Ramya Ravi, Manthan D Janodia
email@example.com , firstname.lastname@example.org
Ramya Ravi1, Manthan D Janodia2
1Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576104.
2Professor and Head of Department of Pharmacy Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal – 576104.
Volume - 13,
Issue - 10,
Year - 2020
Translation of research and innovation from universities or academic institutions to market for societal benefits demand substantial and persistent efforts. This could be achieved through various means and one of the most preferred method of translating university research into commercially viable product is through technology transfer or technology licensing. This urges on establishing technology transfer offices in universities/academia comprising a group of experts from various fields focusing on protecting and commercializing inventions disclosed by faculty members, students or other stakeholders of the organization. This paper discusses various successful strategies and technology transfer models between industry and academia in developed nations as well as a few important success factors. It also provides an insight on evolution of technology transfer practices (governing Acts and legislation) and current status of technology transfer in India.
Cite this article:
Ramya Ravi, Manthan D Janodia. Academia- Industry Technology transfer – A detailed study on Indian Scenario at Global platform. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(10):4981-4989. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00873.2
1. Nandagopal M. Commercializing technologies from universities and research institutes in India: Some insights from the US experience. Curr Sci. 2013; 104(2):183–9.
2. Wright BD, Drivas K, Lei Z, Merrill SA. Industry-funded academic inventions boost innovation. Nature. 2014; 507(7492):297–9.
3. Srivastava P, Chandra S. Technology commercialization: Indian university perspective. J Technol Manag Innov. 2012; 7(4):121–31.
4. Pagar S, Khivansara A, Pagar P, Gandhi M, Jondhale S. Review Article on Technology Transfer. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2014; 2(3):145–53.
5. World Health Organization. Annex 7 WHO guidelines on transfer of technology. WHO Tech Rep Ser No 961, 2011. 2011; (961):285–309.
6. Carsten F, World Intellectual Property Organisation. Patents and Technology Transfer: An Overview. (Special WIPO Economics Seminar) Geneva December 5, 2001.
7. World Intellectual Property Organisation. Transfer of Technolgoy. Fourteenth Session Geneva, January 25 to 29, 2010.
8. Bradley SR, Hayter CS, Link AN. Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer. Found Trends® Entrep [Internet]. 2013; 9(6):571–650. Available from: http://nowpublishers.com/articles/foundations-and-trends-in-entrepreneurship/ENT-048.
9. G. Waugaman P, G. Tornatzky L, O. Gray D. Industry-University Technology Transfer: Models of Alternative Practice, Policy, and Program. 1999; 1–33.
10. Wapner J. The leap to industry. Nature. 2016; 533- S13-5.
11. Intellectual S, Office P, Patents COF, Ventures J, Pitfalls ATHE, Issues C. Two basic types of technology transfer Edwin Mansfield, the noted American economist, makes a useful distinction between. 1997;
12. Assets IP, Series M. Successful Technology Licensing. WIPO. 2004; (903):1–52.
13. Erauw J, Stonier J. Exchanging value: negotiating technology licensing agreements. 2005; 1–181. Available from: https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/317106
14. Lane JP. Understanding Technology Transfer. Assist Technol. 1999; 11(1):5–19.
15. Nandagopal M, Gala K, Premnath V. Improving technology commercialization at research institutes : Practical insights from NCL Innovations. Innov Educ Conf (IEC), Indian Sch Business, Hyderabad. 2011; 1–12.
16. Ranga M, Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Vol. 27. 2013. 1-48 p.
17. Lawton Smith H, Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges. Prometheus [Internet]. 2014; 32(4):321–36. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08109028.2014.972135.
18. Transfer T, Manual P. A Philosophy of Licensing and Technology Transfer for Academic and Nonprofit Research Institutions. 2006; 2(January).
19. Axanova L. U.S. Academic Technology Transfer Models: Traditional, Experimental And Hypothetical. Les Nouv. 2006;
20. Coupé T. Science Is Golden: Academic RandD and University Patents. J Technol Transf. 2003; 28(1):31–46.
21. Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) | Data [Internet]. [cited 2018 Apr 30]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=ILandpage=1
22. Messer-Yaron H. Technology Transfer Policy in Israel. 2014; Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/jrc/events/20140120-tto-circle/jrc-20140120-tto-circle-messer.pdf
23. Strom R. University Technology transfer through Entrepreneurship Uzi De-Haan Technion – Israel Institute of Technology. 2012; (August).
24. Session E. Standing Committee on the Law of Patents. 2012; (October 2007):1–15.
25. Goondli KS. “ An update on the Indian Patent Information and Modernization ” Intellectual Property India Organization. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/aspac/en/wipo_reg_ip_mnl_10/wipo_reg_ip_mnl_10_ref_u_india.pdf
26. Kumar V, Jain PK. Commercializing new technologies in India a perspective on policy initiatives. Technology in Society 24 (2002): 285-298.
27. Hyndman KG, Gruskin SM, Iyer CS. Technology Transfer: What India can learn from the United States. J Intellect Prop Rights. 2005; 10(September):399–405.
28. Singh R, Tare S. India’s Emerging Technology Commercialization Policy: Lessons From The American Model. J Emerg Knowl Emerg Mark [Internet]. 2010; 2(1):129–57. Available from: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jekem/vol2/iss1/10
29. Gulbranson CA, Audretsch DB. Proof of concept centers: Accelerating the commercialization of university innovation. J Technol Transf. 2008; 33(3):249–58.