Author(s): Amith A Singh, Ravi Gupta, Swetha, Bharath Rao

Email(s): ravi.gupta@manipal.edu

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00140   

Address: Amith A Singh1, Ravi Gupta2, Swetha3, Bharath Rao4
1Reader, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.
2Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
3Post Graduate, Department of Public Health, Prasanna School of Dental Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.
4Department of Oral Biology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 15,      Issue - 2,     Year - 2022


ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Restored teeth in the course of chewing or when exposed to thermal stimuli may lead to sensitivity. One of the significant reasons for sensitivity is microleakage. The repercussion of unaddressed microleakage leading to secondary caries and further on. The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of amongst different types of restorative materials which were silver amalgam and micro-hybrid composite resin with 7th generation bonding agent. And also to examine the effect of carbonated drink on microleakage. Materials and method: Forty extracted premolars were used for the study. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of the teeth, 1mm above the cementoenamel junction cervico-occlusal. Twenty cavities were restored with silver amalgam, and the remaining with composite resin. Group I and Group II both comprised of 10 teeth with silver amalgam restoration and ten teeth with composite resin restoration were immersed in the carbonated drink and water respectively for 15 minutes for ten days. The teeth were later immersed in methylene blue, sectioned and evaluated under a microscope. Statistical analyses used were Fisher's exact test. Result: Silver amalgam showed highest microleakage tendency in the carbonated drink, (P > 0.05). In water, silver amalgam had the least tendency for microleakage. However, composite resin did not statistically significant microleakage in both carbonated drink and water. Conclusion: The silver amalgam restorations showed microleakage in both carbonated drink and water. The microleakage was significantly higher in the carbonated beverage. On the other hand, composite resin restoration showed microleakage neither in carbonated drink nor water.


Cite this article:
Amith A Singh, Ravi Gupta, Swetha, Bharath Rao. Microleakage assessment using 7th generation bonding agent with micro-hybrid composite restoration immersed in a carbonated drink – an in vitro study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2):842-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00140

Cite(Electronic):
Amith A Singh, Ravi Gupta, Swetha, Bharath Rao. Microleakage assessment using 7th generation bonding agent with micro-hybrid composite restoration immersed in a carbonated drink – an in vitro study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2):842-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00140   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-15-2-60


REFERENCES:
1.    Alptekin T, Ozer F, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N, Blatz MB. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2010;
2.    Warreth A, Abuhijleh E, Almaghribi MA, Mahwal G, Ashawish A. Tooth surface loss: A review of literature. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2020 Feb;32(2):53–60. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1013905219306571
3.    Kiruthika Patturaja, Pradeep. D. Awareness of Basic Dental Procedure among General Population. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2016; 9(9):1349-1351.
4.    Ilankizhai R. J.. Dental Fluorosis and Its Management – A Review. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(7):967-971.
5.    Chitra P PR. The Effect of Three Commonly Consumed Soft Drinks on Bracket Bond Strengths, Microleakage and Adhesive Remnant Index: An In-Vitro Study. Paripex Indian J Res. 2014;3(10):129–32.
6.    Katge F, Shitoot A, Pammi T, Mithiborwala S. Evaluation of microleakage of nanoionomer and nanocomposite restorations, immersed in fruit drink, fresh fruit juice and soft drink -An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;
7.    Aurélio M, Vitti RP, Alexandre M, Sinhoreti C, Leonardo R, Consani X, et al. Evaluation of the Surface Roughness and Microleakage of Dental Composites Exposed to Different Beverages. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;
8.    Awad MA, El Kassas D, Al Harthi L, Abraham S, Al‐Khalifa K, Khalaf M, et al. Dentine hypersensitivity and dentine exposure in Arab patient populations. J Oral Rehabil [Internet]. 2020 Apr 19;47(4):473–9. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joor.12927
9.    Patel MU, Punia SK, Bhat S, Singh G, Bhargava R, Goyal P, et al. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of posterior teeth restored with amalgam, composite and zirconomer – A stereomicroscopic study. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2015.
10.    Lopes Coutinho TC, Almeida Tostes M. Comparison of microleakage of different margin types around Class V resin restorations in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;
11.    Popoff DAV, Gonçalves FS, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mjör IA. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: A microleakage study. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;
12.    Yap AU, Lim CC, Neo JC. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int. 1995;
13.    M. Dilip Kumar, S. Subash Sharma. Do composites induce secondary caries formation?- A Review. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(1): 362-364.
14.    Yu-Ri Choi, Min-Kyung Kang. Effect of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on Adhesion Capability in Cementation of Composite Resin Inlay. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(6): 2561-2564
15.    R. Monalisa, Jayalakshmi. A Comparative study on the occurrence of Internal Voids in Composite Restoration Using Different Incremental Techniques. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2016; 9(10):1596-1598.
16.    Ashok Kumar Popuri. Casein Composites as Alternative Biodegradable Polymers. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(1): 17-22.
17.    Jembulingam Sabarathinam, N. P. Muralidharan, Pradeep. Evaluations of Micro-Leakage in Composite Resin Restoration, Glass Ionomer Cement Restoration and Traditional Amalgam Restoration using Streptococcus mutans. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(11): 5341-5344.
18.    Narendiranath Babu T, Akash Kumar Singh, Anil Mandliya, Avneesh Singh, Rama Prabha D. Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Epoxy Resin Based hybrid Composites Reinforced with Jute, Banana and Flax Natural Fibers for Bio medical applications. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(2): 547-552.
19.    G. Nithya Karpagam, Mahesh, Shanmugavel. Patients Needs and Expectations on Dental Treatment. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(7):933-936.
20.    Amina Mehrin Bano, G. Kaarthikeyan. The Knowledge and the Extent of Execution of Oral Hygiene in Undergraduate Dental Students. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(6): 711-715 .

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

0.38
2018CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available