Author(s): Manoj Abraham M, Teh Shiueh Tyng, K. Rekha, Shanmugananth E, Kiruthika S

Email(s): manojpt3@gmail.com

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.01010.7   

Address: Manoj Abraham M*1, Teh Shiueh Tyng2, K. Rekha3, Shanmugananth E4, Kiruthika S5
1Professor and Principal, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Chennai.
2 BPT Student, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia
3Assistant Professor, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Chennai.
4Associate Professor, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Chennai.
5Tutor, Saveetha College of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Chennai.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 11,      Issue - 12,     Year - 2018


ABSTRACT:
The diabetes situation in Malaysia is about 3.5 million or 17.5 per cent of its citizens aged 18 years and above are Diabetic. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is common and frequent cause of morbidity and disability. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are important to prevent disease complications, especially diabetic foot and ulceration. The aim of this research was to find out the prevalence of DPN, to determine which of the 4 screening methods (Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI), Ankle Reflexes, 128-Hz Tuning Fork Test and 10-g Monofilament) was more reliable in screening for DPN and any correlation between them. A cross-sectional study with a random sample size of (N=81), type 2 diabetes mellitus participants in Diabetes Malaysia headquarters were screened for presence of DPN by using 4 different methods. Reliability and correlation between the 4 screening methods were calculated. The prevalence of DPN was 46.91% using MNSI. Prevalence of DPN using 10-g Monofilament test was highest (45.68%) and ankle reflexes were lowest (17.28%). Statistical significant associations were found between 10-g monofilament, MNSI Score, right and left ankle reflex, 128-Hz Tuning Fork Test on the right and left great toe. There was positive correlation between 4 screening methods and were reliable to be used to screen for DPN in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. However MNSI and 10-g Monofilament test were more appropriate and reliable in screening for DPN.


Cite this article:
Manoj Abraham M, Teh Shiueh Tyng, K. Rekha, Shanmugananth E, Kiruthika S. Comparison of Four Screening Methods for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross Sectional Study. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(12): 5551-5558. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.01010.7

Cite(Electronic):
Manoj Abraham M, Teh Shiueh Tyng, K. Rekha, Shanmugananth E, Kiruthika S. Comparison of Four Screening Methods for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross Sectional Study. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(12): 5551-5558. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.01010.7   Available on: https://rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2018-11-12-59


Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available