Possible Influence of Loxoprofen in Lipopolysaccharide Induced Alterations in Brain Serotonin, Noradrenaline and Dopamine Levels in Chronic Mild Stress Treated Mice
Kundu Smita S, Digvijaysinh G. Rana*
Department of Pharmacology, Babaria Institute of Pharmacy, Vadodara, Gujarat - 391240, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: dgrana3755@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of Loxoprofen on serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels in absence or presence of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) after chronic mild stress treatment in mice brain. Background: It has been reported that there is an abnormal prostaglandin levels in depression. Several studies indicated that there has been an elevated level of prostaglandins in depression. It has been reported that Loxoprofen remarkably decrease the PGE2 level in regions of brain. Method: There was an estimation of serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels in mice brain after 21 days of chronic mild stress schedule in which mice were subjected to treatment of Loxoprofen (16.8mg/kg, p.o.) or Venlafexine (4mg/kg, i.p.) with or without treatment of LPS (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) for last 14 days. Results: There was a significant decrease in brain serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels in stressed mice as compared to normal mice. There was a significant decrease in brain serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels in LPS treated stressed mice as compared to LPS treated normal mice. The treatment of Loxoprofen in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in brain serotonin and noradrenaline levels but not dopamine levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. The treatment of Venlafexine in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in all above mentioned three brain neurotransmitters levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice.Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that Loxoprofen influence the LPS induced alterations in serotonin and noradrenaline levels in mice brain after 21 day exposure of chronic mild stress schedule. It can indicate the possible antidepressant-like effect of Loxoprofen in mice subjected to chronic mild stress schedule, having its possible implication in future treatment of depression.
KEYWORDS: Chronic mild stress, Depression, Dopamine, Noradenaline, Serotonin, Lipopolysaccharide, Loxoprofen, Mice.
INTRODUCTION:
Various herbal medicines have also been widely used across the world for their therapeutic effectiveness7. Despite growing evidences for such reports of investigations, there exist many limitations of current antidepressants treatment8 like suicide tendency and discontinuation syndrome and there is need of time to focus research on minimising side effects9.
Considering such reports of limitations of current antidepressant agents, it can be proposed that there is a need for the more exploration of pathophysiology of depression and also a need to develop antidepressant agents based on novel targets. Further, in the last few years, many studies have revealed the role of inflammation and inflammatory mediators in the neurobiology of depression10-15.
Several reports indicated the abnormal prostaglandin E levels in depression16-18. Various studies reported that there has been an elevated level of prostaglandins (PGs) especially PGE2 in depression16-17, 19. Further, it has been reported in various preclinical studies that PGE2 may contribute to neuro-inflammation from various preclinical studies20. Several studies reported that depressed individuals may have increased levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the saliva, plasma and CSF21-22. Signs of an inflammatory process, particularly high prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels, have been described in major depression23.
Further, increased levels of PGE2 has been correlated with up-regulation of cyclooxegenase-2 (COX-2)24. COX-2 inhibitors inhibit the PGE2, suggesting a positive role in depression25-26. It has been reported that various antidepressant drugs could inhibit PGE2 synthesis including MAO-inhibitors27-30 and tricyclic antidepressants31. Loxoprofen is an analgesic category of drug, having anti-inflammatory properties. Various reports in preclinical studies indicated that Loxoprofen remarkably decreases the PGE2 level in brain regions32.
Considering the above mentioned evidences, reports and property of inhibition of PGE2 of Loxoprofen, it can be hypothesized that Loxoprofen may affect brain serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels. Hence, it has been proposed to study the effect of Loxoprofen in Lipopolysaccharide induced alterations in serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels in mice after chronic mild stress treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Animals:
Swiss albino male mice were obtained from Zydus Research Centre, Moraiya, Ahmedabad. They were housed under standard conditions with free access to food and water, under 12:12 hr light: dark cycle. Mice were allowed to acclimatize for 07 days before the initiation of behavioural tests were performed. Each animal was used only once (N= 6 animals per group). The experiments were performed after the protocol for experimental design was approved with protocol no. BIP/IAEC/2018/06 by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of Babaria Institute of Pharmacy. The experiments were conducted according to the guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiment on Animals (CPCSEA).
Drugs:
Venlafaxine [VEN] as triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor was administered in the dose of 4mg/kg i.p.33 . Lipopolysaccharide [LPS] was administered in the dose of 0.5mg/kg, i.p34 Loxoprofen [LOX] was dissolved in 0.5% CMC solution32. Venlafaxine was dissolved in normal saline solution (0.9% NaCl)33. LPS was dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution (pH 7.4)34.
Chronic Mild Stress (CMS):
Stress schedule followed in paradigm:
Total sixty mice with ten groups were subjected to stress schedule. The stress schedule for producing chronic mild stress was followed according to the already reported stressor schedule 35. The stress scheme included various stressors which included three five hour periods of water and food deprivation immediately before the sucrose tests, two periods of intermittent illumination, two periods (7 and 12 hr) of 45 degree cage tilting, one additional 16-hr period of water deprivation, one 12hr period in a soiled cage (adding 100ml water in the bedding) and three periods (7, 9 and 12hr) of low intensity stroboscopic illumination (150flashes/min). These stressors were scheduled every day for a total period of 21 days.
Groups of mice:
Out of these sixty mice, eighteen mice were housed under normal condition. They were subdivided into three groups as follows: Group I received saline and serve as vehicle control- I (VC-I), Group II received 0.5% CMC serve as vehicle control- II (VC-II), Group III received Lipopolysaccharide (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) (LPS). Rest of forty two mice were housed under chronic mild stress and were divided as follows: Group IV received stress and saline (10ml/kg, p.o.) (STR-I), Group V received stress and 0.5% CMC (10ml/kg, p.o.) (STR-II), Group VI received stress and Venlafaxine (4mg/kg, i.p.), Group VII received stress and Loxoprofen (16.8mg/kg, p.o.), Group VIII received stress and Lipopolysaccharide (0.5mg/kg, i.p.), Group IX received stress and Lipopolysaccharide (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) and Venlafaxine (4 mg/kg, i.p.), Group X received stress and Lipopolysaccharide (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) and Loxoprofen (16.8mg/kg, p.o.).
Measurement of brain serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels in mice brain:
All mice of group one to group ten as mentioned above were sacrificed and their brains were removed. The isolated brains were kept frozen at - 80°C until assay. Whole brain of each mouse was weighed without thawing and immediately homogenized in 5mL ice cold acidified butanol. The homogenate was centrifuged at 500rpm at 4°C for 10 min and the supernatant was collected. Brain serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine levels were estimated by flourometric method of Jacobowitz and Richardson36.
Statistical analysis:
All quantified data were expressed as mean±S.E.M. for the indicated statistical analysis. Statistical comparisons were performed by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s Test. P<0.05 were considered as degree of significance. All statistical analysis was performed using approved statistical software (Sigmastat software, Systat Software Inc, San Jose, CA, USA.).
Effect of Loxoprofen and Venlafexine on serotonin levels in mice brain:
There was a significant decrease in brain serotonin levels in mice of stress control-I and stress control-II as compared to vehicle control-I and vehicle control-II respectively. There was a significant decrease in brain serotonin levels in LPS treated stressed mice as compared to LPS treated normal mice. Furthermore, Venlafexine showed a significant increase in brain serotonin levels in stressed mice as compared to stress control-I while Loxoprofen showed a non-significant increase in brain serotonin levels in stressed mice as compared to stress control-II. However, the same treatment of Loxoprofen in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in brain serotonin levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. Similarly, the treatment of Venlafaxine in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in brain serotonin levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. (Table 1)
Effect of Loxoprofen and Venlafexine on noradenaline levels in mice brain:
There was a significant decrease in brain noradrenaline levels in mice of stress control-I and stress control - II as compared to vehicle control-I and vehicle control-II respectively. There was a significant decrease in brain noradrenaline levels in LPS treated stressed mice as compared to LPS treated normal mice. Furthermore, Venlafexine showed a significant increase in brain noradrenaline levels in stressed mice as compared to stress control-I while Loxoprofen showed a non-significant increase in brain noradrenaline levels in stressed mice as compared to stress control-II. However, the same treatment of Loxoprofen in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in brain noradrenaline levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. Similarly, the treatment of Venlafaxine in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in brain noradrenaline levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. (Table 2)
Table 1: - Effect of Loxoprofen and Venlafexine on serotonin levels in mice brain
|
Group No |
Treatment |
Dose (mg/kg) |
Route |
5-HT (ng/gm of brain tissue) [Mean ± SEM] |
|
I |
Vehicle Control-I |
10 ml/kg |
p.o. |
167.73 ± 16.60 |
|
II |
Vehicle Control-II |
10ml/kg |
p.o. |
162.15 ± 24.16 |
|
III |
Lipopolysaccharide |
0.5 mg/kg |
i.p |
89.99 ± 6.84 |
|
IV |
Stress Control-I |
10 ml/kg |
p.o. |
112.28 ± 11.45* |
|
V |
Stress Control-II |
10ml/kg |
p.o. |
93.16 ± 14.26+ |
|
VI |
Stress and Venlafexine |
4mg/kg |
i.p. |
155.43 ± 11.55$ |
|
VII |
Stress and Loxoprofen |
16.8 mg/kg |
p.o. |
102.58 ± 14.05 |
|
VIII |
Stress and Lipopolysaccharide |
0.5 mg/kg |
i.p. |
67.88 ± 5.74# |
|
IX |
Stress, Lipopolysaccharide and Venlafaxine |
0.5 mg/kg + 4mg/kg |
i.p. & i.p. |
219.21 ± 43.51£ |
|
X |
Stress, Lipopolysaccharide and Loxoprofen |
0.5 mg/kg + 4mg/kg |
i.p. & p.o. |
102.59 ± 14.05£ |
Each column expressed as Mean ± SEM of six animals after respective treatments. Data were analysed by One-way Analysis variance (ANNOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *p<0.05 when compared with VC-I, +p<0.05 when compared with VC-II, #p<0.05 when compared with LPS, $p<0.05 when compared with STR-I, £p<0.05 when compared with STR+LPS.
Table 2 - Effect of Loxoprofen and Venlafexine on noradrenaline levels in mice brain
|
Group No |
Treatment |
Dose (mg/kg) |
Route |
NE (ng/gm of brain tissue) [Mean ± SEM] |
|
I |
Vehicle Control-I |
10 mg/kg |
p.o. |
719.94 ± 73.75 |
|
II |
Vehicle Control-I |
10ml/kg |
p.o. |
768.06 ± 82.03 |
|
III |
Lipopolysaccharide |
0.5 mg/kg |
i.p |
619.59 ± 30.66 |
|
IV |
Stress Control-I |
10 mg/kg |
p.o. |
474.49 ± 50.66* |
|
V |
Stress Control-II |
10ml/kg |
p.o. |
510.82 ± 59.95+ |
|
VI |
Stress and Venlafexine |
1 mg/kg |
i.p. |
640.99 ± 50.83$ |
|
VII |
Stress and Loxoprofen |
16.8 mg/kg |
p.o. |
527.88 ± 56.89 |
|
VIII |
Stress and Lipopolysaccharide |
0.5 mg/kg |
i.p. |
390.33 ± 76.92# |
|
IX |
Stress, Lipopolysaccharide and Venlafaxine |
0.5 mg/kg + 4mg/kg |
i.p. & p.o. |
659.22 ± 47.64£ |
|
X |
Stress, Lipopolysaccharide and Loxoprofen |
0.5 mg/kg + 4mg/kg |
i.p. & p.o. |
611.61 ± 62.39£ |
Each column expressed as Mean ± SEM of six animals after respective treatments. Data were analysed by One-way Analysis variance (ANNOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *p<0.05 when compared with VC-I, +p<0.05 when compared with VC-II, #p<0.05 when compared with LPS, $p<0.05 when compared with STR-I, £p<0.05 when compared with STR+LPS.
Table 3: - Effect of Loxoprofen and Venlafexine on dopamine levels in mice brain
|
Group No |
Treatment |
Dose (mg/kg) |
Route |
DA (ng/gm of brain tissue) [Mean ± SEM] |
|
I |
Vehicle Control-I |
10 mg/kg |
p.o. |
1602.96 ± 146.59 |
|
II |
Vehicle Control-I |
10ml/kg |
p.o. |
1357.12 ± 81.51 |
|
III |
Lipopolysaccharide |
0.5 mg/kg |
i.p |
1476.64 ± 117.17 |
|
IV |
Stress Control-I |
10 mg/kg |
p.o. |
1033.60 ± 38.70* |
|
V |
Stress Control-II |
10ml/kg |
p.o. |
1049.30 ± 97.52+ |
|
VI |
Stress and Venlafexine |
4mg/kg |
i.p. |
1482.32 ± 177.99$ |
|
VII |
Stress and Loxoprofen |
16.8 mg/kg |
p.o. |
907.36 ± 193.19 |
|
VIII |
Stress and Lipopolysaccharide |
0.5 mg/kg |
i.p. |
790.44 ± 220.59# |
|
IX |
Stress, Lipopolysaccharide and Venlafaxine |
0.5 mg/kg + 4mg/kg |
i.p. & i.p. |
1378.86 ± 136.95£ |
|
X |
Stress, Lipopolysaccharide and Loxoprofen |
0.5 mg/kg + 4mg/kg |
i.p. & p.o. |
1100.00 ± 350.82 |
Each column expressed as Mean ± SEM of six animals after respective treatments. Data were analysed by One-way Analysis variance (ANNOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *p<0.05 when compared with VC-I, +p<0.05 when compared with VC-II, #p<0.05 when compared with LPS, $p<0.05 when compared with STR-I, £p<0.05 when compared with STR+LPS.
Effect of Loxoprofen and Venlafexine on doamine levels in mice brain:
There was a significant decrease in brain dopamine levels in mice of stress control- I and stress control- II as compared to vehicle control-I and vehicle control-II respectively. There was a significant decrease in brain dopamine levels in LPS treated stressed mice as compared to LPS treated normal mice. Furthermore, Venlafexine showed a significant increase in brain dopamine levels in stressed mice as compared to stress control-I while Loxoprofen showed a non-significant increase in brain dopamine levels in stressed mice as compared to stress control-II. The treatment of Loxoprofen in LPS treated stressed mice also did not show a significant a increase in brain dopamine levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. However, the treatment of Venlafaxine in LPS treated stressed mice showed a significant increase in brain dopamine levels as compared to LPS treated stressed mice. (Table 3)
DISCUSSION:
The results of the present investigations indicated the antidepressant-like effect of Loxoprofen in mice. The link between stress and depression is not novel. It has been reported that stress has become the leading cause for the neurobiology of depression. Various models involving chronic stress exposure to negative stressful events can be considered the most effective in modelling depressive behaviour37.
Various theories have been proposed regarding the causes of depression. Among these theories the lack of neurotransmitter levels such as noradrenaline or dopamine levels in the brain has received the most common focused area of research. The theory that depression is caused by decreased levels of noradrenaline and serotonin, received considerable support also38.
The results of study indicated that Loxoprofen alter the serotonin and noradrenaline levels in mice but not the dopamine level. However, the exact mechanism by which Loxoprofen indicated a significant antidepressant- like action in a chronic mild stress model remains to be elucidated. Though, the previously reported inhibitory action of Loxoprofen on PGE2 synthesis may show potential role of PGE2 in mediating the antidepressant effect of Loxoprofen in animal models of depression. It can be possible that alterations in the brain serotonin or noradrenaline levels induced by Loxoprofen at specified dose as mentioned in the present study may be achieved by the inhibition of PGE2 in brain. It is also possible that such Loxoprofen induced PGE2 inhibition may be responsible for the alterations in brain serotonin or noradrenaline levels.
Although we were unable to measure brain PGE2 levels in the brain but further research work is suggested to examine if Loxoprofen induced alteration in brain PGE2 levels may affect the brain serotonin or noradrenaline levels in mice brain. It has been also suggested for the researcher to measure the serotonin or noradrenaline levels in particular parts of the brain that are mainly affected in depression.
The data from the neurotransmitter levels after chronic mild stress shows the potential antidepressant-like action of Loxoprofen in mice, but further work is required for further exploration of the present investigations.
Regardless any previous reports or studies, these are the first results for the potential antidepressant-like effect of Loxoprofen by showing the alterations in the brain serotonin and noradrenaline levels in mice brain after chronic mild stress treatment, having its further potential implication in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression in future.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of the present study indicated that Loxoprofen influence LPS induced alterations in serotonin levels and noradrenaline levels in chronic mild stress treated mice. It also indicated possible antidepressant-like effect of Loxoprofen in mice subjected to chronic mild stress, having its possible implication in future treatment of depression.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The authors are grateful to the management team of Babaria Institute of Pharmacy, Vadodara, India for providing necessary facilities for this work. Also thankful to Zydus Research Centre, Ahmedabad for providing animals and all other pharmaceutical companies for providing gratis sample of drug for this research. They are also thankful to Anand Pharmacy College, Anand for providing facility for spectrofluorometric analysis
REFERENCES:
1. Sharma I, Kaur M, Parashar B, Kainth A. Depression: An overview. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014; 4(1): 28-31.
2. Dave PH, Vishnupriya V, Gayathri R. Herbal remedies for anxiety and depression - A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(8):1253-6. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00237.7
3. Uppala P, Murali KB, Atchuta K, Ramji V. Experimental evaluation of antidepressant activity of aqueous and methanolic leaf and shoot extracts of Ageratum conyzoides Linn in Mice. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2016; 6(3): 153-8. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5691.2016.00022.8
4. Uppala P, Atchuta K, Kumar, Patro S, Murali KB. Experimental evaluation of antidepressant activity of aqueous and chloroform leaf and shoot extracts of Eicchornia crassipes Linn in Mice. Asian Journal Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015; 5(3): 139-44.
5. Malarkodi V, Ravichandiran V, Ramamoorthy S, Vijayalakshmi A, Srikanth J. Antidepressant-Like Effects of the ethanolic extract of Albizzia lebbeck (Linn) leaves in animal models of depression. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2010; 2(1): 30-3.
6. Shewale A, Naikwade NS, Ladda PL. Antidepressant activity of Chrysanthemum morifolium Linn in mice. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2019; 9(4):260-66. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5659.2019.00040.7
7. Adnaik RS, Gavarkar PS, Mohite SK, Magdum CS. Anti-depressant activity of ethanolic extract of Citrullus vulgaris seeds in experimentally induced depressed mice. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2014; 7(6): 660-2.
8. Zajecka JM. Clinical issues in long-term treatment with antidepressants. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2000; 61: 20-5.
9. Patel MA, Patel CM, Patel DB, Anand IS, Patel CN. A review on novel strategies for pharmacotherapy of depression. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2010; 2(2):153-9.
10. Patel A. The role of inflammation in depression. Psychiatria Danubina. 2013; 25: S216-S223.
11. Farooq RK, Asghar K, Kanwal S and Zulqernain A. Role of inflammatory cytokines in depression: Focus on interleukin-1β. Biomedical Reports. 2017; 6: 15-20. doi.org/ 10.3892/br.2016.807
12. Felger JC and Lotrich FE. Inflammatory cytokines in depression: Neurobiological mechanisms and therapeutic implication. Journal of Neuroscience. 2013; 29; 199-229. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.060
13. Jangpangi D. Depression and inflammation: Pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. CHRISMED Journal of Health Research. 2016; 3: 155-60. doi.org/10.4103/2348-3334.183728
14. Noto C, Rizzo LB, Mansur RB, McIntyre RS, Maes M and Brietzke E. Targeting the inflammatory pathway as a therapeutic tool for major depression. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2014; 21: 131-39. doi.org/10.1159/000356549
15. Deepak Kumar. Comorbid depression in inflammatory bowel disease. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020; 10(1):35-8. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5659.2020.00008.9
16. Lieb J, Karmali R and Horrobin DF. Elevated levels of PGE2, and the thromboxane B2 in depression. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Medicine. 1983; 10(4); 361-67. doi.org/ 10.1016/0262-1746(83)90048-3
17. Calabrese JR, Skwerer RG, Barna B, Gulledge AD, Valenzuela R, Butkus A et al. Depression, immunocompetence, and prostaglandins of the E series. Psychiatry Research. 1986; 17(1): 41-7. doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(86)90040-5
18. Linnoila M, Whorton AR, Rubinow DR, Cowdry RW, Ninan PT and Waters RM. CSF prostaglandin levels in depressed and schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1983; 40: 405-06. doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790040059008
19. Fritz M, Klawonn AM, Nilsson A, Singh AK, Lazarus M, Löfberg A et al. Prostaglandin dependent modulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission elicits inflammation-induced aversion in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2016; 126(2): 695-705. doi.org/10.1172/JCI83844
20. Brenneis C, Coste O, Altenrath K, Angioni C, Schmidt H, Schuh CD et al. Anti-inflammatory role of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 in a model of neuroinflammation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010; 286(3): 2331-42. doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.157362
21. Ohishi K, Ueno R, Nishino S, Sakai T and Hayaishi O. Increased level of salivary prostaglandins in patients with major depression. Biological Psychiatry. 1988; 23(4): 326-34. doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(88)90283-1
22. Nishino S, Ueno R, Ohishi K, Sakai T and Hayaishi O. Salivary prostaglandin concentrations: possible state indicators for major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1989; 146(3): 365-68. doi.org/10.1176/ajp.146.3.365
23. De Paiva VN, Lima SN, Fernandes MM, Soncini R, Andrade CA and Giusti-Paiva A. Prostaglandins mediate depressive-like behaviour induced by endotoxin in mice. Behaviour Brain Research. 2010; 215: 146-51. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.015
24. Li RC, Row BW, Gozal E, Kheirandish L, Fan Q, Brittian KR et al. Cyclooxygenase 2 and intermittent hypoxia-induced spatial deficits in the rat. American Journal Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2003; 168(4): 469-75. doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200211-1264OC
25. Müller N, Schwarz MJ, Dehning S, Douhe A, Cerovecki A, Goldstein-Müller B et al. The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib has therapeutic effects in major depression: results of a double- blind, randomized, placebo controlled, add on pilot study to reboxetine. Molecular Psychiatry. 2006; 11: 680-84. doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001805
26. Teeling JL, Cunningham C, Newman TA and Perry VH. The effect of non-steroidal anti- inflammatory agents on behavioural changes and cytokine production following systemic inflammation: implications for a role of COX-1. Brain Behaviour and Immunity. 2010; 24: 409-19. doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2009.11.006
27. Lee RE. The influence of psychotropic drugs on prostaglandin biosynthesis. Prostaglandins. 1974; 5: 63-8. doi.org/10.1016/s0090-6980(74)80132-2
28. Bekemeier H, Giessler AJ and Vogel E. Influence of MAO inhibitors, neuroleptics, morphine, mescaline, divascan, aconitine, and pyrogenes on prostaglandin biosynthesis. Pharmacological Research Communication. 1977; 9: 587-98. doi.org/10.1016/s0031-6989(77)80087-8
29. Fjalland B. Influence of various substances on prostaglandin biosynthesis by guinea pig chopped lung. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1976; 28: 683. doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1976.tb02836.x
30. Hong SL, Carty T and Deykin D. Tranylcypromine and 15-hydroperoxy arachidonate affect arachidonic acid release in addition to inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis in calf aortic endothelial cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1980; 255: 9538-40. doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)43423-0
31. Mtabaji JP, Manku MS and Horrobin DF. Actions of the tricyclic anti-depressant clomipramine on responses to pressor agents. Interactions with prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandins. 1977; 14: 273-81. doi.org/10.1016/0090-6980(77)90161-7
32. Futaki N, Harada M, Sugimoto M, Hashimoto Y, Honma Y, Arai I et al. The importance of brain PGE2 inhibition versus paw PGE2 inhibition as a mechanism for the separation of analgesic and antipyretic effects of lornoxicam in rats with paw inflammation. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2009; 61: 607-14. doi.org/10.1211/jpp/61.05.0009
33. Thomas J, Khanam R and Vohora D. Augmentation of effect of venlafaxine by folic acid in behavioral paradigms of depression in mice: evidence of serotonergic and pro-inflammatory cytokine pathways. Pharmacological Reports. 2016; 68(2): 396-403. doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2015.10.003
34. Mello BS, Monte AS, McIntyre RS, Soczynska JK, Custódio CS, Cordeiro RC et al. Effects of doxycycline on depressive-like behavior in mice after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration. Journal of Psychiatry Research. 2013; 47(10): 1521-29. doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.06.008
35. Chen Y, Wang HD, Xia X, Kung HF, Pan Y and Kong LD. Behavioural and biochemical studies of total furocoumarins from seeds of Psoraleacorylifolia in the chronic mild stress model of depression in mice. Phytomedicine. 2007; 14: 523-29. doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2006.09.007
36. Jacobowitz DM and Richardson SJ. Method for the rapid determination of norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin in the same brain region. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.1977; 8: 515-19. doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(78)90380-5
37. Bartolomucci A and Leopardi R. Stress and Depression: Preclinical Research and Clinical Implications. PLoS One. 2009; 4(1): e4265. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004265
38. Park SY, Kim KB, Ahn SH, Kim HH. Anti-depressive effects of Gami-Shinkiwhanin immobilization stressed aging mice. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(5):1909-16. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00354.2
Received on 02.03.2021 Modified on 11.05.2021
Accepted on 13.06.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2022; 15(5):2081-2086.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00344