Assessing the Antidiabetic Properties of Manihot esculenta Crantz leaves through in vitro and in vivo Studies.

 

Barsha Sarma1*, Tapashi Sutradhar1, Kakali Deka1, Sonot Deori1, Mridul Kumar Borthakur2

1Department of Zoology, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam-781014

2PG & Research Department of Zoology, B. Borooah College (Autonomous), Guwahati, Assam-781007, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: barshasarma29@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Manihot esculenta Crantz, widely used in traditional medicine, is rich in bioactive compounds with potential antidiabetic properties. This study evaluated the antidiabetic activity of its leaf extracts using in vitro and in vivo models. Methods: Leaves were extracted with methanol. α-Amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition assays were conducted to assess in vitro antidiabetic activity. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic male albino mice were used for in vivo evaluation. Blood glucose and serum lipid profiles were measured using standard methods. Results: The methanolic leaf extract showed IC₅₀ values of 0.367 mg/ml (α-amylase) and 0.351 mg/ml (α-glucosidase). In diabetic mice, the extract significantly reduced blood glucose and improved lipid profiles (except HDL) in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusion: Manihot esculenta leaves exhibit significant antidiabetic activity, supporting their potential as a natural therapeutic or functional food for diabetes management. Further research is needed to isolate active compounds and explore mechanisms of action.

 

KEYWORDS: Acute toxicity, Antidiabetic, α-Amylase, α-Glucosidase, Manihot esculenta.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by persistent hyperglycemia due to impaired insulin secretion, insulin action, or both1. Over the past three decades, diabetes prevalence has increased significantly, with South Asia projected to see a >150% rise in type 2 DM cases between 2000 and 20352. Key contributors include sedentary lifestyles and unhealthy diets, which lead to elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS), oxidative stress, and subsequent cellular damage3,4. One therapeutic strategy to manage postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) involves inhibiting carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes—α-amylase and α-glucosidase. These enzymes facilitate starch breakdown into glucose, and their inhibition slows glucose absorption, effectively lowering blood glucose levels5–7. While synthetic inhibitors like acarbose, voglibose, and miglitol are commonly used, they often cause adverse side effects6,8.

 

This has increased interest in plant-based alternatives, as many medicinal plants exhibit antidiabetic activity due to their rich content of bioactive secondary metabolites9.

 

Manihot esculenta Crantz (cassava), a perennial shrub native to South America and widely cultivated in India and Malaysia, is known for its edible leaves and roots10,11. Traditional and scientific studies have highlighted its diverse biological activities, including its potential for diabetes management12, antioxidant13, anticancer14, hepatoprotective15, anti-inflammatory16,17, analgesic18, and antimicrobial effects19. Naturally occurring compounds present in various plant species have been widely explored for their potential in drug discovery, with few investigations carried out on Manihot esculenta20-21. The leaves of M. esculenta are particularly rich in phenolic compounds22, including polyphenols like flavonoids and tannins, which have demonstrated inhibitory effects on α-amylase and α-glucosidase23–25, making it a promising candidate for managing PPHG.

 

Despite its potential, limited research exists on the antidiabetic properties of M. esculenta. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of M. esculenta leaf extract and assess its antidiabetic effects in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic albino mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Plant Material:

Leaves of Manihot esculenta were collected from Mirza and Boko (Kamrup Rural District, Assam, India) and authenticated by the Botanical Survey of India (Voucher Specimen No.: BSI/ERC/Tech/2023-24/1191).

 

Preparation and administration of extract:

Dried leaf powder was macerated in methanol (1:10 w/v) for 48hours at room temperature. The filtrate was concentrated using a rotary evaporator to obtain a semi-solid extract. Mice were orally administered with the extract at doses of 250 and 500mg/kg body weight using a 5 mm orogastric tube for 21 days26.

 

In vitro alpha amylase inhibitory assay:

Inhibition of porcine α-amylase was determined using DNS method27. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm. The % alpha amylase inhibition was calculated by the formula:

                       Absorbance of Control – Absorbance of sample

% Inhibition of α - amtylase activity = -------------------- X 100

                                                    Absorbance of Control

 

IC50 values were determined from inhibition curves.

 

In vitro alpha glucosidase inhibitory assay:

α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was evaluated a slightly modified method28. The α-glucosidase inhibition percentage was calculated by the following equation:

 

                       Absorbance of Control – Absorbance of sample

% Inhibition of α – glucosidase activity = ----------------- X 100

                                                      Absorbance of Control

 

IC50 values were determined from inhibition curves.

 

Acute oral toxicity study:

Acute oral toxicity studies were performed as per Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 423 guidelines with slight modifications29. Five female albino mice (n=5) selected by random sampling were fed with the methanolic leaf extract at different concentrations (5, 50, 300, 2,000 mg/kg body weight and 5,000mg/kg body weight) and were continuously monitored for 1h, 4h and 24hrs for signs of toxicity for 15 days.

 

Selection of dose:

On the basis of toxicity evaluation, 1/10th of highest dose was considered to be the threshold dose i.e. 500 mg/kg body weight and a lower dose 250mg/kg body weight was selected for administration to the animals15.

 

Determination of Body weight:

The body weight of the animal was continuously measured on 1st, 7th, 14th, 21st day of the experiment.

 

Determination of Blood glucose level:

The blood glucose level was determined using Accuchek active glucometer using glucose strips by collecting blood from tail vein.

 

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT):

OGTT was performed by selecting five animals randomly from each group. The animals were fasted overnight before the test. OGTT was performed at baseline and then glucose was administered (2 g/kg body weight) orally. Blood glucose levels were measured at 30, 60, 90- and 120-minutes post glucose administration30.

 

Estimation of serum lipid parameters:

All the parameters were measured using commercially available kits.

 

Statistical Analysis:

The data are presented as mean±SEM (n=5). All the data were analyzed by Student’s t-test using SPSS ver. 21 for Windows. p-value less than 0.05(p<0.05) were considered statistically significant in this study.

 

RESULTS:

α-Amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities:

The ability of M. esculenta leaf extract in methanol to inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities in the context of their antidiabetic potential was tested, with acarbose used as the positive control. The inhibitory effects of extract on α-amylase and α-glucosidase showed lower activity than acarbose, with IC50 values of 0.004 and 0.227 mg/ml (Table 1).

 

Body weight:

In this study, there was significant indication of obesity by the diabetic mice as compared to that of control group. However, it was seen that after 14 and 21 days of treatment, the groups treated with leaf extract (500 mg/kg body weight) (G4) as well as the standard drug treated group (G5) showed reduction in body weight of mice (Table 2).

 

Blood glucose level:

The fasting blood glucose level in normal and STZ induced diabetic mice are represented in Table 3. Initially blood glucose level was elevated in all STZ injected groups. Meanwhile, it was seen that after 14 and 21 days of treatment, treated groups showed significant reduction in their blood glucose level as compared to that of the untreated group.

 

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT):

The results of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) conducted in mice revealed that groups G3, G4, and G5 exhibited significant fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia compared to G2 at the 16th week (Fig 1.).

 

Fig. 1: Oral Glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in normal and extract treated groups (*p<0.05 vs G2) (n=5, Mean±SEM).

 

Serum lipid parameters:

The serum lipid profile had shown elevated concentration of Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG), Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) but High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) showed a significant decrease in diabetic mice as compared to that of control group (G1). But after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment the HDL level was significantly increased compared to the positive control group (G2). Similarly, TC, TG, VLDL, LDL also showed significant decrease in their concentrations after 14 and 21 days of treatment when compared with the positive control group (G2). The serum lipid parameter results have been presented in Tables 4 through 8.

 

Table 1: α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of methanolic extract of Manihot esculenta leaves and Acarbose

Sample

IC50 values of alpha amylase (mg/ml)

IC50 values of alpha glucosidase (mg/ml)

Methanolic Extract

0.367

0.351

Acarbose

0.004

0.227

*IC50- Inhibitory Concentration


 

Table 2: Body weight of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at *p<0.05).

Days

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

0

33.04 ±0.88

33.52± 0.71

30.08±1.01

32±2.14

31.14±0.26*

7

31 ±1.38

33.26±0.67

28.44±0.57*

25.54±0.86**

31.06±0.22

14

31.24 ±1.35

32.66±0.98

28.36±0.68*

25.94±0.48**

31.1±0.32

21

31.76 ±1.11

32.72±0.86

31.06±0.53

26.3±0.73***

31.3±0.39

 

Table 3: Blood glucose level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at  *p<0.05).

Days

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

0

96.8±7.98

218.2±12.26

276.6±33.71

257.2±16.2

260.4±31.39

7

96.2±7.73

222.8±13.87

255.4±30.86

228.4±18.87

194±14.75

14

98.4±3.78

234.8±20.48

214±13.91**

204±13.23**

166.2±8.63***

21

98.8±5.40

245.4±22.25

205.4±10.60**

185.8±6.31***

110.2±11.47***

*Blood glucose level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice

 

Table 4: Showing total cholesterol (TC) level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at *p<0.05).

TC (mg/dl)

Days

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

7

101.4±4.611

270.4±17.811

194.6±7.600

171.2±7.303**

144.4±5.201**

14

99.92±10.563

273.4±17.310

188.2±9.666

169.2±5.927**

125.4±3.668***

21

108±13.509

288±8.080

125.2±6.077***

124±6.700***

116.8±3.652***

*TC-Total Cholesterol

 

Table 5:  Showing triglyceride (TG) level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at *p<0.05).

TG (mg/dl)

Days

G1

G2

`G3

G4

G5

7

126.4±2.712

274±13.464

254.2±6.902

256.4±8.744

226±21.154

14

123.2±8.339

293.4±23.686

221.8±8.230*

185.8±14.904**

158.4±12.151***

21

104±7.314

303.2±18.674

157.2±9.926***

155.2±12.113***

103±4.404***

*TG-Triglyceride

 

Table 6:  Showing High density Lipoprotein (HDL) level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at *p<0.05).

HDL (mg/dl)

Days

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

7

36.18±0.539

27.66±0.555

45.86±0.421***

38.54±0.872***

31.42±0.688

14

34.16±0.791

26.74±0.402

45.42±0.793***

40.2±0.550***

55.94±0.989***

21

35.92±0.839

24.88±0.491

50.68±0.778***

50.12±0.503***

63.33±0.845***

*HDL-High Denisty Lipoprotein

Table 7: Showing Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL-c) level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at *p<0.05).

VLDL-c (mg/dl)

Days

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

7

25.28±0.542

54.8±2.693

50.84±1.380

51.28±1.748

45.2±21.154

14

24.64±1.667

58.68±4.737

44.36±1.646

37.16±2.981

31.68±2.430**

21

20.8±1.462

60.64±3.734

31.44±1.985**

31.04±2.422**

20.6±0.880***

* VLDL-Very Low Density Lipoprotein

 

Table 8: Showing Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL-c) level of normal and STZ induced diabetic mice after 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment (All values are expressed as Mean±SEM (n=5). Significance level is at *p<0.05).

LDL (mg/dl)

Days

G1

G2

G3

G4

G5

7

19.54±6.82

187.94±14.56

97.89±5.79**

81.38±4.69**

67.78±0.28***

14

41.12±8.11

187.98±12.17

98.42±7.23**

91.84±2.39**

37.78±0.24***

21

51.28±11.20

202.48±3.85

43.08±3.31***

42.84±3.77***

32.86±1.92***

*LDL-Low Density Lipoprotein

 


DISCUSSION:

Inhibitors of alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase are commonly used in conventional diabetes management drugs. It has been observed that a number of plants block α-amylase and α-glucosidase and have antidiabetic, antihyperglycemic, and hypoglycemic properties. Plant extracts with similar inhibitory activity offer a natural and potentially safer alternative for controlling blood sugar levels. Our research has revealed a promising inhibitory effect of the methanolic leaf extract of Manihot esculenta. This effect could potentially be attributed to the abundance of phenolic compounds present in the extract31. These findings are consistent with research on the antidiabetic effects of other medicinal plant extracts32-33.

 

There is a clear relationship between body weight and hyperglycemia, with obesity and excess body weight increasing the risk of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes34. In our study, we observed a significant improvement in body weight among animals treated with the extract compared to the diabetic animal group. This might be result of improved glycemic control. The induction of diabetes by streptozotocin is characterised by hyperglycemia, decrease insulin level, increase in level of total cholesterol, triglycerides, high density lipoprotein35. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is used to assess how well the body regulates blood sugar levels after consuming a predetermined amount of glucose. Our study has provided evidence supporting the efficacy of the leaf extract in managing diabetes by reducing blood glucose levels. The lowering of blood glucose level after extract treatment were also reported by similar works on different plant extracts36-40.

 

Diabetes mellitus is associated with alternations in carbohydrate, lipid and protein metabolism as decrease in insulin levels fails to activate enzyme lipase resulting in hyperglycemic state owing to metabolic  abnormalities 41-42. Dyslipidemia is often characterized by increase in TC, TG, LDL, VLDL and decrease in HDL levels. In the present study, the levels of TC, TG were markedly increased following induction of diabetes with Streptozotocin bridging the relationship between dyslipidemia and diabetes43. The changed serum lipid profile in this study was reversed significantly following treatment with Manihot esculenta leaf extract after 14 and 21 days respectively. Similar findings were reported by different other researches44-46.

 

CONCLUSION:

Plants have the ability to prevent diabetes because of a combination of phytochemicals or specific components found in plant extracts. Alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, glycosides, saponins, polysaccharides, stilbenes, and tannins are extensively studied for their potential to modulate blood glucose level. In the current study, the methanolic leaf extract of Manihot esculenta significantly reduced α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity. It also improved blood sugar control and fat levels in diabetic mice. These results suggest that M. esculenta leaves may be useful in treating diabetes and related fat disorders. Future research should be carried out focusing on isolating bioactive compounds and studying the molecular mechanisms involved.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

The authors are thankful to the Institutional Biotech Hub of B. Borooah College, Guwahati, Assam for allowing us to use the facilities available there.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Skyler JS, Bakris GL, Bonifacio E, Darsow T, Eckel RH, Groop L, et al. Differentiation of diabetes by pathophysiology, natural history, and prognosis. Diabetes. 2017; 66(2): 241-55. https://doi.org/10.2337/ db16-0806.

2.      Nanditha A, Ma RC, Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Chan JC, Chia KS, et al. Diabetes in Asia and the Pacific: implications for the global epidemic. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(3): 472-85. https://doi.org/10.2337/ dc15-1536.

3.      Kaminski KA, Bonda TA, Korecki J, Musial WJ. Oxidative stress and neutrophil activation—the two keystones of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int J Cardiol. 2002; 86(1): 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0167-5273(02)00189-4.

4.      Aminjan HH, Abtahi SR, Hazrati E, Chamanara M, Jalili M, Paknejad B. Targeting of oxidative stress and inflammation through ROS/NF-kappaB pathway in phosphine-induced hepatotoxicity mitigation. Life Sci. 2019;232:116607.https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116607.

5.      Ojah EO, Moronkola DO, Akintunde AAM. α-amylase and α-glucosidase antidiabetic potential of ten essential oils from Calophyllum inophyllum Linn. Iberoam J Med. 2020; 2(4):253- 60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3841108.

6.      Hedrington MS, Davis SN. Considerations when using alpha glucosidase inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019; 20(18): 2229-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14656566.2019.1672660.

7.      Artasensi A, Pedretti A, Vistoli G, Fumagall L. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of multi-target drugs. Molecules. 2020;25(8):1987. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081987.

8.      Kirkman MS, Mahmud H, Korytkowski MT. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018; 47(1): 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2017.10.002.

9.      Saifi A, Chauhan R, Dwivedi J. Development of a polyherbal formulation FMST and evaluation for antidiabetic activity in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2017; 7(1): 1-7.

10.   Madukosiri CH, Amos-Tautua BM. Mineral elements and toxicants insegments of Manihot esculenta grown in Bayelsa state. J Life Phys Sci. 2010; 3:115-118.

11.   Fasuyi AO. Nutrient Composition and Processing Effects on cassava leaf (Manihot esculenta Crantz) antinutrient. Pak J of Nutri. 2005; 4(1): 37-42. https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2005.37.42.

12.   Nwose EU, Onodu BC, Anyasodor AE, Sedowo MO, Okuzor JN, Culas RJ (2017). Ethnopharmacological values of cassava and its potential for diabetes and dyslipidemia management: Knowledge survey and critical review of report. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol.; 6(3): 260-266.

13.   Tsumbu CN, Dupont GD, Tits M, Angenot L, Franck T, Serteyn D, Mickalad AM. Antioxidant and antiradical activities of Manihot esculenta Crantz (Euphorbiaceae) leaves and other selected tropical green vegetables investigated on lipoperoxidation and phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) activated monocytes. Nutrients. 2011; 3(9): 818-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3090818.

14.   Arafa NM, Moawad M, El-Shabrawi HM. Comparison the organic and inorganic solvents effect on phenolic compounds extraction and the activity against breast carcinoma cell lines from callus cultures of Manihot esculenta. Int. J Pharm. Tech. Res. 2016; 9(12): 380-396. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17704.01286.

15.   Bahekar S, Kale R. Phytopharmacological aspects of Manihot esculenta Crantz (Cassava). Mint. J of Pharma. & Med. Sc. 2013; 2(1): 2320-3315.

16.   Adeyemi OO, Yemitan OK, Afolabi L. Inhibition of chemically induced inflammation and pain by orally and topically administered leaf extract of Manihot esculenta Crantz in rodents. J. Ethnopharma. 2008;119(1, 2): 6-11.

17.   Okpuzor J, Oloyede AM. Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-Pyretic and Anti-Diarrhoeal Properties of an Anti-Haemorrhoid Tri-Herbal Pill. Nat. and Sci. 2009; 7(8).

18.   Miladiyah I, Dayi F, Desrini S. Analgesic activity of ethanolic extract of Manihot esculenta Crantz leaves in mice. Univ. Med. 2011;30:3-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.18051/UnivMed.

19.   Saad R, Appalaswamy L, Khan J, Kazi H, Yusuf E, Asmani F. Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Activity of Five Malaysian Medicinal Plants. British J Pharm. Res, 2014;4(17):2019-2032. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJPR/2014/12233.

20.   Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020; 83(3): 770-803.https//: doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01285.

21.   Karimov UT, Qing ZH, Aisa HA. Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of the Echinops integrifolius. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2018; 10(3): 216-220.

22.   Gómez-Vásquez R, Day R, Buschmann H, Randles S, Beeching JR, Cooper RM. Phenylpropanoids, phenylalanine ammonia lyase and peroxidases in elicitor-challenged cassava (Manihot esculenta) suspension cells and leaves. Ann Bot. 2004;94(1):87-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch107.

23.   Santos CM, Freitas M, Fernandes E. A comprehensive review on xanthone derivatives as α-glucosidase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2018;157:1460-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j. ejmech.2018.07.073.

24.   Huang Q, Chai WM, Ma ZY, Ou-Yang C, Wei QM, Song S, et al. Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity and non-enzymatic glycation by tannic acid: Inhibitory activity and molecular mechanism. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019; 141: 358-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijbiomac.2019.09.010.

25.   Proença C, Ribeiro D, Freitas M, Fernandes E. Flavonoids as potential agents in the management of type 2 diabetes through the modulation of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 62(12): 3137-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10408398.2020.1862755.

26.   Sabu MC and Kuttan R. Anti-diabetic activity of medicinal plants and its relationship with their antioxidant property. J Ethnopharmacol 2002; 81(2): 155-160.

27.   Faheem A and Iqbal M (2018). Enzyme (Alpha amylase) Inhibitory activity of Riccinus communis. Org. & Med. Chem IJ; 5(3): 1-4

28.   Kumar D, Ghosh R, Pal BC. α-Glucosidase inhibitory terpenoids from Potentilla fulgens and their quantitative estimation by validated HPLC method. J Funct Foods. 2013; 5(3): 1135-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jff.2013.03.010.

29.   OECD. Test no.423: Acute Oral Toxicity-Acute Toxic Class method, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2002.

30.   Smith N, Ferdaoussi M, Lin H and Macdonald PE. Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Mouse. Protocols. Lo 2020.

31.   Funke I, Melzig MF. Traditionally used plants in diabetes therapy: phytotherapeutics as inhibitors of alpha-amylase. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2006; 16:1-5. https:// doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2006000100002.

32.   Kifle ZD, Debeb SG, Belayneh YM. In Vitro α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities of the Crude Extract and Solvent Fractions of Hagenia abyssinica Leaves. Biomed Res Int. 2021: 6652777. doi: 10.1155/2021/6652777.

33.   Manivasagan V, Saranya K, Poojashree S, Ankitha K, Niyathi V. In vitro Antioxidant, Antidiabetic and Antibacterial Activities of Orthosiphon diffusus. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2022; 14(3): 163-0.

34.   Zafar M, Naee I, Hassan NS, Ahmed N, Kaim-Khani Z. Altered liver morphology and enzymes in Streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Int. J of Morpho. 2009; 27719-725.

35.   Ikewuch JC, Ikwuchi CC. Positive moderation of the hematology, plasma biochemistry and ocular indices of oxidative stress in alloxan induced diabetic rats by an aqueous extract of the leaves of Sanseivieria liberica genome and Labroy. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2012; 27-36.

36.   Macharla SP, Goli V, Nath R. Antidiabetic Activity of Bambusa arundinaceae Root Extracts on Alloxan Induced Diabetic Rats. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2012; 2(2): 73-75.

37.   Formulation and Evaluation of Antidiabetic Herbal Capsules. P. B. Suruse, M. K. Kale, N. J. Duragkar, A. Gundawar. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2011; 4(2): 113-118.

38.   Dongare SS, Maske AP, Patil SM, Umbare RP, Mate GS. Antidiabetic Activity of Marsilea quadrifolia linn in Alloxan-Diabetic Rats. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2009; 1(1): 15-17.

39.   R Sathish, K Natarajan, S Selvakumar. Antidiabetic Activity of Swietenia mahagoni Seed Powder in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Mice. Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2010; 2(4): 296-299.

40.   Amutha K, Aishwarya S. Evaluation of Antibacterial and Antidiabetic Activity and Phytochemical Analysis of Syzygium cumini (l.) Skeels. Seed. Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2010; 2(5): 348-350.

41.   Gbenenee TJ, Okoko T, Boisa N. Evaluation of the anti-lipid peroxidative potential of Ficus caprefolia leaf extract using in vitro models. J. Adv. Biol. 2017;16(2):1-8.

42.   Gbenenee TJ, Boisa N, Okoko T. Phytochemical Screening and evaluation of antioxidant activity of Ficus caprefolia leaf extract via in vitro models. Int J Biochem Res Rev. 2017;17(2):1-7.

43.   Yakubu MT, Akanji MA, Oladiji AT. Alterations in serum lipid profile of male rats by oral administration of Fadogia agresis stem. Res. J. Med. Plant. 2008;2(2):66-73.

44.   Pari L, Uma M. Antihyperglycemic activity of Musa sapientum flowers: Effect on Lipid peroxidation in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Phytother. Res. 2000;14(2):136-138.

45.   Radhika K, Kumaravel B, Thamizhiniyan V, Subramanian S. Biochemical evaluation of antidiabetic activity of Piper betel leaves extract in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Asian J. Research Chem. 2013; 6(1):76-82.

46.   Salunkhe VR, Bhise SB. Synergistic Effect of Natural Sweetener on Antidiabetic Potential of Madhujeevan churna. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2009; 1(3): 204-208.

 

 

 

Received on 27.01.2025      Revised on 07.07.2025

Accepted on 20.10.2025      Published on 16.03.2026

Available online from March 18, 2026

Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(3):1080-1084.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00153

© RJPT All right reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.