers of Justicia adhatoda L. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2015; 7(2): 73-90.
21. Mushahida Parveen, Jayshree Narayanan. Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Erythrina stricta Roxb: Stem Bark. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2015; 7(3): 141-145.
22. R Parthasarathy, Amrender Singh, Debjit Bhowmik. Pharmacognostical studies on Thespesia populnea Leaf. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2016; 8(1): 16-20.
23. Harborne JB, Jackman H. Phytochemical methods. 2nd ed. London;1973.
24. Mahesh K. Senghani, Prakash S. Sukhramani, Sarav A. Desai, Ashvin V. Dudhrejia, Navin R. Sheth. Qualitative and Quantitative Standardization of Trikatu Churna. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2011; 3(4): 154-157.
25. Vidya S. Kukde, Mrunali A. Bhongade, Sweety S. Kamde. Standardization and Phytochemical Screening of Ficus religiosa. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(2):971-976.
26. Overton KH, Bently KH. Isolation Purification and Preliminary Observation in Elucidation of structures by Physical and Chemical Methods. New York: Inter Science Pub; 1963.
27. Hurakadli Swathi Basavaraj, Hebbar Chaithra S., Ravikrishna S., Suchitra Narayan Prabhu. Preliminary pytochemical screening and HPTLC finger printing of Clerodendrum inerme (L.) Gaertn. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2018; 10(2): 145-151.
28. Debashisha Panda, Santosh Kumar Dash, Gouri Kumar Dash. Preliminary phytochemical screening and Pharmacogcostic studies of the common weeds, Mimosa pudica Linn., Chromolaena odorata Linn. and Tragia involucrata Linn. collected from Ganjam District, Odisha: A Comparative Study. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2012; 4(2): 92-96.