Author(s): Hisham A. Abbas, Mona A. El-Sayed, Laila M. Al-Kadi, Amany I. Gad

Email(s): h_abdelmonem@yahoo.com

DOI: Not Available

Address: Hisham A. Abbas1*, Mona A. El-Sayed1, Laila M. Al-Kadi2, Amany I. Gad1
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University- Zagazig- Egypt
2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University- Zagazig- Egypt
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 7,      Issue - 7,     Year - 2014


ABSTRACT:
This study aimed to investigate the etiologic agents of diabetic foot infections, their antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation ability. 50 non-repetitive samples were taken during a six-month period. Isolation and identification of pathogens were done according to standard procedures. The sensitivity to antimicrobial agents was determined by the disc diffusion method and the assessment of biofilm production was performed by the tube method. Negative cultures were found in 4 (8%) samples. Polymicrobial infections were found in 22 (44%) samples. A total of 75 bacteria were isolated with an isolation ratio of 1.63 bacteria per patient. Gram-positive cocci were observed in 14.67% of isolates and Gram-negative bacilli in 85.33% of isolates. The most frequent organisms isolated were Proteus mirabilis (20%), E. coli (18.67%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus (10.67% each). Fifty one strains were isolated in polymicrobial cultures. Proteus mirabilis (21.57%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.61%), E. coli (15.69%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.76%), and Staphylococcus aureus (7.84%) were the most common organisms recovered in polymicrobial infections. Imipenem was the most effective antibiotic against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates. High resistance was shown by Acinetobacter baumanii (90.91%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (81.12%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (80%), E. coli (75.97%), Pseudomonas spp. (65.73%), Enterococcus faecalis (60%), Citrobacter freundii (54.55%), Proteus spp. (46.97%), while the least resistance was observed with Staphylococcus aureus (23.75%). Biofilm production was positive in 70 isolates (93.33%). Among these isolates 44.29% were assessed as strong biofilm forming. Six gram-positive isolates (54.55%) and 31 isolates (48.44%) of gram-negative bacilli were strong biofilm forming. Among the common isolated pathogens, Proteus mirabilis was the predominant strong biofilm producer (80%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococcus aureus (50% each) and E.coli (28.57%). Resistance to antibiotics was higher among biofilm forming isolates than non-biofilm forming ones. Multidrug resistance was found in 81.33% of isolates. Gram-negative bacilli showed higher multidrug resistance (89.06%) than gram-positive cocci (36.36%). The most frequent multidrug resistance pathogens were E. coli (21.31%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis (19.67% each) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.11%). Biofilm production was correlated with multidrug resistance. In 90.16% of MDR pathogens, biofilm formation was positive. The most common MDR biofilm producer pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis (21.82% each), E. coli (18.18%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.73%). Due to the great involvement of diabetic foot ulcer in non-traumatic foot amputations, it is of significance to identify the causative pathogens of these ulcers, their antibiogram and biofilm formation in order to select the proper therapy.


Cite this article:
Hisham A. Abbas, Mona A. El-Sayed, Laila M. Al-Kadi, Amany I. Gad. Diabetic foot infections in Zagazig University Hospital: bacterial etiology, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 7(7): July 2014 Page 783-788.


Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Abhirup Dey, Mangala Lakshmi Ragavan, Sanjeeb Kumar Mandal, Nilanjana Das

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00136.6         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Santhosh Kumar V, Praveen D

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00123.2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Leelavathi D Acharya, N R Rau, N Udupa, Surulivel Rajan M, Vijayanarayana K

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00162.1         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Vandana Gautam, Dhriti Kapoor, Saroj Arora, Renu Bhardwaj*

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00166.9         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): A. Julius, Ramachandran Vedasendiyar, Archana Devakannan, Sujatha Rajaraman, Balamurugan Rangasamy, V. Saravanan

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00062.2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): T. Arunkumar, Ann Feba Ebby, G. Narendrakumar

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00441.3         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Dhanalekshmi UnniKrishnan Nair, MP Saraswathy, Narra Kishore, Neelakanta Reddy Pully

DOI: Not Available         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Vaddi Mounika, S. Sarumathy, J. Anisha Ebens, T. S. Shanmugarajan

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00003.8         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Amutha K*, Ashok Kumar A, Godavari A

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00100.7         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Krishnendu Acharya*, Somanjana Khatua, Salman Sahid

DOI: Not Available         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Surendra Nath Pandeya, Rajeev Kumar, Arun Kumar, Ashish Kumar Pathak

DOI: Not Available         Access: Open Access Read More

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

0.38
2018CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags