Correlation between 25(OH)D Levels with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Activity

 

Gatot Soegiarto1,4*, Yuliasih Yuliasih2,4, Deasy Fetarayani1,4, Rizqi Wachida3,4

1Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.

2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine,

Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.

3Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.

4Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: gatot_soegiarto@fk.unair.ac.id

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) manifests immune system dysregulation leading to tissue damage, and hypovitaminosis D is reported to be a contributing factor. Vitamin D acts as an immunomodulator, actively contributing to the pathogenesis of SLE by maintaining antigen-presenting cell (APC) tolerance, inhibiting dendritic cell maturation, and exhibiting antimicrobial and antiapoptotic properties. Objective: This study aims to investigate the association between 25(OH)D serum levels and the activity of SLE in individuals diagnosed with SLE, assessed through the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) score. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional observational analytic study was conducted on 40 SLE subjects at Dr. Soetomo Regional Public Hospital's Outpatient and Inpatient Installation in Surabaya. The disease activity was assessed using SLAM scores, and theArchitect brand instrument, employing chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), was utilized to measure 25(OH)D serum levels. Statistical analysis of the data involved the use of the Spearman correlation test, with significance set at p < 0.05. Result: The average age of the participants was 27.43 years with a standard deviation of 8.65 and a median SLAM score of 17.5 (range: 1-39). The mean 25(OH)D serum level was 21.69±2.72ng/mL, demonstrating a significant negative correlation with SLE activity (p<0.01; r = -0.671). Additionally, there was a negative correlation with C-reactive protein (CRP) (p<0.05; r = -0.414) and positive correlations with complement components C3 (p<0.01; r = 0.538) and C4 (p < 0.05; r = 0.356). Conclusion: The study establishes a substantial negative correlation between 25(OH)D serum levels and SLE activity, as assessed by the SLAM score.

 

KEYWORDS: SLE, Disease activity, 25(OH)D, Human and health, Medicine.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) stands as an autoimmune disease marked by a multifactorial etiology, involving an intricate interplay between genetic factors and environmental influences. Numerous studies emphasize the significance of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, with vitamin D emerging as a notable example.

 

While deficiencies in vitamin D have been widely documented in various autoimmune conditions,1-4 there is currently no concrete data about this condition in SLE patients, especially those treated at Dr. Soetomo Regional Public Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Vitamin D is chiefly derived from de novo synthesis in the skin, triggered by exposure to Ultraviolet B radiation. Despite the intake of vitamin D through food, reliance on dietary sources alone is often inadequate.5 SLE patients exhibit several risk factors for hypovitaminosis D, characterized by nonspecific symptoms such as musculoskeletal pain, paresthesias, and cramps. These symptoms commonly overlap with those experienced by SLE patients, leading to potential oversight. Recognizing the importance of hypovitaminosis D treatment in individuals with SLE, given the potential immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D, becomes crucial.6 Therefore, it is imperative to consider the likelihood of vitamin D hypovitaminosis in SLE patients, ensuring that appropriate management beyond conventional therapy is administered.

 

The role of Vitamin D is presumably exhibited through various mechanisms, including maintaining tolerance of antigen-presenting cells (APC) by inhibiting dendritic cell maturation,7.8 as an antimicrobial,as well as anti-apoptosis by increasing self-antigen. A recent study found that vitamin D has the potential to downregulate the expression of Fasl and Bax. It also increases the expression of Bcl-2, a molecule with an antiapoptotic function. The antiapoptotic and antiproliferative effects are partly due to the termination of the cell cycle in G1. Immune cells can receive stimuli or signals because they have receptors, namely Vitamin D receptors (VDR). Furthermore, macrophages, dendritic cells, and B lymphocytes also have enzymes that can produce active Vitamin D. Activation of VDR initiates the impact on immune cells,8 which will have a positive influence on SLE patients.

 

The afore mentioned report suggests a link between SLE activity and Vitamin D deficiency. The findings indicate heightened disease activity in SLE patients experiencing Vitamin D deficiency. Consequently, the objective of this study is to examine the levels of 25(OH)D in the serum of SLE patients receiving treatment at Dr. Soetomo Regional Public Hospital. The hypothesis posited in this study proposes an inverse association between the levels of 25(OH)D in the serum and disease activity in SLE patients visiting Dr. Soetomo Regional Public Hospital's Outpatient and Inpatient Installation, evaluated through the SLAM score. The primary objective is to facilitate the administration of appropriate additional therapy, with the overarching goal of mitigating the morbidity and mortality rates associated with SLE.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Employing an analytical method with a cross-sectional design, this research considered individuals between the ages of 16 and 50, encompassing both men and women, diagnosed with SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria.The study focused on new SLE patients, including those yet to undergo immunosuppressant therapy or those with a withdrawal period from SLE treatment exceeding four weeks.Inpatients and individuals undergoing routine control with methylprednisolone therapy of ≤4mg (Kasjmir et al., 2011), along with immunosuppressants, were considered. Participants were required to express a willingness to provide informed consent.9 Exclusion criteria comprised SLE patients with overlapping conditions such as other connective tissue diseases (e.g., dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma), diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, a history of malignancy, and those using Vitamin D supplements. It was established that a minimum of 38.8 individuals, rounded up to 40, was required for this study according to the formula for determining sample sizes in correlation studies.

 

All participants underwent uniform clinical and laboratory assessments. Furthermore, clinical and laboratory data were evaluated and calculated using Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) scores, which include constitutional, skin, eye, reticuloendothelial, pulmonary, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neuromotor, as well as joint symptoms. Laboratory tests included hematological examination, as well as LED and renal involvement namely serum creatinine and urine sediment. Each parameter in the SLAM scores was assigned a value of 0-3, contributing to a total score ranging from 0 to 86.10,11 The completion of SLAM scores was conducted and approved by the attending Rheumatologist.

 

The researchers conducted the examination of 25(OH)D serum in Prodia Surabaya laboratory, utilizing chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) technology with Architect 25(OH)D to measure the peripheral blood levels in the study subjects. Variable levels in serum are expressed in units of ng/mL.

 

The assessment of data distribution normality was conducted using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Spearman's statistical test was utilized to determine the correlation between two variables that did not follow a normal distribution. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS for Windows version 23.0. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. Soetomo Regional Public Hospital, Surabaya, under reference number 1197/KEPK/V/2019.

 


Table 1. General and Laboratory Characteristics of Study Subjects.

Indicator

 

Total (n = 40)

n (%)

Mean ± SD

Median

Min

Maks

Gender

 

 

 

 

 

Male

Female

0 (0)

40 (100)

 

 

 

 

Age (years)

 

27.43 ± 8.65

 

 

 

BMI (kg/m2)

 

21.69 ± 2.71

 

 

 

Hemoglobin (gr/dl)

 

 

10.05

2.3

14.1

Leukocytes (cell/mm3)

 

 

8030

2,420

21,990

Lymphocytes (cell/mm3)

 

 

1490

240

6,400

Platelets (cell/mm3)

 

22,46.25 ± 11,65.83

 

 

 

ESR (mm/hour)

 

36.75 ± 20.44

 

 

 

CRP (mg/dl)

 

 

0.50

0.01

14.00

C3 (mg/dl)

 

 

54.80

16.40

144.00

C4 (mg/dl)

 

 

22.45

3.00

90.6

Anti-dsDNA (IU/ml)

 

 

95.10

10.00

2,779.70

 


RESULT:

A cohort of 40 SLE participants, inclusive of both outpatients and inpatients at Dr. Soetomo Regional Public Hospital’s Department of Internal Medicine, meeting the stipulated inclusion and exclusion criteria, were enrolled. The general characteristics and laboratory examination details are presented in Table 1. The majority of the subjects had hematological disorders in the form of anemia, as well as increased LED.

 

25(OH)D Serum Levels in the Study Subjects:

All subjects were examined for their 25(OH)D serum levels, which had a mean of 21.69±2.72ng/mL. The Normality test with Saphiro-Wilk showed that the data obtained were normally distributed.

 

SLE activity in study subjects:

The activity of SLE was measured using the SLAM scores, and the results showed a median of 17.5, with the lowest score of 1 and the highest of 39. The normality test with Saphiro-Wilk showed that the levels of data were abnormally distributed. See Tables 2 and 3.

 

Table 2. Characteristics of the subjects based on the SLAM Scores

Indicator

n (%)

Constitutional

28 (70%)

Integument

24 (60%)

Reticuloendothelial

9 (22.5%)

Pulmonary

16 (40%)

Cardiovascular

8 (20%)

Gastrointestinal

4 (10%)

Neuromotor

23 (57.5%)

Joints

25 (62.5%)

Laboratory:

 

Hematology + LED

35 (87.5%)

Renal

25 (62.5%)

 

Table 3. Characteristics of ANA Profile

Indicator

n (%)

RNP/Sm

12 (30%)

Sm

6 (15%)

SS-A native

16 (40%)

Ro-52 recombinant

12 (30%)

SS-B

5 (12.5%)

Scl-70

2 (5%)

PM-Scl100

1 (2.5%)

Jo-1

1 (2.5%)

dsDNA

12 (30%)

Nucleosomes

13 (32.5)

Histones

18 (45%)

Ribosomal Protein

14 (35%)

AMA-M2

7 (17.5%)

 

Interrelation of 25(OH)D Serum Level with the Activity of SLE in Study Subjects:

Through the utilization of the Spearman correlation test, an exploration into the connection between SLAM scores and 25(OH)D serum levels was conducted, revealing a substantial positive correlation (r = -0.665, p < 0.01), as depicted in Figure 1. Consequently, an examination of the associations between CRP, C3, C4, anti-dsDNA, and LED with 25(OH)D serum levels was conducted, revealing noteworthy correlations exclusively with C3 (r = 0.538; p < 0.01), C4 (r = 0.356; p = 0.024), and CRP (r = -0.414; p = 0.008).

 

Figure 1. Scatter Diagram of the Interrelation of 25(OH)D Serum Level with the Activity of SLE.

 

DISCUSSION:

Hypovitaminosis D is common in Southeast Asian countries, with a prevalence of 6-70%. Some of the factors that influence this include skin pigmentation, aging, sun protection behavior such as sunscreen application, religion, lifestyle, and nutritional differences.12

In this study, the participants comprised productive young women exhibiting mild to high Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) activity. Consequently, it was anticipated that these individuals would manifest adecline in 25(OH)D serum levels. The results reaffirm the hypothesis, showcasing a strong inverse relationship between disease activity, as measured by the SLAM scores, and 25(OH)D serum levels.

 

Gender distribution found that all subjects were female. In several epidemiological studies of SLE patients, it was found that women had a higher incidence than men.13,14 These findings are also consistent with similar studies conducted in Denmark and Korea.15,16 The average age of study subjects at diagnosis is 27.43 years, with a range of 17-49 years. The most dominant age groups in this study sample were 21-30 years old (35%) and 31-40 years old (32.5%). This result is consistent with other studies conducted in Korea, Malaysia, and the Philippines.16,17 These studies support the theory that SLE is a dominant disease in women of childbearing age, and this is related to the estrogen and prolactin hormones.18-20

 

SLAM Score is a tool for scoring systems to assess the activity of SLE, and it has been validated internationally.21 It was obtained in the subjects with a median of 17.5, a minimum score of 1, and a maximum score of 39. This is the same as the study conducted by Paramaiswari et al. (2014) in Jogyakarta, which showed that the average SLAM score of SLE inpatients was16.7.22 Furthermore, Yuliasih et al. (2019) in a study performed in Surabaya reported that the average SLAM score of SLE inpatients was 29.3±3.9. The mean was higher, probably because the study involved only active SLE patients as subjects.23

 

It is noteworthy that the interrelation of the activity of SLE with 25(OH)D serum levels has not demonstrated uniformity across all observations. Several studies reported negative correlations,24-26 while others found no correlation.27,28

 

In this study, the interrelation between the activity of SLE with 25(OH)D serum levels was evaluated using the SLAM scores, with a strong correlation strength of (p <0.05; r = -0.661). The results are in line with Amital et al. (2010) and Mok et al. (2012). Based on the SLEDAI scores (p <0.05), Amital et al.reported an inverse correlation between interrelation of the activity of SLE with 25(OH)D serum levels. Meanwhile, Mok et al. (2012) indicated a significant inverse interrelation of the activity of SLE with 25(OH)D serum levels (p <0.05).29-30

 

 

Mok et al. (2012) highlighted the role of low 25(OH)D serum levels in assessing both renal and extra-renal activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Their discovery revealed that in detecting renal SLE activity, low 25(OH)D serum levels demonstrate greater specificity while showing reduced sensitivity when compared to anti-dsDNA. In particular, the sensitivity and specificity reported for detecting renal SLE activity with 25(OH)D serum levels below 15 ng/mL were 0.44 and 0.78, respectively.30-35

 

In this study, laboratory tests were carried out as mentioned in the 1997 ACR criteria and SLAM score, and some of the parameters examined correlated with SLE activity. The analysis results indicated that LED and anti-ds-DNA were not correlated to the SLAM score, CRP was correlated, while C3 and C4 were negatively correlated to SLAM scores. Contrary to findings in Australia and Egypt, this study did not establish aninterrelationof LED with25(OH)Dserum levels (r = -0.115; p = 0.481) or SLE activity (r = 0.149; p = 0.357). These results differ from studies reporting a significant inverse interrelation of 25(OH)D serum levels with LED.36,37 Other studies describe different conditions where there is a significant relationship between increased LED and high SLE activity based on the BILAG score.38-41

 

Additionally, 25(OH)D serum levels interrelated with CRP results in this study (r = -0.414; p = 0.008). This finding aligns with a study by Emam et al. (2014) in Egypt, revealing a significant inverse correlation between 25(OH)D serum levels and CRP (r = -0.55, P = 0.013).34,42

 

In this study, the results of C3 and C4 significantly and negatively interrelated with the activity of SLE. These results are consistent with Nasiri et al. (2009), Narayanan et al. (2011), and Bahlas and Damiati (2014), which obtained a value of p <0.05.33,35,36 Furthermore, C3 and C4 levels significantlyinterrelated with 25(OH)D serum levels, supporting the findings of Alnaggar et al. (2019).43-45

 

The results indicate that anti-ds-DNA did not exhibit a significant interrelation of the activity of SLE with 25(OH)D serum levels. Prior studies have shown inconsistent outcomes, with some reporting a significant negative interrelationof anti-dsDNA with 25(OH)D serum levels (r= -0.13; p= 0.02).46-48 A a study conducted in Egypt by Emam et al. (2014) revealed a significant inverse interrelation between 25(OH)D serum levels and anti-dsDNA (r= −0.64, P= 0.04).34,49,50 Similarly, Narayanan et al. (2011) found a significant and positive correlation between SLEDAI scores and anti-dsDNA levels in India.35,51-53

CONCLUSION:

This study identifies hypovitaminosis D in SLE patients, with results indicating that the activity of SLE significantly and negatively correlates with 25(OH)D serum levels assessed by SLAM scores. Further research needs to be carried out using appropriate research methods, for example, a cohort study to determine the interrelation of the activity of SLE with 25(OH)D serum levels to assess changes and compare remission, active, and inactive states.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

 

FUNDING SOURCE:

This study was funded by the Faculty Excellence Research Program– Airlangga University 2019.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Cojocaru M and Cojocaru IM. Association between Vitamin D deficiency and Autoimmune Diseases. Revista Medicala Romana. 2014; 62(1).

2.      Kareem MI, Mohammed RH, Abozaid HS, Rayan MM, Mohamed AM, Fathi NA. Hypo-vitaminosis D in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Ankylosing Spondylitis. Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology. 2015; 6(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9899.1000369

3.      Abaza NM, et al. Vitamin D Deficiency in Egyptian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: How Prevalent and Does It Impact Disease Activity? Integrative Medicine Insights: SAGE Journals. 2016; 11: 27-33. https://doi.org/10.4137/IMI.S40035

4.      Maryam S, Atabati E, Yalda R. Comparison of Vitamin D Serum Values between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Lupus Populations: An Observational Study. The Open Rheumatology Journal. 2016; 29; 12: 124. https://doi.org/10.2174%2F1874312901812010065

5.      Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2007; 357(3): 266-281. doi/full/10.1056/nejmra070553

6.      Deluca HF and Cantorna MT. Vitamin D: its role and uses in immunology. The FASEB Journal. 2001; 15: 2579–2585. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.01-0433rev

7.      Norman PE and Powell JT. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation Research. 2014; 114: 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301241

8.      Dankers W, Colin EM, van Hamburg JP, Lubberts E. Vitamin D in Autoimmunity: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017; 2017; 7: 697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00697

9.      Kasjmir YI, Handono K, Wijaya LK, Hamijoyo L, Albar Z, Kalim H, Hermansyah, Kertia N, Achadiono DN, Manuaba IA, Suarjana N, Sumartini D, Ongkowijaya JA. Rekomendasi Perhimpunan Reumatologi Indonesia untuk Diagnosis dan Pengelolaan Lupus Eritematosus Sistemik. Perhimpunan Reumatologi Indonesia. 2011.

10.   Lam GKW, Petri M. Assessment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2005; 23: S120-S132.

11.   Castrejón I, Tani C, Jolly M, Huang A, Mosca M. Indices to assess patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in clinical trials, long-term observational studies, and clinical care. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology. 2014; 32(5 Suppl 85): S 85-95.

12.   Nimitphong H and Holick MF. Vitamin D status and sun exposure in southeast Asia. Dermatoendocrinology. 2013; 5(1): 34-7. https://doi.org/10.4161/derm.24054

13.   Pons-Estel GJ, Ugarte-Gil MF and Alarcón GS. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. 2017; 13(8): 799-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2017.1327352

14.   Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge MJ, Lanyon P, Zhang W. The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Rheumatology. 2017; 56(11): 1945–1961. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex260

15.   Hermansen MF, Lindhardsen J, Torp-Pedersen C, Faurschou M and Jacobsen S. Incidence of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis in Denmark: A Nationwide Cohort Study. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2016; 43(7): 1335-1339. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.151221

16.   Bae EH, Lim SY, Han KD, Jung JH, Choi HS, Kim HY, Kim CS, Ma SK, Kim SW. Trend of prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in South Korea, 2005 to 2015: a nationwide population-based study. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. 2020; 35(3): 652. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.303

17.   Jakes RW, Bae SC, Louthreno W, Mok CC, Navarra SV, Kwon N. Systematic Review of the Epidemiology of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Asia-Pacific Region: Prevalence, Incidence, Clinical Features, and Mortality. Arthritis Care and Research. 2012; 64(2): 159 –168. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20683

18.   Kassi E and Moutsatsou P. Estrogen receptor signaling and its relationship to cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2010; 317452. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/317452

19.   Pierdominici M and Ortona E. Estrogen impact on autoimmunity onset and progression: The paradigm of systemic lupus erythematosus. International Trends in Immunity. 2013; 1: 24-34.

20.   Treadwell EL, Wiley K, Word B, Melchior W, Tolleson WH, Gopee N, Hammons G, Lyn-Cook BD. Prolactin and dehydroepiandrosterone levels in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: The role of the extrapituitary prolactin promoter polymorphism at− 1149G/T. Journal of Immunology Research. 2015; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/435658

21.   Mikdashi J, Nived O. Measuring Disease Activity in Adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: the Challenges of Administrative Burden and Responsiveness to Patient Concerns in Clinical Research. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2015; 17: 183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0702-6

22.   Paramaiswari A, Kertia N, Achadiyono DW. Relationship Between Systemic Lupus Activity Measurement (SLAM) Score and Mortality in Systemic Lupus Erytemathosus (SLE) Inpatients. Acta Interna The Journal of Internal Medicine. 2014; 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/acta%20interna.5729

23.   Yuliasih, Lita DR, Rizki MP. Ratio of Th17/Treg and Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Caspian Journal Internal Medicine. 2019; 10(1): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.22088%2Fcjim.10.1.65

24.   Borba VZ, Vieira JG, Kasamatsu T, Radominski SC, Sato EI, Lazaretti-Castro M. Vitamin D deficiency in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 16: 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0676-1

25.   Vacca A, Cormier C, Piras M, Mathieu A, Kahan A, Allanore Y. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in 2 independent cohorts of patients with systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2009; 16: 1924–1929. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.081287

26.   Hamza RT, Awwad KS, Ali MK, Hamed AI. Reduced serum concentrations of 25-hidroxy vitamin D in Egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Relation to disease activity. Medical Science Monitor. 2011; 17: 711-718. https://doi.org/10.12659%2FMSM.882131

27.   Ruiz-Irastorza G, Egurbide M, Olivares N, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, Aguirre C. Vitamin D deficiency in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence, predictors and clinical consequences. Rheumatology. 2008; 47: 920–923. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken121

28.   Mandal M, et al. Vitamin D levels in Indian systemic lupus erythematosus patients: association with disease activity index and interferon alpha. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 2014; 16(1): R49. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4479

29.   Amital H, Szekanecz Z, Szücs G. Serum concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are inversely related to disease activity: is it time to routinely supplement patients with SLE with vitamin D?. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2010; 69: 1155-1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.120329

30.   Mok CC, Birmingham DJ, Leung HW, Hebert LA, Song H, Rovin BH. Vitamin D levels in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: relationship with disease activity, vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis. Rheumatology. 2012; 51: 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker212

31.   Yap KS, Northcott M, Hoi ABY, Morand EF, Nikpour M. Association of low vitamin D with high disease activity in an Australian systemic lupus erythematosus cohort. Lupus Science and Medicine. 2015; 2: e000064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2014-000064

32.   Tayel MY, El-Zawawy A, Said MI, Soliman EA, Mohamed MK. A study on the role of calcium homeostasis and vitamin D deficiency in premenopausal systemic lupus erythematosus patients and its relation with disease activity. Egyptian Journal of Obesity, Diabetes and Endocrinology. 2016; 2(2): 95-107. DOI:10.4103/2356-8062.197571

33.   Nasiri S, Karimifar M, Bonakdar ZS, Salesi M. Correlation of ESR, C3, C4, anti-DNA and lupus activity based on British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index in patients of rheumatology clinic. Rheumatology International. 2009; 30: 1605–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1201-3

34.   Emam FE, Abd El-Wahab TM, Mohammed MS, Elsalhy AS, Abdel Rahem SI. Assessment of serum vitamin D level in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation. 2014; 41: 71-78. https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.132460

35.   Narayanan K, Marwaha V, Shanmuganandan K, Shankar S. Correlation between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, C3, C4 and Anti-dsDNA Antibodies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2011; 66(2): 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80118-2

36.   Bahlas SM and Damiati LA. Correlation between Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Levels with Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. World Family Medicine Journal: Incorporating the Middle East Journal of Family Medicine. 2014; 12(1): 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.04.021

37.   Alnaggar AR, Fayed A, Soliman A. AB0552 25 Hydroxi-Vitamin D Level in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Is it related to diseases activity and lupus nephritis?.2019;78:1738.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-eular.158.

38.   Martadiani, ED, Widiana IGR, Dewi DAR. Ultrasound evaluation of nephritis, hepatic steatosis, and knee joint effusion in Balinese women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Bali Medical Journal. 2017; 6(3): S1-S6. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i3.712.

39.   Amrutia P, Dave D. Prevailing Tenor for Ayurveda in Views of Ayurvedic Practitioners. Asian J. Management. 2017; 8(4): 1029-1036. DOI: 10.5958/2321-5763.2017.00158.5.

40.   Alimirzae R, Azzizadeh Forouzi M, Abazari F, Haghdoost A. Prevalence of quality of sleeping and its determinants among Students of Kerman Razi School of nursing and midwifery. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 4(1): 76-80.

41.   Putranto TA, Wibisono D, Astoro NW, Yana ML, Prabowo ET, Irwansyah D, Nurhadiyanta N, Rantung Y, Ikrar T, Fandrich F. Introducing the tolerogenic macrophage therapy as an alternative approach to manage systemic lupus erythematosus: a case series. Bali Medical Journal. 2019; 8(3): 726–732. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v8i3.1621.

42.   Nethaji G, Lalitha P. A Descriptive Study to Assess the Quality of Sleep among the Elders Residing at Selected Old Age Homes, Salem. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 4(2): 161-164.

43.   Tenson TA, Linson CC, Mathias T. A Descriptive Study to Assess Screen Viewing and Sleeping Hours among High and Low Achievers School Children (From Standard 3 – Standard 7) In Selected Schools at Mangalore. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 4(3):28-333.

44.   Yulistiawati F, Awalia A. A case report of a woman with SLE and lupus enteritis as the first manifestation of active systemic lupus erythematosus. Bali Medical Journal. 2023; 12(2): 1321–1237. Available at: https://www.balimedicaljournal.org/index.php/bmj/article/view/4291.

45.   Chaudhary G, Choudhary VS. A study to Assess the Knowledge and Practice of Staff Nurses regarding Urinary Catheterization: A Quality Control Study. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 4(3): 334-336.

46.   Thressia PA. (Sr. Tresa Anto), Kumar RN. Effect of Sleep Duration on Obesity and the Glycemic level in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 4(4): 502-507.

47.   Kandarini Y, Sikesa IGPH, Kambayana G. Correlation between the level of urine interleukin-6 with microalbuminuria in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients at Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, Indonesia. Bali Medical Journal. 2020; 9(2): 516–519. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i2.1888

48.   Das S, Deepa OV, Pradhan J, Kumari S. Factors of sleep Disturbances among Hospitalized Patients, Jeopardizing the Prognosis. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 5(2): 302-304. DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00061.0.

49.   Dhanalakshmi N. The Assessment of Knowledge, Beliefs and Practices of Adolescent Girls and the Effect of a Structured Teaching Programme in Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding Menstruation, Pregnancy and Sexual Behaviour in Selected Areas of Pediatric Wards, the Out Patient Department and Medicine OPD of Christian Medical College, Vellore. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2015; 5(2): 172-176. DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00035.X.

50.   Wiradharma KG, Kuswardhani RAT, Kandarini Y. Greater carotid intima-media thickness in elderly patients compare to the non-elderly regular hemodialysis patients. Bali Medical Journal. 2017; 6(2): 400–404. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i2.590.

51.   Dave K, Qureshi A, Gopichandran L. Effects of Earplugs and Eye Masks on Perceived Quality of Sleep during Night among Patients in Intensive Care Units. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2015; 5(3): 319-322. DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00065.8.

52.   Vijaya Raja Kumar J, Uma M. Effectiveness of Acupressure on improving the Quality of Sleep among Cancer Patients. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2015; 5(4): 513-517. DOI: 10.5958/2349-2996.2015.00105.6.

53.   Pramudya D, Hertanto DM, Pitaloka AT, Tjempakasari A, Pranawa P. Lupus nephritis and kidney transplantation: past, present and future. Bali Medical Journal. 2023; 12(2): 1802–1807. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v12i2.4456.

 

 

 

 

Received on 20.08.2023      Revised on 15.04.2024

Accepted on 24.09.2024      Published on 24.12.2024

Available online from December 27, 2024

Research J. Pharmacy and Technology. 2024;17(12):5773-5778.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00878

© RJPT All right reserved