New spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Minoxidil

 

Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna*, Polipalli Venkata Navya, Angirekula Narendra

GITAM School of Pharmacy, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Visakhapatnam, India-530045.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mmukthin@gitam.edu

 

ABSTRACT:

Minoxidil is a vasodilating agent used to treat pattern hair loss and resistant hypertension. New spectrophotometric techniques have been proposed for the estimation of Minoxidil in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Double beam Shimadzu Model UV-1800UV-VIS spectrophotometer was used for the present study. Minoxidil has shown linearity over the concentration range 0.1-20 µg/mL in distilled water, acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), borate buffer (pH 9.0), methanol and 0.1-15 µg/mL in phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and the methods were validated as per ICH guidelines. The proposed methods are simple, economical and can be successfully applied for the assay of Minoxidil in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

 

KEYWORDS: Minoxidil, Spectrophotometric, Acetate buffer, Phosphate buffer, Borate buffer, Methanol, First derivative spectroscopy, Validation.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

Minoxidil, an oral direct-acting peripheral vasodilator, lowers high systolic and diastolic blood pressure and is also applied topically to treat androgenetic alopecia1. Minoxidil is a crystalline powder with molecular formula C9H15N5O (Molecular weight 209.2483 g/mol). It is chemically 6-piperidin-1-ylpyrimidine-2, 4-diamine 3-oxide. It acts by causing vascular smooth muscle cells adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels to open and through the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and the prevention of cell death. Minoxidil is believed to enhance the life of human follicle dermal papillary cells or hair cells. In the present study, the authors have proposed new spectrophotometric techniques for the assay of Minoxidil in topical solution and validated as per ICH guidelines.  Analytical methods such as spectrophotometry2-3, liquid chromatography4-7 and mass spectroscopy8 were developed for the determination of Minoxidil in pharmaceutical dosage forms and biological fluids. Similar type of spectrophotometric methods9-13 have been developed for different drug molecules in the literature and they were all validated as per ICH guidelines.

 

Figure 1: Chemical structure of Minoxidil

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Shimadzu Model No. UV-1800 double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer with quartz cells is used for the entire study, and all the solutions were scanned 200-400 nm. Buffer solutions such as acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8, 7.8), borate buffer (pH 9.0) were prepared as per IP 2022. Minoxidil stock solution was prepared by dissolving 25mg of Minoxidil in 25mL volumetric flask with methanol (1000µg/mL), working standard solutions were prepared in methanol (100µg/mL) and further dilutions were prepared by diluting the working standard solutions with respective buffers as per the proposed methods requirement. Minoxidil is available as tablets and topical solution with brand names Lonitab Minoxidil Tablets (Intas Pharmaceuticals, Label claim: 2.5, 5 mg), Minoxiheart Tablets (STERIS Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Label claim: 5 mg) and Mintop Forte (Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Label claim: 2, 5, 10% w/v), Minoqilib 5% Solution (Galderma India Pvt Ltd, Label claim: 5% w/v), respectively in India.

 

METHOD VALIDATION14

Zero order spectroscopy (Do)

A series of Minoxidil solutions 0.1 - 20 µg/mL were prepared from working standard solution on dilution with distilled water (Method I), acetate buffer (pH 4.0) (Method II), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) (Method III), borate buffer (pH 9.0) (Method V), methanol (Method VI) and 0.1 – 15 µg/mL for phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) (Method IV) and scanned (200-400 nm) against their reagent blanks. The zero order spectrum so obtained has shown maximum absorbance (λmax) at 230 nm for Methods I, II, III, IV, V, and at 230.60 nm for Method VI. The absorbance of all the solutions was noted at λmax, and a calibration curve was drawn by taking the concentration on the X-axis and the corresponding absorbance on the Y-axis for all the six methods respectively. Precision studies were performed by calculating the percentage relative standard deviation of independent assays of 6 determinations of the test concentration, whereas accuracy studies were carried out by standard addition method.

 

First order spectroscopy (D1)

The individual zero-order absorption spectra of Minoxidil so obtained were converted into their first-order derivative spectra with the help of inbuilt software of the instrument for all the six methods. The resultant derivative spectrum has shown minima and maxima in all the six methods and therefore the amplitude were selected for the construction of calibration curves for Method I, II, III, IV, V, and VI.

 

Assay of Minoxidil Topical Solution

Minoxidil is available as topical solution (Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India) (Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. India) the topical solution was extracted with methanol, sonicated and diluted as per the requirement (10µg/mL) with distilled water (Method I), acetate buffer (pH 4.0) (Method II), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) (Method III), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) (Method IV), borate buffer (pH 9.0) (Method V), methanol (Method VI) and the and the percentage recovery was calculated as per the regression equations obtained.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Two different techniques – Zero-order (D0) and First-order derivative spectroscopy (D1) have been developed for the determination of Minoxidil in tablets and topical solution in six different reagents such as distilled water, acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8, 7.8), borate buffer (pH 9.0) and methanol. The review of earlier established spectrophotometric methods were compared with the present method in Table 1.

 

Table 1: Comparison of previously reported UV spectroscopy methods with present methods

Reagent

Linearity (μg/mL)

λmax (nm)

 

Reference

 

0.1N HCl

1-6

279.40

2

2M H2SO4 + KMnO4

(Flow injection method)

2.09-104.62

550

3

Distilled Water

 

0.1-20

 

 

230

 

Present methods

Acetate Buffer (pH 4.0)

Phosphate Buffer (pH 5.8)

Phosphate Buffer (pH 7.8)

0.1-15

Borate Buffer (pH 9.0)

0.1-20

Methanol

230.60

 

Zero order spectroscopy (D0)

Minoxidil has shown absorption maxima at 230 nm for Method I, II, III, IV, V, and at 230.60 nm for Method VI. It obeys Beer-Lambert’s law over the concentration range 0.1-20 µg/mL (Table 2) for distilled water, acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), borate buffer (pH 9.0), methanol and 0.1 – 15 µg/mL for phosphate buffer (pH 7.8). The linear regression equations were found to be y = 0.1584x + 0.0032, y = 0.1251x + 0.0004, y = 0.1475x + 0.0076, y = 0.1664x - 0.0143, y = 0.1567x + 0.0017, y = 0.1734x + 0.0032 for distilled water, acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8, 7.8), borate buffer (pH 9.0) and methanol, respectively. The absorption spectrum of Minoxidil (Do) is given in Figure 2.


 

Table 2: Linearity of Minoxidil (Zero order spectroscopy)

Conc. (µg/mL)

*Absorbance

Methods

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

0.1

0.0195

0.0160

0.0133

0.0148

0.0177

0.0200

0.2

0.0343

0.0290

0.0265

0.0310

0.0346

0.0361

0.4

0.0640

-

-

-

-

0.0709

0.5

-

0.0567

0.0841

0.0845

0.0852

-

0.6

0.0945

-

-

-

-

0.1064

0.8

0.1254

-

-

-

-

0.1406

1.0

0.1620

0.1189

0.1338

0.1357

0.1447

0.1839

2.0

0.3194

0.2927

0.2881

0.3014

0.3048

0.3579

4.0

0.6422

-

-

-

-

-

5.0

-

0.6164

0.7998

0.7897

0.7913

0.7024

6.0

0.9583

-

-

-

-

1.0420

8.0

1.2947

-

-

-

-

1.3863

10

1.5726

1.2027

1.5175

1.6359

1.5959

1.7403

15

-

-

-

2.5033

2.3447

2.5727

20

3.1677

2.5256

2.9303

-

3.1262

3.4926

*Mean of three replicates

 

 

 

Method I (Distilled water)

Method II (Acetate buffer pH 4.0)

 

 

Method III (Phosphate buffer pH 5.8)

Method IV (Phosphate buffer pH 7.8)

 

 

Method V (Borate buffer pH 9.0)

Method VI (Methanol)

Figure 2: Absorption spectra of Minoxidil (10 µg/mL) (D0)

 


First order derivative spectroscopy (D1)

The overlay first-order derivative spectra of Minoxidil in distilled water (Method I), acetate buffer (pH 4.0) (Method II), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) (Method III), phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) (Method IV), borate buffer (pH 9.0) (Method V), methanol (Method VI) were shown in Figure 3 and the spectral characteristics observed were shown in Table 3. The derivative spectrum has shown both maxima and minima and therefore the amplitude was taken against concentration and calibration curves were drawn. Minoxidil obeys Beer-Lambert’s law over the concentration range 0.1-20 µg/mL for distilled water, acetate buffer (pH 4.0), phosphate buffer (pH 5.8), borate buffer (pH 9.0), methanol and 0.1 – 15 µg/mL for phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) respectively and the linear regression equations that are found to be y = 0.0114x + 0.0008, y = 0.0105x + 0.0003, y = 0.011x + 0.0003, y = 0.0128x - 0.0008, y = 0.0121x - 0.0001, y = 0.0143x + 0.0017, respectively.

The percentage RSD in accuracy (Table 4) and precision studies (Table 5-6) for all the methods was found to be less than 2 in indicating that the methods are precise and accurate. The assay was performed for the Minoxidil topical solution and the percentage recovery was calculated (Table 7). The optical characteristics of the method were shown in Table 8.

 

 


 

 

Method I (Distilled water)

Method II (Acetate buffer pH 4.0)

 

 

Method III (Phosphate buffer pH 5.8)

Method IV (Phosphate buffer pH 7.8)

 

 

Method V (Borate buffer pH 9.0)

Method VI (Methanol)

Figure 3: Absorption spectra of Minoxidil (10 µg/mL) (D1)

 

Table 3: Linearity of Minoxidil (First derivative spectroscopy) (Max: Maxima; Min: Minima)

Conc. (µg/mL)

Method I

Method II

Method III

Max

(254.40nm)

Min

(237.20nm)

Ampli

tude

Max

(274 nm)

Min

 (238 nm)

Ampli

tude

Max

(254.60 nm)

Min

(237.20nm)

Amplitude

0.1

00000

0.0013

0.0013

0.0003

0.0009

0.0012

0.0001

0.0011

0.0012

0.2

00000

0.0021

0.0021

0.0008

0.0017

0.0025

0.0002

0.0018

0.0020

0.4

0.0002

0.0043

0.0045

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.5

-

-

-

0.0015

0.0034

0.0049

0.0003

0.0055

0.0058

0.6

0.0004

0.0064

0.0068

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.8

0.0006

0.0087

0.0093

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.0

0.0007

0.0111

0.0118

0.0030

0.0071

0.0101

0.0007

0.0091

0.0098

2.0

0.0015

0.0221

0.0236

0.0075

0.0174

0.0249

0.0014

0.0198

0.0212

4.0

0.0032

0.0442

0.0474

-

-

-

-

-

-

5.0

-

-

-

0.0155

0.0369

0.0524

0.0039

0.0548

0.0587

6.0

0.0048

0.0662

0.0710

-

-

-

-

-

-

8.0

0.0068

0.0893

0.0961

-

-

-

-

-

-

10

0.0088

0.1094

0.1182

0.0268

0.0730

0.1016

0.0080

0.1046

0.1126

15

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20

0.0166

0.2097

0.2263

0.0544

0.1567

0.2111

0.0178

0.2013

0.2191

Conc. (µg/mL)

Method IV

Method V

Method VI

Max

(254 nm)

Min

(237 nm)

Amplitude

Max

(254 nm)

Min

(237.21nm)

Ampli

tude

Max

(254.20 nm)

Min

(238.20 nm)

Ampli

tude

0.1

0.0003

0.0011

0.0014

0.0001

0.0013

0.0014

0.0002

0.0016

0.0018

0.2

0.0004

0.0025

0.0029

0.0002

0.0025

0.0027

0.0004

0.0028

0.0032

0.4

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0006

0.0056

0.0062

0.5

0.0008

0.0062

0.0070

0.0004

0.0059

0.0063

-

-

-

0.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0010

0.0084

0.0094

0.8

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0012

0.0111

0.0123

1.0

0.0009

0.0099

0.0108

0.0008

0.0102

0.0110

0.0016

0.0142

0.0158

2.0

0.0019

0.0217

0.0236

0.0017

0.0214

0.0231

0.0030

0.0273

0.0303

4.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0059

0.0542

0.0601

5.0

0.0049

0.0563

0.0612

0.0047

0.0556

0.0603

-

-

-

6.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0089

0.0804

0.0893

8.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.0117

0.1075

0.1192

10

0.0100

0.1156

0.1256

0.0097

0.1119

0.1216

0.0142

0.1339

0.1481

15

0.0155

0.1779

0.1934

0.0151

0.1651

0.1802

0.0223

0.1962

0.2185

20

-

-

-

0.0211

0.2204

0.2415

0.0301

0.2511

0.2812

 

Table 4: Accuracy of Minoxidil Topical solution

Zero order spectroscopy

Spiked

Conc. (µg/mL)

Formulation

(µg/mL)

Total Conc.

(µg/mL)

*Conc. obtained (μg/mL) [% Recovery] (RSD)

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

2.5 (50%)

5

7.5

7.48

[99.77]

(0.14)

7.46

[99.54]

(0.07)

7.48

[99.79]

(0.22)

7.48

[99.76]

(0.08)

7.45

[99.44]

(0.18)

7.44

[99.30]

(0.14)

5 (100%)

5

10

9.96

[99.69]

(0.01)

9.97

[99.70]

(0.07)

9.93

[99.44]

(0.04)

9.94

[99.40]

(0.04)

9.94

[99.45]

(0.36)

9.94

[99.43]

(0.16)

7.5 (150%)

5

12.5

12.48

[99.90]

(0.06)

12.45

[99.61]

(0.20)

12.45

[99.60]

(0.04)

12.42

[99.43]

(0.07)

12.45

[99.59]

(0.21)

12.42

[99.42]

(0.16)

First Derivative spectroscopy

Spiked

Conc. (µg/mL)

Formulation

(µg/mL)

Total Conc.

(µg/mL)

Conc. obtained (μg/mL) [% Recovery] (RSD)

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

2.5 (50%)

5

7.5

7.45

[99.36]

(0.45)

7.46

[99.51]

(0.20)

7.46

[99.49]

(0.45)

7.46

[99.50]

(0.47)

7.46

[99.38]

(0.10)

7.49

[99.94]

(0.83)

5 (100%)

5

10

9.96

[99.67]

(0.31)

9.95

[99.51]

(0.43)

9.97

[99.72]

(0.56)

9.94

[99.42]

(0.27)

9.98

[99.83]

(0.37)

9.93

[99.34]

(0.28)

7.5 (150%)

5

12.5

12.42

[99.39]

(0.15)

12.43

[99.45]

(0.23)

12.43

[99.48]

(0.19)

12.45

[99.66]

(0.34)

12.41

[99.32]

(0.26)

12.44

[99.53]

(0.28)

*Mean of three replicates

 

 

Table 5: Precision study of Minoxidil Topical solution (Zero order spectroscopy)

Intraday precision

Conc. (µg/mL)

Absorbance

I

II

III

10

1.5726

1.2027

1.5175

10

1.5729

1.2021

1.5089

10

1.5698

1.2029

1.5092

10

1.5719

1.2021

1.5179

10

1.5722

1.2017

1.5099

10

1.5725

1.2022

1.5171

*Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

1.5719 ± 0.011 (0.07)

1.2022 ± 0.0004 (0.03)

1.5134 ± 0.0044(0.29)

Conc. (µg/mL)

IV

V

VI

10

1.6359

1.5959

1.7403

10

1.6360

1.5963

1.7391

10

1.6357

1.5958

1.7398

10

1.6310

1.5950

1.7411

10

1.6398

1.5961

1.7410

10

1.6339

1.5954

1.7409

*Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

1.6353 ± 0.0028 (0.01)

1.5957 ± 0.0004 (0.02)

1.7403 ± 0.0007 (0.04)

Interday precision

Conc. (µg/mL)

Absorbance

I

II

III

10

1.5726

1.2027

1.5175

10

1.5719

1.2031

1.5172

10

1.5720

1.2022

1.5168

Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

1.5721 ± 0.0003 (0.02)

1.2026 ± 0.0004 (0.03)

1.5171 ± 0.0003 (0.02)

Conc. (µg/mL)

IV

V

VI

10

1.6359

1.5959

1.7403

10

1.6350

1.5957

1.7397

10

1.6361

1.5949

1.7418

Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

1.6356 ± 0.0005 (0.03)

1.5955 ± 0.0005 (0.03)

1.7406 ± 0.0010 (0.06)

*Mean of three replicates

 

Table 6: Precision study of Minoxidil Topical solution (First derivative spectroscopy)

Intraday precision

Conc. (µg/mL)

Absorbance

I

II

III

10

0.1182

0.1016

0.1126

10

0.1190

0.1012

0.1121

10

0.1187

0.1015

0.1124

10

0.1184

0.1013

0.1125

10

0.1186

0.1010

0.1126

10

0.1184

0.1011

0.1122

*Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

0.1185 ± 0.0002 (0.23)

0.1012 ± 0.0002 (0.22)

0.1124 ± 0.0002 (0.18)

Conc. (µg/mL)

IV

V

VI

10

0.1256

0.1216

0.1481

10

0.1254

0.1217

0.1489

10

0.1251

0.1219

0.1482

10

0.1253

0.1215

0.1483

10

0.1255

0.1212

0.1486

10

0.1253

0.1216

0.1479

*Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

0.1253 ± 0.0001 (0.14)

0.1215 ± 0.0002 (0.19)

0.1483 ± 0.0003 (0.24)

Interday precision

Conc. (µg/mL)

Absorbance

I

II

III

10

0.1182

0.1016

0.1126

10

0.1180

0.1014

0.1129

10

0.1185

0.1017

0.1127

Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

0.1182 ± 0.0002 (0.21)

0.1015 ± 0.0001 (0.15)

0.1127 ± 0.0001 (0.12)

Conc. (µg/mL)

IV

V

VI

10

0.1256

0.1216

0.1481

10

0.1257

0.1214

0.1484

10

0.1259

0.1218

0.1487

Mean ± S.D (% RSD)

0.1257 ± 0.0001 (0.12)

0.1216 ± 0.0002 (0.16)

0.1484 ± 0.0003 (0.20)

*Mean of three replicates

 

 

Table 7: Assay of Minoxidil Topical Solution

Brand

Zero order spectroscopy

Method I

Distilled Water

Method II

Acetate buffer (pH 4.0)

Method III

Phosphate buffer (pH 5.8)

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

Amount (µg)

%

Recovery

I

9.968

99.68

9.941

99.41

9.958

99.58

II

9.971

99.71

9.952

99.52

9.964

99.64

 

Method IV

Phosphate buffer (pH 7.8)

Method V

Borate buffer (pH 9.0)

Method VI - Methanol

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

Amount (µg)

%

Recovery

I

9.972

99.72

9.961

99.61

9.994

99.94

II

9.979

99.79

9.966

99.66

9.997

99.97

 

First derivative spectroscopy

Method I

Distilled Water

Method II

Acetate buffer (pH 4.0)

Method III

Phosphate buffer (pH 5.8)

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

Amount (µg)

%

Recovery

I

9.956

99.56

9.940

99.40

9.954

99.54

II

9.961

99.61

9.942

99.42

9.957

99.57

 

Method IV

Phosphate buffer (pH 7.8)

Method V

Borate buffer (pH 9.0)

Method VI - Methanol

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

amount (µg)

%

Recovery

*Observed

Amount (µg)

%

Recovery

I

9.969

99.69

9.966

99.66

9.991

99.91

II

9.973

99.73

9.970

99.70

9.995

99.95

*Mean of three replicates

 

Table 8: Optical characteristics of Minoxidil – Zero order spectroscopy

Parameters

Methods

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

Linearity range (µg/mL)

0.1 – 20

0.1 – 20

0.1 – 20

0.1 – 15

0.1 – 20

0.1 – 20

λmax (nm)

230

230

230

230

230

230.60

Molar extinction coefficient (litre/mole/cm-1)

3.314×104

2.617×104

3.086×104

3.481×104

3.278×104

3.628×104

Sandell’s sensitivity (µg/cm2/0.001 absorbance unit)

0.01389

0.00479

0.04474

0.07992

0.00446

0.01268

Slope

0.1584

0.1251

0.1475

0.1664

0.1567

0.1734

Intercept

0.0032

0.0004

0.0076

0.0143

0.0017

0.0032

Correlation coefficient

0.9999

0.9991

0.9993

0.9996

0.9999

0.9999

Precision

(%RSD)

Intraday

0.34

0.22

0.18

0.14

0.19

0.24

Interday

0.16

0.15

0.12

0.12

0.16

0.20

Accuracy (% RSD)

0.01-0.14

0.07-0.20

0.04-0.32

0.04-0.08

0.18-0.36

0.14-0.16

Assay (%)

Brand I

99.68

99.41

99.58

99.72

99.61

99.94

Brand II

99.71

99.52

99.64

99.79

99.66

99.97

 


CONCLUSION:

All the spectrophotometric techniques were validated and found to be very simple, accurate, precise, and economical. These methods can be conveniently used for the routine analysis of Minoxidil Pharmaceutical formulations.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are grateful to Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for providing the gift samples of Minoxidil and M/s GITAM (Deemed to be) University for providing the research facilities.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Lowenthal DT, Affrime MB. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of Minoxidil. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1980; 2 (2): 93-106.

2.      Khadeerunnisa S, Vimalak Kannan T, Vijaya Lakshmi T. Spectrophotometric determination and estimation of Minoxidil in tablet dosage form by UV. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Chem & Anal. 2019; 1(2): 47-51

3.      Rogerio Adelino De S, Felipe Silva S, Priscila C, and Eder Tadeu Gomes. Determination of Minoxidil by bleaching the permanganate carrier solution in a flow-based spectrophotometric system. Analytical Letters. 2011; 44: 349-359.

4.      Zarghi A, Safaati A, Foroutan S.M, Khoddam A. Rapid determination of Minoxidil in human plasma using ion-pair HPLC. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2004; 36: 377–379

5.      Mio I, Chiharu Fu, Rena S, Ryotaro M, Hajime I. Simultaneous determination of Minoxidil and Minoxidil sulfate by high performance liquid chromatography with UV-detection and its applications. Medicine in Drug Discovery. 2020; (7)100050: 2590-0986.

6.      Hemant K G, Jagdish P B, Akshay S, Manjusha S, Ganesh P D, Ashish H T. Development and Validation of Stability Indicating HPLC Method for the estimation of Minoxidil and related substance in topical formulation. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2011; 4 (12):

7.      Lai-Hao, and Pei-Tung. Electrochemical Detector for Liquid Chromatography: Determining Minoxidil in Hair-Growth Pharmaceuticals. Current Analytical Chemistry. Bentham Science Publishers. 2019; 15: 575-582

8.      Poorna Basuri P, Vijayakumar R, Nalini C.N. Estimation of Minoxidil in human plasma using UHPLC-MS/MS and its application in pharmacokinetic study. Journal of Chromatography B. 2022; 1192, 123104.

9.      Mathrusri Annapurna M, Souvik Das, Narendra A and Raja Kumar V. Validated new spectrophotometric methods for the estimation of Bosentan in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Pharm Educ Res. 2010; 1 (2): 73-76.

10.   Mathrusri Annapurna M, Bisht SPS, Ravi Kumar BVV, Raja Kumar V and Narendra A. Spectrophotometric determination of Bosentan and its application in pharmaceutical analysis. International Journal of Comprehensive Pharmacy. 2011; 2 (2): 1-3.

11.   Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. New spectrophotometric method for the determination of Bosentan – An anti-hypertensive agent in pharmaceutical dosage forms. E- Journal of Chemistry. 2012; 9(2): 700-704.

12.   Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. Validated spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Mycophenolate: an Anti-neoplastic agent in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Chemistry. 2013; Article ID 523193.

13.   Narendra A, Deepika D and Mathrusri Annapurna M. Determination of Emtricitabine by derivative spectrophotometric method in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Chemical Science Transactions. 2013; 2(3): 978-982.

14.   ICH Q2 [R1] Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology: November (2005).

 

 

 

Received on 16.02.2024            Modified on 22.03.2024

Accepted on 28.04.2024           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2024; 17(5):2372-2378.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00371