Enhancing Sustainability: Bioprospecting soil bacteria with cellulase production potential for industrial applications

 

Sunny Dhiman1, Anu Kumar1*, Gurpreet Singh1, Shabnum Shafi1,Bhanu Krishan2

1University Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali-140413, Punjab (India).

2Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla,

Himachal Pradesh, 171005.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: anu.uibt@cumail.in

 

ABSTRACT:

In this study, we investigated the local dump yard soil ecosystem in Khanpur (Kharar), Punjab, India, with the aim of identifying bacterial isolates exhibiting potential cellulase production. The primary screening involved the utilization of the CMC agar plate method and Congo red staining to authenticate and validate cellulase-producing microorganisms. To isolate cellulolytic bacteria, soil samples were added into enrichment liquid media containing 1% (w/v) Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) and incubated at 37°C for 72hours. Following incubation, enriched samples were plated on CMC agar plates. Among the 24 bacterial colonies observed on the CMC agar plates, only two displayed halo zone formation, a characteristic indicative of cellulase production, as confirmed by Congo Red staining. These two bacterial isolates, identified as SD2 and SR3, exhibited positive results for cellulase production. The results demonstrated that isolate SD2 and SR3 exhibited significant enzyme activities of 5.42U/ml and 9.71U/ml, respectively under submerged conditions. Further investigation into the morphological and microscopic features of bacterial isolate SR3 revealed its gram-negative, rod-shaped characteristics. The identification of bacterial isolate SR3 was conducted through a comprehensive analysis of morphological and biochemical tests. This research underscores the significance of bioprospecting soil bacteria as a sustainable approach towards meeting the demands of modern industrial processes.

 

KEYWORDS: Sustainable, Carboxymethyl cellulose, Fermentation, Cellulase, Enzyme activity.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

In the realm of sustainable biotechnology, the bioprospecting of microorganisms has become a promising avenue for the discovery of valuable enzymes with industrial applications1. One such endeavour involves exploring the diverse microbial communities residing in unconventional habitats, such as local dump yards. The microbial diversity in soil ecosystems is relatively higher compare to other microbial ecosystems2.

 

 

Local dump yards, often considered as ecological eyesores, host a plethora of microorganisms uniquely adapted to thrive in complex and dynamic environments. Soil bacteria, in particular, play a vital role in the decomposition of organic matter, including cellulose-rich waste. A great majority of soil microorganisms remains unexplored as culturing dominant members using standard cultivation media has been a challenging enterprise. Consequently, the soil ecosystem is widely regarded as an immensely valuable source for discovering new microbial enzymes and bioactivities3. The diversity and adaptability of bacteria in these environments make them attractive candidates for biotechnological applications.

 

Cellulose is most bountiful biomass that serves as a key structural component of plants. It represents a renewable energy source in the biosphere4,5,6. Cellulases are responsible for the degradation of plant polysaccharide cellulose and is a commercially important enzyme that finds its application in many industries7. Cellulose degradation primarily occurs through the action of cellulase enzymes which are typically synthesized by bacteria and fungi8. These cellulases facilitate the efficient hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose units through their synergistic action of enzymes9. Cellulase is an enzyme complex crucial for the hydrolysis of cellulose into simpler sugars. This process, known as cellulolysis, has widespread applications in various industries, including biofuel production, textiles, food and beverage, and pharmaceuticals. Cellulases have garnered significant attention due to their wide-ranging applications across diverse industries such as textile, detergent, leather, food, feed, and paper10,11,12,13. Their exploitation in various industries necessitates the discovery of robust enzymes capable of functioning at high pH and elevated temperatures10. Cellulases are produced by large number of microorganisms14.  Microorganisms such as fungi and bacteria are important producers of cellulases15. Traditionally, cellulase has been obtained from fungi, but recent research has shifted towards exploring bacterial sources due to their potential advantages, such as faster growth rates and ease of genetic manipulation16. Submerged fermentation, a widely employed bioprocessing technique, involves cultivating microorganisms in a liquid medium. This method provides a controlled environment for microbial growth and enzyme production.

 

This article delves into the fascinating world of bioprospecting soil bacteria in dump yard ecosystems specifically for cellulase production through submerged fermentation.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals:

All the chemicals used in this work were of pure grade, purchased from Himedia laboratories, India. All the glassware used was of Borosil.

 

Sample collection and enrichment:

Soil samples were aseptically collected in sterile plastic bags from a fruit waste dumping site near Khanpur, Kharar, Punjab (India). Collected soil samples were enriched with 100mL of enrichment media (Carboxy Methyl Cellulose Broth). Briefly One gram of each sample was suspended in 100ml of enrichment media. Incubation was done under shaking conditions at 37°C for 48hours.

 

Isolation and screening of cellulase producing bacteria:

The cultures exhibiting substantial growth were transferred to similar fresh medium. Upon three more transfers, 1mL of turbid broth was serially diluted up to 10-8 dilutions. The conventional serial dilution agar plating method was employed to isolate cellulase producer bacteria. The production medium contained 0.5 % peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl, 1.0% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), 0.1% KH2PO4 and 1% agar, at pH 7.0. Each serially diluted sample (0.1ml) was plated on CMC Agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37ºC for 48 hours. Bacteria were isolated according to their clear zone forming ability on CMC-Agar plates. The isolates exhibiting maximum zone of clearance were selected for further screening. Pure bacterial cultures were established by repeatedly streaking single colonies on nutrient agar plates with addition of an antifungal compound and were maintained on nutrient agar slants supplemented with 0.01% CMC. Regular sub culturing of the pure cultures was done after every 30 days. The purified colonies were preserved at 4oC. 2 best bacterial isolates designated as SD2 and SR3 exhibiting maximum halo zone around them were interpreted as positive for extracellular cellulase production. The pure culture of isolates SD2 and SR3 were individually streaked in a circular pattern at the centre of the CMC agar plates. Following 1-2 days of plate incubation, the plates were flooded with a 1% w/v Congo red solution for 15minutes. Subsequently, the plates were counterstained with a 1M NaCl solution for 10minutes. The presence of a transparent zone surrounding the bacterial isolates indicated hydrolysis of CMC. These bacterial cultures were individually preserved on CMC agar slants at 4°C.

 

Cellulase production by Submerged Fermentation Process:

Enzyme production was carried out by employing both cellulolytic bacterial isolates SD2 and SR3 in the cellulase production media under submerged conditions. To achieve this, a loopful of bacterial cells from the selected isolates were inoculated into 100ml of inoculum preparation media (pH 7-7.5) comprising 1g CMC, 0.5g yeast extract, 0.5g peptone, 0.5g NaCl, and 0.1g KH2PO4 respectively. The incubation was done at 37°C for 24hours.  Fermentation media was prepared to contain (g/L) glucose 0.5gm, peptone 0.75gm, MgSO4 0.5gm, KH2PO4 0.5gm, and FeSO4 0.01gm. An inoculum level of 2% v/v (OD600=0.6–0.8) of each culture was added separately to 100ml production medium (pH 7-7.5) and incubated at 37oC for 48hrs at 150rpm. Samples were withdrawn from each flask every 12hours and centrifugation was done at 10000rpm for 10minutes at 4°C. Supernatant was used as enzyme source for the assay.

 

Enzyme assay:

To measure cellulolytic activity, Miller's method was employed17. A reaction mixture was prepared in a 10mL test tube, comprising 0.2mL of crude enzyme and 1.8 mL of 0.5% CMC in 50mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH=7). The reaction mixture was incubated in water bath at 37ºC for 30 minutes. Simultaneously, a Blank was prepared containing only 1.8mL of 0.5% CMC in 50mM sodium phosphate buffer. Subsequently, DNS (3ml) was added to both the test tubes containing the sample and the blank to terminate the reaction. Both the sample and blank mixtures were then incubated in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes to develop colour.

 

The absorbance of the sample was measured against the blank at 540nm. One unit of cellulase enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme producing 1μmole of glucose in 1 min in experimental conditions.

 

Morphological Characterization:

The bacterial isolate SR3 with prominent cellulolytic activity was subjected to morphological, microscopic and biochemical characterization. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology was used for morphological and microscopic characterization of the cellulase producing bacterial isolate SR3.

 

Biochemical characterization:

Various biochemical tests such as Methyl Red Test, Citrate utilization test, Voges–Proskauer test, Urease Test, Starch Hydrolysis Test, Catalase test, Indole Test, Oxidase test etc. were performed by standard methods for identification of the bacterial isolate SR318.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

The commercial importance of enzyme cellulase is well established at industrial level. In the present research study, isolation and identification of a potent cellulase producing bacteria from the dump yard soil ecosystem were accomplished. Carboxymethyl cellulose supplemented in nutrient agar plate supported the growth of cellulase producing bacteria by supplying essential nutrients. The spread plate technique, using a 10-8 dilution, demonstrated optimal colony appearance and the growth of multiple colonies on the nutrient agar plate. Among the 24 colonies cultivated on the nutrient agar plate supplemented with CMC, only two bacterial isolates, SD2 and SR3, displayed the halo zones surrounding them, a phenomenon subsequently confirmed through Congo red staining19 (Figure 1a, 1b).

 

Figure 1. The clear zone of CMC hydrolysis around bacterial isolates SD2 and SR3

The quantitative estimation of cellulase production potential of the bacterial isolates showing halo zone formation around them was assessed in cellulase production media in submerged conditions. Both the isolate SD2 and SR3 exhibited considerably good enzyme activities. The enzyme activities of isolates SD2 and SR3 were recorded as 5.42 U/ml and 9.71 U/ml respectively after 48 hours. The isolate SR3 was selected for further study. The bacterial isolate SR3 showing maximum cellulase activity was characterized on the basis of morphological characteristics, microscopic examination, gram staining and biochemical tests. Morphological and microscopic examination of the bacterial isolate SR3 indicated that it is a gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium (Table 1, Figure 2). Table 1 presents the outcomes of several biochemical tests utilized for bacterial identification. Through the assessment of both biochemical and morphological traits, the isolated strain was identified as Enterobacter sp.

 

Figure 2. Gram Staining of Bacterial Isolate SR3

 

Table 1. Morphological characteristics of Bacterial isolate SR3

Test

Characteristics

Clear zone of hydrolysis (Diameter)

2.86 cm

Arrangements

Short rods

Form

Circular

Margin

Sleek

Growth level

Raised

Gram’s staining

Negative

 

Table 2. Biochemical Characteristics of  bacterial isolate SR3

Bacterial isolate SR3

 

Biochemical Test

Characteristics

Indole

_

Methyl Red

_

Voges Proskauer's

+

Citrate utilization

+

Malonate utilization

+

Glucose

+

Lactose

+

Xylose

+

Maltose

+

Fructose

_

Dextrose

_

Mannose

+

Adonitol

+

Arabinose

+

Lactose

+

Sorbitol

+

Mannitol

+

Rhamnose

+

Cellobiose 

+

Melezitose

+

Trehalose 

+

Melibiose

+

Sucrose

+

Oxidase

_

Catalase

+

Gelatin

_

Urease

_

Starch hydrolysis

_

Inulin

_

Sodium gluconate

_

 

The cellulolytic capabilities of the identified bacterial isolate are influenced by the type and quantity of biowaste present in natural environments. The initial screening of bacterial isolates through the Congo red CMC agar method confirmed the secretion of cellulose-degrading enzymes by the cellulase producing bacteria.   Subsequently, the secondary screening was done to evaluate the cellulase production potential of the isolate. The isolated isolate was cultivated in a fermentation medium, and cellulase production was evaluated under various culture conditions. Further, the isolated isolate was characterised through morphological and biochemical analysis. Through morphological, microscopic, and biochemical characterization, the isolated isolate was identified as Enterobacter sp. The Enterobacter sp. demonstrated optimal cellulase activity (10.56 U/ml) at a pH of 6.5 and a temperature of 40°C after 24 hours of incubation, with a substrate concentration of 1% w/v CMC. Previous research investigations also reported the isolation of cellulase producing bacteria from various sources including soil, cow urine etc.20, 21. The bioprospecting of soil bacteria in local dump yard ecosystems for cellulase production under submerged fermentation represents a cutting-edge approach in the field of industrial biotechnology. By tapping into the hidden potential of these microbial communities, researchers aim to contribute to the development of sustainable and eco-friendly solutions for cellulase production, furthering the integration of bioprocessing into various industries. As we unravel the mysteries of nature's microbial diversity, the dump yard ecosystem emerges as an invaluable source of innovation for a greener and more sustainable future.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

This study not only successfully isolated cellulase-producing bacteria from the local dump yard soil ecosystem but also evaluated their cellulolytic potential under submerged conditions. The findings contribute valuable insights into the microbial diversity of dump yard environments, emphasizing their potential for biotechnological applications, particularly in cellulase production. The enzyme activity of bacterial isolates can vary depending on the substrate used, the presence of metals in the reaction whether facilitating or inhibiting it, as well as the pH and temperature of the medium. With the increasing demand for garments due to population growth, there is a need for large-scale garment manufacturing. Cellulase plays a crucial role in this industry by softening garments quickly and aiding in the removal of excess dye. Moreover, cellulase has substantial demand in other industries such as ethanol production, fuel manufacturing, detergent production, and pharmaceuticals. To meet this demand, cellulase-producing bacteria with high enzyme activity are essential for sustaining the supply chain. However, further research can explore the use of different substrates in cellulase production, including natural substrates like wheat straw, rice, corn, and hemp, which could significantly enhance cellulase enzyme production.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

None.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Perez Rojo F. Pillow JJ. Kaur P. Bioprospecting microbes and enzymes for the production of pterocarpans and coumestans. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023; 11:1154779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1154779

2.      Bastida F. Eldridge DJ. García C. Kenny Png G. Bardgett RD.  Delgado-Baquerizo, M. Soil microbial diversity–biomass relationships are driven by soil carbon content across global biomes. The ISME Journal. 2021; 15(7): 2081-91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00906-0

3.      Lee MH. Lee SW. Bioprospecting potential of the soil metagenome: novel enzymes and bioactivities. Genomics and informatics. 2013; 11(3): 114. https://doi.org/10.5808/gi.2013.11.3.114

4.      Saha S. Roy RN. Sen SK. Ray AK. Characterization of cellulase‐producing bacteria from the digestive tract of tilapia, Oreochromis mossambica (Peters) and grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes). Aquaculture Research. 2006; 37(4): 380-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01442.x

5.      Klemm D. Heublein B. Fink HP. Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2005; 44(22): 3358-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200536238.

6.      Bhat M. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances. 2000; 18(5): 355-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-9750(00)00041-0.

7.      Sowmya H. Screening of Enzymes from Actinomycetes and Fungi isolated from Plastic Dumped Soil. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(5): 2261-2266. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2019.00376.7

8.      Immanuel G. Dhanusha R. Prema P. Palavesam AJ. Effect of different growth parameters on endoglucanase enzyme activity by bacteria isolated from coir retting effluents of estuarine environment. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2006; 3:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03325904.

9.      Pérez J. Munoz-Dorado J. De la Rubia TD. Martinez J. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. International Microbiology. 2002; 5: 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3.

10.   Gyalai-Korpos M. Nagy G. Mareczky Z. Schuster A. Réczey K. Schmoll M. Relevance of the light signaling machinery for cellulase expression in Trichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina). BMC Research Notes. 2010; 3:1-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-330.

11.   Ibrahim AS. El-diwany AI. Isolation and identification of new cellulases producing thermophilic bacteria from an Egyptian hot spring and some properties of the crude enzyme. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2007; 1(4): 473-8.

12.   Suresh Chandra KR. Snishamol C. Nagendra Prabhu G. Cellulase production by native bacteria using water hyacinth as substrate under solid state fermentation. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology. 2005.https://doi.org/10.21161/mjm.120504.

13.   Cavaco-Paulo A. Mechanism of cellulase action in textile processes. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1998; 1; 37(3): 273-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8617(98)00070-8.

14.   Ranjani M. Rajan S. Murugesan AG. Isolation and optimization of cellulase enzyme by Ocrobacterium sp from Cow dung. Research J. Science and Tech. 2013; 5(2): 255-258. http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:rjst&volume=5&issue=2&article=005

15.   Chand T. Pandey FK. Dhingra S. Sharma MK. Production of Industrially Significant Enzymes from Bio-Wastes Using Aspergillus niger by Solid State Fermentation. Research J. Science and Tech. 2014; 6(1):  16-19. https://rjpdft.com/HTMLPaper.aspx?Journal=Research%20Journal%20of%20Pharmaceutical%20Dosage%20Forms%20and%20Technology;PID=2014-6-1-6

16.   Acharya S, Chaudhary A. Bioprospecting thermophiles for cellulase production: a review. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2012; 43: 844-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822012000300001.

17.   Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical chemistry. 1959 Mar 1; 31(3): 426-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030

18.   Buchanan RE. and Gibbons NE. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 8th Edition, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.1974; 1268 p.

19.   Jalgaonwala RE. Mahajan RT. Isolation and Characterization of Endophytic Bacterial Flora from Some Indian Medicinal Plants. Asian J. Research Chem. 2011; 4(2): 296-300. http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajrc&volume=4&issue=2&article=031&type=pdf

20.   Bharathi V. Firdous J. Mona, R. Muhamad N. Efficacy of Cellulose Degrading Bacteria from Soil in Production of Cellulase from Corn Waste. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(9): 4024-4028. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00740.0

21.   Bharathirajan M. Rebecca LJ. Muniyandi MJ. Study on the Antibacterial Activity and Identification of cellulolytic bacteria from Cow Urine. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(9): 3993-3997. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00734.5

 

 

 

Received on 18.04.2024      Revised on 30.09.2024

Accepted on 22.01.2025      Published on 02.05.2025

Available online from May 07, 2025

Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(5):2127-2131.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00305

© RJPT All right reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.