Author(s): Abdulkareem Umar, Nordin Bin Simbak, Naresh Bhaskar Raj, Aisha Ahmad, Shmaila Hanif, Ashiru Hamza Muhammad, Mahadeva Rao US

Email(s): bnaresh@unisza.edu.my

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00590.X   

Address: Abdulkareem Umar1*, Nordin Bin Simbak2, Naresh Bhaskar Raj3, Aisha Ahmad4, Shmaila Hanif4, Ashiru Hamza Muhammad4, Mahadeva Rao US5
1Postgraduate Student, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), 20400, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu Darul Iman Malaysia.
2Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), 20400, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu Darul Iman Malaysia.
3Lecturer, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), 21300, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu Darul Iman Malaysia.
4Lecturer, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Science, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.
5Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), 20400, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu Darul Iman Malaysia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 10,      Issue - 10,     Year - 2017


ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of combining anodal cortical and back muscle stimulations in chronic low back pain (CLBP). Forty eight patients divided into four groups participated in the study. The control group received infrared therapy (IRT) and a session soft tissue massage (STM), while those in the other groups received combined dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and Back muscle stimulation plus IRT and STM, combine primary motor cortex (PMC) and Back muscle stimulations plus IRT and STM and Williams flexion exercise plus IRT and STM respectively. The primary outcome (disability level) was assessed using modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire while bothersome questionnaire (secondary outcome) was used to assess the level of bothersome of the participants. Statistical analysis revealed that participants that received DLPFC/Back muscle stimulation plus IRT and STM (p=0. 046, z=-2.02) have much improvement in disability compare to those that received PMC /Back muscle stimulations plus IRT and STM. In addition, the control intervention (IRT and STM) proves to be more effective (P=0.025, Z=-2.24) compare to other groups. It is concluded that IRT and a session of STM is more effective in the reduction of disability and improvement of the functions in CLBP than the combine stimulations, but the result cannot be generalized because of the small sample size and type of design used in this clinical trial.


Cite this article:
Abdulkareem Umar, Nordin Bin Simbak, Naresh Bhaskar Raj, Aisha Ahmad, Shmaila Hanif, Ashiru Hamza Muhammad, Mahadeva Rao US. Effect of Combined Brain and Back Muscle Stimulations on Level of Physical Disability among Chronic Low Back Pain Patients. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2017; 10(10):3326-3330. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00590.X


Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): M. Dilip Kumar

DOI: Not Available         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Abdulkareem Umar, Nordin Bin Simbak, Naresh Bhaskar Raj, Aisha Ahmad, Shmaila Hanif, Ashiru Hamza Muhammad, Mahadeva Rao US

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00590.X         Access: Open Access Read More

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

0.38
2018CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags