Imelda Darmawi, Trimurni Abidin, Harry Agusnar, Basri A. Gani
email@example.com and , firstname.lastname@example.org
Imelda Darmawi,1 Trimurni Abidin1*, Harry Agusnar2, Basri A. Gani3*
1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
2Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.
3Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia.
Volume - 15,
Issue - 6,
Year - 2022
Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) plays a role in the pathogenesis of dental root canal infections. Chitosan has antibacterial properties and a chelating agent in the tooth root canal and is biodegradable and non-toxic. They analyzed the irrigation response of Chitosan nanoparticles to the virulence properties of E. faecalis in the dental root canal. Examination of E. faecalis virulence properties was carried out with violet crystals to obtain biofilm inhibition strength, Gram staining to determine lysis and coagulation of bacterial cells, and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) to analyze the surface roughness of the tooth root canal. Chitosan nanoparticles combined with 2.5% NaOCl has a strong inhibition of the formation of E. faecalis biofilm, both based on the control group (p> 0.05; 0.088) and incubation time of 48 h and 72 h, also inhibitory power, which was better at 24 h (p> 0.05; 0.185) than the other groups. Irrigation solution of Chitosan nanoparticles combined with 2.5% NaOCl has better lysis and cell agglutination of E. faecalis bacteria compared to other groups, especially at all incubation times, based on the control group (p> 0.05; 0.104) and incubation time (p> 0.05; 0.580) can reduce the surface roughness of the dental root canal, but the impact of giving irrigation materials to each treatment group with the incubation time showed significant differences (p<0.05). The Chitosan nanoparticles solution as an irrigation material has a strong ability to suppress the formation of biofilms, coagulation, and lysis of E. faecalis cells and better reduce the walls' surface roughness dental root canal at 24 hours incubation time.
Cite this article:
Imelda Darmawi, Trimurni Abidin, Harry Agusnar, Basri A. Gani. In Vitro Study of Irrigation solution of Chitosan Nanoparticles to Inhibit the Adhesion and Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus faecalis in the Root Canal. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(6):2691-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00450
Imelda Darmawi, Trimurni Abidin, Harry Agusnar, Basri A. Gani. In Vitro Study of Irrigation solution of Chitosan Nanoparticles to Inhibit the Adhesion and Biofilm Formation of Enterococcus faecalis in the Root Canal. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(6):2691-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00450 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-15-6-54
1. Oojashree, Roy A. In-vitro Antibacterial activity of Ethyl Acetate extract of Sesbania grandiflora leaf against E. faecalis – A root Canal threat. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(12):2147-2149. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00435.2
2. Wang Q-Q, Zhang C-F, Chu C-H, Zhu X-F. Prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis in saliva and filled root canals of teeth associated with apical periodontitis. International Journal of Oral Science. 2012;4(1):19-23. doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.17
3. Tandra DT , Gopinath P. Biofilm Formation Among Enterococci Species. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(11): 1877-1879.
4. Daw K, Baghdayan AS, Awasthi S, Shankar N. Biofilm and planktonic Enterococcus faecalis elicit different responses from host phagocytes in vitro. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2012;65(2):270-82. doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2012.00944.x
5. Zareen ZI, Prakasam G. Oral Biofilms. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(10):1812-1814. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00368.1
6. Chaugule VB, Panse AM, Gawali PN. Adverse reaction of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic treatment of primary teeth. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015;8(2):153. doi.org/10.5005%2Fjp-journals-10005-1304
7. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in endodontics. European Journal of Dentistry. 2013;7(S 01): S135-S42. doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.119091
8. Nasution AI, Soraya C, Nati S, Alibasyah ZM. Effect of Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid and RcPrep to Microstrain of Human Root Dentin. Journal of International Oral Health. 2016;8(1):32.
9. Rahimi S, Janani M, Lotfi M, et al. A review of antibacterial agents in endodontic treatment. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2014;9(3):161.
10. Seelan RG, Kumar A, Jonathan R, et al. Comparative evaluation of effect of different irrigation solutions against Enterococcus faecalis: A polymerase chain reaction-based study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2015;7(Suppl 2): S576. doi.org/10.4103%2F0975-7406.163546
11. Cheung RCF, Ng TB, Wong JH, Chan WY. Chitosan: an update on potential biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Marine Drugs. 2015;13(8):5156-86. doi.org/10.3390/md13085156
12. Walczak K, Thiele J, Geisler D, Boening K, Wieckiewicz M. Effect of Chemical Disinfection on Chitosan Coated PMMA and PETG Surfaces—An In Vitro Study. Polymers. 2018;10(5):536. doi.org/10.3390%2Fpolym10050536
13. Abidin T, Agusnar H, Wandania F. The effect of chitosan dentinogenesis and its derivatives on reversible dental pulp tissue inflammation. Research report of IPTEK Grant. Sumatera Utara University. 2007.
14. Silva P, Guedes DFC, Nakadi FV, Pécora JD, Cruz‐Filho AMd. Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation. International Endodontic Journal. 2013;46(4):332-38. doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02119.x
15. Gani BA, Bachtiar EW, Bachtiar BM. The Role of Cigarettes Smoke Condensate in Enhanced Candida albicans Virulence of Salivary Isolates Based on Time and Temperature. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2017;10:769-77.
16. Wang Y, Guo L-Y, Fang H-Z, et al. An in vitro study on the efficacy of removing calcium hydroxide from curved root canal systems in root canal therapy. International Journal of Oral Science. 2017;9(2):110-16. doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2017.14
17. Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G, Plotino G. The effect of root canal preparation on the surface roughness of WaveOne and WaveOne Gold files: atomic force microscopy study. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2017;43(1). doi.org/10.5395/rde.2018.43.e10
18. Odeyemi OA. Microtiter plate assay methods of classification of bacterial biofilm formation. Food Control. 2017(73):245-46. doi.org/10.1128/aem.68.6.2950-2958.2002
19. Kim S-H, Park C, Lee E-J, et al. Biofilm formation of Campylobacter strains isolated from raw chickens and its reduction with DNase I treatment. Food Control. 2017;71:94-100.
20. Kadurugamuwa JL, Sin L, Albert E, et al. Direct continuous method for monitoring biofilm infection in a mouse model. Infection Immunology. 2003;71(2):882-90. doi.org/10.1128/iai.71.2.882-890.2003
21. Batubara FY, Abidin T, Agusnar H. Effect of addition of nanoparticle chitosan to casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) on tooth remineralization. Dentika Dental Journal. 2014;18(1):16-16.
22. del Carpio-Perochena A, Kishen A, Felitti R, et al. Antibacterial properties of chitosan nanoparticles and propolis associated with calcium hydroxide against single-and multispecies biofilms: an in vitro and in situ study. Journal of Endodontics. 2017;43(8):1332-36. doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.017
23. Abbas HA, Serry FM, EL-Masry EM. Biofilms: The Microbial Castle of Resistance. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 6(1): Jan. 2013; Page 01-03.
24. Saha D, Tamrakar A. Xenobiotics, Oxidative Stress, Free Radicals Vs. Antioxidants: Dance Of Death to Heaven's Life. Asian Journal Research Pharmaceutica Sciences. 2011; 1(2):36-38.
25. Sheik R, Nasim I. Newer Root Canal Irrigants-A Review. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology 2016; 9(12):1451-1456. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00473.X
26. Helander I, Nurmiaho-Lassila E-L, Ahvenainen R, Rhoades J, Roller S. Chitosan disrupts the barrier properties of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2001;71(2-3):235-44. doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00609-2
27. Ramesh T, Thangaraj M, Kumaran R, Annadurai D, Subramanian J, S. Purushothaman MS. Synthesis, Characterization and Efficacy of Antibiotic Coated Chitosan Nanoparticles on Human Pathogens. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(8):3903-3908. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00691.5
28. Deepigaa M. Antibacterial Resistance of Bacteria in Biofilms. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10(11): 4019-4023. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00728.4
29. Fathima HM, Geetha RV. Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers in Combination with Clove Oil. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(8): 3355-3358. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00616.9
30. del Carpio-Perochena A, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, et al. Chelating and antibacterial properties of chitosan nanoparticles on dentin. Restorative Dentistry and endodontics. 2015;40(3):195-201. doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.195
31. Lanka-Divya, Bhagavan MRu, Sushil YR. Chitosan-Based Micro and Nanoparticles: A Promising System for Drug Delivery. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2014;7(12):1463-1471.
32. Pimenta JA, Zaparolli D, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM. Chitosan: effect of a new chelating agent on the microhardness of root dentin. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2012;23(3):212-17. doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000300005