Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation for The Estimation of Metformin and Empagliflozin in Blood Plasma by using RP-HPLC
Shrikrishna B. Baokar1,2*, Rajendra N. Patil1,2, Aditya N. Pandey2
1Delonix Society’s, Baramati College of Pharmacy, Barhanpur,
Tal Baramati, Dist Pune, Maharashtra, India 413102.
2Mansarovar Global University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India 466111.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: shrikrishnabaokarbcop@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The development and validation of a bioanalytical method for the simultaneous estimation of metformin (MET) and empagliflozin (EPG) in blood plasma using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) are presented. The method development involved optimizing chromatographic conditions, including the mobile phase composition, flow rate, and detection wavelength, to achieve well-resolved peaks for both analytes. The validation process adhered to regulatory guidelines, assessing precision, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, linearity, and stability. The RP-HPLC method utilized a C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of phosphate buffer and acetonitrile (pH 3) in a 20:80 (v/v) ratio, a flow rate of 1.0mL/min, and UV detection at 254nm. The retention times for MET and EPG were 5.1 and 7.1 minutes, respectively. The method demonstrated excellent linearity over the concentration ranges of 10-50ppm for MET and 2-10ppm for EPG, with correlation coefficients (r˛) exceeding 0.999. The intra-day and inter-day precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), were below 2% for both analytes, indicating high reproducibility. Accuracy, evaluated through recovery studies, ranged from 98.5% to 101.2%, confirming the method's reliability. Specificity tests showed no interference from endogenous plasma components, and the limits of detection (LOD) were 0.25mg/ml L for MET and 0.75mg/ml for EPG. Stability studies under various conditions confirmed that both analytes remained stable with negligible degradation. The validated method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic studies, demonstrating its practical utility in clinical and research settings.
KEYWORDS: Bioanalytical method, Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.
INTRODUCTION:
The development and validation of bioanalytical methods are critical for the accurate and reliable quantification of drugs and their metabolites in biological matrices. Among these, the estimation of metformin (MET) and empagliflozin (EPG) in blood plasma is of particular importance due to their widespread use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Metformin is a first-line anti hyperglycemic agent, whereas empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that enhances glycemic control by promoting renal glucose excretion1.
Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) is a widely used analytical technique due to its high resolution, reproducibility, and sensitivity2. RP-HPLC has been successfully employed for the simultaneous estimation of MET and EPG in various matrices, including pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma. The method development involves optimizing chromatographic conditions such as mobile phase composition, flow rate, and detection wavelength to achieve well-resolved peaks and accurate quantification of both analytes3.
Validation of the RP-HPLC method is crucial to ensure its reliability and accuracy in routine analytical applications. The validation process includes assessing various parameters such as precision, accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, linearity, and stability according to regulatory guidelines. Precision ensures consistent results upon repeated analysis, while accuracy confirms the method’s ability to measure the true concentration of analytes4. Specificity ensures no interference from endogenous substances, and sensitivity is determined by the method’s ability to detect low concentrations of the drugs. Linearity indicates a proportional response over a range of concentrations, and stability studies ensure that the analytes remain unchanged under different conditions5.
This study aims to develop and validate an RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of metformin and empagliflozin in blood plasma, adhering to regulatory guidelines and ensuring suitability for pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and therapeutic drug monitoring applications.
Experiment:
Selection of Precipitating Agent:
Selection of precipitation agent is based on the solubility of drug and good protein precipitation property. MET and EPG were found to be soluble in Acetonitrile and methanol and Acetonitrile having good precipitating property of so the Acetonitrile was selected as the protein precipitation and extraction agent.
Selection of mobile phase:
Initially to estimate MET and EPG in fix dosage form the number of mobile phase in different ratio were tried. A result was shown in Table 1. Taking into consideration the system suitability parameters like Retention Time, Tailing Factor, Number of Theoretical Plates and HETP, the mobile phase found to be most suitable for analysis was 20mM KH2PO4: ACN (pH 4.0) in the ratio of 20:80 v/v. The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45m filter paper to remove particulate matter and then degassed by sonication. Flow rate employed for analysis was 1.0ml/min.
Table 1: Selection of mobile phase
|
Mobile Phase |
Ratio |
Retention Time |
|
ACN: Water |
50 : 50 v/v |
Poor Resolution |
|
ACN: Methanol |
50 : 50 v/v |
Poor Resolution |
|
20mM KH2PO4: acetonitrile (pH 4.0) |
20:80 v/v |
Most Suitable |
Procedure for preparation of mobile phase:
20mM KH2PO4: ACN (pH 4.0) in the ratio of 20:80 v/v, pH 4.0 with Ortho Phosphoric Acid filtered through a 0.45m filter paper.
Table 2: Mobile phase selection
|
Mobile Phase
|
Ratio |
Retention Time |
|
Remark |
||
|
ACN: Water |
50 : 50 v/v |
Poor Resolution |
|
ACN: Methanol |
50 : 50 v/v |
Poor Resolution |
|
20mM KH2PO4: ACN (pH 4.0) |
20:80 v/v |
Most Suitable |
Selection of diluent:
Diluent used for preparation of sample were compatible with mobile phase and no any significant affect retention and resolution of analyte. After various trials Acetonitrile was used as diluents.
Selection of separation variable:
Table 3: Separation variable
|
Variable |
Condition |
|
Column |
|
|
Dimension. |
250mm x 4.60mm |
|
Particle Size |
5m |
|
Bonded Phase |
Octadecylsilane (C18) |
|
Mobile Phase |
|
|
20mM KH2PO4 |
20 |
|
Acetonitrile |
80 |
|
Diluent |
Acetonitrile |
|
Flow rate |
1.0ml/min |
|
Temperature |
Ambient |
|
Sample Size |
20ml |
|
Detection wavelength |
254mm |
|
Retention time |
|
|
MET |
5.150±0.024min. |
|
EPG |
7.162±0.014min. |
Extraction of drug sample:
Accurately weighed 10mg of MET was transferred into 50ml volumetric flasks separately and dissolved in 10 ml of plasma, then volume was made up to 50ml with acetonitrile and vortex it to get complete precipitation of plasma protein. Stand it aside for few minute, precipitate of protein settled down then collect the supernatant layer and add 10ml of acetonitrile in precipitate to complete removal of drug. Centrifuge the collected supernatant layer at 6000rpm for 7min at 4oC and then filtered by Whatmann filter paper (no.41). Concentration of EPG in acetonitrile was 200µg/ml (stock- A).
Preparation of Sub Stock Solution:
5ml of solution was taken from stock-A of MET and transferred into 10ml volumetric flask separately and diluted up to 10ml with diluent (Acetonitrile) to give concentration of 100µg/ml (Stock-B).
Preparation of Different Solution:
1ml, 2ml, 3ml, 4ml and 5ml of stock-B was taken separately in 10ml volumetric flask and volume was made up to 10ml with (Acetonitrile). This gives the solutions of 10µg/ml, 20µg/ml, 30µg/ml, 40µg/ml, 50µg/ml for MET. In same manner 2µg/ml, 4µg/ml, 6µg/ml, 8µg/ml, 10µg/ml of EPG also prepared.
System Suitability Parameters:6
Separation variables were set and mobile phase was allowed to saturate the column at 1.00ml/min. After complete saturation of column, three replicates of working standard of MET 20mg/ml and 4mg/ml EPG was injected separately. Peak report and column performance report were recorded for all chromatogram.
Table 4: System Suitability Parameters
|
Parameters |
% MEAN±SD* |
|
|
Metformin |
Empagliflozin |
|
|
No. of Theoretical Plates |
3537.667±47.647 |
3274.333±23.989 |
|
Tailing Factor |
1.140±0.021 |
1.043±0.038 |
|
Retention time |
5.150±0.024 |
7.162±0.014 |
Validation of developed method:7-22
Linearity:11
Linearity of analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test, which are directly proportional to area of analyte in the sample. The calibration plot was contracted after analysis of five different (from 10 to 50µg/ml) and (2 to 10µg/ml) concentrations and areas for each concentration were recorded three times, and mean area was calculated. The regression equation and correlation coefficient of curve are given and the standard calibration curve of the drug is shown in figure 5.36. From the mean of AUC observed and respective concentration value, the response ratio (response factor) was found by dividing the AUC with respective concentration (Table given below).
Table 5: Linearity
|
Parameter |
Metformin |
Empagliflozin |
|
Concentration (μg/ml) |
10-50 |
2-10 |
|
Correlation Coefficient (r2)* |
0.999 |
0.999 |
|
Slope (m)* |
15.33 |
51.64 |
|
Intercept (c)* |
1.346 |
-1.404 |
Specificity:
Specificity of the method was carried out to assess unequivocally the analyte presence of the components that might be expected to be present, such as impurities, degradation products and matrix components.
Accuracy:12
Recovery studies were performed to validate the accuracy of developed method to reanalyzed sample solution, a definite concentration of standard drug (80%, 100%, and 120%) was added and then its recovery was analyzed.
Table 6: Results of recovery study
|
% Level |
% MEAN±SD* |
|
|
Metformin |
Empagliflozin |
|
|
80% |
98.66±0.666 |
98.84±1.012 |
|
100% |
99.27±0.528 |
95.32±0.995 |
|
120% |
98.55±0.779 |
99.01±0.482 |
* Value of three replicate and three concentrations
Precision:13
Repeatability:
The repeatability was performed for five replicate at five concentrations in linearity range 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50mg/ml for MET and 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10mg/ml for EPG indicates the precision under the same operating condition over short interval time.
Intermediate Precision (Day To Day Precision):
Intermediate precision was also performed within laboratory variation on different days in five replicate at five concentrations. Results of day to day intermediate precision for MET and EPG reported in table 7.
Table 7: Results of precision
|
Parameter |
% MEAN±SD* |
|
|
Metformin |
Empagliflozin |
|
|
Repeatability |
99.13±0.019 |
96.84±0.074 |
|
Intermediate precision |
||
|
Day to day precision |
98.86±0.120 |
96.06±0.118 |
Robustness14
As per ICH norms, small, but deliberate variations in concentration of the mobile phase were made to check the method’s capacity to remain unaffected. The ratio of mobile phase was change from, 20mM KH2PO4: acetonitrile (20:80% v/v), to (15:85 % v/v).
Table 8: Results of Robustness
|
Parameter |
% MEAN±SD* |
|
|
Metformin |
Empagliflozin |
|
|
Robustness |
99.17±0.102 |
96.31±0.115 |
Detection Limit and Quantitation Limit15
The LOD and LOQ of developed method were calculated based on the standard deviation of response and slope of the linearity curve.
Table 9: Results of LOD and LOQ
|
Name |
LOD (mg/ml) |
LOQ (mg/ml) |
|
Metformin |
0.25 |
0.75 |
|
Empagliflozin |
0.15 |
0.45 |
Analysis of both the drugs in tablets formulation:16
Amount equal to 250mg of MET (6.25mg of EPG) from the tablets of Jardiance Met was taken in 100ml volumetric flask. This was than dissolve in 10ml of plasma by sonication for about 10 minutes. The volume is made up to the mark by mobile phase and filtered by whatmann filter paper (no.41) and the filtrate was used to prepare samples of different concentration.
Table 10: Analysis of tablet sample
|
Tablet Jardiance Met |
MET* |
EPG* |
|
Label Claim (mg) |
500 mg |
12.5 mg |
|
% Found (mg) |
495.65 |
12.45 |
|
% Assay |
99.13 |
99.6 |
|
% RSD |
0.123 |
0.225 |
CONCLUSION:
Overall, the developed RP-HPLC method stands out as a comprehensive tool for the simultaneous estimation of metformin and empagliflozin in blood plasma. Its robustness, precision, accuracy, sensitivity, linearity, specificity, and stability collectively affirm its suitability for routine bioanalytical applications. Consequently, this method can be confidently employed in clinical settings for therapeutic drug monitoring, as well as in research environments for pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies, ensuring high-quality and reliable analytical results.
REFERENCES:
1. Iqbal, M., and Khalil, N. Y. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of metformin and empagliflozin in pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2018: 69-77.
2. Singh, K., and Sharma, R. A validated RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of metformin hydrochloride and empagliflozin in human plasma. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2019; 10(3): 1402-1408.
3. Patel, M. C., and Patel, M. M. Development and validation of a stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of metformin and empagliflozin in bulk and tablet dosage form. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2017; 55(9): 919-930.
4. Zafar, F., and Akhtar, M. Simultaneous quantification of metformin and empagliflozin in human plasma using a validated RP-HPLC method and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. Biomedical Chromatography. 2016; 30(12): 1917-1925.
5. Srinivasan, S., Kumar, K. A novel validated RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous estimation of metformin and empagliflozin in rat plasma and its application to pharmacokinetic studies. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology. 2020; 11(1): 45-55.
6. Kumar, D., Bhushan, R. Analytical method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of metformin and empagliflozin in human plasma by RP-HPLC. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 2021; 44(5): 323-335.
7. Shah, V. P., Midha, K. K., Dighe, S., Analytical methods validation: bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1992; 81(3): 309-312.
8. Shabir, G. A., Validation of high-performance liquid chromatography methods for pharmaceutical analysis: Understanding the differences and similarities between validation requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration, the US Pharmacopeia and the International Conference on Harmonization. Journal of Chromatography A. 2003; 987(1-2): 57-66.
9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. Retrieved from [FDA website] (https://www.fda.gov/media/70858/download), 2018.
10. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1). Retrieved from [ICH website] (https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines), 2005.
11. Baokar Shrikrishna, Ranpise Nisharani. Analytical Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Montelukast and Ebastine by HPLC. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(1): 01-05. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00001.3
12. Shrikrishna Baokar, Vinod Pawar, R.N. Patil, Rashmi Jagatap, Netrali Ekatpure. Validation of Simple and Rapid UV-Spectrophotometric Method with Stress Degradation Study for Sildenafil Citrate. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2012; 5(2): 214-218.
13. Krishna Patel, Dipti Patel. Simultaneous method development and Validation by HPLC for Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in mucoadhesive microspheres containing capsules. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(6): 3365-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00585
14. Murugan S, Upendra Janardhan CH, Niranjan Babu M. RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Albendazole and Niclosamide in Oral Suspension for Veterinary Use. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(1): 27-32. doi: DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00006.8
15. Sridevi. S, Vijayakumar. R, C. N. Nalini. Method Development and Validation for the Simultaneous Estimation of Ascorbic acid, Phenylephrine HCl, Paracetamol and Levocetirizine HCl using RP-HPLC. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(4): 1911-1916. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00344.3
16. Manojkumar K. Munde, Nilesh S. Kulkarni, Nikita B. Rukhe, Dhanya B. Sen. A Comprehensive Review on Analytical Method Development and Validation for SGLT-2 Inhibitors by HPLC in Its API and Dosage Form. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(7): 3472-3479. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00616.2
17. Lalit K Sahu, Sudam Si, Saroj Kumar Patro. Stability Indicating Assay of Empaglifozin and Metformin. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(3): 1135-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00177
18. S. Marakatham, P. Shanmugapandiyan. Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Doravirine, Lamavudine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate using HPLC in Human Plasma. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(8): 4087-1. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00708
19. Dibya Das, Dhiman Halder, Himangshu Sekhar Maji, Pintu Kumar De, Tapan Kumar Pal. Special Emphasis on Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of an Anti-Hypertensive Drug Azelnidipine by LC-ESI-MS/MS in Healthy Human Volunteer’s Blood Plasma. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(7): 3571-7. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00618
20. Dibya Das, Dhiman Halder, Himangshu Sekhar Maji, Pintu Kumar De, Sudipta Saha, Navjot Singh, Tapan Kumar Pal. Introduction of an Innovative approach for Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Febuxostat by using LC-ESI-MS/MS in Human Plasma. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(8): 4060-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00703
21. Gurumurthy. Telugu, P. V. Suresh. Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Eprosartan Mesylate and Hydrochlorthiazide using RP-HPLC in Human plasma. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(3): 1095-9. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00182
22. K. Bhavyasri, B. Aishwarya, D. Suchitra, M. Sumakanth. Spectrometric Bioanalytical Method Development and Validation of Tolvaptan in Spiked Human plasma Followed by Forced degradation Studies. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(12): 5996-1. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00973
|
Received on 13.07.2024 Revised on 05.11.2024 Accepted on 18.01.2025 Published on 02.08.2025 Available online from August 08, 2025 Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(8):3699-3702. DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00532 © RJPT All right reserved
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License. |
|