Transferosomes as an Efficient Carrier System for better Therapeutic response of Targeted Drug Delivery System
Rishabh Gupta1, Manmohan Singhal2, Nimisha1*
1Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Lucknow, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Sector 125, Noida, 201313, India.
2Faculty of Pharmacy, DIT University, Dehradun, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: nsrivastava3@lko.amity.edu
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND: Targeted drug delivery systems (TDDS) mainly focuses to aim the medication to a specific organ site and hence reducing the amount of drug in remaining tissues therefore, improving its bioavailability and therapeutic index at the targeted site. This helps in minimizing the adverse effects and improves its efficacy. OBJECTIVE: Presently there are different carrier systems like liposomes, transferosomes, pharmacosomes, phytosomes, aquasomes, niosomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, microparticles, nanoparticles, etc. are being used for the purpose of site specific drug delivery and also to prevent drug candidate from metabolic degradation process. The major focus of this review work is on Transferosomes proves as an efficient carrier for target delivery of drugs. The drugs molecules get decomposed due to different metabolic processess and other physiological conditions of the body; this emerges the need for site specific systems for drug delivery to prevent the drug molecules. This site specific process is also known as smart drug delivery because these nanocarrier systems significantly changes their physiochemical properties in response to internal environment of the body and release the drug at its targeted site at a specific rate according to severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: The applications of these nano systems like fabrication, encapsulation, response to various stimuli are vital for site specific delivery of drugs. Nanotechnological application in drug delivery enhances the process of drug delivery. There are various kinds of nano-size particulate systems that are already approved for their clinical use although these are now in their development stages. This will be a major focus for future drug targeting with various newer molecules.
KEYWORDS: Targeted drug delivery system, Transferosomes, Nanotechnology, Cancer, Carrier.
INTRODUCTION:
Targeted drug delivery systems (TDDS) also known as smart drug delivery as this method comprises of raising the concentration of drug in a specific target organ in comparison to other organs or part of the body. There are two types of targeting methods that are used very frequently to enhance the concentration of drug in the specific organ are active targeting and passive targeting.
Carrier systems either transport the drug in the targeted organ or sometimes in the surrounding space of specific organ. A prominent carrier system is should be able to penetrate across the most prominent barriers like Blood Brain Barrier (BBB). Presently, nano medicines emerging as a medical application of nanotechnology process. Since these nanoparticles are of nano size hence they allow the delivery of hydrophobic drugs and also helpful in preventing the metabolic degradation of drug in the liver. Nanotechnological application of drug delivery helps the drugs to stay in blood and therefore have minimal fluctuations in the dose levels in plasma, hence produces minimal adverse effects. For delivery of drugs to targeted site, nanotechnological carrier systems like transferosomes, liposomes, dendrimers, etc and drug-polymer conjugates were used. There are various other approaches used for this purpose like binding of drug molecules targeting ligands that helps to recognize the antigens associated with specific disease. Pharmacological characteristics of the active drug moiety have vital role in deciding the biological activity of the drug in the patient’s body. This biological activity takes place when drug-receptor interaction took place at specific site of delivery. Whereas, this drug-target interaction is useful only when drug produces maximum therapeutic effect and lesser adverse effects1. This is the aim that targeted drug delivery is focused for achieving. This offers an enhanced treatment efficacy and reduced adverse effects2 and the multifunctional nature of nanomaterials can be seen in Figure 15.
Newer delivery systems mostly consist of lipid moiety, surfactants, polymeric and proteic technology to deliver the sustained delivery of the drug through proper distribution in the body and protecting the drug candidate from the harsh body environment and also prevents the drug from the metabolic processess like first pass metabolism to avoid maximum drug loss. There are various nanotechnological systems used in this process are transferosomes, liposomes, dendrimers, quantum dots, nanocapsules, hydrogels, aquasomes, phytosomes, resealed erythrocytes, etc in different disease states for targeted drug delivery. These TDDS were used in such diseases where it is so critical for active drug candidate to reach to its target site through the internal complicated network in the body of patient. These systems are very helpful to raise the amount of active drug moiety in the specific organ as compared to other organs3. The advantages of these TDDS can be seen in Figure 24 along with various other nanovesicular systems for delivery of drugs that are under research to minimizes the limitations of these systems and also to enhance the efficacy and therapeutic response of the drugs molecules and secondly the focus is on cells microenvironment and how it interacts with these under process new drug delivery systems4.
The drug candidates get decomposed before reaching to its specific site because it does not able to bear conditions of body’s internal harsh microenvironment and decompose the drug. This emerges the need to develop the site specific drug delivery systems that helps to reach drug to its specific site and act on the specified organ. Therefore, these nano systems are very significant in guiding the nano system to its desired site of action by changing the physiochemical nature of delivery system against microenvironment of the body and deliver the drug at predetermined rate. The process of encapsulation, response to various stimuli and fabrication are very helpful to great extent and thus these systems are then able to surpass any barrier and deliver maximum therapeutic response.
Figure 1: Multifunctional Nanomaterials and Their Application in Drug Delivery5
Figure 2: Advantages of Targeted Drug Delivery Systems4
DISCUSSION:
Strategies of drug targeting:
Drug targeting is the area of focus because of emerging need to deliver drug at its specific site and hence maximizing the therapeutic efficacy in the target organ and therefore minimizing the adverse effects that may rise up otherwise. There are two most common strategies that are taken into considerations to delivery drug to desired organ6.
Passive targeting:
Passive targeting process mainly focus on accumulating the drug in the vicinity of target organ/tissue like in case of cancer tissues. This effect of accumulating the drug in target organ vicinity is known as Enhanced Permeability Retention (EPR) effect. This type targeting process mostly occur with all types of nanovesicular systems. The term passive targeting is not appropriate as it does not clearly define as a part of selective framework. However, the EPR effect is for administration of nanoparticles and 95% of the total drug accumulates in the other organs than those of targeted organs like lungs, liver and spleen and thus drug is distributed to target organs through blood circulation. For example, Leishmaniasis, candidiasis and brucellosis are being treated for microbial contamination by some of antimalarial drugs6,7.
Active targeting:
Active targeting used to describe the drug targeting interactions by using receptor-ligand interactions. Although the interaction among ligand and receptor is possible only when these two are in closer proximity (i.e., ≤ 0.5 mm). Extravasation and blood circulation are helpful in delivery of currently available drugs to its specific site. Active targeting basically means the interaction of ligand and receptor but it happens after extravasation and systemic circulation. Active targeting can be sub-classified in 3 sub class of drug targeting7. The active and passive targeting processess are depicted in Figure 36,7.
First order targeting:
This sub class of active targeting focuses on drug distribution to capillaries of the specific organ/tissue. For e.g., lymphatic tissue is connected with cerebral ventricles, peritoneal cavity and pleural cavity, etc6,8.
Second order targeting:
This sub class target drugs to desired sites, like to specified tumor cells in case of cancer and to “Kupffer cells” in liver6.
Third order targeting:
This sub class of active targeting, drug is targeted to specific site by intercellular localization via the process of receptor based ligand mediated entry and endocytosis8.
Figure 3: Active vs Passive Targeting6, 7
Components of drug targeting:
Target and the drug carriers are the two main components of drug delivery system to deliver drug to specific site/organ/tissue.
Target:
An organ or tissue or cell that is being treated is termed as ‘Target’.
Drug Carrier or Marker:
The process of drug delivery can only be possible only through a carrier systems or marker that carry drug molecule to desired site of action. Carriers are designed systemically in a manner that it can hold the active drug molecule in them by the process of encapsulation6,8.
Drug Delivery Vehicles:
Drug delivery vehicles or system that transport the drug to specified organ or into the surrounding of specific target site. A drug delivery vehicle is known ideal when it has the characteristic of crossing even the most prominent barrier like BBB. It must be rapidly recognizable by specified cells and further the drug-ligand complex formation must be stable and it should be completely biodegradable and reduced toxicity. This nature helps the carrier system to be completely cleared from the body and physiological means and thus prevents the chances of any type of further tissue toxicity4,6.
Nanotechnology-based delivery systems:
The nanomaterials are being used for treatment of various diseases. So it is necessary to study the properties of the nanomaterials that can later be used for various treatment purposes9-12. Though the recent trend has been shifted to the field of drug delivery. It is due to use of large molecules for drug delivery that are slightly incompatible and results in less therapeutic efficacy, poor solubility, reduced bioavailability, adverse effects and raise the need of targeted drug delivery13-16. The delivery of nanostructures become possible because of fabrication of nanomaterials at nanoscale17,18,19.
By the virtue of nanotechnology, the drug adheres in the blood circulation for a longer duration, thus lesser fluctuations and lesser adverse effects. These nanoparticulate materials can easily penetrate through tissue and taken up by cells. These systems have an important role in effective targeted drug delivery process. As compared to microparticles, uptake of these nanoparticles can be 15-250 time faster and better17,20.
Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery Systems Transferosomes:
Transferosomes are just modified form of liposomes, that comprises of phosphatidylcholine and edge activators. These are tailored for delivery of active constituents at enhanced rate as these are soft malleable vesicles by nature and composition21,22. IDEA AG a German company registered it first and were used for its proprietary technology for the purpose of drug delivery 23-26. The term Transferosomes means ‘to carry body’ and it is extracted from a Latin word ‘Transfere’ and a Greek word ‘soma’ for ‘body’27,28. Figure 4 depicts the structure of transferosomes comprising of phosphatidylcholine and edge activator. It is an artificially designed vesicle and or a cell engaged in exocytosis. It is very helpful and suitable for targeted drug delivery at controlled rate to specific target site with minimal metabolic degradation. These can easily adapt to certain stress levels, complex aggregates. The modified liposome is preferred because of its ultra-deformable nature and has a hydrophilic core followed by a lipoidal bilayer. It’s interdependent in composition and shape makes it self-optimizing and self-regulating29, 30. This nature helps transferosomes to cross even most prominent barriers with ease and for release of therapeutic agent, it acts as a carrier system for non-invasive site specific delivery of drugs and sustained release of dosage form31-35.
Figure 4: Structure of Transferosomes showing ultradeformable vesicles21
Composition and Mechanism:
Transferosomes comprises of optimized lipid aggregate and are self-adaptable. The surfactant molecules attached to it acts as “edge activators” providing it ultra-deformable nature that allows to penetrate through various barriers of the body to 1/10th of its original diameter and after penetration it can regain its original structure. As compared to case of conventional liposomes that hardly penetrate through a pore size of 50 nm due to its large size whereas transferosomes having a diameter upto 500 nm can also penetrate across the barriers by squeezing them upto 1/10th of their original size36. It is suggested that the driving force needed to penetrate through various barriers is known as “gradient concentration”. Use of adequate ratio of surfactants contributes to its property of deformability. The amount of surfactants plays a very vital role in the formulation of transferosomes as it provides provide flexibility to vesicle membrane at sublytic concentration whereas at higher concentration it can completely rupture the vesicles37.
The membrane present in the transferosome reduces the chance of complete vesicle to rupture due to its flexible nature and allows it to reconstitute its components composition accordingly locally or reversibly when they squeeze themselves against any barrier or pores of cells/tissue. It also prevents the cost of membrane rupturing and able to get through the pores very efficiently and effectively at a faster rate 38-41. It is consisting of atleast one phosphatidylcholine moiety that act as aqueous solvent that self-resemblance to lipid bilayer. By addition of one component in the bilayer that contributes to its softness(surfactant), flexibility of lipid bilayer and its permeation enhance to a great extent. Therefore, by optimizing the permeability and flexibility results in adapting to a suitable shape and size frequently and rapidly42.
Method of Preparation:
The suitable solvent system for dissolving phospholipids, drug and surfactants is alcohol. Further, the organic solvent is evaporated by rotary evaporator under a reduced pressure of 40°C43-45 and leftover quantity of organic solvent is removed by vacuum. Then there is formation of lipid film that is later hydrated with appropriate buffer system by rotating the rotary evaporator at 60 rpm for atleast 1 hour followed by vesicles left for swelling for 2 hours at room temperature. Therefore, the formed Multilamellar Vesicles (MLVs) are sonicated so that it can transform into smaller vesicles listed in Table 142,46,47 and the manufacturing process is depicted through the flowchart in Figure 548.
Table 1: Different additives used in the formulation of transferosomes Ingredients Examples Functions
S.No. |
Ingredients |
Example |
Function |
Reference No. |
1. |
Phospholipid |
Soya phosphatidylcholine, Egg phosphatidylcholine, Dipalmityl phosphatidylcholine, Distearyl phosphatidylcholine |
Vesicle forming component |
42,46,47 |
2. |
Surfactant |
Sod. Cholate, Sod. deoxy- cholate, Tween 80 and Span 80 |
For providing flexibility |
42,46,47 |
3. |
Alcohol |
Ethanol, Methanol |
As a solvent |
42,46,47 |
4. |
Dye |
Rhodamine-123,DHPE and Fluorescein-DHPE, Nile-red, 6 Carboxy fluorescence |
Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM) study |
42,46,47 |
5. |
Buffering agent |
Saline phosphate buffer at pH 6.5; 7% v/v ethanol Tris buffer at pH 6.5. |
Hydrating medium |
42,46,47 |
Figure 5: Method of Preparation of Transferosomes48
Table 2: Methods for the characterization of transferosomes
S. No. |
Parameter |
Method |
Reference No. |
1. |
Morphology of vesicle structure |
TEM |
49,50 |
2. |
Entrapment Efficiency (EE) |
Mini column centrifugation method |
49,50 |
3. |
Vesicle size and size distribution |
Differential Laser Scanning (DLS) method |
49,50 |
4. |
Skin permeation potential |
Confocal laser scanning microscopy |
49,50 |
5. |
Phospholipid surfactant Interaction |
Fluorescence microscopy |
49,50 |
6. |
Degree of deformability |
Transmission electron microscopy |
49,50 |
7. |
Charge density and surface charge |
Thin layer chromatography |
49,50 |
8. |
Turbidity |
31P NMR |
49,50 |
9. |
In vitro release study |
DLS, Calorimeter, Extrusion method |
49,50 |
10. |
Effect on the skin structure |
Zeta meter, Nephelometer |
49,50 |
11. |
Stability study |
Diffusion through biological or synthetic membrane, diffusion through dialysis bag, Histological studies, TEM and DLS method. |
49,50 |
Characterization of transferosomes:
· Morphology of transferosomes can be conducted using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)49.
· Dynamic Light Scattering and Photon Correlation Spectroscopy used for the purpose of particle size determination and size distribution49,50.
· Entrapment Efficiency (EE) of transferosomes for drug candidate can be easily determined by the method of ultracentrifugation.
· Stability of vesicles can be assessed by any change in shape and size of the vesicular structure over a period of time and drug content determination can be performed using Spectrophotometric methods like High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)51.
· In vitro release studies of drug molecule can be done using dialysis bag method or a Franz diffusion cell. All characterization methods are depicted in Table 249,50.
The advantages and limitations of these TDDS for nanovesicular system (Transferosomes) are depicted in Table 352,53 for delivery of drugs that are under research to minimizes the limitations of these systems and also to enhance the efficacy and therapeutic response of the drugs molecules and secondly the focus is on cells microenvironment and how it interacts with these under process new drug delivery systems4.
Table 3: Advantages and Limitations of Transferosomes
S. No. |
Advantages |
Limitations |
Reference No. |
1. |
High penetration due to high deformability |
Expensive manufacturing process |
52,53 |
2. |
More stable |
Chemically unstable due to its predisposition to oxidative degradation |
52,53 |
3. |
Incorporate wider range of molecular weight |
Difficulty in loading hydrophobic drugs |
52,53 |
4. |
Biocompatible and Biodegradable |
Lack of purity of natural phospholipids |
52,53 |
LITERATURE REVIEW54-61:
Author |
Results |
Reference No. |
(Azimi et al., 2019) (Jiang et al., 2018) |
Apart from all the mentioned studies, transferosomes have been recently formulated to deliver proteins, such us the growth hormone or oligopeptides. |
[54,55] |
(Wu et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019) |
In the case of microneedles, the formation of micron-scale pathways into the skin, as well drive nanomedicines directly into the skin can potentially enhance the delivery of transferosomes across the SC. |
[56,57] |
(Salem et al., 2019) |
The transferosomal gel was formed by adding Carbopol 934 and then Poloxamer 407 to the reconstituted transferosomes. The mixture was stirred until a clear solution was obtained. Two drops of triethanolamine were finally added to adjust the pH and form the gel. Optimized transferosomes resulted in 4.5-fold more permeable than resveratrol suspension across sheep nasal mucosa. |
[58] |
(Omar et al., 2019) |
The burst effect observed during the first hours upon administration has been also linked with a small breakage of the lipid bilayer due to the vesicle deformation taking place during the permeation, allowing a partial release of the drug located in the core. |
[59] |
(van Zyl et al., 2019) |
In terms of zeta potential, transferosomes seem have shown the greatest colloidal stability when compared to liposomes and niosomes in liquid media. |
[60] |
(Hadidi et al., 2018) |
Transferosomes have exhibited good colloidal stability (with no sign of aggregation) up to three months both at 4 °C and 25 °C. |
[61] |
Future Perspectives:
Targeted drug delivery has immense scope due to various limitation of these non-site specific drug delivery systems. By using nanomaterials for site specific delivery can provide an alternative approach for short term strategies. Rate limiting factor might be a concern for toxicity in the cells/organs. New strategies can be framed to overcome and it can be important path forward to focus and find new techniques to minimize the toxicity in the organs. There is vast potential in this area to maintain its tolerability and efficiency. Newer drug delivery systems are under development phase that surely contributes to this concept of targeting drug delivery of drugs to specific site and gain maximum therapeutic efficacy.
CONCLUSION:
This concept of targeted drug delivery results in administering injectables of low dose and hence the adverse effects were found significantly less as compared to conventional drug delivery systems. The main disadvantage of this conventional system of drug delivery emerges the need of fast developing of these TDDS for site specific delivery of drugs. Nanotechnology application in the process of drug delivery has now particularly helpful in enhanced drug delivery. There are various nanovesicular carrier systems that have already been approved for their clinical use and many more are there in the research pipeline that open the way for further research too. There are some other targeting approaches that have been developed based on the same principle. This indicated a bright future of targeted drug delivery approaches. As this review mainly focuses on the targeted drug delivery of transferosomes being an efficient carrier system. Likewise, many other carrier systems can be further modified or optimized to a certain extent so that these will be helpful in one or the other drug delivery approaches. Transferosomes has the ability of ultra deformability and squeeze itself to 1/10th of its diameter due to presence of phosphatidylcholine and edge activators that contributes to its property of enhanced permeation and penetration across the barriers. Transferosomal formulations are approved for cosmetic and pharmaceutical use. These have the ability to increase prolong the release, transdermal flux and also improves the targeted delivery of these bioactive molecules and can hold drug candidate to a wider solubility range. This opens new opportunities and challenges for more site specific therapies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
All The authors would like to thank Amity Institute of Pharmacy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus for providing the library facilities for the review work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
REFERENCES:
1. A.M. Hillery and A.H. Lloyd, Drug delivery and targeting, London, Taylor and Francis e-Library, 2005.
2. Gupta M, Sharma V; Targeted drug delivery system: A Review. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 2011; 1:134-138.
3. M. Gupta and V. Sharma, Research Journal of Chemical Sciences., 2011; 1(2): 136-137.
4. Martinho N, Damgé C, Reis CP. Recent advances in drug delivery systems. Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology. 2011 Dec 9;2(05):510.
5. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F20794991%2F5%2F4%2F1690%2Fhtm&psig=AOvVaw1i0_Gu_By3woqEerKk62Ie&ust=1598171384857000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCLCo3PCyrusCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAY
6. Rani K, Paliwal S. A review on targeted drug delivery: Its entire focus on advanced therapeutics and diagnostics. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci. 2014;2(1C):328-1.
7. Bae YH, Park K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011 Aug 10;153(3):198.
8. Agnihotri J, Saraf S, Khale A. Targeting: new potential carriers for targeted drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2011;8(2):117-23.
9. Nimisha Srivastava, Zeeshan Fatima, Chanchal Deep Kaur and Dilshad Ali Rizvi, “Berberine Chloride Dihydrate Enthused Nanovesicles for the Management of Dermatitis Nanovesicles for Dermatitis”, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology-Asia (2020) 10: 1.
10. Fatima Z. Formulation and Performance evaluation of Berberis aristata extract loaded ethosomal gel. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics (AJP): Free full text articles from Asian J Pharm. 2017 Sep 9;11(03).
11. Nimisha DA, Fatima Z, Neema CD. Antipsoriatic and anti-inflammatory studies of Berberis aristata extract loaded nanovesicular gels. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2017 Oct;13(Suppl 3): S587.
12. Srivastava K., Nimisha, Singh AK, Formulation and evaluation of seabuckthorn leaf extract loaded ethosomal gel, Asian journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, Vol 8, Issue 5, 2015; 309-312.
13. Pandey K. An Overview on Promising Nanotechnological Approaches for the Treatment of Psoriasis. Recent Patents on Nanotechnology. 2020 Jun 1;14(2):102-18.
14. Singh A, Srivastava N. Novel Nanolipoidal Systems for the Management of Skin Cancer. Recent Patents on Drug Delivery and Formulation. 2020 Aug 17.
15. Singh N, Singh A, Pandey K. Current Insights for the Management of Acne in the Modern era. Recent Patents on Anti-infective Drug Discovery. 2020 Jul 29.
16. Fatima Z, Kaur CD. A review on potential of novel vesicular carriers for carrying herbal drugs in the treatment of dermatological disorders. Journal of Atoms and Molecules. 2016 May 1;6(3):987.
17. Sezer AD, editor. Recent advances in novel drug carrier systems. BoD–Books on Demand; 2012 Oct 31.
18. Deepak HB, Prince SE. A Systematic Review on the Role of PD-1 and its Ligands in Autoimmunity. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017;10(8):2771-6.
19. Vijayalakshmi A, Srinivas P, Vinodh MN, Gaffur A, Singh UK. Antimicrobial activity of Antipsoriatic Plant Givotia rottleriformis Griff. Ex Wight. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016;9(8):1109-14.
20. Kavitha S. Pharmacognostical Evaluation and Standardisation of Ayurvedic Formulation Patoladi Kwatha Churna for Psoriasis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020;13(3):1171-4.
21. Kalimuthu S, Yadav AV. Nanobased Drug Delivery System: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2009;2(1):21-7.
22. Patidar V, Sharma D, Maliwal D, Chatap V. Penetration Enhancement Techniques for Transdermal Drug Delivery System. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2009;2(1):28-33.
23. Srisuk P, Thongnopnua P, Raktanonchai U, Kanokpanont S. Physico-chemical characteristics of methotrexate-entrapped oleic acid-containing deformable liposomes for in vitro transepidermal delivery targeting psoriasis treatment. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012 May 10;427(2):426-34.
24. Nasr M, Mansour S, Mortada ND, Elshamy AA. Vesicular aceclofenac systems: a comparative study between liposomes and niosomes. Journal of Microencapsulation. 2008 Oct 1;25(7):499-512.
25. Srisuk P, Thongnopnua P, Raktanonchai U, Kanokpanont S. Physico-chemical characteristics of methotrexate-entrapped oleic acid-containing deformable liposomes for in vitro transepidermal delivery targeting psoriasis treatment. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012 May 10;427(2):426-34.
26. Nasr M, Mansour S, Mortada ND, El Shamy AA. Lipospheres as carriers for topical delivery of aceclofenac: preparation, characterization and in vivo evaluation. Aaps Pharmscitech. 2008 Mar 1;9(1):154-62.
27. Patel PA, Chaulang GM, Akolkotkar A, Mutha SS, Hardikar SR, Bhosale AV. Self-emulsifying drug delivery system: A review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2008;1(4):313-23.
28. Mayavanshi AV, Gajjar SS. Floating drug delivery systems to increase gastric retention of drugs: A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2008;1(4):345-8.
29. Chien YW. Novel drug delivery systems. New York: Marcel Decker Inc; 1982; 149-215.
30. Cevc G, Blume G. New, highly efficient formulation of diclofenac for the topical, transdermal administration in ultradeformable drug carriers, Transfersomes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2001 Oct 1;1514(2):191-205.
31. Cevc G, Blume G. Lipid vesicles penetrate into intact skin owing to the transdermal osmotic gradients and hydration force. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Biomembranes. 1992 Feb 17;1104(1):226-32.
32. Elsayed MM, Abdallah OY, Naggar VF, Khalafallah NM. Lipid vesicles for skin delivery of drugs: reviewing three decades of research. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2007 Mar 6;332(1-2):1-6.
33. Gupta M, Agrawal U, Vyas SP. Nanocarrier-based topical drug delivery for the treatment of skin diseases. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2012 Jul 1;9(7):783-804.
34. Cevc G, Schätzlein A, Blume G. Transdermal drug carriers: basic properties, optimization and transfer efficiency in the case of epicutaneously applied peptides. Journal of Controlled Release. 1995 Sep 1;36(1-2):3-16.
35. El Zaafarany GM, Awad GA, Holayel SM, Mortada ND. Role of edge activators and surface charge in developing ultradeformable vesicles with enhanced skin delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2010 Sep 15;397(1-2):164-72.
36. Chuanping N, Hongzhao C, Weiying G. Preparation and Study on Properties of Ibuprofen Transfersomes. Journal of Mathematical Medicine. 2010;2.
37. Shen Y, Zhang Y. Liao Ming. Preparation and quality evaluation of drug loading transferosomes. Med J Chin People's Liberation Army. 2007;10.
38. Malakar J, Sen SO, Nayak AK, Sen KK. Formulation, optimization and evaluation of transferosomal gel for transdermal insulin delivery. Saudi Pharmaceutical journal. 2012 Oct 1;20(4):355-63.
39. Trotta M, Peira E, Carlotti ME, Gallarate M. Deformable liposomes for dermal administration of methotrexate. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2004 Feb 11;270(1-2):119-25.
40. Bhatia A, Singh B, Wadhwa S, Raza K, Katare OP. Novel phospholipid-based topical formulations of tamoxifen: evaluation for antipsoriatic activity using mouse-tail model. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology. 2014 Mar 1;19(2):160-3.
41. Bseiso EA, Nasr M, Sammour O, Abd El Gawad NA. Recent advances in topical formulation carriers of antifungal agents. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology. 2015 Sep 1;81(5):457.
42. Duangjit S, Opanasopit P, Rojanarata T, Ngawhirunpat T. Characterization and in vitro skin permeation of meloxicam-loaded liposomes versus transfersomes. Journal of Drug Delivery. 2011;2011.
43. Jain S, Jain P, Umamaheshwari RB, Jain NK. Transfersomes—a novel vesicular carrier for enhanced transdermal delivery: development, characterization, and performance evaluation. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 2003 Jan 1;29(9):1013-26.
44. Patel R, Singh SK, Singh S, Sheth NR, Gendle R. Development and characterization of curcumin loaded transfersome for transdermal delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2009 Dec 1;1(4):71.
45. Pandey S, Goyani M, Devmurari V, Fakir J. Transferosomes: a novel approach for transdermal drug delivery. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 2009;1(2):143-50.
46. Boinpally RR, Zhou SL, Poondru S, Devraj G, Jasti BR. Lecithin vesicles for topical delivery of diclofenac. European journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2003 Nov 1;56(3):389-92.
47. Cevc G. Material transport across permeability barriers by means of lipid vesicles. In Handbook of Biological Physics 1995 Jan 1 (Vol. 1, pp. 465-490). North-Holland.
48. Chaubey R, Srivastava N, Singh A. Enhancement of Dissolution Rate of Quercetin Using Solid Dispersion Approach: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology-Asia. 2020 Jun 1;10(3):330-49.
49. Jain S, Umamaheswari RB, Bhadra D, Tripathi P, Jain P, Jain NK. Ultradeformable liposomes: A recent tool for effective transdermal drug delivery. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2003;65(3):223.
50. Barry B. Transdermal drug delivery. In: Aulton EM. (editor). Pharmaceutics, The science of dosage forms design, 2nd ed., Churchill Livingstone, Newyork: Harcourt Publishers; 2002; 499-33.
51. Singodia D, Gupta GK, Verma A, Singh V, Shukla P, Misra P, Sundar S, Dube A, Mishra PR. Development and performance evaluation of amphotericin B transfersomes against resistant and sensitive clinical isolates of visceral leishmaniasis. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2010 Jun 1;6(3):293-302.
52. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.semanticscholar.org%2Fpaper%2FHERBAL-NOVEL-DRUG-DELIVERY-SYSTEMS-AND-Chauhan Tyagi%2Fa64a84efb14966cdd98ce2a96cca130157fbeae7&psig=AOvVaw3cxzjWe9v9OHEOYC6IKu6k&ust=1598185308560000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCKj2ysrmrusCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAK
53. https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.slideshare.net%2Fsagarsavale1%2Ftransfersome&psig=AOvVaw3J3PtnkGjeE0L3hzS7IThI&ust=1598186135843000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCPjBscDqrusCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD
54. Azimi M, Khodabandeh M, Deezagi A, Rahimi F. Impact of the Transfersome Delivered Human Growth Hormone on the Dermal Fibroblast Cells. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2019 Nov 1;20(14):1194-202.
55. Jiang T, Wang T, Li T, Ma Y, Shen S, He B, Mo R. Enhanced transdermal drug delivery by transfersome-embedded oligopeptide hydrogel for topical chemotherapy of melanoma. ACS Nano. 2018 Sep 5;12(10):9693-701.
56. Wu X, Li Y, Chen X, Zhou Z, Pang J, Luo X, Kong M. A surface charge dependent enhanced Th1 antigen-specific immune response in lymph nodes by transfersome-based nanovaccine-loaded dissolving microneedle-assisted transdermal immunization. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2019;7(31):4854-66.
57. Yang J, Liu X, Fu Y, Song Y. Recent advances of microneedles for biomedical applications: drug delivery and beyond. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2019 May 1;9(3):469-83.
58. Salem HF, Kharshoum RM, Abou-Taleb HA, Naguib DM. Nanosized transferosome-based intranasal in situ gel for brain targeting of resveratrol: formulation, optimization, in vitro evaluation, and in vivo pharmacokinetic study. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019 Jul 1;20(5):181.
59. Omar MM, Hasan OA, El Sisi AM. Preparation and optimization of lidocaine transferosomal gel containing permeation enhancers: a promising approach for enhancement of skin permeation. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2019; 14:1551.
60. Van Zyl L, Viljoen JM, Haynes RK, Aucamp M, Ngwane AH, du Plessis J. Topical delivery of artemisone, clofazimine and decoquinate encapsulated in vesicles and there in vitro efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):33.
61. Hadidi N, Saffari M, Faizi M. Optimized Transferosomal Bovine Lactoferrin (BLF) as a Promising Novel Non-Invasive Topical Treatment for Genital Warts Caused by Human Papiluma Virus (HPV). Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research: IJPR. 2018;17(Suppl2):12.
Received on 03.10.2020 Modified on 23.05.2021
Accepted on 11.08.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm.and Tech 2022; 15(2):913-920.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00153