An Integrated Molecular Docking Study of Marine Bioactive compound as promising drug candidate against SARS CoV-2 receptor in complex with Antibody

 

Avinash Shankar Bhosale*, Sagar Dnyaneshwar Sonone,

Sachin Madhukar Sonone, H. R. Wagh

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Satara College of Pharmacy, Satara 415004, Maharashtra, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: bhosalea1@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The Covid-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-19. Due to insufficiency of targeted medication, enforced scientist to form new antiviral drug. We describe our current understanding of Phycocyanobilin, Vidarabine, Avarol, and Mycalamide A, a marine bioactive molecule that having good binding affinity with covid-19 receptor. We perform molecular docking study by using Schrödinger software (maestro v 10.2) for SARS CoV-2 receptor spike protein complexed with neutralizing antibody CT-P59(PDB ID-7CM4) and SARS CoV-2 receptor in complexed with antibody ION-300(PDB ID-7BNV) with marine bioactive compound collected from Pub-chem. database. According to our findings, these compounds have good receptor binding affinity, with Phycocyanobilin and Vidarabine having the highest binding affinity.

 

KEYWORDS: Marine bioactive compound, SARS CoV-2 Spike protein, antibody receptor, Molecular Docking study, Covid.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

Covid-19 or corona virus is an infectious respiratory disease1. Covid-19 caused by (SARS CoV-2) severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus2,3,. It began to spread over the world in late December. It first appeared in China, in Wuhan city. And it is currently affecting almost every country on the planet4,5. It has been declared a pandemic disease by the WHO (World Health Organization)5. This pandemic disease related deaths crossed near about 6.3 million worldwide till the 24 May 2022. Fever, dry cough, weariness, chills, body acne, and breathing problems, as well as short breath problems, chest pain, are all symptoms of Covid 194,6. Basically, sars-cov-2 interacts with lung epithelial cells and triggers an immunological response and cytokinin storm, resulting in respiratory failure, which is the most prevalent cause of death in the Covid -19 pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped single- stranded positive sense RNA virus and it has ability to change its structure according to the climatic conditions7,8,9.

 

In the midst of a pandemic, one of the tragedies is that there are no particular antiviral medications available to treat covid-1910,11.. All drugs in market are supplied only for supportive purpose but Covid-19 vaccines, such as covishield, covaxin, Pfizer, and sputnik, are currently being developed.12,13,14

 

Various receptor protein of SARS CoV-2 was structure out. For performing the study we select two recently structured out SARS CoV-2 receptor protein such as SARS CoV-2 receptor in complexed with antibody ION-300(PDB ID-7BNV) with DOI: 10.2210/pdb7BNV/pdb and expression system is homo-sapiens and second one is SARS CoV-2 receptor spike protein complexed with neutralizing antibody CT-P59(PDB ID-7CM4) with DOI: 10.2210/pdb7CM4/pdb which is downloaded from protein data bank(https://www.rcsb.org)

 

For this investigation, we select marine sponges derived compound such as Vidarabine Avarol and Mycalamide A and Phycocyanobilin which is algae metabolite. Vidarabine is a purine nucleoside isolated from Tethya crypta, a Caribbean sponge. Vidarabine is an antiviral that can be used to treat herpes, poxviruses, rhabdoviruses, hepadnaviruses, and certain RNA tumour viruses. Avarol is a sesquiterpenoid hydroquinone isolated from the Dysidea avara (Dysideidae) sponge that has anti-psoriatic and antiviral properties. Mycalamide A, is marine natural compound isolated from sponges from a New Zealand sponge of the genus Mycale. it is known as a protein synthesis inhibitor with potent antitumor activity. Phycocyanobilin is a blue phycobilin, a tetrapyrrole chromophore found in cyanobacteria, red algae, glaucophytes, and some cryptomonad chloroplasts. Its primary purpose is to aid in the selective elimination of atherosclerotic plaques or cancer cells. We select these marine bioactive compounds against SARS CoV-2 receptor protein complexed with antibody to check its binding affinity to the receptor by using Schrodinger docking software.15-22.

 

MATERIAL AND METHOD:

Data source:

In order to get two-dimensional configuration of marine bioactive compound a Pub-Chem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used. A protein database of PDB (https://www.rcsb.org) was used to achieve whole configuration of SARS CoV-2 receptor protein complexed with antibody.

 

Ligand preparation:

The following marine bioactive compound molecules were taken from the database Pub-Chem(https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) prepare ligand by using Schrodinger software. The selected compound is Vidarabine (CID ID:21704), Avarol (CID ID:72185), Phycocyanobilin (CID ID:365902), Mycalamide A (CID ID:10345974)

 

Figure 1: Ligand mole of Marine bioactive compound a) Phycocyanobilin b) Vidarabine c) Mycalamide A d) Avarol

 

Protein preparation:

The SARS CoV-2 receptor spike protein complexed with antibody ION-300 (PDB ID-7BNV) and SARS CoV-2 receptor protein complexed with antibody CT-P59 were obtained from the RCSB PDB (protein data bank) (PDB ID-7CM4). Protein preparation is done with Schrodinger software, which optimizes and minimizes protein.

 

Table 1: PDB ID of SARS CoV-2 receptor spike protein complex with antibody

Sr. No

Receptor Name

PDB ID

1

SARS CoV-2 receptor complexed with antibody ION-300

7BNV

2

SARS CoV-2 Spike protein receptor complexed with neutralizing antibody CT-P59

7CM4

 

Figure 2: Protein preparation of 7CM4 and 7BNV

 

Site-map generation:

After protein preparation for detection of active binding site of protein molecules next task is to perform site-map generation. Software generates different binding sites in protein molecule with different D score value from that we selected site which having more D score value. That means it shows the binding site which having high D score shows good binding site for the ligand molecule.

 

Figure 3: Site map of protein 1- 7CM4 and 2- 7BNV

 

RESULT AND DISCUSSION:

This study examines the binding mode of SARS CoV-2 recently developed protein in complex with antibody using computer docking analysis by using Schrödinger software (maestro v 10.2). We select two protein complexes with antibody which having PDB ID are 7BNV, 7CM4.Four marine bioactive compound have been docked and evaluate according to targeted protein all selected marine bioactive compound significantly interacts with receptor protein of Covid 19 virus. For Covid 19 restraint compound with the glide score which is above -3 is consider to be good. That means it shows good binding with receptor protein. Table 2 shows highest glide score of compounds against SARS CoV-2 is i.e., -6.18, and the lowest -2.72.

 

The highest glide score which is – 6.18 which is for Phycocyanobilin against SARS Cov-2 receptor in complex antibody ION-300 (7BNV) that means it shows higher binding affinity toward the receptor and Mycalamide A which having -3.80 glide score which shows poor or low binding affinity toward this receptor as compared to Phycocyanobilin. similarly for another SARS CoV-2 Spike protein receptor complexed with neutralizing antibody CT-P59 Vidarabine shows good binding affinity toward this receptor with a glide score -5.32.and Mycalamide A which having glide score -2.72 shows poor binding affinity toward receptor. Here are images of docking of ligand with the two different receptors with antibody.

 

Figure 4: Molecular docking of 7BNV with 1.Phycocyanobilin 2.Avarol 3.Vidarabine 4. Mycalamide A

 

In figure 4, Part-1 shows molecular association with SARS CoV-2 receptor protein in complex with antibody ION-300. It intereact with Phycocyanobilin by forming 3 hydrogen bond namely Gly H: 42 (2.05 A0 ), Glu H: 162 (1.73 A0 ) AlaH: 182 (1.80 A0) . Part - 2 shows intereaction with the receptor by forming the  one hydrogen bond (sidechain) with Glu l: 168 (2.69 A0). Part – 3 shows intereaction by forming the 5 hydrogen bond are as Gln H : 39 (2.20 A0), Met h: 40 (2.70 A0), Gly H: 42 (2.09 A0), Glu L: 168 (1.64 A0),Glu L: 168 (1.93 A0). Part – 4  show intereaction by forming the 3 hydrogen bond are as Lys H: 43 (2.68 A0), Glu L: 168 (1.58 A0), Glu L: 168 (1.99 A0).

 

Figure 5: Molecular docking of 7CM4 with 1.Phycocyanobilin 2.Avarol 3.Vidarabine 4.Mycalamide A

 

In figure 5, Part-1 shows molecular association with SARS CoV-2 Spike protein receptor complexed with neutralizing antibody CT-P59. It intereact with Phycocyanobilin by forming 4 hydrogen bond namely Lys H: 45 ( 1.75 A0 ), Gly H: 44 (2.73 A0 ) Pro H: 43 (2.07 A0) Lys L: 167 (2.49 A0)  one salt bridge (3.68 A0) one  pi-cation (6.30 A0 ) . Part -2 shows intereaction with the receptor by forming the 2 hydrogen bond with Pro H: 42 (2.21 A0) and Asp L: 86 (1.87 A0). Part-3 shows intereaction by forming the 4 hydrogen bond are as Asp L: 86 (1.76 A0), Glu H: 84 (1.92 A0), Glu L: 106 (2.31 A0), Glu L: 106 (1.65 A0) and one pi-cation with lys l: 167 (3.29). Part-4 show intereaction by forming the 2 hydrogen bond are as ASP L:86 (1.82 A0), ASP L:86 (2.21 A0) .Table no 2 show the glide score of marine bioactive compound which is calculate by using shrodinger docking software.

 

Table 2: Glide score of marine bioactive compound.

Sr. No

Compound Name

CID ID

PDB ID

7BNV

PDB ID

7CM4

Glide score

Glide score

1

Phycocyanobilin

365902

-6.18

-4.48

2

Avarol

72185

-4.75

-3.85

3

Vidarabine

21704

-5.22

-5.32

4

Mycalamide A

10345974

-3.80

-2.72

 

CONCLUSION:

Our current molecular docking study indicate that the marine bioactive compound i.e., Vidarabine, Avarol, Phycocyanobilin, Mycalamide A are good ligand molecule for significantly binds with SARS CoV-2 receptor in complex with antibody (ION-300, CT-P59) work by interacting with it these marine bioactive compound used to produce safe and effective drug and also these compound help in lead detection in modern method and identified lead compound will then tested in vitro and in vivo to see how successful they are against SARS CoV-2(Covid –19).

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Pande M, Kundu D, Srivastava R. Drugs repurposing against SARS-CoV2 and the new variant B. 1.1. 7 (alpha strain) targeting the spike protein: molecular docking and simulation studies. Heliyon. 2021; 1; 7(8):e07803. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07803

2.      Gui M, Song W, Zhou H, Xu J, Chen S, Xiang Y, Wang X. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein reveal a prerequisite conformational state for receptor binding. Cell Research. 2017; 27(1):119-29. doi.org/10.1038/cr.2016.152

3.      Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. Emerging corona viruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020 ;92(4):418-23. doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25681

4.      Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, Hu Y, Tao ZW, Tian JH, Pei YY, Yuan ML. A new corona virus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579(7798):265-9. doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3

5.      Sardar R, Satish D, Birla S, Gupta D. Comparative analyses of SAR-CoV2 genomes from different geographical locations and other coronavirus family genomes reveals unique features potentially consequential to host-virus interaction and pathogenesis. BioRxiv. 2020 Jan 1. doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.21.001586

6.      Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Liu C, Gu C, Xu S, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Han W, Hong X. Development and structural basis of a two-MAb cocktail for treating SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nature Communications. 2021;11;12(1):1-6. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20465-w

7.      Anil Malik, Neelam Malik, Priyanka Dhiman, Anurag Khatkar, Saloni Kakkar. Molecular docking, synthesis, α-amylase inhibition, urease inhibition and antioxidant evaluation of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzoic acid Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(12):5653-5663. derivatives. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00978.8

8.      Merkley E, Loewen PJ. Anti-intellectualism and the mass public’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour. 2021;5(6):706-15.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01112-w

9.      Wang Y, Li P, Rajpoot S, Saqib U, Yu P, Li Y, Li Y, Ma Z, Baig MS, Pan Q. Comparative assessment of favipiravir and remdesivir against human coronavirus NL63 in molecular docking and cell culture models. Scientific Reports. 2021;6;11(1):1-3.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02972-y

10.   Li P, Liu J, Ma Z, Bramer WM, Peppelenbosch MP, Pan Q. Estimating global epidemiology of low-pathogenic human coronaviruses in relation to the COVID-19 context. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;23;222(4):695-6. doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa321

11.   Adamo S, Michler J, Zurbuchen Y, Cervia C, Taeschler P, Raeber ME, Baghai Sain S, Nilsson J, Moor AE, Boyman O. Signature of long-lived memory CD8+ T cells in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature. 2022;602(7895):148-55.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04280-x

12.   Archana B. Chavhan, Pavan S. Jadhav, Satish Shelke. COVID 19: Outbreak, Structure and Current therapeutic strategies. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2021; 11(1):76-83.doi.org/10.5958/2231-5713.2021.00013.1

13.   Arif Nur Muhammad Ansori, Viol Dhea Kharisma, Amaq Fadholly, Martia Rani Tacharina, Yulanda Antonius, Arli Aditya Parikesit. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Emergence and Its Treatment with Alternative Medicines: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology 2021; 14(10):5551-7.doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00967

14.   Vipul Kumar, Sudhakar Kancharla, Manoj Kumar Jena. In silico screening of FDA approved drugs predicts the therapeutic potentials of Antibiotic drugs against the papain like protease of SARS-CoV-2. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(8):4035-9.doi.org/ 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00699

15.   A. Anto Arockia Raj, J. Vinnarasi. Natural Potential Inhibitors for Covid 19 – An Insilico Approach. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(9):4913-9. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00854

16.   Avanti K. Galande, Sachin H. Rohane. Insilico Molecular docking analysis in Maestro Software. Asian J. Research Chem. 2021; 14(1):97-100. doi.org/10.5958/0974-4150.2021.00017.1

17.   Balasankar Karavadi, Martina V. Insilico Analysis of Inhibitors Related to Aggressive Behavior in Human Beings. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(4): 1436-1441.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00268.8

18.   E. Shanmugapriya, V. Ravichandiran, M. Vijey Aanandhi. Molecular docking studies on naturally occurring selected flavones against protease enzyme of Dengue virus. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016; 9(7):929-932. 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00178.5

19.   Jeyabaskar Suganya, Mahendran Radha, Sharanya Manoharan, Vinoba. V, Astral Francis. Virtual Screening and Analysis of Bioactive Compounds of Momordica charantia against Diabetes using Computational Approaches. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(10):3353-3360.doi.org/ 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00596.0

20.   Padmini R, Sitrarasi R, Razia M. Molecular Docking Studies of Bioactive Compounds from Allium sativum Against EML4-ALK Receptor. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(11): 3741-3747.doi.org/ 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00679.5

21.   Safiya sultana T, Umamaheswari S, Sivakumar M, Umar Khan S. De Novo In-silico Pharmacological Analysis of Herbal Phytoconstituents for COVID-19 Treatment. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(1):257-2.doi.org/ 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00042

22.   Prachi Parvatikar, Bhaskar Saha, Sayandeep K. Das, R. Chandramouli Reddy, Shrilaxmi Bagali, Raghavendra V. Kulkarni, Aravind V. Patil, Mallanagoud S. Biradar, Kusal K. Das. Molecular Docking Identifies Novel Phytochemical Inhibitors Against SARS-COV-2 for Covid-19 Therapy. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2):555-8.doi.org/ 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00090

 

 

 

Received on 15.06.2022            Modified on 12.09.2022

Accepted on 22.11.2022           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2023; 16(8):3805-3808.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00628