Polyherbal effect between Phyllanthus urinaria and Curcuma longa as an Anticancer and Antioxidant
Sapti Puspitarini1, Nashi Widodo2, Sri Widyarti2, Yoga Dwi Jatmiko2, Muhaimin Rifa’i2*
1Doctoral Program, Biology Department, Science and Mathematics Faculty,
Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.
2Biology Department, Science and Mathematics Faculty, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: immunobiology@ub.ac.id
ABSTRACT:
A combination of herbals medicines is an alternative treatment choice for developing anticancer therapy because of its benefits, active compounds, and non-toxic side effect. This study investigates the anticancer and antioxidant activity of Phyllanthus urinaria and Curcuma longa water extract combination. The analysis of their bio-active components was done using LC-HRMS. The biological activity prediction was made using PassOnline and Cytoscape. Anticancer activity, apoptosis, and cell cycle assay were tested on treated T47D breast cancer cells line with the combination herbal extract and individual herbal extract compare to the untreated and cisplatin-treated control cells. This study also determined the antioxidant activity and phenolic and flavonoid total assay. The result showed that these herbs' compounds were predicted to have a biological function in cancer treatment. The herbal combination has efficiency inducing apoptosis with more than 50% compared to the individual herbal treatment and untreated control cells. Cell cycle analysis shows these herbals affect cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase compared to the control cells. The antioxidant activity and total phenol and flavonoid of P. urinaria and C. longa combination positively correlate with the anticancer activity result. Compusyn test results on cell toxicity parameters showed that the combination of both herbs had an additive effect (C = 1). Although this combination has no synergism effect, the water extract of P. urinaria and C. longa combination can be an anticancer agent.
KEYWORDS: Additive effect; Anticancer; Antioxidant activity; Curcuma longa; Herbal formulation; In silico; In vitro; Phyllanthus urinaria.
INTRODUCTION:
Indonesia's biodiversity is the second largest in the world after the Amazon Rainforest in Brazil that causes Indonesia to have many indigenous medicinal plants1. Indonesian herbal medicine usage has been applied in Indonesian society to promote health, prevent and cure diseases2. Their benefits go hand in hand with their active compounds. Their active compounds have several pharmacology functions, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, cardioprotection, and antimicrobial effects3,4. Therefore, herbal medicine is a potential source for new drug design5,6.
Phyllanthus urinaria is an herbal plant widely distributed in tropical regions in Asia, America, and India. In Southeast Asia, China, India, and Brazil, P. urinaria has long been used as traditional medicine for digestive disease, liver disease, malaria, and jaundice7,8. P. urinaria has pharmacological potency due to its active compounds. P. urinaria has pharmacological activities, such as hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cardioprotective effects. P. urinaria contains 93 active compounds, including 12 flavonoids, 21 phenolics, 13 terpenoids, 22 lignans, 16 tannins, and other active compounds7.
Curcuma longa L. belongs to the Zingiberaceae family, which is extensively cultivated for its rhizomes. It is a perennial herb distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the world. A great variety of pharmacological activities of turmeric have been reported. It exhibits anti-parasitic, antispasmodic, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, and gastrointestinal effects. The aqueous extracts of C. longa contain total phenol content ranging from 4.52% to 7.68%. The flavonoid content ranged from 0.29% to 0.67%9,10.
P. urinaria and C. longa are different herbal extracts that have been consumed daily as Indonesian preventive medicine. People believe these herbals could prevent and cure any kind of disease. The majority of herbal medicines have a function on pharmaceutics due to their active compounds. When herbs are used in combination, the effects can be complicated because various interactions can occur among the individual components. Because of multiple elements in the mix of herbal products, the consequences of herb–herb or herb-drug interactions are often unpredictable and complicated11. Combining drugs and herbs may have synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects12,13.
Antioxidant is a molecule that capable of acting as an oxidation inhibitor14. In addition, antioxidants can neutralize free radicals, such as peroxide, hydroperoxide, or lipid peroxyl, thus inhibiting the oxidative mechanisms before caused damage to cells15. Medicinal plants contain antioxidants, such as phenolic acids, polyphenols, and flavonoids4,16, that can increase the antioxidant capacity and reduce the risk of certain diseases such as cancer and diabetes, and heart disease17. Herbs' antioxidant activity can be determined by several assays, including 2,2–Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity assay18.
Cancer has characteristic uncontrolled growth, invasion, and sometimes metastasis19,20. Therefore, the invention of an anticancer agent is a challenging task for the researcher. Furthermore, cancer therapy agents should have the ability to induce apoptosis in cancer cells21. Chemotherapeutic treatments, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation, lead to several side effects, including hair loss, immunosuppression, and mucositis15–17. So, the search for new anticancer drugs is needed to obtain new insight into anticancer agents, mainly from natural products. Therefore, this study investigates the combination of P. urinaria and C. longa as an anticancer candidate using in silico and in vitro approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
P. urinaria and C. longa powder was obtained from UPT. Material Medika Batu, Batu, Indonesia. The sample powder was extracted in boiling demineralized water in a ratio of 1:20 (w/v) for four h. After that, the solution was filter with a fine cloth and centrifuged using Hermle centrifuge type z446. Then the solution was filtered with a rough filter, continued with a 2,5µm Whatman filter. The water of extract was removed using freeze dryer become to a powder and frozen until usage. The extracts were called P. urinaria water extract (PUWE) and C. longa water extract (CLWE). PUWE, CLWE, and their combination (i.e., PUWE + CLWE with 1:1 ratio) were prepared in a water solvent.
Biological function prediction:
The biological function prediction of the active compound was retrieved from PassOnline Way2drug prediction (http://www.pharmaexpert.ru/passonline/). Prediction of Activity Spectra for Substances is a computer program that is used for biological activity predictions. The Pa values were utilized for PASSOnline analysis, which means the activity prediction of the active compound to carry out their functions22. Pa values have a range of 0.1 > 0.9. When the value is higher, their probability activity is more accurate. The active compounds which are used are based on the LC-HRMS result.
Compound–protein interaction network:
Compound–protein interaction networks were investigated using Cytoscape integrated with StringApps. Cytoscape software is an available network tool designed to analyze and visualize networks, whereas StringApps was designed to serve protein-protein association from STRING network and protein–chemical interaction from STITCH networks23.
The cells were tested using WST-1 (Sigma) for cytotoxicity assay. P. urinaria and C. longa's cytotoxicity activity was tested against human breast cancer (T47D) cells. The T47D cells were obtained from the Laboratory of Structure, Development, and Physiology of Animals, Biology Department, Science and Mathematics Faculty, Brawijaya University. The T47D cells were cultured as in the previous study22. The treatments used were PUWE, CLWE, and their combination (i.e., PUWE + CLWE with 1:1 ratio). The data were analyzed using the CompuSyn program.
Cell cycle and apoptosis assay:
The cells were seeded to approximately 75,000 cells/well into 24 well plates. The doses used in the cell apoptosis assay were obtained from the IC50 value, and this study used cisplatin three µg/mL (KALBE Farma). After incubation for 24 h, the treated T47D cells were harvested and incubated in the dyes for 30 min and then analyzed using the flow cytometer (BD FACS Calibur) equipped with CellQuest software for flow cytometry analysis. For the cell cycle assay, the cells were dyed using propidium iodide (BioLegend). For the cell apoptosis assay, the cells were tested using annexin-V/propidium iodide dyes (BioLegend).
DPPH scavenging activity assay:
DPPH scavenging activity assay was used to determine the antioxidant activity of the sample. Extract of 100µL (range of the sample 31.25–500µg/mL) was added to 100-µL DPPH (Sigma) in ethanol solution (SmartLab) (0.4mM) in 96 well plates. The mixture was incubated for 30 min, and its absorbance was then measured using an ELISA reader (BioTek ELx808) with λ = 490nm. The inhibition percentage was adjusted using Equation 1. The IC50 value was calculated from linear regression of the cytotoxicity chart using Equation 2.
(Equation 1)
(Equation 2)
Determination of total flavonoids:
Total flavonoids were estimated using aluminum
chloride colorimetric assay23. Quercetin (MarkHerb) was used as a
standard in 96% ethanol solution with a serial dilution range of
1.5625–100µg/mL. Sample of 50µL (1 mg/mL) or standard was added to 10µL of AlCl3
(Sigma) (10%, w/v) followed by 150-µL 96% ethanol solution (SmartLab).
Lastly, added 10µL of CH3COONa (Sigma) (1M)
to the mixture in 96 well plates. As a blank, 96% ethanol solution was used.
The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 40 min and protected from
light. The absorbance was measured using an ELISA reader (BioTek ELx808) in λ
= 405nm. Total flavonoid contents were expressed in Quercetin equivalent
(standard curve equation of Quercetin; )mg QE/g of dry extract.
Determination of total phenolic content:
The total phenolic content was estimated using the Folin–Ciocalteu assay with modification24. Sample or standard of 100 µL was added to 1.0 mL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (Merck) (a ready-to-use reagent diluted 10-fold with distilled water). After 5 min, 1.0 mL of Na2CO3 (Sigma) (7,5%, w/v) was added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 90 min in dark conditions. Total phenolic content was measured using spectrophotometry in λ = 725nm. Gallic acid (MarkHerb) was used as standard. Gallic acid was expressed in gallic acid equivalent (standard curve equation of gallic acid) mg GAE/g of dry extract.
RESULTS:
LC-HRMS analysis of PUWE and CLWE:
The LC-HRMS shows the qualitative analysis of the bio-active compounds present in the PUWE and CLWE. These herbals contain bioactive compounds such as; phenolics, terpenoids, and alkaloids. Some of these compounds have been reported to have anticancer activities in several cell lines (Table 1).
Table 1. Compounds obtained from the LC-MS analysis
Herbal |
Active Compound |
Activity anticancer |
P. urinaria |
Rutin25 |
Inhibitor cell cycle; Inducer apoptosis26,27 |
|
Quercetin28 |
Inhibitor cell cycle; Inducer apoptosis29–31 |
|
Corilagin32 |
Inducer apoptosis33 |
|
Isoquercitrin32 |
Anti-proliferative34 |
C. longa |
ar-turmerone35,36 |
Inducer apoptosis37 |
|
ferulic acid35 |
Inducer cell cycle arrest and autophagy38 |
|
Vanillin35 |
Anti- proliferative39 |
|
Curcumin35,36 |
Inducer apoptosis and anti-proliferative35 |
Active compounds of function prediction:
The prediction of functional bioactive components present in both herbal (PUWE and CLWE) shown in Table 2. The results show that most bio-active components work as anticancer through apoptosis (i.e., P53 enhancer, caspase-3 stimulant, and apoptosis agonist) and metastasis inhibitor (i.e., MMP9 and JAK2 expression inhibitor). Comparing the bio-active components in P. urinaria seems to be more potent as an anticancer than the C. longa.
Table 2. Function prediction as anticancer from PassOnline
Biological function prediction as anticancer (PassOnline) |
Compound (Pa score) |
|||||||
Rutin (CID: 5280805) |
Quercetin (CID: 5280343) |
Corilagin (CID: 73568) |
Isoquercetin (CID: 5280804) |
ar-turmerone (CID: 160512) |
ferulic acid (CID: 445858) |
Curcumin (CID: 969516) |
Isoferulic acid (CID: 736186) |
|
Anticarcinogenic |
√ (0.983) |
√ (0.757) |
|
√ (0.965) |
|
|
|
|
Chemopreventive |
√ (0.968) |
√ (0.717) |
√ (0.794) |
√ (0.956) |
|
|
|
|
TP53 expression enhancer |
√ (0.893) |
√ (0.844) |
√ (0.827) |
√ (0.959) |
|
√ (0.778) |
|
√ (0.788) |
Proliferative diseases treatment |
√ (0.952) |
|
|
√ (0.921) |
|
|
|
|
Antineoplastic |
√ (0.849) |
√ (0.797) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caspase 3 stimulant |
√ (0.839) |
|
|
√ (0.801) |
|
√ (0.749) |
√ (0747) |
√ (0.749) |
Apoptosis agonist |
√ (0.747) |
√ (0.887) |
√ (0.794) |
√ (0.792) |
√ (0.714) |
√ (0.702) |
√ (0.803) |
|
JAK2 expression inhibitor |
|
√ (0.787) |
|
|
|
√ (0.915) |
|
√ (0.915) |
MMP9 expression inhibitor |
|
√ (0.734) |
|
|
|
√ (0.865) |
√ (0.805) |
√ (0.865) |
Note: √ represents the compounds that have function prediction as an anticancer agent.
Figure 1. Protein–active compound network. A. Network of PUWE; B. network of CLWE; C. PUWE–CLWE collaborative network. The blue circle represents proteins involved in the cancer disease mechanism. The green rectangle represents active compounds from herbal plants. The yellow square represents the proteins connecting two herbs. The green line represents active compound–protein interaction. The red line represents active compound–active compound interaction. The gray line represents protein-protein interaction
Compound–protein interaction network:
Compound-protein interaction networks were used to investigate the interaction of bioactive components from the herbal with the proteins. The data presented in Figure1 shows all the proteins that interact with the bio-active components play a role in cancer disease mechanism. As shown in Figure1, when all the bio-active components from both herbals were combined, EGFR is the only protein that forms interaction between two herbals. However, there is no interaction were formed between bio-active components of the two herbals.
Antioxidant activity and total phenol and flavonoid content:
In a comparison of the antioxidant activity, total phenol and flavonoid content of the individual herbal and their combination are shown in Table 3. The combination of herbal (PUWE+CLWE) showed intense antioxidant activity against DPPH free radical (88.06±2.16ppm), whereas the PUWE alone showed better against DPPH free radical (33.32±3.09ppm) than the combination or CLWE alone. In addition, total phenol and flavonoid content have a positive correlation with DPPH free radical scavenging activity.
Table 3. Antioxidant activity and total phenol and flavonoid content of the samples
Sample |
IC50 of DPPH scavenging (ppm) |
Total Phenol (mgGAE/g) |
Total flavonoid (mgQE/g) |
PUWE |
33.32 ± 3.09 |
26.87 ± 0.25 |
5.14 ± 0.35 |
CLWE |
2272.21 ± 5.87 |
3.95 ± 0.08 |
3.15 ± 0.18 |
PUWE+CLWE |
88.06 ± 2.16 |
15.21 ± 0.06 |
4.80 ± 0.17 |
Anticancer activity:
The anticancer activity of herbals was assessed by treating breast cancer cell line T47D with single herbal and two herbal combinations. The herbal of PUWE can control cell growth better than the combination or CLWE alone. Based on IC50 results indicate that PUWE (163.942µg/mL) has a better inhibitory ability against cancer cell growth followed by the herbal combination (PUWE+CLWE) (301.290) then CLWE (1343.76 µg/mL). Furthermore, the number of combination indexes shows that PUWE+CLWE is classified as nearly additive (Table 4).
Table 4. Anticancer assay result of the samples
Compounds concentration |
Fractional inhibition (fa) |
IC50 |
Combination index value |
|
PUWE (µg/mL) |
CLWE (µg/mL) |
|||
100 |
- |
0.162 |
163.942 µg/mL (PUWE) |
|
200 |
- |
0.74 |
||
400 |
- |
0.908 |
||
- |
100 |
0.025 |
1343.76 µg/mL (CLWE) |
|
- |
200 |
0.118 |
||
- |
400 |
0.137 |
||
50 |
50 |
0.192 |
301.290 µg/mL (Combination) |
1.03 (nearly additive) |
100 |
100 |
0.244 |
||
200 |
200 |
0.665 |
The ability of herbs to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in T47D cells:
The herbal ability to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest was assessed by treating T47D cell line with the individual and combination herbal in different concentrations: 0 (control), ˝.IC50, IC50, and 2.IC50 (Table 5). As determined by Annexin-V/propidium iodine staining, the herbals can induce apoptosis in the T47D cell line compared to the control. The individual herbal extract of PUWE induced apoptosis in T47D cells in a dose-dependent manner. The effect is different when the T47D cells were treated with individual herbal extract of CLWE as the apoptosis was very low and was not dose-dependent. The effect of combination herbal extract (PUWE+CLWE) was significantly higher to induce apoptosis in T47D cells in a dose-dependent manner. The extent of apoptosis percentage was greater (28.08±6.9 to 75.21±2.22% for 105.5 to 602µg/mL doses) when the cells were treated with the combination herbal extract (PUWE+CLWE). The apoptosis cell percentage is shown in Figure 2A.
The data presented in Figure 2B shows the percentage of T47D cells being arrested in different cell cycle stages after being treated with different concentrations of herbal extract for 24 hours. The individual herbal extract of PUWE induced cell cycle arrest in the S phase, but the effect is different when the cells are treated in a higher concentration of PUWE (2.IC50) as accumulated of cell cycle arrest G2/M phase. The effect of CLWE shows the opposite result with PUWE as showing the accumulation of cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase at low concentrations (˝.IC50 and IC50) then arrest in S phase at higher concentration (2.IC50). The effect of combination herbal extract (PUWE+CLWE) was significantly higher to induce cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase at the highest and lowest concentrations, but the accumulation of cell cycle arrest changes in the middle concentration accumulated in the G0/G1 phase.
Table 5. Concentration conversion of apoptosis and cell cycle assay
Concentration Label |
Concentration Conversion |
||
PUWE (µg/mL) |
CLWE (µg/mL) |
PUWE+CLWE (µg/mL) |
|
˝.IC50 |
81,5 |
671,5 |
150,5 |
IC50 |
163 |
1343 |
301 |
2.IC50 |
326 |
2686 |
602 |
Figure 2. The ability of herbs to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in T47D cells after 24 h incubation. A: cell apoptosis percentage. B: Cell cycle arrest percentage
DISCUSSION:
P. urinaria and C. longa are different herbal extracts that have been consumed daily as Indonesian preventive medicine. People believe these herbals could prevent and cure any kind of disease. These species have excellent antioxidants and contain benefits bio-active components such as; curcumin from C. longa L. and Quercetin, rutin from P. urinaria. The extract of P. urinaria and C. longa contains an active compound shown to induce apoptosis and anti-proliferative (Tabel 1.). However, because this research uses crude extract, future research needs to conduct active compounds validation (e.g., single compound isolation) to get novel compounds.
STITCH conducts its work by collecting information about interactions from metabolic pathways, crystal structures, binding experiments, and drug–target relationships40. Based on this in-silico analysis of the compound-protein network, expected that the combination of this herbal extract could disturb the proteins that play a role in cancer cells progression. Our present study reported that curcumin, rutin, and Quercetin are bio-active components of herbal combination (PUWE+CLWE) that interact together, targeting EGFR protein (Figure 1.), as reported that increasing of this protein can trigger cancer cells progression41. Curcumin, routine, and Quercetin are known to have the ability to downregulate EGFR in cancer cases, thereby inducing apoptosis and inhibiting the growth of cancer cells42–44. First, though, the mechanisms need to be investigated. Naturally, the body has a balanced system that regulates the amount of expressed protein as needed. However, in cancer cases, the body loses its balanced system, so there is an excess and a deficiency in proteins. New alternatives are required to maintain the body's balance, one of which is herbs' use. Increasing several proteins can trigger the progression of cancer cells. These proteins include HMOX145, CCND146, SERPINE147, EGFR and PTGS241, AKT1, MAPK14 and MAPK848, STAT349, GSR50, P4HB51, CYP1B152, AKR1C353, HCK54, and MCL155. In addition, decreasing several proteins can trigger the progression of cancer cells. These proteins include TP53 and CASP356. Although the resulting direct effect is unknown, the protein–compound interaction is expected to work appropriately to balance protein in the body system.
This study found that the combination of these aqueous herbal extracts (PUWE+CLWE) has intense antioxidant activity against DPPH free radicals (Table 3). Treatment of T47D breast cancer cells with IC50 to 2.IC50 concentrations of herbal combination has the efficiency to induce apoptosis (Figure 2A.) with more than 50% compared to the individual herbal treatment and control. The treatment also increases the number of inhibition cell growth in dose-dependent (Table 4.). Cell cycle analysis shows that T47D cells treated with these herbals increase the percentage of cells in G2/M phase compare to the control cells (Figure 2B.). These results indicated that the cells are getting arrest at G2/M phase. The antioxidant activity and total phenol and flavonoid content of PUWE, CLWE, and their combination positively correlate with anticancer activity. PUWE has strong antioxidant and anticancer activities. It also has the highest total phenol and total flavonoid content than other samples. Herbal medicine has the potential as a new drug against cancer due to its active compounds8. Polyphenol compounds from plant sources have health benefits in various diseases, such as antioxidant and anticancer activities.
The individual herbal extract of PUWE and CLWE induced T47D cell death through apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. T47D cells treated with PUWE show a higher percentage of apoptosis than CLWE; this may be due to the higher amount of phenol and flavonoid contained in PUWE (Tabel 3.). Several studies reported that herbal medicine has potential as a new drug against cancer due to its active compounds5. Polyphenol compounds from plant sources have health benefits in various diseases, such as antioxidant and anticancer activities57. The research used cisplatin for control because cisplatin establishes a chemotherapy drug that can induce apoptosis through multiple mechanisms, such as activate signal transduction pathways, death receptor signaling, and mitochondrial pathways. In addition, cisplatin can cause cell cycle arrest at the G1, S, or G2-M phase by inhibiting the DNA synthesis and repair58.
The cells treated with PUWE had more cell arrest in the S phase than the untreated control cells, whereas higher accumulation in the G2/M phase was shown in CLWE treatment cells at the same concentration (˝.IC50). When treated with ˝. IC50 combination extract (PUWE+CLWE) accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase was higher than individual treatment. This result similar to Hu et al.'s report that curcumin could induce cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase59. This result indicated that these herbals might affect the cell cycle by regulating the expression of regulatory proteins in the G2/M cell phase.
In this study, the combination of P. urinaria and C. longa has an additive effect (Table 4). An additive effect is an add-up of individual effects where each agent does not affect the other (no-interactions)12. Besides the combination herbal extract (PUWE+CLWE), PUWE may show the best anticancer effect than CLWE. PUWE showed a higher percentage of apoptosis than CLWE because the active compound content in PUWE has a better anticancer activity role than the active compound in CLWE (Table 2). This is also evidenced by the IC50 value obtained. Furthermore, PUWE is lower than CLWE (Table 4).
Meanwhile, it cannot be confirmed that CLWE has an anticancer effect because CLWE has a high IC50 value (Table 2). The combination of natural extract observed in this study seems to be free of side effects and proven anticancer preventive potential. However, the anticancer potential needs further investigations to realize the benefit function of this combination extract. The result of the combination depends on the individual dose-effect curves and enables unequivocal definitions of synergy, additive effect, and antagonism. This effect may be influenced by the extraction process and the content and concentration of compounds in the herbs60.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study concludes that the combination of P. urinaria and C. longa has potential as anticancer agents. The herbal combination extract can inhibit cancer cell growth and induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in T47D cells inappropriate dose of IC50. Combining both herbs has not shown a synergism interaction, but the combination of herbal compounds shown targeting the same protein (EGFR) can eliminate cancer cells. Furthermore, further study is needed to determine the effective anticancer doses of combination herbs. In addition, a study on protein expression related to cancer mechanisms needs to be conducted to clarify the effects of herbal treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are grateful to the authorities of the Ministry of Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia for funding this research. The Laboratory of Structure, Development and Physiology of Animals, Biology Department, Science and Mathematics Faculty, Brawijaya University for facilitating this research is also acknowledged.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Elfahmi, Woerdenbag HJ and Kayser O. Jamu: Indonesian traditional herbal medicine towards rational phytopharmacological use. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2014;4(2):51-73.
2. Sumarni W, Sudarmin S and Sumarti SS. The scientification of jamu: a study of Indonesian's traditional medicine. Journal Physic: Conference Series. 2019;1321:032057.
3. Tao L, Zhu F, Qin C, et al. Nature's contribution to today's pharmacopeia. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32(10):979-980.
4. Rajendran R, Hemachander R, Ezhilarasan T, et al. Phytochemical analysis and in-vitro antioxidant activity of Mimosa pudica Lin., leaves. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2010;3(2):551-555.
5. Harvey AL, Edrada-Ebel R and Quinn RJ. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nature Review Drug Discovercy. 2015;14(2):111-129.
6. Mukesh KDJ, Sonia K, Madhan R, et al. Antiyeast, Antioxidant and anticancer activity of Tribulus terrestris Linn and Bougainvillea spectabilis Linn. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011;4(9):1483-1489.
7. Geethangili M and Ding S-T. A review of the phytochemistry and pharmacology of Phyllanthus urinaria L. Front Pharmacology. 2018;9:1109.
8. Mao X, Wu L-F, Guo H-L, et al. The genus phyllanthus: An ethnopharmacological, phytochemical, and pharmacological review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7584952
9. Tanvir EM, Hossen MS, Hossain MF, et al. Antioxidant properties of popular turmeric (Curcuma longa) varieties from bangladesh. Journal of Food Quality. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8471785
10. Omosa LK, Midiwo JO, Kuete V. Chapter 19 - Curcuma longa. In: Kuete V. Medicinal spices and vegetables from Africa. Academic Press; 2017:425-435.
11. Gupta SC, Sung B, Kim JH, et al. Multitargeting by turmeric, the golden spice: From kitchen to clinic. Molecular Nutrition and Food Research. 2013;57(9):1510-1528.
12. Chou TC. Drug Combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay Method. Cancer Reserach. 2010;70(2):440-446.
13. Zhou X, Seto SW, Chang D, et al. Synergistic Effects of chinese herbal medicine: a comprehensive review of methodology and current research. Front Pharmacology. 2016;7.
14. Raju DC, Victoria TD, Biji N, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant potential of ethanolic extract of Centella asiatica L. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2015;8(9):1289-1293.
15. Kirtawade R, Salve P, Kulkarni A, et al. Herbal antioxidant: Vitamin C. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2010;3(1):58-61.
16. Kanagavalli M and Anuradha R. A study on phytochemical constituents and in vitro antioxidant activity of Carica papaya. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2012;5(1):119-120.
17. Gahlot K, Lal VK and Jha S. Total phenolic content, flavonoid content and In vitro antioxidant activities of Flemingia species (Flemingia chappar, Flemingia macrophylla and Flemingia strobilifera). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2013;6(5):516-523.
18. Kumar T and Jain V. Phytochemical Screening, Phenolic, Flavonoids, Carotenoids contents and antioxidant activity of Folkloric Memecylon edule roxb. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016;9(10):1547-1551.
19. Pagare MS, Joshi H, Patil L, et al. Human milk: excellent anticancer alternative. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2012;5(1):14-19.
20. Saha D, Mridha D, Mondal S, et al. Organoselenium as a cancer chemopreventive agent against carcinogenesis. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2011;4(3):367-368.
21. Vemuri SK, Banala RR, Subbaiah GPV, et al. Anticancer potential of a mix of natural extracts of turmeric, ginger and garlic: A cell-based study. Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2017;4(4):332-344.
22. Filimonov DA, Rudik AV, Dmitriev AV, et al. Computer-aided estimation of biological activity profiles of drug-like compounds taking into account their metabolism in human body. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(20):7492.
23. Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Gorodkin J, et al. Cytoscape stringapp: network analysis and visualization of proteomics data. Journal of Proteome Research. 2019;18(2):623-632.
24. Melakhessou MA, Benkiki N and Marref SE. Determination of antioxidant capacity, flavonoids and total phenolic content of extracts from Atractylis flava Desf. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(12):5221-5228.
25. Du G, Xiao M, Yu S, et al. Phyllanthus urinaria: a potential phytopharmacological source of natural medicine. International Journal of Clinical Experimental Medicine 2018;11(7):6509-6520
26. Deepika MS, Thangam R, Sheena TS, et al. A novel rutin-fucoidan complex based phytotherapy for cervical cancer through achieving enhanced bioavailability and cancer cell apoptosis. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 2019;109:1181-1195.
27. Yan X, Hao Y, Chen S, et al. Rutin induces apoptosis via P53 up-regulation in human glioma CHME cells. Translational Cancer Research. 2019;8(5):2005-2013-2013.
28. Fang S-H, Rao YK and Tzeng Y-M. Antioxidant and inflammatory mediator's growth inhibitory effects of compounds isolated from Phyllanthus urinaria. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2008;116(2):333-340.
29. Jeong J-H, An JY, Kwon YT, et al. Effects of low dose quercetin: Cancer cell-specific inhibition of cell cycle progression. Journal of Cell Biochemistry. 2009 Jan 1; 106(1): 73–82.
30. Gibellini L, Pinti M, Nasi M, et al. Quercetin and cancer chemoprevention. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011;2011:1-15.
31. Hashemzaei M, Far AD, Yari A, et al. Anticancer and apoptosis-inducing effects of Quercetin in vitro and in vivo. Oncology Reports. 2017;38(2):819-828.
32. Jantan I, Haque MdA, Ilangkovan M, et al. An insight into the modulatory effects and mechanisms of action of phyllanthus species and their bioactive metabolites on the immune system. Front Pharmacology. 2019;10:878.
33. Gupta A, Singh AK, Kumar R, et al. Corilagin in cancer: a critical evaluation of anticancer activities and molecular mechanisms. Molecules. 2019;24(18): 3399.
34. Chen Q, Li P, Li P, et al. Isoquercitrin inhibits the progression of pancreatic cancer in vivo and in vitro by regulating opioid receptors and the mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway. Oncology Reports. 2015;33(2):840-848.
35. Lee W-H, Loo C-Y, Bebawy M, et al. Curcumin and its derivatives: their application in neuropharmacology and neuroscience in the 21st century. Current Neuropharmacology. 2013;11(4):338-378.
36. Abdel-Lateef E, Mahmoud F, Hammam O, et al. Bioactive chemical constituents of Curcuma longa L. rhizomes extract inhibit the growth of human hepatoma cell line (HepG2). Acta Pharmaceutica. 2016;66(3):387-398.
37. Ji M, Choi J, Lee J, et al. Induction of apoptosis by ar-turmerone on various cell lines. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2004;14(2):253-256.
38. Gao J, Yu H, Guo W, et al. The anticancer effects of ferulic acid is associated with induction of cell cycle arrest and autophagy in cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell International. 2018;18(1):102.
39. Naz H, Tarique M, Khan P, et al. Evidence of vanillin binding to CAMKIV explains the anticancer mechanism in human hepatic carcinoma and neuroblastoma cells. Molecular Cell Biochemistry. 2018;438(1):35-45.
40. Kuhn M, von Mering C, Campillos M, et al. STITCH: interaction networks of chemicals and proteins. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;36:D684-D688.
41. Wang D, Xia D, DuBois RN. The crosstalk of PTGS2 and EGF signaling pathways in colorectal cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2011;3(4):3894–3908.
42. Perk AA, Shatynska-Mytsyk I, Gerçek YC, et al. Rutin mediated targeting of signaling machinery in cancer cells. Cancer Cell International. 2014;14(1):124.
43. Starok M, Preira P, Vayssade M, et al. EGFR inhibition by curcumin in cancer cells: a dual mode of action. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(5):1634-1642.
44. Jung JH, Lee JO, Kim JH, et al. Quercetin suppresses HeLa cell viability via AMPK-induced HSP70 and EGFR down-regulation. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2010;223(2):408-414.
45. Podkalicka P, Mucha O, Józkowicz A, et al. Heme oxygenase inhibition in cancers: possible tools and targets. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;2018(1):23-32.
46. Shan Y-S, Hsu H-P, Lai M-D, et al. Cyclin D1 overexpression correlates with poor tumor differentiation and prognosis in gastric cancer. Oncology Letters. 2017;14(4):4517-4526.
47. Zhang Q, Lei L and Jing D. Knockdown of SERPINE1 reverses resistance of triple‑negative breast cancer to paclitaxel via suppression of VEGFA. Oncology Reports. 2020;44(5):1875-1884.
48. Slattery ML, Lundgreen A and Wolff RK. Dietary influence on MAPK-signaling pathways and risk of colon and rectal cancer. Nutrition Cancer. 2013;65(5):729-738.
49. Ma J, Qin L and Li X. Role of STAT3 signaling pathway in breast cancer. Cell Communication Signal. 2020;18(1):33.
50. Baity M, Wang L, Correa AM, et al. Glutathione reductase (GSR) gene deletion and chromosome 8 aneuploidy in primary lung cancers detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. American Journal of Cancer Reserach. 2019;9(6):1201–1211.
51. Zhang J, Guo S, Wu Y, et al. P4HB, a novel hypoxia target gene related to gastric. BioMed Research International. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9749751
52. Alsubait A, Aldossary W, Rashid M, et al. CYP1B1 gene: Implications in glaucoma and cancer. Journal of Cancer. 2020;11(16):4652-4661.
53. Dozmorov MG, Azzarello JT, Wren JD, et al. Elevated AKR1C3 expression promotes prostate cancer cell survival and prostate cell-mediated endothelial cell tube formation: implications for prostate cancer progressioan. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):672.
54. Poh AR, O'Donoghue RJJ, Ernst M. Hematopoietic cell kinase (HCK) as a therapeutic target in immune and cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6(18):15752-15771.
55. Xiang W, Yang C-Y and Bai L. MCL-1 inhibition in cancer treatment. Oncology Targets Therapy. 2018;11:7301-7314.
56. Frank AK, Pietsch EC, Dumont P, et al. Wild-type and mutant p53 proteins interact with mitochondrial caspase-3. Cancer Biology Therapy. 2011;11(8):740–745.
57. Grigalius I and Petrikaite V. Relationship between antioxidant and anticancer activity of trihydroxyflavones. Molecules. 2017;22(12).
58. Florea AM and Büsselberg D. Cisplatin as an anti-tumor drug: cellular mechanisms of activity, drug resistance and induced side effects. Cancers. 2011;3(1):1351.
59. Hu S, Xu Y, Meng L, et al. curcumin inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Experimental Therapy Medicine. 2018;16(2):1266-1272
60. Foucquier J and Guedj M. Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape. Pharmacology Research and Perspectives. 2015;3(3):e00149.
Received on 03.02.2021 Modified on 29.03.2021
Accepted on 05.05.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm.and Tech 2022; 15(2):671-678.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00111