K Usha S Pai, Yadav D. Bodke, M Manjunath Setty, Savaliya Mihir, Keerthi Priya, K Sreedhara Ranganath Pai
K Usha S Pai1, Yadav D. Bodke1*, M Manjunath Setty2, Savaliya Mihir2, Keerthi Priya2, K Sreedhara Ranganath Pai3*
1Department of Industrial Chemistry, Kuvempu University, Jnanasahyadri, Shankarghatta - 577451, Karnataka.
2Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Karnataka, India.
3Department of Pharmacognosy, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Karnataka, India.
Volume - 14,
Issue - 10,
Year - 2021
Cancer is one of the major causes of death in the world today. Although chemotherapeutic regimen remains the prime treatment of cancer, it is important to explore for newer compounds due to their adverse reactions and the growing rate of resistance. Traditionally, some plants are used for the treatment of cancers in India. However, no scientific data backing the evidence exists for the same. Among such plants is Cleome viscosa Linn, which is used in the Indian system of medicine for cancer treatment. To test its anticancer activity and generate scientifically reliable data, the extraction of whole plant has been carried out using methanol and fractions were generated using petroleum ether, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and n-butanol. The fractions were first tested in vitro for their antiproliferative activity and mechanistic studies. In this paper, we report the anticancer potential of the fractions by a preliminary cytotoxicity activity in vitro using cell lines followed by the liquid tumor (EAC) model in mice. Upon screening on a panel of cancer cell lines, the fractions of petroleum ether, dichloromethane and ethyl acetate were found to possess significant cytotoxic activity on Hela and U343 cell lines. With this evidence, we have then tested the in vivo activity on mice using the liquid tumor model in which the fractions of pet ether, dichloromethane and ethyl acetate exhibit a potential anticancer activity which is evident in characteristics like inhibition of tumor progression, increase in the mean survival time and percentage increased life span along with a decrease in tumor volume. The fractions also showed significant anti-oxidant properties.
Cite this article:
K Usha S Pai, Yadav D. Bodke, M Manjunath Setty, Savaliya Mihir, Keerthi Priya, K Sreedhara Ranganath Pai. Cleome Viscosa Exhibits Cytotoxicity in Vitro and improves Tumor Inhibitory Properties in Vivo in Liquid Tumor Model. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2021; 14(10):5397-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00941
K Usha S Pai, Yadav D. Bodke, M Manjunath Setty, Savaliya Mihir, Keerthi Priya, K Sreedhara Ranganath Pai. Cleome Viscosa Exhibits Cytotoxicity in Vitro and improves Tumor Inhibitory Properties in Vivo in Liquid Tumor Model. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2021; 14(10):5397-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00941 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-14-10-59
1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J Nat Prod. 2007;70 (3):461-477. doi:10.1021/np068054v
2. Surh YJ. Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3 (10):768-780. doi:10.1038/nrc1189
3. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420 (6917):860-867. doi:10.1038/nature01322
4. Cai Y, Luo Q, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Sci. 2004;74 (17):2157-2184. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047
5. Albini A, Tosetti F, Benelli R, Noonan DM. Tumor inflammatory angiogenesis and its chemoprevention. Cancer Res. 2005;65 (23):10637-10641. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3473
6. Ranjan A, Ramachandran S, Gupta N, et al. Role of Phytochemicals in Cancer Prevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20 (20):4981. Published 2019 Oct 9. doi:10.3390/ijms20204981
7. Kotecha R, Takami A, Espinoza JL. Dietary phytochemicals and cancer chemoprevention: a review of the clinical evidence. Oncotarget. 2016;7 (32): 52517-52529. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9593
8. Thomasset SC, Berry DP, Garcea G, Marczylo T, Steward WP, Gescher AJ. Dietary polyphenolic phytochemicals--promising cancer chemopreventive agents in humans? A review of their clinical properties. Int J Cancer. 2007;120 (3): 451-458. doi:10.1002/ijc.22419
9. Nadkarni AK (1982): The Indian Materia Medica, Vol. I. Bombay, Popular Prakashan, pp. 351–352.
10. Lenkalapally Matsyagiri, Kommu Sudhakar, Takkadpelliwar Santoshi, Masna Nagarjuna, N. L. Gowrishankar. A Review on Medicinal Uses and Pharmacological Effects of Cleome viscosa. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2012; 4(1): 44-48.
11. Sahu P, Gupta S, Monideepa Banerjee, Charles Lekhya Priya, Kokati Venkata Bhaskara Rao. Phytochemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Hemolytic activity and HPLC analysis of Ethanolic Extract of Cleome viscosa Linn. Stems. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2014; 7(10): 1140-1144.
12. Ray AB, Chattopadhyay SK, Konno C, Hikino H. Structure of cleomiscosin A, a coumarino-lignoid of Cleome viscosa seeds. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980; 21: 4477–4480.
13. Ray AB, Chattopadhyay SK, Konno C, Hikino H. CleomiscosinB, a coumarino-lignan from seeds of Cleome viscosa. Heterocycles. 1982;19: 19–20.
14. Srivastava SK, Chauhan JS, Srivastava SD. A new naringenin glycoside from Cleome viscose. Phytochemistry. 1979;18: 2057–2058.
15. Chauhan JS, Srivastava SK, Srivastava SD. Kaempferide 3-glucuronide from the roots of Cleome viscosa. Phytochemistry. 1979;18: 691–692.
16. Songsak T, Lockwood GB. Glucosinolates of seven medicinal plants from Thailand. Fitoterapia 2002;73: 209–216.
17. Rajput N, Dinesh Sachan, Shikha Gangwar, Dipti Sachan. Medicinal properties of Cleome viscose: A Critical Review. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012;5 (6): 753-756.
18. Parimaladevi B, Boominathan R, Mandal SC. Studies on analgesic activity of Cleome viscosa in mice. Fitoterapia. 2003;74 (3):262-266. doi:10.1016/s0367-326x(03)00020-04
19. Pillai LS, Nair BR. A comparative study of the anthelmintic potential of cleome viscosa L. And Cleome burmanni. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011;73 (1): 98-100. doi:10.4103/0250-474X.89766
20. Devi BP, Boominathan R, Mandal SC. Evaluation of anti-diarrheal activity of Cleome viscosa L. extract in rats. Phytomedicine. 2002;9 (8): 739-742. doi:10.1078/094471102321621368
21. Rani S M, Raja Sreekanth M, Emmanuel S. Evaluation of the Wound-Healing Activity of Methanolic Extract of Cleome Viscosa Linn. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2011;4 (3): 441-445.
22. Saxena, B.R., M.C. Koli and R.C. Saxena. Preliminary ethnomedical and phytochemical study of Cleome viscosa L. Ethnobotany. 2000;12: 47-50.
23. Sudhakar M, Rao ChV, Rao PM, Raju DB. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Cleome viscosa and Gmelina asiatica. Fitoterapia. 2006;77 (1):47-49. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2005.08.003
24. Poonia Lalita, Singh Gajendra Kamal, Nagori Badri Prakash. Anti-ulcer activity of Cleome viscose linn. against gastric ulcer in rats. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2013; 5(3): 115-118.
25. Salla Pujitha, A. Jaswanth, A. Ganesh, Irfana Begum, Noor Jahan. Evaluation of Anticancer activity of Maytenus emarginata on Ehrlich’s Ascites Carcinoma treated mice. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2018; 8(3):133-136.
26. Gopal M, Shenoy S. & Doddamani LS. Antitumor activity of 4-amino and 8-methyl-4-(3diethylamino propylamino)pyrimido[4',5':4,5] thieno (2,3-b) quinolines. J Photochem Photobiol B, 72, 69-78.
27. Sridharamurthy NB, Yogananda R and Riyaz Mahamood. Effect of Root Extracts and Isolated Compounds of Xanthium strumarium L. on Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in Mice. Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2011;3 (4): 158-167.
28. Vijayabaskaran M, Babu G, Venkateswaramurthy N, Sivakumar P, Perumal V, Sivakumar T, Sambathkumar R, Jayakar B. Antitumor Activity and Antioxidant Role of Ethanolic Extract of Pseudarthria viscida Linn against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma. Asian J. Research Chem. 2011;4 (1): 110-113.
29. Giustarini D, Dalle-Donne I, Milzani A, Fanti P, Rossi R. Analysis of GSH and GSSG after derivatization with N-ethylmaleimide. Nat Protoc. 2013; 8(9): 1660-9.
30. Kumar KC S, Muller K. Medicinal plants from Nepal; II Evaluation as inhibitors of lipid peroxidation in biological membranes. J ethnopharmacol. 1999; 64(2): 135-139.
31. Khare P, Kamal Kishore, Dinesh Kumar Sharma. Catalase and Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) activity in Swiss Albino mice treated with Ethanolic leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2019; 12(9):4259-4262. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00732.7
32. Kuninaka S, Ichinose Y, Koja K, Toh Y. Suppression of manganese superoxide dismutase augments sensitivity to radiation, hyperthermia and doxorubicin in colon cancer cell lines by inducing apoptosis. Br J Cancer. 2000; 83(7): 928–934.
33. Kaynar H, Meral M, Turhan H, Keles M, Celik G, Akcay F. Glutathione peroxidase, glutathione-S-transferase, catalase, xanthine oxidase, Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase activities, total glutathione, nitric oxide, and malondialdehyde levels in erythrocytes of patients with small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Let. 2005; 227(2): 133-9.
34. Sedlak J. & Lindsay RH. Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent. Anal Biochem. 1968;25: 192-205.
35. Dolai N, Karmakar I, Suresh Kumar RB, Kar B, Bala A, Haldar PK. Evaluation of antitumor activity and in vivo antioxidant status of Anthocephalus cadamba on Ehrlich ascites carcinoma treated mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;142:865–70.
36. Samudrala PK, Augustine BB, Kasala ER, Bodduluru LN, Barua C, Lahkar M. Evaluation of antitumor activity and antioxidant status of Alternanthera brasiliana against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in Swiss albino mice. Pharmacognosy Res. 2015;7 (1):66-73. doi:10.4103/0974-8490.147211.