New Spectrophotometric Method for the Estimation of Fenofibrate
Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna*, Pothina Tejasri, Angirekula Narendra
GITAM School of Pharmacy, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Visakhapatnam, India-530045.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mmukthin@gitam.edu
ABSTRACT:
Fenofibrate is a Antihyperlipidemic used to treat cholesterol. New spectrophotometric technique have been developed for the estimation of Fenofibrate in pharmaceutical dosage form. Double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU Model UV-1800) was used for the present study. Fenofibrate has shown linearity over the concentration range 0.5-40 µg/mL for acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1M sodium hydroxide and 1-40 µg/mL for phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), and distilled water respectively and the methods were validated as per ICH guidelines. The proposed methods are simple, economical and can be successfully applied for the assay of Fenofibrate in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
KEYWORDS: Fenofibrate, Spectrophotometric, Acetate buffer, Phosphate buffer, 0.1M Sodium Hydroxide, Method Validation, ICH guidelines.
INTRODUCTION:
Fenofibrate (CAS 49562-28-9) is an oral medication of fibrate class used to treat abnormal lipid levels which is approved by FDA for the treatment of patients with hypertriglyceridemia, primary hypercholesterolemia etc. It is chemically propan-2-yl 2-[4-(4-chlorobenzoyl) phenoxy]-2-methylpropanoate1 and available as white, crystalline powder with molecular formula C20H21ClO4 and molecular weight 360.83g/mol.
Spectrophotometric methods2-5, liquid chromatographic methods, LC-MS methods etc were developed for the assay of Fenofibrate in pharmaceutical dosage forms and biological fluids. Similar type of methods were developed for different drug molecules in the literature6-10. The authors have proposed new spectrophotometric technique for the assay of Fenofibrate in pharmaceutical dosage form and validated as per ICH guidelines.
Figure 1: Chemical structure of Fenofibrate
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Shimadzu Model No. UV-1800 double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer with quartz cells is used for the entire study and all the solutions were scanned 200-400nm. Solutions such as acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), 0.1M sodium hydroxide solutions were prepared as per IP 2022. Fenofibrate stock solution was prepared by dissolving 25mg of Fenofibrate in 25mL volumetric flask with methanol (1000µg/mL) from which working standard solution (100µg/mL) was also prepared in methanol and further dilutions were prepared on dilution with different solutions in the present study and the methods were validated as per ICH guidelines. Fenofibrate is available as tablets with brand names LIPICARD (USV Private Ltd; Label claim 160mg), FINOBRATE (Knoll Health Care Pvt Ltd; Label claim 145mg). FINATE (Franco-Indian Pharmaceuicals Pvt Ltd.; Label claim 160mg) and as FENOBATE capsules (East West Pharma Private Ltd; 200mg) in India.
Method validation11
A series of Fenofibrate solutions 0.5-40µg/mL were prepared from working standard on dilution with acetate buffer (pH 4.0) (Method I), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) (Method II), 0.1M sodium hydroxide buffer (Method III), and 1-40µg/mL were prepared from working standard on dilution with phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) (Method IV), distilled water (Method V), and scanned (200-400nm) against their reagent blanks. The spectra so obtained has shown maximum absorbance (λmax) at 292 nm (Method I), 291.20nm (Method II), 291.60nm (Method III), 293.60nm (Method IV) and 290.20nm (Method V). The absorbance of all these solutions was noted at λmax, and a calibration curve was drawn by taking the concentration on the X-axis and the corresponding absorbance on the Y-axis. Precision studies were performed by calculating the percentage relative standard deviation of independent assays of six determinations on the same day and on three consecutive days (Day1, Day 2 and Day 3) whereas accuracy studies were carried out by standard addition method.
Assay of Fenofibrate tablets:
Twenty tablets of Fenofibrate were powdered with the help of motor and pestle and tablet powder equivalent to 10mg of Fenofibrate was weighed and dissolved in 10mL volumetric flask containing methanol (1000 µg/mL), the solution was sonicated and filtered. Working standard solution was prepared in methanol (100µg/mL), further series of dilutions were prepared on dilution with acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1M Sodium Hydroxide, phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), distilled water for Method I, II, III, IV and V respectively and the percentage recovery was calculated from the linear regression equations obtained.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
New spectrophotometric methods have been developed for the determination of Fenofibrate tablets using acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1M sodium hydroxide buffer, phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) and distilled water. A review of previously published spectrophotometric methods was given in Table 1.
Table 1: Spectrophotometric methods in literature
|
Reagent |
Linearity (μg/mL) |
λmax (nm) |
Reference
|
|
Methanol |
0-60 |
287.5 |
2 |
|
Methanol + DW |
2-12 |
285 |
3 |
|
Methanol |
3-30 |
285.5 |
4 |
|
4M sodium acetate and 1.25M sodium citrate |
5-35 |
296 |
5 |
|
Acetate buffer (pH 4.0), |
0.5-40 |
292 |
Present method |
|
Phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) |
291.20 |
||
|
0.1M Sodium hydroxide |
291.60 |
||
|
Phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) |
1-40 |
293.60 |
|
|
Distilled water |
290.20 |
Fenofibrate has shown absorption maxima at 292 nm (Method I), 291.20 nm (Method II), 291.60 nm (Method III), 293.60 nm (Method IV), 290.20 nm (Method V). It obeys Beer-Lambert’s law over the concentration range 0.5-40 µg/mL in acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1M Sodium hydroxide buffer, and concentration range 1-40 µg/mL in phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), distilled water (Table 2). The linear regression equations were found to be y=0.0519x-0.0174 (0.9993), y=0.0505x-0.0124 (0.9996), y=0.053x-0.0143 (0.9993), y=0.0494x-0.014 (0.9998), y=0.0499x-0.01 (0.9999) for acetate buffer, phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1M Sodium hydroxide, phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) and distilled water respectively.
The percentage RSD in accuracy (Table 3) and precision studies (Table 4) for all the methods was found to be less than 2 in indicating that the methods are precise and accurate. The assay was performed for tablets and the percentage recovery was calculated (Table 5). The optical characteristics of the method were shown in Table 6.
Table 2: Linearity of Fenofibrate
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Absorbance |
||||
|
Methods |
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
|
0.5 |
0.0300 |
0.0277 |
0.0313 |
- |
- |
|
1 |
0.0468 |
0.0455 |
0.0553 |
0.0382 |
0.0452 |
|
2 |
0.0837 |
0.0987 |
0.0923 |
0.0865 |
0.0884 |
|
5 |
0.2217 |
0.2177 |
0.2348 |
0.2285 |
0.2218 |
|
10 |
0.4752 |
0.4720 |
0.4838 |
0.4655 |
0.4897 |
|
20 |
0.9843 |
0.9698 |
1.0053 |
0.9643 |
0.9885 |
|
30 |
1.5691 |
1.5171 |
1.6129 |
1.4795 |
1.4934 |
|
40 |
2.0625 |
2.0144 |
2.1102 |
1.9659 |
1.9842 |
|
|
|
|
Method I (Acetate buffer pH 4.0) |
Method II (Phosphate buffer pH 7.8) |
|
|
|
|
Method III (0.1M Sodium hydroxide) |
Method IV (Phosphate buffer pH 5.8) |
|
|
|
|
Method V (Distilled water) |
|
Figure 2: Absorption spectra of Fenofibrate (30 µg/mL)
Table 3: Accuracy of Fenofibrate Tablet
|
Spiked Conc. (µg/mL) |
Formulation (µg/mL) |
Total Conc. (µg/mL) |
Conc. obtained (μg/mL) [% Recovery] (RSD) |
||||
|
Method I |
Method II |
Method III |
Method IV |
Method V |
|||
|
0.5 (50%) |
1 |
15 |
96.64 [0.037] 0.0391 |
94.96 [0.304] 0.3202 |
99.28 [0.327] 0.3295 |
98.00 [0.011] 0.0117 |
97.35 [0.026] 0.0271 |
|
1 (100%) |
1 |
20 |
97.84 [0.145] 0.1482 |
98.03 [0.035] 0.0358 |
97.26 [0.453] 0.4666 |
99.01 [0.01] 0.0100 |
99.05 [0.047] 0.0477 |
|
1.5 (150%) |
1 |
25 |
97.21 [0.02] 0.0205 |
98.50 [0.137] 0.1400 |
98.94 [0.140] 0.1416 |
99.20 [0.122] 0.1231 |
99.61 [0.015] 0.0153 |
*Mean of three replicates
Table 4: Precision study of Fenofibrate Tablet
|
Intraday precision |
|||||
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Absorbance |
||||
|
Method I |
Method II |
Method III |
Method IV |
Method V |
|
|
10 |
0.4752 |
0.4720 |
0.4838 |
0.4655 |
0.4897 |
|
10 |
0.4753 |
0.4722 |
0.4835 |
0.4653 |
0.4892 |
|
10 |
0.4751 |
0.4721 |
0.4832 |
0.4649 |
0.4895 |
|
10 |
0.4760 |
0.4728 |
0.4842 |
0.4654 |
0.4893 |
|
10 |
0.4754 |
0.4731 |
0.4845 |
0.4659 |
0.4890 |
|
10 |
0.4755 |
0.4726 |
0.4839 |
0.4662 |
0.4896 |
|
Mean ± S.D (% RSD) |
0.4754±0.0003 (0.067) |
0.4724±0.0004 (0.092) |
0.4838±0.0004 (0.096) |
0.4655±0.0004 (0.098) |
0.4893±0.0002 (0.053) |
|
Interday precision |
|||||
|
Conc. (µg/mL) |
Absorbance |
||||
|
Method I |
Method II |
Method III |
Method IV |
Method V |
|
|
10 |
0.4752 |
0.4720 |
0.4838 |
0.4655 |
0.4897 |
|
10 |
0.4762 |
0.4725 |
0.4842 |
0.4657 |
0.4893 |
|
10 |
0.4749 |
0.4723 |
0.4847 |
0.4661 |
0.4899 |
|
Mean ± S.D (% RSD) |
0.4754±0.0006(0.143) |
0.4722±0.0002(0.053) |
0.4842±0.0004(0.093) |
0.4657±0.0003(0.065) |
0.4896±0.0003(0.0624) |
*Mean of three replicates
Table 5: Assay of Fenofibrate tablets
|
Brand |
Method I |
Method II |
Method III |
Method IV |
Method V |
|||||
|
Observed (mg) |
% Recovery |
Observed (mg) |
% Recovery |
Observed (mg) |
% Recovery
|
Observed (mg) |
% Recovery
|
Observed (mg) |
% Recovery |
|
|
I |
9.95 |
99.5 |
9.32 |
93.2 |
9.98 |
99.8 |
9.93 |
99.3 |
9.96 |
99.6 |
|
II |
9.9 |
99 |
9.53 |
95.3 |
9.99 |
99.9 |
9.86 |
98.6 |
9.99 |
99.9 |
Table 6: Optical characteristics
|
Parameters |
Method I |
Method II |
Method III |
Method IV |
Method V |
|
|
Linearity range (µg/mL) |
0.5-40 |
0.5-40 |
0.5-40 |
1-40 |
1-40 |
|
|
λmax (nm) |
292 |
291.20 |
291.60 |
293.60 |
290.20 |
|
|
Molar extinction coefficient (litre/mole/cm-1) |
1.8727 x 104 |
1.8221 x 104 |
1.9123 x 104 |
1.7824 x 104 |
1.8005 x 104 |
|
|
Sandell’s sensitivity (µg/cm2/0.001 absorbance unit) |
0.31599 |
0.22574 |
0.25094 |
0.26315 |
0.18036 |
|
|
Slope |
0.0519 |
0.0505 |
0.053 |
0.0494 |
0.0499 |
|
|
Intercept |
0.0174 |
0.0124 |
0.0143 |
0.014 |
0.01 |
|
|
Correlation coefficient |
0.9993 |
0.9996 |
0.9993 |
0.9998 |
0.9999 |
|
|
Precision (%RSD) |
Intraday |
0.0670 |
0.0924 |
0.0967 |
0.0985 |
0.0539 |
|
Interday |
0.1432 |
0.0533 |
0.0931 |
0.0656 |
0.0624 |
|
|
Accuracy (% RSD) |
0.02-0.14 |
0.03-0.32 |
0.14-0.46 |
0.01-0.12 |
0.01-0.04 |
|
|
Assay (%) |
99.5 |
93.2 |
99.8 |
99.3 |
99.6 |
|
CONCLUSION:
All the spectrophotometric techniques were validated and found to be very simple, accurate, precise, and economical. These methods can be conveniently used for the routine analysis of Fenofibrate pharmaceutical formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are grateful to USV Private Ltd. for providing the gift samples of Fenofibrate and M/s GITAM (Deemed to be) University for providing the research facilities.
REFERENCES:
1. M J Chapman Pharmacology of Fenofibrate, Am. J. Med. 83(5B): 2 1-5.
2. Krishna R. Gupta, Sonali S. Askarkar, Prashant R. Rathod and Sudhir G. Wadodkar. Validated spectrophotometric determination of Fenofibrate in formulation. Der Pharmacia Sinica, 2010; 1(1): 173-178.
3. Preeti Vinod Gaikwad, Sanjay Dinkar Sawant, Minal Rushikesh Ghante and Neha Manish Munot. Three simple spectrometric methods for Fenofibrate in tablet form. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2011; 4(6): 1741-1742.
4. Jadhav Vijay, Raut Chandrakant and Dhabale Pandurang N. UV-Spectrophotometry Estimation of Fenofibrate in Tablet Dosage Form. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2010; 3(2): 326-328.
5. Jat R.K, Sharma S, Chippa R.C, Singh Rambir and Alam Imran. Quantitative estimation of Fenofibrate in bulk drug and tablets by UV Visible spectroscopy. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics; 2012; 2(3): 129-131.
6. Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. New spectrophotometric method for the determination of Bosentan – An anti-hypertensive agent in pharmaceutical dosage forms. E- Journal of Chemistry. 2012; 9(2): 700-704.
7. Mathrusri Annapurna M, Souvik Das, Narendra A and Raja Kumar V. Validated new spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of Bosentan in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Pharm Educ Res. 2010; 1 (2): 73-76.
8. Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. Validated spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Mycophenolate: an Anti-neoplastic agent in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Chemistry. 2013; Article ID 523193.
9. Mathrusri Annapurna M, Bisht SPS, Ravi Kumar BVV, Raja Kumar V and Narendra A. Spectrophotometric determination of Bosentan and its application in pharmaceutical analysis. International Journal of Comprehensive Pharmacy. 2011; 2 (2): 1-3.
10. Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. Determination of Emtricitabine by derivative spectrophotometric method in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Chemical Science Transactions. 2013; 2(3): 978-982.
11. ICH Q2 [R1] validation of analytical procedures: Text and Methodology: November (2005).
Received on 12.03.2024 Modified on 19.04.2024
Accepted on 23.05.2024 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2024; 17(6):2753-2756.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00431