Review on Nitrosamine:

A Potential Genotoxic Impurity

 

Baratam Kasinath, Boddu Veeraswami*

Gitam Central Research Laboratories, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam - 45, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: veeraswamiboddu@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Nitrosamine impurities are a group of chemical compounds that have raised concerns due to their potential carcinogenicity. Nitrosamines are taken orally by humans from food and medicine. N-nitroso compounds (NOC) are exposed by human beings from food, tobacco smoking, medicines and other environmental sources. The recent discovery of nitrosamines made huge changes in the pharmaceutical world. Safety issues has been found in few drugs like valsartan, tetrazole-containing angiotensin-II receptor blockers, ranitidine, and metformin etc... due to the unacceptable levels of N-nitroso compounds. These nitrosamine impurities may form if an amine compound reacts with a nitrosating agent under suitable conditions (viz., temperature, pH etc.) during the manufacturing and storage of the product. To ensure the quality and safety of the drug product, drug regulatory agencies throughout the world have introduced stringent measures on nitrosamine contamination for all drug products in the market. To comply current regulatory requirements, many drug products have been recalled and it causes shortage of medicines in the market. Hence, omission or prevention of nitrosamine impurities in drug products is essential to meet daily medicine needs for human beings and to enhance human lifespan. In this review on Nitrosamine discussed the classifications, Toxicity, acceptable intakes, limit calculations and control measures gives you a significant knowledge and awareness on Nitrosamine.

 

KEYWORDS: Nitrosamine/ Genotoxic Impurity/ Endogenous and Exogenous Nitrosamine/ N-Nitrosodimethylamine.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Nitroso compounds were first discovered by Adolf von Baeyer in 1863. In 1956, Barnes and Magee found that dimethylnitrosamine causes liver tumors in rats. N-nitroso compounds are classified into N-nitrosamines and N-nitroso amides (Fig. 1). Nitrosamines are stable compounds formed by a reaction between secondary or tertiary amines and nitrous acid under specific temperature and pH conditions1.

 

 

Primary amines, however, do not form nitrosamines, as they produce reactive diazonium ions. N-nitroso amides are unstable due to the presence of both nitroso and carbonyl groups2. N-nitroso compounds (NOC) can cause the human cancer by exposing in both endogenous and exogenous.

 

 

 

N-nitrosamide

N-nitrosamine

Figure 1: Structures of N-Nitros compounds

 

Carcinogenicity of Nitrosamine impurities:

Nitrosamines (NA) are not directly carcinogenic but can be converted into alkylating agents through metabolic activation, leading to DNA mutations3. The P450 enzyme, primarily found in the liver, plays a key role in this process. It catalyzes oxidation reactions, aiding in the metabolism of medicines, toxins, and biological substances. This oxidation activates nitrosamines, turning them into alkylating agents capable of modifying DNA and causing mutations.

 

Endogenous and Exogenous Nitrosamine formation:

NA exposure can be endogenous or exogenous. Endogenously, nitrosamine impurities can form in the stomach. Studies show that feeding animals nitrite and secondary amines leads to tumor formation, suggesting endogenous NA formation. In food, NA can form when a nitrosating agent, like nitrogen oxides, reacts with amines. Two major sources of nitrogen oxides in food are nitrate/nitrite addition and heating/drying during food processing. NA are found in high concentrations in dried meat, cheese, pickled foods, and food stored or processed under moist conditions4.

 

Recently, nitrosamine impurities were unexpectedly found in some human medicines. In July 2018, Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. recalled Valsartan tablets due to trace amounts of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in the Valsartan API (Fig. 2) made by Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.5. The U.S. EPA considers NDMA a probable human carcinogen based on animal studies. The acceptable intake is 96 nanograms of NDMA per day, deemed reasonably safe for humans. 

 

In October 2018, ScieGen recalled certain Irbesartan products due to N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) contamination, a suspected human carcinogen. Irbesartan was the first non-Valsartan product found with NDEA impurity, and Aurobindo manufactured the API for ScieGen's Irbesartan (Fig. 2)6.

 

In November 2018, Sandoz voluntarily recalled Losartan tablets due to N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) contamination, with the API manufactured by Zhejiang Huahai (Fig. 2)7. In March 2019, Losartan was again recalled, this time by Torrent, due to a new impurity, N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA), in the API from Hetero Labs8. The common feature in Valsartan, Irbesartan, and Losartan is the tetrazole ring in their structure, which is also present in two other sartans, Candesartan and Olmesartan. The structures of all these 5 molecules are shown in Figure 2.

 

 

 

Valsartan

Irbesartan

 

 

Losartan

Candesartan

 

Olmesartan

Figure 2 Tetrazole ring containing API’s

 

To better control nitrosamines in APIs, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare (EDQM) revised Sartan monographs in the 10th edition of Ph. Eur., adding interim limits. Unlike tetrazole-containing sartans, azilsartan, eprosartan, and telmisartan do not carry the same nitrosamine contamination risk9. The concern extended beyond sartans when NDMA was found as a contaminant in Ranitidine (Fig. 3) in September 201910, Metformin (Fig. 3) in December 201911, and later in Nizatidine12 (Fig. 3).

 

 

 

Metformin

Nizatidine

 

Ranitidine

Figure 3 Nitrosamine contaminated drug substances

 

Toxicity and acceptable intakes of Nitrosamine Impurities:

 

In various animal species NA compounds are identified as potential genotoxic nature are classified as possible human carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)13. ICH society NA compounds are classified as “cohort of concern”, and few guidelines are issued for industry are ICH M7. The acceptable intakes proposed by several health agencies are provided in the Table 1 along with the structure, IARC group and mutagenicity of respective nitrosamine compounds.

 

 

 


Table 1: Acceptable intakes of various Nitrosamine compounds

Nitrosamine compound name

Abbreviation

Structure

IARC group@

Acceptable intake (AI) (ng/day)

#EMA

#FDA

#Health Canada

#ANVISA

N-Nitrosodimethylamine

NDMA

 

 

2A

96.0

96.0

96.0

96.0

N-Nitrosodiethylamine

NDEA

 

 

2A

26.5

26.5

26.5

26.5

N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine

NDBA

 

 

2B

26.5

-

26.5

26.5

N-nitrosomorpholine

NMOR

 

 

2B

127.0

-

-

-

N-nitrosodipropylamine

NDPA

 

 

2B

26.5

-

-

-

N-Nitroso ethylisopropylamine

EIPNA

 

 

-

26.5

26.5

26.5

26.5

N-Nitroso diisopropylamine

DIPNA

 

 

-

26.5

26.5

26.5

26.5

N-Nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid

NMBA

 

 

-

96.0

96.0

96.0

96.0

1-Methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine

MeNP/ MNP

 

 

-

26.5

-

96.0

26.5

N-Nitroso-N-methylaniline

NMPA

 

 

-

34.3

26.5

-

34.3

N-nitroso-varenicline

NNV

 

 

-

37.0

-

-

-

@ IARC Group – 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans,IARC Group – 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans

# EMA - European Medicines Agency

FDA - Food and Drug Administration

ANVISA - Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency)

 


Limit Calculation:

Nitrosamine’s limit can be calculated in two ways.

1.     N-nitrosamines should be subjected to a substance-specific limit derivation process, in accordance with ICH M7, if adequate substance-specific animal carcinogenicity data are available to compute a dependable TD50.

2.     The default option for N-nitrosamines can be a class-specific TTC of 18 ng/day (derived from the Lhasa carcinogenic potency database) if there is insufficient substance-specific data to derive a substance-specific limit for lifetime exposure, as advised by the ICH M7 guideline.

 

If properly justified, a method based on SAR concerns to determine an acceptable intake limit is acceptable.

 

Nitrosamine Contamination sources in pharmaceutical products:

Several root causes are identified for the formation of nitrosamines in pharmaceutical products. The details are given in Figure 4.

 

Figure 4 Contamination sources of nitrosamines

 

Controls of Nitrosamines:

Handle the risk with mutagenic impurities in a drug by using ICH M7 guidance. Total Four control options (refer to ICH M7; Section 8) are identified to regulate the mutagenic impurities. Out of four options, option 1 and 2 only testing is involved and option 3 and 4 are a combination of testing and experts’ knowledge.

Option 1: Impurity can be controlled in the API if the specification limit ≤ the acceptable limit.

Option 2: Impurity control in the starting substances / active intermediates control specifications with a specification limit ≤ the acceptable limit.

Option 3: Impurity control in the specification of a raw material/ starting material/ intermediate/ in-process control, with a specification limit > the acceptable limit and prove the process capability by spike-purge studies to guarantee the impurity level in the drug substance is below compound specific limit.

Option 4: Justification of control approach based on scientific principles.

 

Quantitative evaluation of Nitrosamines in Pharmaceutical products:

Quantitative evaluation of nitrosamines is challenging due to the low specification limits in tetrazole-containing sartans and other contaminated drugs. These limits are based on low acceptable intake values, drug dosage, and long-term use. Regulatory bodies in the US and EU require testing of at-risk medicinal products by September 26, 2022 (EU), and September 1, 2023 (US), three years after the guidance was published.

 

To test nitrosamine impurities in medicinal products, analytical methods must be developed and validated for specificity, precision, accuracy, and linearity. Regulatory agencies, research bodies, and the pharmaceutical industry have developed various methods using gas chromatography (GC-MS/MS), liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detection to meet current regulatory requirements. Few authors are wrote some reviews and research on Nitrosamine impurities in recent years shows its significance14-28.

 

Purging of nitrosamines based on theoretical knowledge:

The purging of nitrosamine impurities is validated on theoretical thought of their physicochemical properties graphical representation was shown in Figure 5 and the detailed approach developed by Teasdale et al.,29. Each physicochemical property has its own purge value are shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2 Standard Purge factors and their values

Influencing factor

Relative Purge scale

Inference

 

Rate of Reactivity

100

More reactive

10

Reasonably reactive

01

Least reactive

 

Relative solubility

10

Easily miscible

3

Moderative soluble

1

Partially miscible

 

Strength of vaporization

10

boiling point >20 °C

3

boiling point within ±20 °C

1

boiling point <20 °C

Rate of Ionization

10 - 3

genotoxic impurities are have different ionization potential rather than desired product treated

Chromatogram

10 - 100

Extent of Polarity

scavenger resins

3 - 100

Validated on individual criteria

 

The Purge score 100 shows 99% of the impurity removed.

 

 

Figure 5: Physicochemical parameters to calculate the purge value

 

Purge ratio:

 

Purge ratio =

Purge factor for the impurity

Required purge factor @ TTC or PDE

 

 

Based on purge ratio, analytical data evidential requirements are made and shown in Table 3.

 

Table 3 Evidential requirements based on purge ratio

Purge Ratio (PR)

Evidential Requirements

>1000

Option 4 supporting; can go with purge ratio

1000 < PR > 100

-         Purge calculation

-         Literature evidence

-         Analytical data to support purge studies

100 < PR > 1

Option 4 supporting only with purge ratio

-         Purge calculation

-         Literature evidence

-         Analytical data to support purge studies

PR < 1

Option 4 not supported

 

CONCLUSIONS:

To cater current regulatory requirements and to ensure the quality of drug and patient safety; pharmaceutical industry should take utmost care towards new product developments and process optimization of the existing developed and marketed products to reduce the level of nitrosamines by implementing precautionary measures as discussed above. If at all nitrosamines present in the Active Pharma Ingredient substance, suitable analytical method to be developed and validated adequately to control the nitrosamines.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

There is no conflict of interest among the authors to publish this article.

 

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS STATEMENT:

All the authors are collectively worked to do this research work at various stages of data collection, design of the work, data analysis, interpretation and drafting the article.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

The authors are acknowledged to GITAM Central Research Laboratories, GITAM Deemed to be University, Visakhapatnam for providing necessary facilities to perform this research work.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Control of Nitrosamine Impurities in Human Drugs. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/media/141720

2.      Loeppky RN. Nitrosamine and N-Nitroso Compound Chemistry and Biochemistry Advances and Perspectives. ACS Symposium series. American Chemical Society. 1994; 553: 1-18. doi: 10.1021/bk-1994-0553.ch001

3.      Hiroshi YH et al., Cytochrome P450 2E1 and 2A6 enzymes as major catalysts for metabolic activation of N-nitrosodialkylamines and tobacco-related nitrosamines in human liver microsomes. Carcinogenesis. 1992; 13(10): 1789 - 1794. doi: 10.1093/carcin/13.10.1789.

4.      Tricker AR, Preussmann R. Carcinogenic N-nitrosamines in the diet: occurrence, formation, mechanisms ad carcinogenic potential. Mutation Research. 1991; 259(3–4): 277–89. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90123-4.

5.      Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Valsartan and Valsartan HCTZ Tablets Due to Detection of a Trace Amount of Unexpected Impurity, N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in The Products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/prinston-pharmaceutical-inc-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-valsartan-and-valsartan-hctz-tablets

6.      Sciegen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Irbesartan Tablets, USP 75 Mg, 150 Mg, and 300 Mg Due to The Detection of Trace Amounts of NDEA (N-Nitrosodiethylamine) Impurity Found in The Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/sciegen-pharmaceuticals-inc-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-irbesartan-tablets-usp-75-mg-150-mg

7.      Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of One Lot of Losartan Potassium and Hydrochlorothiazide Due to the Detection of Trace Amounts of NDEA (N-Nitrosodiethylamine) Impurity Found in the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/sandoz-inc-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-one-lot-losartan-potassium-and-hydrochlorothiazide-due

8.      FDA Updates and Press Announcements on Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) Recalls (Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan). U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-arb-recalls-valsartan-losartan

9.      Nitrosamines: EMA aligns recommendations for sartans with those for other medicines. EMA/134937/2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/angiotensin-ii-receptor-antagonists-sartans-article-31-referral-nitrosamines-ema-aligns_en-0.pdf

10.   Statement alerting patients and health care professionals of NDMA found in samples of ranitidine. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-alerting-patients-and-health-care-professionals-ndma-found-samples-ranitidine

11.   Statement from Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, on impurities found in diabetes drugs outside the U.S. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-janet-woodcock-md-director-fdas-center-drug-evaluation-and-research-impurities-found

12.   Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall of Nizatidine Oral Solution, 15 mg/mL, Due to Potential Levels of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) Impurity Amounts Above the Levels Established by FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, USA. https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/amneal-pharmaceuticals-llc-issues-voluntary-nationwide-recall-nizatidine-oral-solution-15-mgml-due

13.   IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans. World Health Organization. https://monographs.iarc.fr/list-of-classifications

14.   Karishma PF and Vinod HJ. Insight into Analytical Techniques for the Detection of Nitrosamine Impurities: A Review. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(1): 30-4. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00005

15.   Ajay IP et al. Nitrosamine Impurity: Management of Unwelcome Guest in Pharma Market. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(4): 303-8. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00049

16.   Ashok BP et al. A Brief Review on Genotoxic impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2021; 11(3): 187-3. doi: 10.52711/2231-5691.2021.00034

17.   Ahamed Noor M et al. A Review on Genotoxicity. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. July-Sept. 2014; 4(3): 162-165.

18.   Samrat Debnath et al. Impurity Linked Genotoxicity assessment of the Antineoplastic Chemotherapy agent using Ames model. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(7): 3339-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00551

19.   Hassan Jaddi et al. Synthesis and genotoxic evaluation of a 4-(Oxiran-2-ylmethyl)-1,4-benzothiazin-3-one. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(11): 5217-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00879

20.   Meera Sumanth et al. Genotoxicity Testing of Lipovedic- A Polyherbal Anti-hypercholesterolemic Drug. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. Aug. 20114, (8): Page 1189-1192

21.   Anil Kumar K et al. Determination of Genotoxic Impurities in Nilotinib using LC-MS Method. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(3): 1003-7. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00155

22.   Moushumi BJ et al. In Vivo Evaluation of Genotoxic Effects of Sivanar Amirtham Formulation on Rats Using Micro Nucleus Assay. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(11): 5017-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00843

23.   Alexander ML al. Evaluation of genotoxicity in buccal mucosa of patients subjected to X-rays by degenerative nuclear alterations study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(11):5845-8. Doi: doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.01017

24.   Veeraswami B and Ramarao R., Identification and Validation of Potential Genotoxic Impurity in Rizatriptan by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography., Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science., 4th January 2024, Volume 14 (1), 212-220. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2024.152121 

25.   Veeraswami B and Ramarao R., Identification and Validation of Genotoxic Impurity in Ezetimibe by Reverse Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography., Oriental Journal of Chemistry., 10th July 2023, Volume 39 (4), 896-903. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojc/390410

26.   Rama Rao R, et al. Development and Validation of Three Potential Genotoxic Impurities by Liquid Chromatography Single Quad Mass Detector in Iomeprol., Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International., 29th October 2021, Vol. 33 (Issue 47A), 756-767. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i47A33071

27.   Rama Rao R, et al. A Simple and Sensitive LC-MS/MS Method for Determination and Quantification of Potential Genotoxic Impurities in the Vismodegib Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International., 21st September 2021, Vol. 33 (Issue 44B), 88-102. doi: 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i44B32654

28.   Michael JB et al. Controlling a Cohort: Use of Mirabilis-Based Purge Calculations to Understand Nitrosamine-Related Risk and Control Strategy Options. Organic Process Research and Development. 2020, 24, 1531- 1535. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00264

29.   Teasdale A et al. A Tool for the Semiquantitative Assessment of Potentially Genotoxic Impurity (PGI) Carryover into API Using Physicochemical Parameters and Process Conditions. Organic Process Research and Development. 2010, 14 (4), 943 - 945. doi: 10.1021/op100071n

 

 

 

Received on 02.04.2024      Revised on 06.11.2024

Accepted on 08.03.2025      Published on 01.10.2025

Available online from October 04, 2025

Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(10):5041-5046.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00728

© RJPT All right reserved

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License.