ABSTRACT:
Background: The shoulder prosthesis design resulted in significant reductions in loss of work force and mortality if industries manufacturing prostheses design and manufacture prostheses according to the morphometric data of the population of their own country. Objectives: This morphometric evaluation was proposed to find a correspondence of the anthropometric parameters measured at the proximal and distal humeral parts of humerus. Materials and methods: The claims of this study were appraised on radiographs of dry bones. In this study, (20) dry bones available in the anatomy museum of the department of human anatomy/College of medicine/ Al-Nahrain University were used. The parameters measured on the X-ray of dry bones at the proximal and the distal parts of humerus were statistically compared and evaluated. Results: Significant and high significant correlations found for the parameters provide regression equations for them; these equations allow extraction of missing limit from an available one. Accordingly, statistical regression equations has been concluded for the parameters of the proximal part of the x-ray of dry bone from the values obtained from comparable parameter of the distal part of the x-ray of dry bone. Conclusions: The statistical evaluation upraised the theory of "recapitulation" and introducing a scheme for mathematic reprocessing of approximate estimation for the proper choice of humeral head arthroplasty depending on plain X-imaging to the proximal and distal part of the humerus.
Cite this article:
Safa Abdul Nasser Fadhil, Hayder Jawad Mubarak. A Morphometric Evaluation of the Humerus in relation to Shoulder Arthroplasty. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(10):4817-4822. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00847.1
Cite(Electronic):
Safa Abdul Nasser Fadhil, Hayder Jawad Mubarak. A Morphometric Evaluation of the Humerus in relation to Shoulder Arthroplasty. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(10):4817-4822. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00847.1 Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2020-13-10-50
REFERENCES:
1. Ahmed, Y.A., L. Tatarczuch, C.N. Pagel, H.M. Davies, M. Mirams and E.J. Mackie. Physiological death of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cart.2007, 15: 575-586.
2. Akman, Ş. D., Karakaş, P., and Bozkir, M. G. The morphometric measurements of humerus segments. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences.2006, 36(2), 81-85.
3. Allen, G. M. The diagnosis and management of shoulder pain. Journal of ultrasonography.2018, 18(74), 234-239.
4. Ashiyani, Z. A., Solanki, S., and Mehta, C. D. (2017). The Morphometric Measurement of Segments of Humerus. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science.2017, 4(1), 38-40).
5. Desai, S. J., Deluce, S., Johnson, J. A., Ferreira, L. M., Leclerc, A. E., Athwal, G. S., and King, G. J. An anthropometric study of the distal humerus. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.2014 23(4), 463-469.
6. Attum, B., and Thompson, J. H. Humerus Fractures Overview. In Stat Pearls [Internet]. Stat Pearls Publishing.2019.
7. Aydin Kabakci, A. D., Buyukmumcu, M., Yilmaz, M. T., Cicekcibasi, A. E., Akin, D., and Cihan, E. Estudio Osteométrico Del Húmero. International Journal of Morphology.2017, 35(1), 219-226.
8. Barvencik, F., Gebauer, M., Beil, F. T., Vettorazzi, E., Mumme, M., Rupprecht, M., and Amling, M. Age‐and sex‐related changes of humeral head microarchitecture: Histomorphometric analysis of 60 human specimens. Journal of orthopaedic research. 2010, 28(1), 18-26.
9. Benegas, E., Zoppi Filho, A., Ferreira Filho, A. A., Neto, A. A. F., Negri, J. H., Prada, F. S., and Zumiotti, A. V. Surgical treatment of varus malunion of the proximal humerus with valgus osteotomy. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.2007, 16(1), 55-59.
10. Bernat, A., Huysmans, T., Van Glabbeek, F., Sijbers, J., Gielen, J., and Van Tongel, A. The anatomy of the clavicle: A Three‐dimensional Cadaveric Study. Clinical Anatomy.2014, 27(5), 712-723.
11. Blitz, E., Sharir, A., Akiyama, H., and Zelzer, E. Tendon-bone attachment unit is formed modularly by a distinct pool of Scx-and Sox9-positive progenitors. Development.2013, 140(13), 2680-2690.
12. Blumer, M. J. F., Fritsch, H., Pfaller, K., and Brenner, E. Cartilage canals in the chicken embryo: ultrastructure and function. Anatomy and embryology.2004, 207(6), 453-462.
13. Bogart, B. I. Elsevier\'s Integrated Anatomy and Embryology, 2007.
14. Boudreau, S., Boudreau, E. D., Higgins, L. D., and Wilcox III, R. B. Rehabilitation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.2007, 37(12), 734-743.
15. Brems, J. J. Biomechanics of Shoulder arthroplasty: Lessons learned. In Orthopaedic Proceedings, The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2002, 84, No. SUPP_II, pp. 174-174.
16. Brown, S. A. N., Doolittle, D. A., Bohanon, C. J., Jayaraj, A., Naidu, S. G., Huettl, E. A., and Wysokinski, W. E. Quadrilateral space syndrome: the Mayo Clinic experience with a new classification system and case series. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Elsevier..2015, 90, 3, pp. 382-394.
17. Capo JT, Criner KT, Shamian B. Exposures of the humerus for fracture fixation. Hand Clin. 2014, 30(4):401-14, v.
18. Chen, K. S., Tatarczuch, L., Mirams, M., Ahmed, Y. A., Pagel, C. N., and Mackie, E. J. Periostin expression distinguishes between light and dark hypertrophic chondrocytes. The international journal of biochemistry and cell biology.2010, 42(6), 880-889.
19. Churchill, R. S. Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: current status. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.2014, 23(9), 1409-1414.
20. Craig, R. S., Lane, J. C., Carr, A. J., Furniss, D., Collins, G. S., and Rees, J. L. Serious adverse events and lifetime risk of reoperation after elective shoulder replacement: population based cohort study using hospital episode statistics for England. Bmj.2019, 364, l298.
21. Curtis, A. S., Burbank, K. M., Tierney, J. J., Scheller, A. D., and Curran, A. R. The insertional footprint of the rotator cuff: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery.2006, 22(6), 603-609.
22. Dancker, M., Lambert, S., and Brenner, E. Teres major muscle–insertion footprint. Journal of anatomy.2017, 230(5), 631-638.
23. De Wilde, L., and Van Tongel, A. The history of shoulder arthroplasty. In Joint Replacement Technology , Woodhead Publishing.2014, pp. 571-601.
24. Della valle, C., Parvizi, J., Bauer, T. W., Dicesare, P. E., Evans, R. P., Segreti, J., Spangehl, M., Watters III, W. C., Keith, M. and Trkelson, C. M. J. J. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee.2011, 93, 1355-1357.
25. DeLude, J. A., Bicknell, R. T., Mac Kenzie, G. A., Ferreira, L. M., Dunning, C. E., King, G. J. and Drosdowech, D. S. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.2007, 16(4), 477-483.
26. Drake, R. L., Vogl, W., and Mitchell, A. W. Gray’s anatomy for students. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone. Elsevier, 2010.
27. Epperson, T. N., and Varacallo, M. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Sternoclavicular Joint. In Stat Pearls [Internet]. Stat Pearls Publishing, 2019.
28. Forell, G. V., Robertson, D., Lee, S. Y., and Cook, D. D. Preventing lodging in bioenergy crops: a biomechanical analysis of maize stalks suggests a new approach. Journal of experimental botany.2015, 66(14), 4367-4371.
29. Frank, R. M., Forsythe, B., and Provencher, M. T. Case Competencies in Orthopaedic Surgery E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.2016.
30. Friedman, R. J. Prospective analysis of total shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ).1997, 26(4), 265-270.
31. Gangavarapu Sreedevi, Muralidhar Reddy Sangam. The study of morphology and morphometry of Acetabulum ondry bones. Int J Anat Res.2017, 5(4.2):4558-4562.
32. Gregory, T. M., Boukebous, B., Gregory, J., Pierrart, J., and Masemjean, E. Suppl-6, M6: Short, Medium and Long Term Complications After Total Anatomical Shoulder Arthroplasty. The open orthopaedics journal.2017, 11, 1133.
33. Gregory, T., Hansen, U., Emery, R. J., Augereau, B., and Amis, A. A. Developments in shoulder arthroplasty. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine.2007, 221(1), 87-96.
34. Hamilton MA, Diep P, Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Routman H. Effect of reverse shoulder design philosophy on muscle moment arms. J. Orthop. Res. Apr.2015, 33(4):605-13.
35. Hita‐Contreras, F., Sánchez‐Montesinos, I., Martínez‐Amat, A., Cruz‐Díaz, D., Barranco, R. J., and Roda, O. Development of the human shoulder joint during the embryonic and early fetal stages: anatomical considerations for clinical practice. Journal of anatomy.2018, 232(3), 422-430.
36. Ilayperuma, I., Nanayakkara, B. G., Hasan, R., Uluwitiya, S. M., and Palahepitiya, K. N. Coracobrachialis muscle: morphology, morphometry and gender differences. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.2016, 38(3), 335-340.
37. Inman, V. T., Saunders, J. D. M., and Abbott, L. C. Observations on the function of the shoulder joint. JBJS.1944, 26(1), 1-30.
38. Iyem, C., Serbest, S., Inal, M., Burulday, V., Kaya, A., Kultur, T., and Tiftikci, U. A morphometric evaluation of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty, 2017.