GC-MS Analysis and Antioxidant Evaluation of Ativisa Root Extract
Karthikeyan Sekar, Rajeswary Hari, Deepalakshmi Moorthy, Roopashree Hari,
Srivarshini Sampath, Saranya Alagasen
Department of Biotechnology, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute,
Deemed to be University, Chennai - 95, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: karthi.sekar786@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Plants provide an unlimited source of bioactive metabolites that have been utilized in the pharmaceutical industry as a source of diet and medication. Free radicals are known to be the major aspect of oxidative stress that creates damage to the cell. The natural sources of antioxidants which preventing and repairing the damage caused by the free radicals to the cells. Aconitum heterophyllum (Ativisa) belongs to family Ranunculaceae is traditionally utilized externally as well as internally for treating various human diseases such as rheumatic fever, painful joints, gastroenteritis, diarrhoea, oedema, Bronchial asthma. In the present study ethanolic and ethyl acetate extract of the roots of Acontium heterophyllum was investigated for its antioxidant activity and phytochemical composition using GC-MS. GC-MS studies exhibited the existence of 24 phytochemical compounds in ethanol root extract and 31 phytochemical compounds in ethyl acetate root extract. The major phytochemicals detected in ethanolic and ethyl acetate roots extracts of Acontium heterophyllum were Alpha-D-Glucopyranoside beta-D-Fructofuranosyl, Benzophenone semicarbazone, Dodecanoic acid ethyl ester, Ethyl iso-allocholate, l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6 dihexadecanoate, Phytol, Methyl ricinoleate, 13-docosenamide(z), 1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine5-(1,3,5-trimethyl-4-pyrazolyl)amino. The antioxidant potency of ethanol and ethyl acetate root extracts of Acontium heterophyllum on DPPH (23.05% and 21.05 %) and NO radicals (48.58% and 46.70%) at the highest concentration (500 μg/ml) compared to standard ascorbic acid. These findings suggest Acontium heterophyllum could be used as an alternative source for the investigation of new antioxidant agents.
KEYWORDS: Acontium heterophyllum, Phytochemical, Free Radical, Antioxidant, GC-MS.
INTRODUCTION:
From olden days, the utilization of medicinal plants has plays a significant role in daily life even the development in modern medicine and pharmaceuticals research. In India, About 3000 plants species are identified as threpeutic agent1. Bioactive metabolites which present in the medicinal plant sources are extremely safe and can exhibit overwhelming biological actions. Several plants are screened for phytochemical compounds, which are used as a home medication to treat various diseases. Generally, these beneficial medicinal plants possess lesser side effects have been applied in a diverse system of Indian medication2.
WHO defined that 70–80% of the world’s population utilizing medicinal plants as a preliminary therapeutic agent3. Medicinal activity of the medicinal plants can be primarily demonstrated by their phytochemical and antioxidant constituents4.
All living organisms comprise of antioxidant and repairing mechanism to prevent themselves from oxidative damage, but these mechanisms cannot completely protect from damage which may result in oxidative stress. Oxidative stress and free radicals are recognized to be the basic reason for various human diseases5. Naturally occurring antioxidant from medicinal plant plays a vital role in preventing and restoring the impairment activated by the ROS and free radicals to the cells as a result of the imbalance among the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the antioxidants. Normally free radicals such as superoxide radical (O2 ⋅), hydroxyl radical (OH·), peroxide radical (ROO·) and nitric oxide radicals etc are generated in the biological system during excessive metabolism6,7.
Phytochemicals are bioactive metabolites that are naturally found in plants, which offers high antioxidant potential since it is used as a therapeutic agent for many human diseases. Therefore, these present studies are focused to naturally occurring antioxidants from medicinal plant Acontium heterophyllum8. Medicinal plants contain various valuable bioactive compounds namely phenolic compounds, carotenoids, vitamins, terpenoids, essential oils, aromatic compounds, alkaloids, sterols, fatty acids, anthocyanin, tannins that are highly potential to prevent cellular oxidative stress could be separated from plant extracts and then used as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of various disorders. Several bioactive compounds that are detected from the medicinal plants of which some are currently in preclinical trials9,10.
Aconitum heterophyllum belongs to family Ranunculaceae is traditionally utilized externally as well as internally for treating various human diseases11. Aconitum heterophyllum, commonly known as Indian atees and Atividayam in Tamil, is commonly distributed all over the world and cultivated in tropic fields. Throughout the world, about 300 species of Aconitum are identified, of which around 24 species are found in India12. In India, Aconitum heterophyllum is utilized in many ayurvedic formulations as the major ingredient. The plant Aconitum heterophyllum roots are ideal for the treatment of various disorders such as rheumatic fever, painful joints, gastroenteritis, diarrhoea, oedema, Bronchial asthma. The plant Aconitum Heterophyllum also explored to have antidiarrheal, hepatoprotective, antipyretic and analgesic, antioxidant, anti-flatulent, anti-periodic and anti-phlegmatic properties13,14.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Extraction:
Preparation of Aconitum heterophyllum extract:
The roots of Aconitum heterophyllum (1kg) were desiccated in room temperature and powdered into a coarse powder. The powder was separated through a 40-mesh sieve and extracted with ethanol and ethyl acetate in soxhlet apparatus at 60oC. The filtrate left after ethanol and ethyl acetate extraction was dried successively. The extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure using rota flash evaporator until all the solvent had been detached and the extract was stored in the refrigerator for further studies15.
Phytochemical screening:
GC–MS Analysis:
Gas Chromatograph:
A Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph was armed with a straight deactivated 2mm direct injector liner and a 15m Alltech EC-5 column (250μ I.D.,0.25μ film thickness). A split injection was useful for sample administration and the split ratio was set to 10:1. The oven temperature program was programmed to start at 35°C, hold for 2minutes, then ramp at 20°C per minute to 450°C and hold for 5 minutes. The helium carrier gas was fixed to 2ml/minute flow rate.
Mass Spectrum:
A Direct connection with capillary column metal quadrupole mass filter pre-rod mass spectrometer operating in electron ionization (EI) mode with software GCMS solution ver. 2.6 was used for all analyses. Low-resolution mass spectra were acquired at a resolving power of 1000 (20% height definition) and scanning from m/z 25 to m/z 1000 at 0.3 seconds per scan with a 0.2-second inter-scan delay. High-resolution mass spectra were acquired at a resolving power of 5000 (20% height definition) and scanning the magnet from m/z 65 to m/z 1000 at 1 second per scan.
Mass spectrometry library search:
Identification of the components of the compound was matching their recorded spectra with the data bank mass spectra of NIST library V 11 provided by the instrument's software.GC/MS metabolomics Database was used for the similarity search with retention index15.
Antioxidant Assay
DPPH radical scavenging activity:
DPPH radical scavenging ability was examined by the method of Cuendet et al16. In varying concentration range of Aconitum heterophyllum root extracts (100 to 500µg/ml) were added to 3.0 ml of methanolic solution of DPPH (0.1mM). In control, the methanol was replaced for root extract. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min in the darkroom at 370C and absorbance was read at 517nm by UV-visible spectrophotometer. The percentage of inhibition was determined by the following equation: A0-Ax100/A0, where A0 and A represents the absorbance of the control and test sample, respectively. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard.
Anti-inflammatory assays:
Nitric oxide scavenging activity:
Griess reaction was employed to determine the Nitric oxide formed from sodium nitroprusside17. The reaction mixture (3ml) containing sodium nitroprusside (10mm) in phosphate buffer saline and the Aconitum heterophyllum root extracts (100, 200, 300, 400and 500μg/ml) was incubated at 25oC for the period of 150min, after this period of incubation 1.5ml of the reaction mixture was taken and mixed with 1.5ml of the Griess reagent (1% sulphanilamide, 2% orthophosphoric acid and 0.1% Napthylethyline diamine hydrochloride). The absorbance of the chromophore generated was read at 546 nm. Percentage of nitric oxide inhibited was determined by using the formula below
Percentage Inhibition = (A of Control – A of Sample)/A of Control× 100. A- absorbance.
Statistical analysis:
The experiments were repeated thrice for each parameter and the SD was calculated
RESULTS
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
The phytochemical compounds present in the ethanol and Ethyl acetate root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum was screened by the GC-MS chromatogram are shown in Figure 1 and 2. The phytochemical compounds of the ethanol and ethyl acetate extract of Aconitum heterophyllum with their retention time (RT), molecular formula, molecular weight (MW) and peak area as a percentage has shown in Table 1 and 2. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of 22 phytochemical compounds in ethanol extract and 24 phytochemical compounds in ethyl acetate extract. The major constituents identified from ethanol and ethyl acetate extract of Aconitum heterophyllum are Alpha-D-Glucopyranoside beta-D-Fructofuranosyl (2.43%), Benzophenone semicarbazone (1.24%), Dodecanoic acid ethyl ester (1.01%), Ethyl iso-allocholate (0.99%), l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6 dihexadecanoate (14.50%), Phytol (1.58%), Methyl ricinoleate (0.99%), 13-docosenamide (z) (1.20%), 1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine5-(1,3,5-trimethyl-4-pyrazolyl)amino (46.93%).
Antioxidant Assay:
DPPH radical scavenging activity:
The DPPH radical scavenging activities of the root extracts and standard (Ascorbic acid) are shown in Table 3. DPPH is reduced to diphenyl picryl hydrazine with plant extracts in a concentration-dependent manner. The radical scavenging potential of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Aconitum heterophyllum on DPPH radical is 23.05% and 21.05% respectively, at the highest concentration (500 μg/ml). Among the two extracts, ethanol extract had shown the highest DPPH scavenging activity similar to the standard antioxidant Ascorbic acid (25.05%).
Nitric oxide scavenging activity:
The Nitric oxide radical scavenging ability of the extracts and standard (Ascorbic acid) are shown in Table 4. Nitric oxide scavenging power of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Aconitum heterophyllum was concentration-dependent, and the highest inhibitory effect at 48.58% and 46.70% was observed at the concentration of 500 μg /ml. Among the two extracts, ethanol extract had shown the highest Nitric oxide scavenging activity similar to standard antioxidant Ascorbic acid (51.22%)
Fig 1: GC-MS chromatogram of Aconitum heterophyllum ethanolic root extrac
Table 1: Phyto-components identified in Aconitum heterophyllum Ethanolic root extract
Peak# |
R.Time |
Name of compound |
Molecular Formula |
Mol. weight |
Area% |
1 |
5.139 |
L-Gala--ido-octose |
C8H16O8 |
240 |
25.06 |
2 |
5.585 |
Butane, 2,3-dichloro-2-methyl- |
C5H10Cl2 |
140 |
0.87 |
3 |
5.803 |
Aziridine, 2-methylene-1-(1-methylethyl) |
C6H11N |
97 |
1.12 |
4 |
6.094 |
4,5-Diamino-6-methyl-2-thiopyrimidine |
C5H8N4S |
156 |
0.60 |
5 |
6.450 |
1,3-Butanedione, 1-(2-furanyl) |
C8H8O3 |
152 |
0.69 |
6 |
6.745 |
6-Tridecene, 7-methyl- |
C14H28 |
196 |
5.10 |
7 |
7.133 |
Pyrrolidine, 2 alpha-[1-pyrrolidinoformyl] |
C9H16N2O |
168 |
13.80 |
8 |
7.317 |
alpha-L-Galactopyranoside, methyl 6-deoxy |
C7H14O5 |
178 |
1.38 |
9 |
7.531 |
alpha-D-Glucopyranoside, beta-D-Fructofuranosyl |
C12H22O11 |
342 |
2.43 |
10 |
7.750 |
2-Pipecoline-1-dithiocarbamate |
C7H13NS2 |
175 |
1.32 |
11 |
8.704 |
4-Amino-2,3-xylenol |
C8H11NO |
137 |
1.83 |
12 |
11.141 |
Mannitol, 1,1'-O-1,16-hexadecanediylbis- |
C28H58O12 |
586 |
2.05 |
13 |
12.381 |
Benzophenone semicarbazone |
C14H13N3O |
239 |
1.24 |
14 |
13.732 |
3-Chloropropionic acid, heptadecyl ester |
C20H39ClO2 |
346 |
1.38 |
15 |
15.954 |
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diheptyl ester |
C22H34O4 |
362 |
0.72 |
16 |
16.560 |
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester |
C14H28O2 |
228 |
1.01 |
17 |
17.286 |
Ethyl iso-allocholate |
C26H44O5 |
436 |
0.99 |
18 |
18.315 |
I-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate |
C38H68O8 |
652 |
14.50 |
19 |
19.522 |
I-Methionine, N- neopentyloxycarbonyl-, ethyl ester |
C13H25NO4S |
291 |
18.07 |
20 |
22.371 |
Phytol |
C20H40O |
296 |
1.58 |
21 |
29.275 |
Bacteriochlorophyll-c stearyl |
C52H72MgN4O4 |
840 |
1.61 |
22 |
30.108 |
Phenylalanine, 4-acetylamino |
C11H14N2O3 |
222 |
0.63 |
23 |
30.296 |
3-pyrrolidin-2-yl-propionic acid |
C7H13NO2 |
143 |
1.68 |
24 |
31.580 |
alpha-D-Glucopyranoside, methyl 2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-3-O-(trimethylsilyl)-, cyclic butylboronate |
C16H32BNO6Si |
373 |
0.35 |
Table 2: Phytocomponents identified in Aconitum heterophyllum ethyl acetate root extract
Peak |
R.time |
Name of compound |
Molecular Formula |
Mol. weight |
Area% |
1 |
8.649 |
Phenol, 2,4-di-tert-butyl |
C14H22O |
206 |
0.82 |
2 |
8.889 |
2,4-diethyl-6-methyl-1,3,5-trioxane |
C8H16O3 |
160 |
0.09 |
3 |
8.992 |
4-Allyl-2-t-butyl-4-methyl-1,3-oxathiolan-5-one |
C11H18O2S |
214 |
0.07 |
4 |
9.595 |
Z,Z-2,5Pentadecadien-1-ol |
C15H28O |
224 |
0.10 |
5 |
9.667 |
Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione-4,7-ethano-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-2-phenyl- |
C16H15NO2 |
253 |
0.01 |
6 |
10.655 |
Pyridine, 3-(phenylmethyl)- |
C12H11N |
169 |
0.04 |
7 |
12.262 |
Methyl ricinoleate |
C19H36O3 |
312 |
0.99 |
8 |
13.317 |
N-(1-Anilino-2,2,2-trichloroethyl)decanamide |
C18H27Cl3N2O |
392 |
0.01 |
9 |
15.834 |
2,3-O-Benzal-d-mannosan |
C13H14O5 |
250 |
0.11 |
10 |
17.568 |
Thiazolidin-4-one, 5-ethyl-2-imino- |
C5H8N2OS |
144 |
3.60 |
11 |
18.042 |
2H-Pyran,2-(2 heptadecynyoxy)tetrahydro- |
C22H40O2 |
336 |
0.84 |
12 |
18.658 |
3-Propylnorleucine |
C9H19NO2 |
173 |
0.83 |
13 |
20.230 |
1,2,3-Thiadiazole-4-carboxylic acid, (1-amino-2-chloroethenylideneamino) ester |
C5H5ClN4O2S |
220 |
0.73 |
14 |
21.291 |
1,5-Cyclooctadiene,1-t-butyl- |
C12H20 |
164 |
1.11 |
15 |
23.667 |
2H-Pyran, tetrahydro-4-methyl-2-(2-methyl-1-propenyl)- |
C10H18O |
154 |
0.03 |
16 |
24.000 |
2H-Pyrimido[1,2-a] pyrimidine, 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-1-methyl |
C8H15N3 |
153 |
0.23 |
17 |
26.714 |
Citronellyl Tiglate |
C15H26O2 |
238 |
1.14 |
18 |
28.865 |
4,4-Dimethyl-2-allylcyclohexanone |
C11H18O |
166 |
1.17 |
19 |
28.984 |
Bis(cic-13-docosenamido) methane |
C45H86N2O2 |
686 |
3.46 |
20 |
29.179 |
2-(p-Methoxyphenyl) ethyl beta.-d-glucopyranoside |
C15H22O7 |
314 |
2.35 |
21 |
35.025 |
Azacyclononan-2-one,5,5,8,8-tetramethyl- |
C12H23NO |
197 |
0.03 |
22 |
35.218 |
dl-alanyl-l –leucine |
C9H18N2O3 |
202 |
0.07 |
23 |
37.125 |
5-Bromovaleric acid, oct-3-en-2-yl ester |
C13H23BrO2 |
290 |
0.01 |
24 |
38.153 |
N-maleic acid 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl,-4-piperidylmonoamide |
C13H22N2O3 |
254 |
0.02 |
25 |
38.551 |
4-(3-Hydroxy-2,2,6-trimethyl-7-oxa-bicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl)-but-3-en-2-one |
C13H20O3 |
224 |
0.06 |
26 |
41.921 |
Fumaric acid,2-decyl tridecyl ester |
C27H50O4 |
438 |
0.97 |
27 |
42.483 |
Batilol |
C21H44O3 |
344 |
2.91 |
28 |
42.625 |
13-docosenamide,(z) |
C22H43NO |
337 |
1.20 |
29 |
43.238 |
13,14-epoxyursan-3-ol,acetate |
C31H50O3 |
470 |
5.19 |
30 |
45.131 |
1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine, 5-(1,3,5-trimethyl-4-pyrazolyl)amino- |
C8H13N7 |
207 |
46.93 |
31 |
45.486 |
Triaraachine |
C63H122O6 |
974 |
16.50 |
Figure 2: GC-MS chromatogram of Aconitum heterophyllum ethyl acetate root extract.
Table 3: DPPH Scavenging activity of Aconitum heterophyllum ethanolic and ethyl acetate root extract
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Percentage inhibition (%) |
||
EEAH |
EAEAH |
Ascorbic Acid |
|
100 |
11.52±1.76 |
09.12±0.80 |
14.06±1.12 |
200 |
14.40±1.52 |
12.23±1.34 |
17.25±1.15 |
300 |
17.56±1.22 |
15.24±1.36 |
19.54±1.37 |
400 |
20.71±2.50 |
18.36±1.40 |
22.16±1.36 |
500 |
23.05±1.34 |
21.05±1.23 |
25.05±1.40 |
Values are mean ± SD, n = 3; EEAH: Ethanolic root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum: EAEAH: Ethyl Acetate root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum ,
Table 4: No Scavenging activity of Aconitum heterophyllum ethanolic and ethyl acetate root extract
Concentration (µg/ml) |
Percentage inhibition (%) |
||
EEAH |
EAEAH |
Ascorbic Acid |
|
100 |
38.30±1.24 |
34.22±1.14 |
40.12±1.32 |
200 |
40.78±1.27 |
37.78±1.17 |
43.18±1.36 |
300 |
44.68±1.34 |
42.15±1.20 |
46.23±1.37 |
400 |
46.81±1.37 |
45.12±1.26 |
48.81±1.40 |
500 |
48.58±1.41 |
46.70±1.32 |
51.22±1.44 |
Values are mean ± SD, n = 3; EEAH: Ethanolic root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum, EAEAH: Ethyl Acetate root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum
DISCUSSION:
Mass spectrometry has been the best tool for screening the qualitative and quantitative information on molecules based on their structural compositions and molecular weight. The phytochemical analysis studied on the ethanol and ethyl acetate extract of Aconitum heterophyllum exposed the existence of efficient compounds that are known for its medicinal value. The GC-MS analysis exhibits the presence of nine compounds in the ethanol and ethyl acetate extract of Aconitum heterophyllum which are responsible for the biological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer have been tabulated Table 5 and 6.
Table 5: Major Bioactive compounds of ethanol root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum
S. No |
Bioactive compounds |
Biological Activity |
1. |
Alpha-D-Glucopyranoside,beta-D-Fructofuranosyl |
Antioxidant18 |
2. |
Benzophenone semicarbazone |
Anticancer agent19 |
3. |
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester |
Antibacterial, Antiviral, Antioxidant, Candidicide, Hypercholesterolemic20 |
4. |
Ethyl iso-allocholate |
Cytotoxic activity, Anticancer and Anti-inflammatory agent21 |
5. |
l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6 dihexadecanoate |
Antitumor and Antimicrobial activity22 |
6. |
Phytol |
Anti-inflammatory,Anti-thrombotic, Antimicrobial, and Antitumor23 |
Table 6: Major Bioactive compounds of ethyl acetate root extract of Aconitum heterophyllum
S. No |
Bioactive compounds |
Biological Activity |
1. |
Methyl ricinoleate |
Antioxidant24 |
2. |
13-docosenamide,(z) |
Antifungal and Antibacterial activity25 |
3. |
1,2,4-Triazol-3-amine, 5-(1,3,5-trimethyl-4-pyrazolyl)amino |
Antitumor activity26 |
The root extract was reacted with DPPH radical which reduced the radical to diphenyl picryl hydrazine due to its antioxidant potential. The antioxidant potential of the root extracts to scavenge the DPPH free radical by donating hydrogen proton was indicated by stage of discolouration27. The free radical scavenging potential of the root extracts against DPPH was compared with the standard ascorbic acid. It was observed that radical scavenging potential of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Aconitum heterophyllum on DPPH radical at the highest concentration (500μg/ml). The activity of the Aconitum heterophyllum root extracts was comparatively lesser than that of the standards. The results of this study demonstrated that ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Aconitum heterophyllum possess antioxidant potential might be related to its phenolic, sterols and terpenoids contents28.
Nitric oxide is an important signalling molecule that played a vital role in the pathological process of numerous inflammatory disorders. Nitric oxide becomes toxic when it reacts with the strong oxidant superoxide anion to form peroxynitrite. The root extract act as a scavenger of nitric oxide by interacts with oxygen that leads to the reduction of nitrite ions formation28. NO scavenging power of ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Aconitum heterophyllum was concentration-dependent, and shows the highest inhibitory effect at the highest concentration (500μg/ml). The results of this present study demonstrated that ethanol and ethyl acetate extracts of Aconitum heterophyllum possess antioxidant potential might be related to its phytochemical consituents29.
CONCLUSION:
From these findings, it is concluded that the Aconitum heterophyllum might be used as an alternative source for the investigation of new antioxidant agents.
REFERENCE:
1. Monika S, Vinod K, Veenu J. Indian medicinal plants with antidiabetic potential: An overview. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2021;14(4):2328-5.doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00411
2. Kousalya K, Priya T, Venkatalakshmi P. Studies on the Anti-inflammatory potential of selected medicinal plants invitro. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2020July28;13(7):3147-3150. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00556.9
3. Kaliyaperumal K, Kaliyaperumal J, Jegajeevanram V, Embialle M. Traditional Medicinal Plants: A Source of Phytotherapeutic Modality in Resource-Constrained Health Care Settings. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2013September26;18(1):67-74.doi: 10.1177/2156587212460241
4. Tandra Das .T. Role of Antioxidants in Health and Diseases-A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2015August28;8(8):1033-1037.doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00176.6
5. Kumar A, Mahajan A, Begum Z. Phytochemical Screening and In vitro Study of Free Radical Scavenging Activity of Flavonoids of Aloe vera. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2020February15;13(2):593-598. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00112.2
6. Sofia K, Firdous SM. Morin combat against Oxidative stress induced different diseases in Experimental models: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2020Septemer4;13(9):4522-4526. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00797.0
7. Ganesh C, Vishnu C, Akshay B, Manini M, Savita M, Chandrakant M. Synergistic Antioxidant activity of a Polyherbal Preparation.Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2020March1;13(3):1193-1197.doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00220.6
8. Arya B, Krishnaveni K, Sambathkumar R. Review on Antioxidant Supplements use in Cancer Chemotherapy. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics.2020February28;12(1):21-24. doi: 10.5958/2321-5836.2020.00005.1
9. Ranjit V. Gadhave, Bhanudas S. Kuchekar. Design, Synthesis, Characterization and Antioxidant activity of Novel Benzothiazole and Coumarin based 6-(3, 5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl) pyridazin-3-one Derivatives. Research Journal of pharmacy and Technology.2020December18;13(12):5661-5667. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00986.5
10. Ermi A, Lia F. Screening Phytochemical, Antioxidant Activity and Vitamin C Assay from Bungo perak-perak (Begonia versicolar Irmsch) leaves. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.2020August4; 10(3): 183-187.doi:10.5958/2231-5691.2020.00032.5
11. Vishal MB, Manjeet K, Anil A. Aconitum heterophyllum-An Overview. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International.2021October13;33(46A):242-247. doi:10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i46a32862
12. Venu Gopala RK, Madhavi E, Lakshmipathy PR and Maignana K. Antioxidant and Nephroprotective Activities of Aconitum heterophyllum Root in Glycerol Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research.2016March1;10(3):1-5.doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/10798.7388
13. Paramanick D, Panday R, Shukla SS and Sharma V. Primary Pharmacological and Other Important Findings on the Medicinal Plant "Aconitum Heterophyllum" (Aruna). Journal of Pharmacopuncture. 2017June30; 20(2):89-92. https://doi.org/10.3831/KPI.2017.20.011
14. Ahmad H, Ahmad S, Shah SAA, Latif A, Ali M, Khan FA, Tahir MN, Shaheen F, Wadood A and Ahmad M. Antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of diterpenoid alkaloids from Aconitum heterophyllum. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry.2017July1;25(13):3368-3376. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.04.022
15. Wilawan P, Wannachai C. GC-MS Analysis and Antioxidant Activity of Bauhinia Nakhonphanomensis Leaf Ethanolic Extract. Pharmacognosy Journal.2017July; 9(5):663-667.doi:10.5530/pj.2017.5.105
16. Cuendet M, Hostettmann K and Potterat O. Iridoid glucosides with free radical scavenging properties from Fragrea Blumei. Helvetica Chimica Acta.1997September23;80:1144–1151. doi:10.1002/CHIN.199739261
17. Marcocci I, Marguire JJ, Droy-Lefaiz MT and Packer L. The nitric oxide scavenging properties Ginkgo Biloba extract. Biochemical and Biophysical Research communication.1994June;201:748-755. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1764
18. Li SY, Fuchino H, Kawahara N, Sekita S and Satake M. New phenolic constituents from Smilax bracteata. Journal of Natural Product.2002February8;65(1):262–266.doi: 10.1021/np010338m.
19. Islam K, Ali SM, Jesmin M and Khanam JA. In vivo Anticancer Activities of Benzophenone Semicarbazone against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma Cells in Swiss Albino Mice. Cancer Biology and Medicine.2012December;9(4):242-247.doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2012.04.004
20. Anand Gideon V. GC-MS analysis of phytochemical components of Pseudoglochidion anamalayanum Gamble: An endangered medicinal tree. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research. 2015;5(12):36-41.doi: Not Available
21. Thakur RS, Ahirwar B. A steroidal derivative from Trigonella foenum graecum L.that induces apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 2019; 27(1):231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.05.001
22. Karthikeyan SC, Velmurugan S, Donio MB, Michaelbabu M and Citarasu T. Studies on the antimicrobial potential and structural characterization of fatty acids extracted from Sydney rock oyster Saccostrea glomerata. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.2014December31;13:332. doi: 10.1186/s12941-014-0057-x
23. Gyeong AK, Somi KC. Phytol suppresses melanogenesis through proteasomal degradation of MITF via the ROS-ERK signaling pathway. Chemico-Biological Interactions.2018February24;286:132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.02.033
24. Reddy KK, Ravinder T, Kanjilal S. Synthesis and evaluation of antioxidant and antifungal activities of novel ricinoleate-based lipoconjugates of phenolic acids. Food Chemistry.2012April17;134(4):2201-2207.doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.046
25. Dos Reis CM, da Rosa BV, da Rosa GP, do Carmo G, Morandini LMB, Ugalde GA, Kuhn KR, Morel AF, Jahn SL and Kuhn RC. Antifungal and antibacterial activity of extracts produced from Diaporthe schini. Journal of Biotechnology.2019February12;294:30-37.doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.01.022
26. Kutz CJ, Holshouser SL, Marrow EA and Woster PM. 3,5-Diamino-1,2,4-triazoles as a novel scaffold for potent, reversible LSD1 (KDM1A) inhibitors. Medchemcomm.2014December;5(12):1863-1870.doi: 10.1039/C4MD00283K
27. Yamin, Ruslin, Mistriyani, La Ode MF, Sabarudin, Muhammad A. Free Radical Scavenging Activity of extract and fraction of Okra seeds determined by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazy) method. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2021April29;14(4):2045-8.doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00363
28. Priyanga R, Vadakkenchery SH, Palanisamy UM, Thamburaj S, Natesan G. Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of In vitro Antioxidant and Anti-urolithiatic Potential of various fractions of Clitoria ternatea L. Blue Flowered Leaves. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis.2019January24;9(2):67-76. doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2019.00014.0
29. Jenifer. P, Balakrishnan CP, Chidambaram Pillai S. In-vitro Antioxidant activity of Marine Red Algae Gracilaria foliifera. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.2017June19;7(2):105-108.doi: 10.5958/2231-5713.2017.00018.6
Received on 21.10.2020 Modified on 17.07.2021
Accepted on 11.08.2022 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2023; 16(2):703-708.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00120