Response of Tolerance Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana Lam to Metabolism Changes of Candida albicans Cell

 

Sri Rezeki1, Diana Setya Ningsih2, Subhaini Jakfar2, Abdillah Imron Nasution3, Basri A. Gani3

1Departemen of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry,

Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

1Departemen of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry,

Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

3Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry,

Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: iy_99fkg@usk.ac.id

 

ABSTRACT:

Candida albicans is a major pathogen causing biofilm formation and infections in the oral cavity. Alternative treatments using natural ingredients like Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana with known antifungal activity are needed to address these infections. This study evaluates the tolerance response of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L to changes in C. albicans cell metabolism. The assessment includes growth inhibition, hydrophobicity by spectrophotometry, metabolite activity by MTT assay, phospholipase by precipitation test, and nucleic acid deformation and phospholipid content by FTIR. Results show significant inhibition of C. albicans growth at the highest concentration (400μg/mL), with M. oleifera displaying more potent inhibition than Z. mauritiana across all parameters. At 400μg/mL, M. oleifera inhibits phospholipase activity by 70%, close to the positive control (75%), while Z. mauritiana reaches 65%. FTIR analysis reveals significant nucleic acid deformation, indicating cellular damage. Furthermore, M. oleifera inhibits phospholipid release by 70%, compared to 65% for Z. mauritiana L, close to Fluconazole's effectiveness (75%). In the hydrophobicity test, M. oleifera shows a 60% inhibition of C. albicans cell hydrophobicity, higher than Z. mauritiana L (58%). These findings suggest both extracts hold antifungal potential, with M. oleifera demonstrating more potent inhibitory activity on various aspects of C. albicans metabolism.

 

KEYWORDS: Moringa oleifera, Ziziphus mauritiana, Candida albicans, tolerance response, Metabolism changes.

 

 


 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION: 

Candida albicans is a pathogenic fungal microorganism that is often found in the normal flora of the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and human genitourinary tract. In healthy conditions, C. albicans do not cause problems, but under certain circumstances, such as a weakened immune system or long-term use of antibiotics, this fungus can cause infection1.

 

One of the most common forms of infection is oral candidiasis, or "thrush", which is characterized by excessive growth of C. albicans in the oral cavity2. These infections can cause pain, white sores in the mouth, and difficulty swallowing. In addition,  untreated candidiasis can worsen oral health conditions, including increasing the risk of further complications such as spreading the infection to other organs in individuals with weakened immunity3.

The metabolic response of Candida albicans in the pathogenesis of candidiasis infection is related to its ability to form biofilms and produce hydrolytic enzymes such as phospholipase and protease, which favor colonization and invasion of host tissues4. The biofilm formed by C. albicans provides extra protection against the immune system and antifungal drugs, making it more difficult to overcome by conventional medicine5. This condition triggers the repetition of various antifungal synthetic drugs, including the polyene group, such as nystatin, and the azole group, such as Fluconazole6. This recitation has become a significant problem in the medical field due to the limited selection of effective antifungal drugs.

 

The importance of this research lies in searching for alternative natural ingredients that effectively overcome C. albicans infection, especially in conditions of resistance to synthetic antifungal drugs. Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana are plants with potential antimicrobial and antifungal activity7. Bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, alkaloids, and phenolics contained in these plant extracts are thought to be able to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms, including C. albicans, in a different way than synthetic drugs, thus potentially addressing drug resistance issues8. This research is significant in dental pharmacology because it can provide a safer and more effective alternative treatment based on natural ingredients in overcoming oral candidiasis infection. Natural ingredients such as M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana can be a more affordable solution, have fewer side effects, and support the development of more environmentally friendly herbal medicines.

 

This study offers novelty in using local plant extracts to assess their tolerance response and potential inhibition of C. albicans cell metabolism. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of extracts of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana to inhibit the metabolic activity of C. albicans, especially in terms of phospholipid release, which plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of candidiasis infection. The results of this research are expected to contribute to the development of science in the field of antifungal pharmacology based on natural ingredients and provide more effective and resistant treatment options for fungal resistance.

 

Material and Methods:

This study used C. albicans ATCC 10231 as research subjects, seeding  M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L extracts as test materials with concentrations (50, 100, 200, and 400μg/mL), respectively. Candida albicans culture was carried out using Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) media. After aseptic inoculation, the culture is incubated at 37°C for 24-48hours. The growing colonies are then inoculated into Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) and incubated for 18-24hours to produce the mushroom suspension. The C. albicans suspension was then diluted with saline until it reached the McFarland standard of 0.5(1.5x108 CFU/mL), which was measured using a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 625nm with an absorbance value between 0.08 to 0.1(300 CFU/mL).

 

Plant extraction:

Extraction begins by carefully cleaning the leaves of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. The leaves are then dried in the shade or in an oven at 40-50°C until completely dry. After drying, the leaves are ground until they become a fine powder. As many as 100grams of dried leaf powder are soaked in 1 liter of 70% or 96% ethanol for 3-7 days at room temperature while stirring periodically to ensure optimal extraction of active compounds. Once the soaking process is complete, the solution is filtered to separate the solid part from the liquid extract. This liquid extract is then evaporated using an evaporator or rotavapor at low temperatures to remove the ethanol solvent. The resulting concentrated extract is stored in a sterile glass bottle in a cool, dark place, such as in a refrigerator at 4°C, to maintain the stability of the active compound before being used in further testing9.

 

Growth Assay

The growth test of Candida albicans was carried out using extracts of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana at concentrations of 50, 100, 200, and 400 μg/mL. C. albicans cultures were prepared according to McFarland standard 0.5, then inoculated with the extract and incubated at 37°C for 24hours. The growth of microorganisms was measured using spectrophotometry at OD 625nm. Lower OD values indicate the presence of significant growth inhibition by the extract10.

 

Metabolic Activity Assay:

Metabolic activity tests with MTT Assay for Candida albicans affected by extracts of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana were performed by preparing cultures in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB), which were then incubated at 37°C for 24hours and diluted to reach the McFarland standard of 0.5. Extracts at 50, 100, 200, and 400μg/mL concentrations were added to microplates containing 100μL of culture. Negative and positive controls are also prepared. The microplate is re-incubated at 37°C for 24hours. After incubation, MTT solution is added and incubated for 4 hours to allow the formation of formazane crystals. The medium is then discarded, and the formed formazan crystals are dissolved with the addition of DMSO. Absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 570nm using a spectrophotometer, with lower absorbance values indicating a decrease in metabolic activity10.

Enzymatic Assay:

The enzymatic phospholipase test for Candida albicans, after being affected by the extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L was carried out by preparing C. albicans cultures in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) and incubated at 37°C for 24hours. After incubation, the culture is centrifuged to separate the cells from the supernatant. C. albicans cells were then tested on egg yolk agar media to observe phospholipase activity. Phospholipase activity is measured based on the diameter of the precipitation zone formed around the colony. The decrease in the diameter of the precipitation zone indicates the inhibition of phospholipase activity by the extract. Extracts of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana were tested at various concentrations (50, 100, 200, and 400μg/mL) and compared with no extract-free control to determine the effect of inhibiting phospholipase activity11.

 

Metabolism Changes Assay:

Candida albicans cells are extracted by growing cultures in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) incubated at 37°C for 24-48hours. After incubation, the culture is centrifuged at 3,000-5,000rpm for 10-15minutes, and the cell pellets are washed with sterile PBS. Intracellular component extraction was carried out with a chloroform-methanol mixture, then centrifuged again at 10,000-12,000rpm to separate the cell debris. Supernatants containing intracellular components are collected for analysis using FTIR (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy). FTIR detected phospholipids and nucleic acid deformations in C. albicans affected by M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L extracts. Phospholipids, as an indicator of phospholipase activity, show absorption bands at 2850-2950 cm⁻ą (C-H), 1740 cm⁻ą (C=O), and 1250-1150 cm⁻ą (P=O). Nucleic acid deformation is examined through absorption bands at 1700-1600 cm⁻ą (C=O) and 1225-1250 cm⁻ą (P=O), indicating changes in the structure of DNA or RNA. Changes in intensity in these bands indicate enzyme activity and cellular damage due to the treatment of the extract on C.   albican 12.

 

Hydrophobicity Assay:

Examining the surface hydrophobicity of C. albicans cells after being affected by extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L using xylene solution began with preparing C. albicans culture. The cultures were incubated in Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) at 37°C for 24-48hours and then diluted to reach the McFarland standard of 0.5. Afterward, extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana were added at concentrations of 50, 100, 200, and 400μg/mL, and then the cultures were re-incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, the cultures are centrifuged at 5,000rpm for 10min, and the cell pellets are washed with sterile PBS and then resuspended in 3mL of PBS. A total of 0.5mL of xylene is added to the cell suspension, left for 2minutes, and left until the water and xylene phases are separated. The water phase containing the cells was then separated, and the absorbance was measured at 600nm using a spectrophotometer. Cell hydrophobicity was calculated based on the percentage change in turbidity (OD) before and after treatment with xylene, which reflects the level of surface hydrophobicity of C. albicans cells13,14

 

Statistical Analysis:

The analysis was between the treatment groups using One-Way ANOVA, while the T-test analyzed the tested extract groups. The meaning limit is p<0.05, with a value of 1 as an indicator of a strong relationship.

 

ReSults:

Table 1 shows that the extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. effectively inhibit the growth of C. albicans by increasing the concentration of extracts. At a concentration of 400μg/mL, both extracts decreased growth by up to <150CFU/mL with a growth percentage of 8%, close to the effectiveness of positive control (Fluconazole), which showed 7% growth. Both extracts showed inhibition at lower concentrations (50-200 μg/mL), but the growth percentage remained higher than at the highest concentrations. Negative control (PBS) showed the highest growth of >600 CFU/mL with a growth percentage of 35-36%. Statistical tests showed significant differences in the effect of the extract on the growth of C. albicans, with p-values of 0.011 for M. oleifera and 0.05 for Z. mauritiana.


Table 1. Growth of C. albicans under the influence  of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L

Concentration (µg/mL)

N

Pertumbuhan C. albicans (OD 625 nm)

**p-value

M. oleifera

Z. mauritiana Lam

Mean

Std Dev

CFU/mL

Growth

Mean

Std Dev

CFU/mL

Growth

50

3

0.11

0.012

>300

22%

0.11

0.012

>300

21%

0.04

100

3

0.08

0.010

<300

16%

0.09

0.01

>300

16%

200

3

0.07

0.007

<300

13%

0.07

0.007

<300

13%

400

3

0.04

0.005

<150

8%

0.05

0.006

<150

8%

Control + (FZ)

3

0.04

0.005

<150

7%

0.04

0.005

<150

7%

Control - (PBS)

3

0.18

0.005

>600

35%

0.19

0.005

>600

36%

*p-value

 

0.011

0.05

 

* One Way ANOVA; ** T-test; FZ(Fluconazole); PBS (Phosphate Buffer Saline)

 



Table 2. Effect of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L  on the activity of C. albicans metabolites

Concentration (µg/mL)

N

Aktivitas Metabolit C. albicans (OD 570 nm)

**p-value

M. oleifera

Z. mauritiana Lam

Mean

Std Dev

Effect

Mean

Std Dev

Effect

50

3

0.12

0.01

Moderate

0.13

0.011

Moderate

0.05

100

3

0.09

0.008

Hight

0.1

0.009

Moderate

200

3

0.07

0.007

Hight

0.08

0.008

Hight

400

3

0.04

0.005

Hight

0.05

0.006

Hight

Control + (FZ)

3

0.03

0.003

Hight

0.03

0.003

Hight

Control - (PBS)

3

0.18

0.015

No Effect

0.19

0.016

No Effect

*p-value

 

0.031

0.02

 

* One Way ANOVA; ** T-test; FZ(Fluconazole); PBS (Phosphate Buffer Saline)

 


Figure 1. Percentage inhibition of Metabolite Activity of C. albicans. M. oleifera provides better antifungal properties for suppressing C. albicans' metabolite activity than Z. mauritiana L.

 

Table 2 shows the effect of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana  L extracts on the activity of C. albicans metabolites measured through OD 570nm. At a concentration of 400μg/mL, both extracts showed significant inhibition of metabolite activity, with Moringa oleifera having an OD of 0.04 and Z. mauritiana L having an OD of 0.05, both close to the effectiveness of Fluconazole's positive control (OD 0.03). At lower concentrations of 50μg/mL, the activity of C. albicans metabolites was still moderately affected, with an OD of 0.12 for M. oleifera and an OD of 0.13 for Z. mauritiana L. Negative control (PBS) indicates the absence of influence, with OD of 0.18 and 0.19, reflecting the activity of metabolites without inhibition. Statistical tests showed significant differences in the influence of the two extracts on the activity of the metabolites of C. albicans, with p-values of 0.031 for M. oleifera and 0.02 for Z. mauritiana L.

 

Figure 1 shows that Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana Lam can inhibit the activity of Candida albicans metabolites, with Z. mauritiana showing higher inhibition at low concentrations (about 40%) than M. oleifera (about 20%). However, inhibition by Z. mauritiana decreased with increasing concentration, while M. oleifera showed more stable inhibition. At the highest concentration (400μg/mL), both extracts were close to the effectiveness of a positive control (Fluconazole), which showed an inhibition of nearly 70%. Negative control (PBS) shows no inhibition, with high metabolite activity. Overall, M. oleifera showed a more stable inhibition of the metabolite activity of C. albicans, while Z. mauritiana was more effective at low concentrations.

 

Table 3 shows the effect of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana Lam extracts on the production of Candida albicans phospholipase. At 50 to 400μg/mL concentrations, M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana showed increased inhibition as the concentration increased. At a 400 μg/mL concentration, M. oleifera achieved phospholipase inhibition of 66%, the same as the positive control of Fluconazole, while Z. mauritiana achieved 60%. Negative control (PBS) showed no inhibition, with a phospholipase diameter of 15 mm. The p-value of the ANOVA test showed a significant effect of the two extracts on the inhibition of phospholipase production.


 

Table 3. Effect of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L on phospholipase production of C. albicans 

Concentration (µg/mL)

N

Fosfolipase C. albicans (mm)

**p-value

M. oleifera

Z. mauritiana Lam

Mean

Std Dev

%

Mean

Std Dev

%

50

3

11

1.1

26

12

1.2

20

0.15

100

3

9

0.9

40

10

1.0

33

200

3

7

0.7

53

8

0.8

46

400

3

5

0.5

66

6

0.6

60

Control + (FZ)

3

5

0.5

66

5

0.5

66

Control - (PBS)

3

15

1.5

0

15

1.5

0

*p-value

 

0.048

0.05

 

* One Way ANOVA; ** T-test; FZ(Fluconazole); PBS (Phosphate Buffer Saline)

 


Figure 2 reports the results of Pearson's correlation between the phospholipase inhibitory power of Candida albicans by extracts of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana, both of which show a Pearson value of 0.99. This indicates a solid association between the two extracts in inhibiting phospholipase activity, with a positive correlation where the increase in the percentage of resistance by one extract is directly proportional to the rise in resistance by the other. This suggests that the two extracts work in parallel in inhibiting the phospholipase enzyme, which plays an essential role in the virulence of C. albicans.

 

Figure 2. Pearson Correlation Phospholipase Inhibition Value of C. albicans after being influenced by  M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L.

Table 4 shows the effect of extracts of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana on phospholipid release by Candida albicans. At low concentrations (50 μg/mL), phospholipid inhibition was moderate, with M. oleifera reaching 25% and Z. mauritiana 20%. Inhibition increases at 100 μg/mL concentrations to 40% for M. oleifera and 35% for Z. mauritiana. At the highest concentration (400 μg/mL), M. oleifera showed the highest inhibition of 70%, while Z. mauritiana reached 65%, close to the positive control effectiveness of Fluconazole (75%). A positive correlation between concentration and inhibition was seen, with M. oleifera slightly more effective than Z. mauritiana.

 

Table 5 shows that the extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. can inhibit nucleic acid deformation in Candida albicans with increasing effectiveness with the concentration of the extract. At a 50 μg/mL concentration, M. oleifera inhibits deformation by 25%, while Z. mauritiana reaches 20%. At a 100 μg/mL concentration, the inhibition increased to 40% and 35%, respectively. At the highest concentration of 400 μg/mL, M. oleifera showed stronger inhibition, with %T values of 44% for C=O and 43% for P=O, as well as an inhibition percentage of 70%, while Z. mauritiana reached 65%, close to the positive control effectiveness of Fluconazole which reached 75%.

 


 

 

Table 4. Inhibition of Phospholipid release of C. albicans after interaction with M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L

Concentration (µg/mL)

N

Phospholipids C. albicans  (wavelength cm-1)

M. oleifera (%T)

Z. mauritiana Lam (%T)

C-H (2850-2950)

C=O (1740)

P=O (1250-1150 )

% Inhibition

C-H (2850-2950)

C=O (1740)

P=O (1250-1150)

% Inhibition

50

3

88

85

83

25

87

84

82

20

100

3

78

74

72

40

77

73

71

35

200

3

65

62

58

55

64

61

57

50

400

3

45

40

37

70

44

41

36

65

Control + (FZ)

3

35

33

32

75

34

32

31

70

Control - (PBS)

3

95

97

92

0

94

96

91

0

FZ (Fluconazole); PBS (Phosphate Buffer Saline)

 

 

 

Table 5. Response to nucleic acid deformation of C. albicans after interaction with M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L

Concentration (µg/mL)

N

Nucleic acid deformation of C. albicans (wavelength cm-1)

M. oleifera (%T)

Z. mauritiana Lam (%T)

C=O (1700-1600)

P=O  (1225-1250)

% Inhibition

C=O  (1700-1600)

P=O  (1225-1250)

% Inhibition

50

3

88

85

25

89

86

20

100

3

77

74

40

78

75

35

200

3

65

60

55

64

60

50

400

3

44

43

70

46

44

65

Control + (FZ)

3

31

30

75

33

32

70

Control - (PBS)

3

96

91

0

96

91

0

FZ (Fluconazole); PBS (Phosphate Buffer Saline)

 


 

Figure 3 reports the Nucleic Acid Deformation of C. albicans After Being Treated with Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana. The graph shows a similar pattern for Candida albicans after treatment with extracts M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. at the same concentration. At low concentrations (50 μg/mL), the %T value remains high (85-90%), indicating that nucleic acid deformation is insignificant at these concentrations. At intermediate concentrations (100 and 200 μg/mL), a significant decrease in %T was observed, with values dropping to about 60-70%, indicating an increase in DNA and RNA deformation of C. albicans on both extracts. At the highest concentration (400 μg/mL), both extracts achieved maximum inhibition with a %T value of about 40%, indicating nucleic solid acid deformation. Although both extracts are effective, Moringa oleifera again showed a slight advantage in inhibiting nucleic acid deformation in C. albicans Than Ziziphus mauritiana 15.

 

Figure 3. FTIR analysis of nucleic acid deformation of C. albicans after interacting with M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L.

 

Table 6 shows that Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana effectively reduce the surface hydrophobicity of Candida albicans cells, with increased inhibition as concentration increases. At the highest 400 μg/mL concentration, M. oleifera achieved hydrophobicity inhibition of 60%, while Z. mauritiana reached 58%. The positive control (Fluconazole) showed the highest inhibition of 75%, while the negative control (PBS) showed no inhibition. Statistical tests show significant differences between the two extracts in reducing hydrophobicity, especially at higher concentrations.

 

Figure 4 shows that both M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. effectively inhibit the surface hydrophobicity of Candida albicans cells, especially at the highest concentration (400 μg/mL). At these concentrations, both extracts significantly decreased hydrophobicness, which is seen from the thin layer of hydrophobicity, indicating a reduction in the hydrophobic properties of the cell. This suggests that both extracts can disrupt the surface structure of C. albicans cells, which is essential in forming biofilms. At lower concentrations (200 μg/mL), the inhibition of hydrophobicity is weaker, indicated by a thicker layer of hydrophobicity. Although the effect is quite good, the effectiveness of both extracts is still slight under the positive control of Fluconazole, which shows maximum inhibition with almost no layer of hydrophobicity.

 

 

 


Table 6. Formation  of C. albicans  cell surface hydrophobicity after interaction with M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L

Concentration (µg/mL)

N

Hydrophobicity C. albicans (OD 600 nm)

**p-value

M. oleifera

Z. mauritiana Lam

Mean

Std Dev

% Inhibition

Mean

Std Dev

% Inhibition

50

3

0.48

0.03

22

0.50

0.04

20

0.172

100

3

0.42

0.02

30

0.43

0.03

28

200

3

0.34

0.02

45

0.35

0.02

43

400

3

0.25

0.01

60

0.27

0.02

58

Control + (FZ)

3

0.12

0.01

75

0.14

0.01

73

Control - (PBS)

3

0.58

0.04

0

0.60

0.05

0

*P-Value

 

0.041

0.0124

 

* One Way ANOVA; ** T-test; FZ (Fluconazole)


 


Figure 4. Hydrophobicity of C. albicans cell surface. Lines 1 and 2 (M. oleifera 400 and 200 μg/mL), Lines 3 and 4 (Z. mauritiana L 400 and 200 μg/mL) on C. albicans. Line 5 and 6 (Fluconazole).


 

DISCUSSION:

This study evaluated the potential of Moringa oleifera and Ziziphus mauritiana as antifungal agents against Candida albicans through growth tests, metabolite activity, phospholipase production, nucleic acid deformation, and cell hydrophobicity. The results showed that both extracts effectively inhibited C. albicans, with M. oleifera consistently showing more potent inhibition, especially at the highest concentration (400μg/mL). Both extracts are also close to the effectiveness of Fluconazole in inhibiting phospholipase and nucleic acid deformation. This indicates that this plant extract has the potential as a natural alternative to treating fungal infections.

 

Table 1 shows the effects of assay material on the growth of C.albicans; both extracts significantly inhibited the growth of C. albicans and increased concentration. Both extracts showed significant inhibition, although the growth percentage was higher than the highest concentration. This study's results align with previous findings that show that the extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L contain bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, saponins, and phenols known to be effective antifungal agents. The bioactive compounds from plant extracts can interfere with fungal growth by inhibiting enzymatic mechanisms and the biosynthesis process of fungal cells 16. The plant extracts rich in flavonoids and phenols significantly inhibited the formation of Candida albicans biofilms and reduced their virulence17. In addition, these results reinforce research shows that M. oleifera extract has a significant antifungal effect on C. albicans through mechanisms of inhibition of cellular metabolism and enzymatic activity18.

 

Table 2 shows that the extracts of M.oleifera and Z. mauritiana L effectively inhibit the activity of the metabolites of Candida albicans, mainly through bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, tannins, and saponins. Flavonoids have been reported to inhibit key enzymes in the metabolism of fungal cells, reducing the ability of fungi to survive and causing infections19. In addition, tannin and saponin compounds cause damage to cell membranes, resulting in intracellular metabolite leakage and inhibiting the growth and cellular activity of C. albicans20. The effectiveness of this inhibition is in line with previous research that suggests that plant extracts can be a natural alternative in overcoming resistance to synthetic antifungals such as       Fluconazole 21.

 

Table 3 reports that both test materials can inhibit the production of Candida albicans phospholipase, an essential enzyme in the virulence of this fungus. This inhibition of phospholipase is significant, as the enzyme phospholipase plays a role in the degradation of host cell membranes and contributes to the spread of infection. Phospholipase is an enzyme that plays a role in the phospholipid breakdown of the host cell membrane, which allows C. albicans to invade tissues and spread disease22. Flavonoids and saponins in plant extracts are known to interfere with the structure and function of fungal cell membranes and inhibit the activity of the phospholipase enzyme, reducing the virulence of C. albicans23. This study supports previous findings suggesting that bioactive compounds in plants have antifungal solid activity, mainly through the mechanism of inhibition of important enzymes in fungal pathogenesis24. This natural extract also has the potential to be an effective therapeutic alternative to the resistance of synthetic antifungal drugs25. A preview study showed that some antifungal compounds could increase the fluidity of fungal cell membranes, causing leakage of intracellular contents and ultimately inhibiting the production of enzymes necessary to maintain membrane structure, including phospholipase26.

 

Table 4 reports that  M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. can induce phospholipid release by Candida albicans. The antifungal compounds of both extracts can work by interfering with the phospholipids of the cell membrane of Candida albicans. Phospholipids are essential components of cell membranes, which maintain the integrity and function of the membrane and allow cells to communicate with the outside environment27. The bioactive compounds in both extracts can damage phospholipid structures by disrupting hydrophobic bonds within the membrane, leading to increased membrane permeability and metabolic dysfunction of fungal cells28. These disorders inhibit critical metabolic processes and weaken fungal cells, leading to cell         death 29.

 

Table 5 shows the report that extracts M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L against the nucleic acid deformation of Candida albicans. Antifungal compounds in plant extracts, such as flavonoids, tannins, and saponins, can cause deformation in the nucleic acids of fungal cells by disrupting the stability of DNA and RNA structures30. Flavonoids bind to nucleic acids, disrupting DNA replication, RNA transcription, and protein synthesis, ultimately inhibiting the growth and reproduction of fungal cells31. In addition, saponins can affect the permeability of cell membranes, so antifungal compounds can more easily enter cells and cause direct damage to genetic material32. Damage to the C=O and P=O groups, which are important components in DNA and RNA, suggests that these extracts can damage the essential structure of nucleic acids, resulting in significant deformation in C. albicans cells33. This study also supports previous research that shows the potential of bioactive compounds in plant extracts as an inhibitor of the virulence of pathogenic microorganisms by damaging their genetic material34.

 

Table 6 reports that both extracts effectively inhibit the surface hydrophobicity of Candida albicans cells, with increased inhibition as the concentration of the extract increases. Cell surface hydrophobicity is an important factor in the adhesion and biofilm formation process in Candida albicans35. The bioactive compounds in plant extracts disrupt cell membrane structure and damage the lipid layer of cell membranes, disrupting hydrophobic properties that are important for cellular interactions and adhesion to the host surface36. In addition, saponins are known to have natural surfactant properties capable of damaging the integrity of fungal cell membranes, disrupting hydrophobic interactions between cells, and reducing the cell's ability to form biofilms37. These results suggest that plant extracts can be an effective natural alternative to prevent the development of biofilms and improve the therapeutic response to fungal infections.

 

Conclusion:

This study shows that the extracts of M. oleifera and Z. mauritiana L. have significant potential as antifungal agents against Candida albicans. Both extracts effectively inhibit growth, metabolite activity, phospholipase production, nucleic acid deformation, and surface hydrophobicity of C. albicans cells, especially at high concentrations (400μg/mL). Moringa oleifera tends to show slightly stronger effectiveness than Ziziphus mauritiana, although both are close to positive control effectiveness (Fluconazole). Thus, these two extracts can be developed as natural alternatives in the treatment of Candida albicans infections that are resistant to synthetic drugs, making an essential contribution to the pharmacology of dentistry and the treatment of fungal infections of the oral cavity.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

 

Acknowledgment:

This research is financed by  the Directorate of Research, Technology, and Community Service, Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, with  Master Contract Number: 094/E5/PG. 02.00.PL/2024, dated June 11, 2024, and Sub-contract Number: 664 /UN11.2.1/PG.01.03/SPK/DRTPM/2024, dated June 12, 2024

 

References:

1.      Rezeki S, Gani BA, Abdat M, et al. The measurement of Candida albicans Tolerance under the influence of Moringa oleifera. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(6): 2579-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00423

2.      Rezeki S, Hakim RF, Sunnati S, Salvinia S, Gani BA. The Oral Biology Parameter of the Diabetes Mellitus Type-2 Patients Relate to the Oral Candida Species Development. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2022; 15(2): 757-65.

3.      Gani BA, Soraya C, Sugiaman VK, et al. Fungistatic effect of Moringa oleifera Lam. on the metabolism changes of Candida albicans. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research. 2023; 11(1): 179-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.56499/jppres22.1533_11.1.179

4.      Gani BA, Bachtiar EW, Bachtiar BM. The role of cigarettes smoke condensate in enhanced Candida albicans virulence of salivary isolates based on time and temperature. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2017; 10: 769-77.

5.      Bachtiar BM, Gani BA, Deviana A, et al. The discrepancy between clove and non-clove cigarette smoke-promoted Candida albicans biofilm formation with precoating RNA-aptamer. F1000 Research 2021; 10. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52266.3

6.      Campoy S, Adrio JL. Antifungals. Biochemical pharmacology 2017; 133: 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2016.11.019

7.      Jangid R. Antimycotic Activity of Leaf Extracts of Medicinal Plants Against Dermatophytes. Journal of Fungal Diversity 2020; 1(1): 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.14302/issn.2766-869X.jfd-20-3603

8.      Vaou N, Stavropoulou E, Voidarou C, Tsigalou C, Bezirtzoglou E. Towards Advances in Medicinal Plant Antimicrobial Activity: A Review Study on Challenges and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms 2021; 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102041

9.      Soraya C, Batubara FY, Nasroen SL, Jakfar S, Gani BA. Role of Moringa oleifera irrigation solution on the cell metabolism change of Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research 2024; 15(3): 200-07. https://doi.org/10.4103/JAPTR.JAPTR_442_23

10.   Soraya C, Syafriza D, Gani BA. Antibacterial effect of Moringa oleifera gel to prevent the growth, biofilm formation, and cytotoxicity of Streptococcus mutans. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2022; 15(3): 1053-61.

11.   Fule S, Das D, Fule R. Detection of phospholipase activity of Candida albicans and non albicans isolated from women of reproductive age with vulvovaginal candidiasis in rural area. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015; 33(1): 92-95. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.148392

12.   Syafriza D, Rifki A, Yulina V, Gani BA. The Assessment of Metabolic Changes and Stress Response of Streptococcus Mutans Growth in Saliva by Fourier Transform Infra-Red. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2022; 15(3): 1086-94.

13.   Utmi Arma UA, Gani BA, Gani BA. Role of Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. on Oral Candidiasis and its Relation to the Antibody Response, Blood Electrolyte, and Liver Profil. Journal Of International Dental and Medical Research. 2022; 15(2): 561-70.

14.   Rizki MI. Identification of active compound and Antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria of Chromolaena odorata leaf extract. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(10): 4720-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00793

15.   Janani M, Viswanathan D, Pandiaraj S, et al. Review on phyto-extract methodologies for procuring ZnO NPs and its pharmacological functionalities. Process Biochemistry 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2024.08.015

16.   Veni RK, Meenambiga S. In-silico analysis of endophytic fungal metabolites against secreted aspartic proteinase enzyme of Candida albicans. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2019; 12(7): 3495-500. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00594.8

17.   Meenambiga S, Rajagopal K, Shevalkar M. Endophytic Fungi, A Novel source in the treatment of Oral infections. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(6): 2936-42. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00520.X

18.   Soraya C, Alibasyah ZM, Nazar M, Gani BA. Chemical Constituents of Moringa oleifera Leaves of Ethanol Extract and its Cytotoxicity against Enterococcus faecalis of Root Canal Isolate. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(8): 3523-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00591

19.   Al Aboody MS, Mickymaray S. Antifungal efficacy and mechanisms of flavonoids. Antibiotics 2020; 9(2): 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9020045

20.   Zhou X, Zeng M, Huang F, et al. The potential role of plant secondary metabolites on antifungal and immunomodulatory effect. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2023; 107(14): 4471-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12601-5

21.   Basumatary S, Changmai N. Biological materials assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles and potential applications: A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(6): 2681-94. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00497.3

22.   Barman A, Gohain D, Bora U, Tamuli R. Phospholipases play multiple cellular roles including growth, stress tolerance, sexual development, and virulence in fungi. Microbiological Research 2018; 209: 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.12.012

23.   Raja V, Ahmad S, Irshad M, et al. Anticandidal activity of ethanolic root extract of Juglans regia (L.): Effect on growth, cell morphology, and key virulence factors. Journal de Mycologie Medicale 2017; 27(4): 476-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.07.002

24.   Loi M, Paciolla C, Logrieco AF, Mulč G. Plant bioactive compounds in pre-and postharvest management for aflatoxins reduction. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020; 11: 243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00243

25.   Wei L, Zhang Q, Xie A, et al. Isolation of bioactive compounds, antibacterial activity, and action mechanism of spore powder from Aspergillus niger xj. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022; 13: 934857. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.934857

26.   González-Ponce HA, Rincón-Sánchez AR, Jaramillo-Juárez F, Moshage H. Natural dietary pigments: potential mediators against hepatic damage induced by over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs. Nutrients 2018; 10(2): 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020117

27.   Mejia EM, Hatch GM. Mitochondrial phospholipids: role in mitochondrial function. Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes. 2016; 48: 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-015-9601-4

28.   Sant D, Tupe S, Ramana CV, Deshpande M. Fungal cell membrane—promising drug target for antifungal therapy. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2016; 121(6): 1498-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13301

29.   Silva-Gomes R, Caldeira I, Fernandes R, Cunha C, Carvalho A. Metabolic regulation of the host–fungus interaction: from biological principles to therapeutic opportunities. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2024; 116(3): 469-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleuko/qiae045

30.   Praveen N, Preetha RST, Pagare V, et al. Plant-based Metabolites as Source of Antimicrobial Therapeutics: Prospects and Challenges. Antimicrobials in Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research 2023: 165-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003268932-9

31.   Rodríguez B, Pacheco L, Bernal I, Pińa M. Mechanisms of Action of Flavonoids: Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties. Ciencia, Ambiente y Clima 2023; 6(2): 33-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.22206/cac.2023.v6i2.3021

32.   Li Y, Shan M, Zhu Y, et al. Kalopanaxsaponin A induces reactive oxygen species mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and cell membrane destruction in Candida albicans. PLoS One 2020; 15(11): e0243066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243066

33.   Pezzotti G. Raman spectroscopy in cell biology and microbiology. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 2021; 52(12): 2348-443.

34.   Mickymaray S. Efficacy and mechanism of traditional medicinal plants and bioactive compounds against clinically important pathogens. Antibiotics. 2019; 8(4): 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrs.6204

35.   Muadcheingka T, Tantivitayakul P. Distribution of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species in oral candidiasis patients: Correlation between cell surface hydrophobicity and biofilm forming activities. Archives of oral biology 2015; 60(6): 894-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.03.002

36.   Nobre TM, Pavinatto FJ, Caseli L, et al. Interactions of bioactive molecules & nanomaterials with Langmuir monolayers as cell membrane models. Thin Solid Films 2015; 593: 158-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.09.047

37.   Otzen DE. Biosurfactants and surfactants interacting with membranes and proteins: same but different? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 2017; 1859(4): 639-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.09.024

 

 

 


 

 

 

Received on 25.09.2024      Revised on 20.01.2025

Accepted on 05.04.2025      Published on 05.09.2025

Available online from September 08, 2025

Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(9):4144-4152.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00596

© RJPT All right reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.