Studying the impact of some commonly used spices on Glycemic index and -load of a Carbohydrate-rich meal
Maha Ismail*, Zeinab Sarem
Department of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mahasalehismail@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of some commonly used spices on glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL). Cumin (Cuminum cyminum), ginger (Zingiber officinale), and coriander fruits (Coriandrum sativum L.) were the used spices in this study, whereas the widely consumed carbohydrate-rich boiled potato was chosen as the test food. The study included 10 healthy, non-diabetic participants, 6 males and 4 females aged between 20 and 30 years with Body mass index (BMI) below 25 (BMI: mean±SD, 20.98±3.43). On specific meeting days over 5 weeks, the participants consumed the following test meals: glucose (standard food), boiled potato (test food), boiled potato with 0.5g of cumin, boiled potato with 0.5g of coriander, and boiled potato with 0.5g of ginger. Each meal was consumed with 150ml of water after 10-12 h overnight fasting. The glycemic index values were calculated after measuring capillary blood glucose at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120min. The values of blood glucose responses and the blood glucose incremental area under curve (IAUC) of boiled potato decreased significantly after adding the studied spices (P<0.05). The GI and GL values for boiled potato with each type of the studied spices (GI=88.73, GL=12.32 for boiled potato with cumin, GI=86.53, GL=12.02 for boiled potato with coriander and GI=85.01, GL=11.81 for boiled potato with ginger) were significantly lower than boiled potato alone (GI=93.33, GL=12.96) (P<0.05). The GI and GL values of boiled potato with ginger were significantly the lowest (P<0.05). Despite this significant decrease in GI and GL values of boiled potato after adding the studied spices, their values remained high and intermediate, respectively (GI ≥70 and GL=11-19) and therefore unsuitable for diabetics. This study indicated that spices such as ginger, coriander and cumin had significant impact on GI and GL.
KEYWORDS: Ginger, Cumin, Coriander, Glycemic index, Glycemic load.
INTRODUCTION:
To study the impact of ginger, coriander and cumin on GI and GL of boiled potato, the study was designed over 5 weeks on a specific day (a washout period of 7 days). In the first meeting, each subject ate 50grams of glucose (glucose was used as the reference food with a GI score of 100) with 150ml of water. The reference food was consumed within10 -15 minutes. The participants were not allowed to engage in any physical activity throughout the 2-hour study period. Baseline fasting capillary blood sample was collected by finger prick method using a blood-glucose measurement device (Glucolab Auto Coding, OSANG Healthcare (infopia)) after a 10–12hour overnight fasting. Capillary blood sampling is a more precise method for determining the glycemic index values of foods compared to venous blood sampling36. Further capillary blood samples were collected at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after completing the consumption of the reference food39. The same protocol was repeated with the test food as following: In the second meeting, each subject consumed the portion of boiled potato (containing 50grams of available carbohydrate) with 150ml of water. In the third meeting, the same amount of boiled potato was consumed but with 0.5grams of cumin added to it, along with 150 ml of water. The protocol was repeated in the fourth meeting, but with the addition of 0.5grams of coriander to the same amount of the test food. In the fifth meeting, 0.5grams of ginger was added. Blood sugar measurements were performed in the same manner as those for the reference food.
Capillary blood glucose values for each subject at time 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min intervals after consumption of each tested food were recorded. The average blood glucose response curve was constructed by the mean blood glucose concentration of the subjects at each time point after eating the required amount of the studied food using Microsoft Excel 2016 Software. The incremental areas under the curve (IAUC) were calculated for tested food and for reference food. Glycemic index (GI) was calculated by dividing Test IAUC by the Reference IAUC using the following formula40: IAUC for test foodGlycemic index (GI) = ------------------------------- × 100 IAUC for reference food The GL for 100 g of the boiled potato was calculated using the following formula40: GI × grams of carbohydrates in a typical serving of studied food
Glycemic Load = ---------------------------------------------
(GL) 100
Statistical analysis:
RESULTS:Determination of available carbohydrate content in the test food (boiled potato):Table 1 shows the proximate composition of total dietary fiber, ash, lipid, protein and moisture of boiled potato (%) (g/100g). Available carbohydrate content of boiled potato was 13.8933% (g/100g). Boiled potato portion served to subjects containing 50g available carbohydrate was 359.8857g consumed with 150ml of water.Determination of glycemic index and glycemic load of test food products (boiled potato, boiled potato with cumin, boiled potato with coriander and boiled potato with ginger):Table 2 shows the capillary blood glucose response from 0 min to 120min to the test food (boiled potato) and reference food (glucose). Table 3 shows the capillary blood glucose response from 0 min to 120 min to the test food with 0.5g of each type of the studied spices (boiled potato with cumin, boiled potato with coriander, and boiled potato with ginger). The mean blood glucose peak values at 30 min after consuming boiled potato with ginger and coriander fruits were significantly lower than their values after consuming boiled potato alone 148.1±17mg/dl (P<0.05). Boiled potato with ginger showed the lowest mean blood glucose peak value 132.5±14.1mg/dl (P<0.05) followed by boiled potato with coriander 134.2±14.1 mg/dl (P<0.05). The mean blood glucose values at 60 min for boiled potato with the studied spices did not change significantly when compared to their values after consuming boiled potato alone (P>0.05). The mean blood glucose value at 90 min was significantly lower for boiled potato with cumin (94.2±8.5mg/dl) when compared to boiled potato alone 106.9±14.5 (P<0.05). The mean blood glucose values at 120 min for boiled potato with the studied spices did not change significantly when compared to their values after consuming boiled potato alone (P>0.05). Table 1. The proximate compositions of moisture, ash, protein, lipid, total dietary fiber and available carbohydrate of boiled potatoes (%) (g/100g)
Test food (boiled potato)n=3Mean±SD |
Moisturecontent (%) |
Ash content (%) |
Protein content (%) |
Fat content (%) |
Total dietary fiber content (%) |
Available Carbohydrate content (by difference) (%) |
81.1925±0.689 |
0.9022±0.028 |
2.1395±0.099 |
0.0682±0.004 |
1.8043±0.033 |
13.8933% |
Table 2. Capillary blood glucose levels with test food (boiled potato) and reference food (glucose) (mg/dl) (S.No: Subject number =10)
S. No |
Blood glucose level for boiled potato (mg/dl) |
Blood glucose level for glucose (mg/dl) |
|||||||||
Time Points (min) |
Time Points (min) |
||||||||||
0 |
30 |
60 |
90 |
120 |
0 |
30 |
60 |
90 |
120 |
|
|
1 |
103 |
142 |
98 |
101 |
98 |
101 |
150 |
130 |
105 |
72 |
|
2 |
88 |
159 |
112 |
96 |
104 |
109 |
147 |
119 |
114 |
104 |
|
3 |
108 |
144 |
123 |
91 |
89 |
98 |
149 |
122 |
101 |
71 |
|
4 |
104 |
122 |
97 |
93 |
87 |
94 |
130 |
118 |
84 |
100 |
|
5 |
105 |
142 |
110 |
121 |
156 |
108 |
151 |
133 |
126 |
90 |
|
6 |
101 |
172 |
109 |
119 |
99 |
108 |
161 |
122 |
111 |
115 |
|
7 |
96 |
155 |
120 |
135 |
105 |
90 |
173 |
193 |
113 |
104 |
|
8 |
85 |
122 |
118 |
114 |
98 |
86 |
131 |
149 |
135 |
83 |
|
9 |
92 |
156 |
116 |
101 |
89 |
92 |
167 |
150 |
94 |
90 |
|
10 |
97 |
167 |
126 |
98 |
81 |
97 |
159 |
126 |
104 |
101 |
|
Mean |
97.9 |
148.1 |
112.9 |
106.9 |
100.6 |
98.3 |
151.8 |
136.2 |
108.7 |
93 |
|
±SD |
7.6 |
17.0 |
9.7 |
14.5 |
20.9 |
8.0 |
13.9 |
23.0 |
14.7 |
14.4 |
|
Table 3. The capillary blood glucose response from 0 min to 120 min with test food with 0.5g of each type of studied spices (boiled potato with cumin, boiled potato with coriander and boiled potato with ginger) (mg/dl) (S.No: Subject number =10)
S. No |
Blood glucose level for boiled potato with cumin (mg/dl) |
Blood glucose level for boiled potato with coriander (mg/dl) |
Blood glucose level for boiled potato with ginger (mg/dl) |
||||||||||||
Time Points (min) |
Time Points (min) |
Time Points (min) |
|||||||||||||
0 |
30 |
60 |
90 |
120 |
0 |
30 |
60 |
90 |
120 |
0 |
30 |
60 |
90 |
120 |
|
1 |
76 |
137 |
93 |
91 |
96 |
96 |
117 |
98 |
90 |
86 |
86 |
119 |
95 |
86 |
77 |
2 |
96 |
122 |
113 |
105 |
92 |
99 |
123 |
119 |
91 |
86 |
99 |
158 |
89 |
83 |
73 |
3 |
89 |
151 |
96 |
104 |
99 |
100 |
164 |
101 |
80 |
71 |
93 |
155 |
92 |
92 |
80 |
4 |
100 |
133 |
124 |
84 |
92 |
86 |
136 |
92 |
85 |
93 |
96 |
127 |
111 |
108 |
91 |
5 |
107 |
139 |
113 |
104 |
99 |
105 |
135 |
117 |
123 |
101 |
93 |
115 |
106 |
107 |
132 |
6 |
94 |
161 |
101 |
94 |
87 |
84 |
146 |
105 |
96 |
110 |
105 |
132 |
83 |
84 |
97 |
7 |
108 |
160 |
154 |
82 |
103 |
94 |
140 |
104 |
121 |
111 |
90 |
130 |
97 |
128 |
110 |
8 |
98 |
123 |
96 |
99 |
88 |
92 |
121 |
113 |
88 |
83 |
85 |
135 |
98 |
96 |
79 |
9 |
95 |
149 |
127 |
93 |
84 |
85 |
123 |
118 |
109 |
90 |
87 |
122 |
117 |
108 |
90 |
10 |
101 |
131 |
113 |
86 |
90 |
106 |
137 |
111 |
85 |
81 |
92 |
132 |
106 |
99 |
98 |
Mean |
96.4 |
140.6 |
113 |
94.2 |
93 |
94.7 |
134.2 |
107.8 |
96.8 |
91.2 |
92.6 |
132.5 |
99.4 |
99.1 |
92.7 |
±SD |
9.2 |
14.1 |
18.6 |
8.5 |
6 |
7.9 |
14.1 |
9.2 |
15.4 |
12.8 |
6.2 |
14.1 |
10.4 |
14 |
17.9 |
Figure 1. Mean blood glucose responses induced by 50 g available carbohydrate portions of reference food (glucose), test food (boiled potato), boiled potato with cumin, boiled potato with coriander, and boiled potato with ginger.
Figure 1 displays the mean blood glucose responses induced by 50 g of available carbohydrate portions from all studied foods. The blood glucose incremental area under curve (IAUC) for reference food was (1.5202). (IAUC) values for boiled potato with the studied spices (1.3489 with cumin, 1.3155 with coriander, and 1.2924 with ginger) were significantly lower when compared to boiled potato alone (1.4189) (P<0.05).
Depending on the obtained (IAUC) value for the reference food (glucose) 1.5202 and the above mentioned formulas, glycemic indices (GI) and glycemic loads (GL) for the studied meals were measured (Table 4). The GI and GL values were significantly lower for boiled potato with the studied spices when compared to those of boiled potato alone (93.33 and 12.96) (P<0.05). The GI and GL of boiled potato with ginger was significantly the lowest (85.01 and 11.81) (P<0.05) followed by those of boiled potato with coriander (86.53 and 12.02) and then of boiled potato with cumin (88.73 and 12.32).
Boiled potato |
Boiled potato with cumin |
Boiled potato with coriander |
Boiled potato with ginger |
||||||||
IAUC |
GI |
GL |
IAUC |
GI |
GL |
IAUC |
GI |
GL |
IAUC |
GI |
GL |
|
1.4189 |
93.33 |
12.96 |
1.3489 |
88.73 |
12.32 |
1.3155 |
86.53 |
12.02 |
1.2924 |
85.01 |
11.81 |
DISCUSSION:
The nutritional composition of boiled potato obtained from this study was similar to others, so that Jimenez et al. (2015)41, reported that the content of moisture, ash, protein, lipid, fiber and carbohydrate in boiled Spunta potato were (82.97±0.00, 0.84±0.05, 1.97±0.00, 0.05±0.01, 2±0.12, and 12.17g/100g) respectively. However, boiled I. colorada potato and fried Spunta potato showed different values in some nutritional elements and similar values in others in terms of moisture, ash, protein, lipid, fiber and carbohydrate in comparison to our results (73.57±0.07, 1.32±0.11, 2.50 ±0.01, 0.5±0.02, 1.94±0.11, and 20.17g/100g) and (64.75±1.58, 1.74±0.08, 4.09±0.15, 4.79±0.52, 4.15± 0.32, and 20.48g/100g) respectively, this may be due to the different type of potato and cooking processes used41.
In this study, we evaluated the impact of certain types of spices (cumin, coriander, and ginger) on glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of boiled Spunta potato. The GI of boiled potato without spices addition was (GI=93.33), and classified as high (GI ≥ 70). This result was similar to the finding of Gracia-Alonso and Goni, (2000)42 with (GI=99.6). Fernandes et al. (2005)43 found that GI value of potato may vary depending on the cooking method used and variety, ranging from intermediate for boiled red potato consumed cold (GI=56) to moderately high for roasted California white potato (GI=72) to high for instant mashed potato (GI=88). Moreover, Soh and Brand-Miller, (1999)44 reported that the starch structure of potato varies with maturation, leading to lower GI values for new potatoes. The GL of 100g-serving size of boiled potato without spices addition was (GL=12.96), which classified as intermediate (GL=11 - 19). This finding was higher than that reported by another study found that GL values ranged between (3-10). This Contradiction may be due to the difference in the potato variety and processing methods used in our study45.
Adding the studied spices to boiled potato led to a significant decrease in both GI and GL of boiled potato. The GI and GL of boiled potato with ginger were the lowest (GI=85.01 and GL=11.81), followed by boiled potato with coriander (GI=86.53 and GL=12.02), and then with cumin (GI=88.73 and GL=12.32). Although the GI and GL values of boiled potato decreased after adding the studied spices, but they remained high and intermediate, respectively, and unsuitable for diabetics, as health organizations recommend to consume low-glycemic foods46.
The obtained decrease in GI and GL values of boiled potato with the studied spices may be resulted from the observed decrease in the blood glucose response which led to a significant decrease in the IAUC. This reduced blood glucose response to the boiled potato after spices adding may be due to the in literature mentioned anti-hyperglycemic bioactive substances present in these spices.
Khandouzi N et al. (2015)47 reported a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes after taking a 2 g/day of ginger powder supplement for 12 weeks. Andallu et al. (2003)48 also observed a significant decrease in blood glucose levels in men with type 2 diabetes aged between 40 and 60 years, who were given 3 g/day of dry ginger powder in divided doses for 30 days. Ginger's ability to decrease blood glucose levels may be attributed to the presence of bioactive phenolic compounds like gingerol and shogaol, which can enhance glucose uptake and boost increased expression of GLUT1 and GLUT4 glucose transporters on the plasma membrane49,50. Additionally, these compounds have been shown to reduce glucose levels by inhibiting key enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism, α-glucosidase and α-amylase, leading to delayed carbohydrate digestion, reduced glucose absorption rate, and decreased postprandial rise in blood glucose51.
On the other hand, Mechchate et al. (2021)52 reported that coriander seeds possess an anti-hyperglycemic effect may be due to the presence of certain polyphenols such as rutin and catechin. Additionally, Abou El.Soud et al. (2012)53 found that linalool and geranyl acetate, active compounds in the essential oil of coriander seeds, have a hypoglycemic effect on diabetic rats treated with streptozotocin. Chithra and Leelamma (1999)54 also indicated that coriander impacts the activity of key enzymes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, resulting in a decreased level of blood glucose through improved glycogenesis and glycolysis, and a decrease in glycogen degradation in rats fed a high-fat cholesterol diet.
According to Jafari et al. (2016)55 a 50 and 100 mg daily supplement of essential oil of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) over a period of 8 weeks produced a significant decrease in the mean fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, and serum insulin level in patients with type 2 diabetes. Tahir et al (2016)56 reported that essential oils and emulsions of Cuminum cyminum had a potent antidiabetic influence, resulted from in vitro inhibition of α-amylase activity by the main components of Cuminum cyminum such as α-pinene, α-terpinene and cumin aldehyde.
The GI of boiled potato remained high, despite the significant lowering effect of the studied spices on the blood glucose response and IAUCs, this result could be attributed to the use of a small quantity of the studied spices to reflect normal use, and their tested effect was in non-diabetic, healthy subjects57.
CONCLUSION:
The impact of three types of spices on the GI and GL of boiled potato were investigated in the present study. The results clearly revealed that adding ginger, coriander, and cumin to boiled potato significantly reduced its GI and GL. Glycemic index and glycemic load of boiled potato with ginger were the lowest, followed by with coriander, and then with cumin. The GI and GL of boiled potato remained high and intermediate, respectively and therefore, unsuitable for diabetics. However, the blood glucose response was significantly decreased after the study spices were added. Additional studies are needed to confirm these finding. Higher amounts of ginger, coriander, and cumin are also needed to be studied. We also recommend evaluating the effect of other types of spices on GI and GL of other carbohydrate-rich foods.
REFERENCES:
1. Khalil, L.; Boubou, A.; Kaddar, N. Effect of Dapagliflozin on Serum Uric Acid in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15 (11): 4994–4998. https://doi.org/ 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00839
2. Ojo, O.; Ibrahim, H.; Rotimi, E.; Ogunlakin, D.; Ojo, A.; Damilare, R.; Ogunlakin, A. Diabetes Mellitus: From Molecular Mechanism to Pathophysiology and Pharmacology. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2023.100247.
3. Magliano, D. J.; Boyko, E. J.; IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th edition scientific committee. IDF DIABETES ATLAS, 10th ed.; IDF Diabetes Atlas; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, 2021.
4. Sapra, A.; Bhandari, P. Diabetes. In Stat Pearls; Stat Pearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL), 2024.
5. Mayhoub, D.; Sarem, Z.; Bobo,A. Studying Some of the Biological Effects of Some Commercially Available Dietary Supplements Containing Grape Seed Extract in Type2 Diabetic Patients | Tishreen University Journal -Medical Sciences Series. 2023; 45(3): 281–294.
6. Alam, S.; Hasan, M. K.; Neaz, S.; Hussain, N.; Hossain, M. F.; Rahman, T. Diabetes Mellitus: Insights from Epidemiology, Biochemistry, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Complications and Comprehensive Management. Diabetology. 2021; 2 (2): 36–50. https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology2020004.
7. Hatem, O.; Sarem, Z. Investigation of Lipid Oxidation in Commonly Consumed Fish Oil Supplements in Syrian Market. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12 (11): 5333–5337. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00925.9
8. Suresh, Y.; Das, U. N. Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Chemically Induced Diabetes Mellitus. Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Nutrition. 2003; 19 (3): 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00855-9.
9. Anderson, J. W.; Randles, K. M.; Kendall, C. W. C.; Jenkins, D. J. A. Carbohydrate and Fiber Recommendations for Individuals with Diabetes: A Quantitative Assessment and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004; 23 (1): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2004.10719338.
10. Thomas, D. E.; Elliott, E. J. The Use of Low-Glycaemic Index Diets in Diabetes Control. Br J Nutr. 2010; 104 (6): 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510001534.
11. Jenkins, D. J.; Wolever, T. M.; Taylor, R. H.; Barker, H.; Fielden, H.; Baldwin, J. M.; Bowling, A. C.; Newman, H. C.; Jenkins, A. L.; Goff, D. V. Glycemic Index of Foods: A Physiological Basis for Carbohydrate Exchange. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1981; 34 (3): 362–366.
12. Chlup, R.; Bartek, J.; Reznícková, M.; Zapletalová, J.; Doubravová, B.; Chlupová, L.; Seckar, P.; Dvorácková, S.; Simánek, V. Determination of the Glycaemic Index of Selected Foods (White Bread and Cereal Bars) in Healthy Persons. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2004; 148 (1): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2004.003.
13. Eleazu, C. O. The Concept of Low Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Foods as Panacea for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Prospects, Challenges and Solutions. African health sciences. 2016; 16 (2): 468–479. https://doi.org/ 10.4314/ahs.v16i2.15
14. Nayak, B.; Berrios, J. D. J.; Tang, J. Impact of Food Processing on the Glycemic Index (GI) of Potato Products. Food Research International. 2014; 56: 35–46.
15. Lu, Z.-Q.; Yan, J. Dietary Carbohydrate and Age-Related Cataract. In Handbook of Nutrition, Diet and the Eye; Elsevier, 2014; 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401717-7.00027-7
16. Tian, J.; Chen, J.; Ye, X.; Chen, S. Health Benefits of the Potato Affected by Domestic Cooking: A Review. Food Chemistry. 2016; 202: 165–175.
17. Anderson, G. H.; Soeandy, C. D.; Smith, C. E. White Vegetables: Glycemia and Satiety. Advances in Nutrition. 2013; 4 (3); 356S-367S. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003509.
18. Singh, A.; Raigond, P.; Lal, M. K.; Singh, B.; Thakur, N.; Changan, S. S.; Kumar, D.; Dutt, S. Effect of Cooking Methods on Glycemic Index and in Vitro Bioaccessibility of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Carbohydrates. LWT 2020; 127: 109363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109363.
19. Pinhero, R. G.; Waduge, R. N.; Liu, Q.; Sullivan, J. A.; Tsao, R.; Bizimungu, B.; Yada, R. Y. Evaluation of Nutritional Profiles of Starch and Dry Matter from Early Potato Varieties and Its Estimated Glycemic Impact. Food Chemistry. 2016; 203: 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.040.
20. Henry, C. J. K.; Lightowler, H. J.; Kendall, F. L.; Storey, M. The Impact of the Addition of Toppings/Fillings on the Glycaemic Response to Commonly Consumed Carbohydrate Foods. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2006; 60 (6): 763–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602380
21. Lal, M. K.; Tiwari, R. K.; Jaiswal, A.; Luthra, S. K.; Singh, B.; Kumar, S.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Gaikwad, K.; Kumar, A.; Paul, V.; Singh, M. P. Combinatorial Interactive Effect of Vegetable and Condiments with Potato on Starch Digestibility and Estimated in Vitro Glycemic Response. Food Measure. 2022; 16 (3): 2446–2458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-022-01354-w.
22. Parvathi, P.; Geetha, R. V. Spices and Oral Health. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2014; 7 (2): 235–237.
23. Sundar, S.; Padmalatha, K.; Helasri, G.; Vasanthi, M.; Narmada, B. S.; Lekhya, B.; Jyothi, R. N.; Sravani, T. Anti-Microbial Activity of Aqueous Extract of Natural Preservatives-Cumin, Cinnamon, Coriander and Mint. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9 (7): 843–847.
24. AL-Ani, I. I.; Al-Ani, A. H. Effect of Cumin Using Instead of the Industrial and Preservatives Materials in Production Methods of Hommous Tahina. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12 (1): 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00029.5
25. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Xia, X.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant Activity of Spices and Their Impact on Human Health: A Review. Antioxidants. 2017; 6 (3): 70. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/antiox6030070
26. Gopinath, P. Antibacterial Activity of Ginger Oil against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11 (8): 3257–3258. https://doi.org/ 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00598.X
27. Gupta, S.; Srinivasan, R.; Suneetha, V. Evaluating and Checking the Quality of Various Spices in Aerosol Preparation Namely VIT RSS Aerosol. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2018; 11 (12): 5269–5272. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00960.5
28. Choudhury, A.; Saha, S.; Bahadur, S.; Roy, A. Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Bioactive Phytochemical in Combination with Standard Antifungal Drugs. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12 (5): 2346–2352. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00392.5
29. Sanghvi, K.; Chandrasheker, K. S.; Pai, V. Review on Curcuma Longa: Ethnomedicinal Uses, Pharmacological Activity and Phytochemical Constituents. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13 (8): 3983–3986. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00704.0
30. Sureshkumar, C. A.; Meera, R.; Devi, P.; Sathish, M.; Varadharajan, R.; Muthumani, P. Antinociceptive, Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Coriander Sativum Leaves. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2010; 3 (3): 744–747.
31. Swathy, S.; Roy, A.; Rajeshkumar, S. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Ginger Oleoresin Mediated Silver Nanoparticles. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13 (10): 4591–4593. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00808.2
32. Bhutkar, M. A.; Bhise, S. B. Spices and Condiments in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011; 4 (1): 37–42.
33. Jafri, S. A.; Abass, S.; Qasim, M. Hypoglycemic Effect of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale) in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Rats (Rattus Norvagicus). Pak Vet J 2011.
34. Mohamed, D. A.; Hamed, I. M.; Fouda, K. A. Research Article Antioxidant and Anti-Diabetic Effects of Cumin Seeds Crude Ethanol Extract. J Biol Sci. 2018; 18 (5): 251–259. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2018.251.259
35. Mishra, B. B.; Padmadeo, S. R.; Thakur, K. R.; Jha, D. K.; VyomeshVibhaw, K. P.; Kumar, P. Hypoglycemic and Antioxidative Potential of Coriandrum Sativum Seed Extract in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Rats. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications. 2021; 14 (1): 275–281.
36. Wolever, T. M.; Vorster, H. H.; Björck, I.; Brand-Miller, J.; Brighenti, F.; Mann, J. I.; Ramdath, D. D.; Granfeldt, Y.; Holt, S.; Perry, T. L. Determination of the Glycaemic Index of Foods: Interlaboratory Study. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2003; 57 (3): 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601551
37. Horwitz, W.; Latimer, G. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th edGaithersburg. AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA 2005.https://doi.org/10.4236/ajc.2015.34011
38. Maclean, W.; Harnly, J.; Chen, J.; Chevassus-Agnes, S.; Gilani, G.; Livesey, G.; Warwick, P. Food Energy–Methods of Analysis and Conversion Factors. In Food and agriculture organization of the united nations technical workshop report; The Food and Agriculture Organization Rome, Italy, 2003; 77: 8–9.
39. Z. Sarem and K. Kaffoura, “Determination of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Some Widely Consumed Foods in Syrian Society,” Tishreen Univ. Journal - Medical Sci. Ser. Vol. 2022; 86 43: No. 6: 173–89.
40. Determination of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Taste Good Biscuits in Healthy Human Adult Subjects, Under Fasting Conditions. Indian Journal of Nutrition 2020, 7 (1).
41. Jimenez, M. E.; Rossi, A. M.; Samman, N. C. Changes during Cooking Processes in 6 Varieties of Andean Potatoes (Solanum Tuberosum Ssp. Andinum). 2015.https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.65078
42. García-Alonso, A.; Goñi, I. Effect of Processing on Potato Starch: In Vitro Availability and Glycaemic Index. Food / Nahrung 2000; 44 (1): 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(20000101)44:1<19::AID-FOOD19>3.0.CO;2-E.
43. Fernandes, G.; Velangi, A.; Wolever, T. M. Glycemic Index of Potatoes Commonly Consumed in North America. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2005; 105 (4): 557–562. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jada.2005.01.003
44. Soh, N. L.; Brand-Miller, J. The Glycaemic Index of Potatoes: The Effect of Variety, Cooking Method and Maturity. European journal of clinical nutrition. 1999; 53 (4): 249–254. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600713
45. Pinhero, R. G.; Liu, Q.; Sullivan, J. A.; Marcone, M.; Yada, R. Y. The Effect of Potato Varieties and Processing Methods on Glycemic Response. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2020; 11 (7): 1144–1162. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.117081
46. Chapter 4 - The role of the glycemic index in food choice. https://www.fao.org/3/W8079E/w8079e0a.htm#chapter%204%20%20%20the%20role%20of%20the%20glycemic%20index%20in%20food%20choice (accessed 2024-02-03).
47. Khandouzi, N.; Shidfar, F.; Rajab, A.; Rahideh, T.; Hosseini, P.; Mir Taheri, M. The Effects of Ginger on Fasting Blood Sugar, Hemoglobin A1c, Apolipoprotein B, Apolipoprotein A-I and Malondialdehyde in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Iran J Pharm Res 2015; 14 (1): 131–140.
48. Andallu, B.; Radhika, B.; Suryakantham, V. Effect of Aswagandha, Ginger and Mulberry on Hyperglycemia and Hyperlipidemia. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2003; 58 (3): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAL.0000040352.23559.04.
49. Li, Y.; Tran, V. H.; Duke, C. C.; Roufogalis, B. D. Gingerols of Zingiber Officinale Enhance Glucose Uptake by Increasing Cell Surface GLUT4 in Cultured L6 Myotubes. Planta Med. 2012; 78 (14): 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315041.
50. Noipha, K.; Ninla-Aesong, P. Antidiabetic Activity of Zingiber Officinale Roscoe Rhizome Extract: An in Vitro Study. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences. 2018; 25 (4): 160–160. https://doi.org/10.4308/hjb.25.4.160
51. Rani, M.; Padmakumari, K.; Sankarikutty, B.; Cherian, L.; V M, N.; K G, R. Inhibitory Potential of Ginger Extracts against Enzymes Linked to Type 2 Diabetes, Inflammation and Induced Oxidative Stress. International journal of food sciences and nutrition. 2011; 62: 106–110. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2010.515565.
52. Mechchate, H.; Es-Safi, I.; Amaghnouje, A.; Boukhira, S.; A. Alotaibi, A.; Al-Zharani, M.; A. Nasr, F.; M. Noman, O.; Conte, R.; Amal, E. H. E. Y. Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory and Antidiabetic Proprieties of LC-MS/MS Identified Polyphenols from Coriander Seeds. Molecules 2021; 26 (2): 487. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/molecules26020487
53. El-Soud, N. H. A.; El-Lithy, N. A.; El-Saeed, G. S. M.; Wahby, M. S.; Khalil, M. Y.; El-Kassem, L. T. A.; Morsy, F.; Shaffie, N. Efficacy of Coriandrum Sativum L. Essential Oil as Antidiabetic. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2012, No. July, 3646–3655.
54. Chithra, V.; Leelamma, S. Coriandrum Sativum—Mechanism of Hypoglycemic Action. Food Chemistry. 1999; 67 (3): 229–231.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00113-2
55. Jafari, S.; Sattari, R.; Ghavamzadeh, S. Evaluation the Effect of 50 and 100 Mg Doses of Cuminum Cyminum Essential Oil on Glycemic Indices, Insulin Resistance and Serum Inflammatory Factors on Patients with Diabetes Type II: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine. 2017; 7 (3): 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.08.004
56. Tahir, H. U.; Sarfraz, R. A.; Ashraf, A.; Adil, S. Chemical Composition and Antidiabetic Activity of Essential Oils Obtained from Two Spices (Syzygium Aromaticum and Cuminum Cyminum). International Journal of Food Properties. 2016; 19 (10): 2156–2164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015.1110166.
57. Kahale, K. H.; Tranchant, C.; Pakzad, S.; Farhat, A. G. Effect of Sumac Spice, Turkish Coffee and Yerba Mate Tea on the Postprandial Glycemic Response to Lebanese Mankoucheh. Nutrition and Food Science 2015; 45 (3): 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/NFS-12-2014-0097
Received on 08.02.2024 Modified on 18.05.2024
Accepted on 10.08.2024 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2024; 17(9):4187-4193.