A review on antitumor action of amygdalin on various types of cancers
Vadivelan Ramachandran*, Kirankumar Rapindra Hosalli,
Inbakumar Vijayakumar, Lalithkumar Mani, Ruchi Tiwari, Gaurav Tiwari
JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Ooty, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: vadivelanr@jssuni.edu.in
ABSTRACT:
Cancer can be described as the abnormal cell division which is uncontrolled and involves the destruction of neighbour cells and tissues. This condition is significantly holds up a fact that 18 million fresh cases were detected during 2018 and the prevalence rate of cancer within 0 to 74 years is 20.2%. WHO stated that 9.6 million deaths worldwide occur by this disease. A complete cure for cancer has not been found yet but in recent years researches are made in the development of site-specific drugs with low cytotoxic effect with high specificity. However, amygdalin which belongs to the nitroside group has a standout feature for the presence of cyanide in it, this cyanide involves in the decomposition of carcinogenic substances and ultimately leads to the blocking of the nutrient source to the tumor cells which inhibits further growth of cancer cells leading to the cancer cell apoptosis. Amygdalin is extensively used in various diseases such as bronchitis, nausea, leprosy, asthma, etc but recently the antitumor property was evident in a large number of in-vitro studies in various types of cancer such as breast, renal, bladder, cervical, prostate by inhibiting the growth of tumor cells, apoptosis, and reducing metastasis of tumor cells. During this review, we look upon the role of amygdalin in a range of diseases and mainly focused on the treatment of various types of cancers.
KEYWORDS: Amygdalin, TGF-β, Bcl 2 and Bax, DU145 and LNCaP cell lines, UMUC3cell lines, RT112 cell lines.
INTRODUCTION:
Cancer occurs to be the second-largest cause of death worldwide with a mortality rate of 9.8 billion till 2018. Besides United States encompasses to be the most affected population globally1. Cancer is a broad word that refers to a variety of malignant diseases that can affect various parts of the body2. Cancer is group of disease characterised by abnormal cell proliferation that can spreadto other areas of the body3. According to the world health organisation, plants have the capacity to synthesise a wide range of chemical compounds that are used to treat a variety of diseases4.
In contrast to the chemically synthesized anticancer compounds which are extracted from plant sources, such as Catharanthus roseus, Taxus brevifolia, Cephalotaxus species, Curcuma longa, and many others, Amygdalin shows great therapeutic effect on both antitumor and anticancer activity. Amygdalin is one of the nitriloside, which contains abundant cyanide in the seeds of the prunasinin family which includes, black berries,plums, apples, blueberry, peaches, apricots etc5,6, Amygdalin shows pharmacological action containing a cyanogenic component possessing a chemical formula C20H27O11 and a molecular mass of 457.42g/mol. Additionally Amygdalin is also called as laetrile (vitamin B17) which consists of hydrocyanic acid, benzaldehyde, and two glucose molecules (D-mandelonitrile-β-D-glucoside-6-β-glucoside).7
Amygdalin under amygdalase and prunasin is non-toxic in general but decomposed into benzaldehyde and hydrocyanic acid will hydrolyze and produces prunasin and mandelonitrile HCN) that is a poisonous product.8,9 The various study states that amygdalin’s effect has a wide range of remedial actions as a supporting role in several diseases which includes bronchitis, leprosy, asthma, etc,10,11. Alongside it also shows numerous pharmacological activities like analgesia, anti-inflammation, anticancer, antitussive, antiasthmatic, antiulcer, immunoregulation, antifibrosis, immunosuppression12. Cancer is a severe illness that affects the majority of the world’s population13. Amygdalin is already using for anticancer activity in different countries like America, Japan, Germany, Italy which functions by decomposing carcinogenic substances, blocking the supplements for tumor cells thereby inhibiting cancer cell development14,10. Additionally, this compound diminishes the disease manifestation, progressive stages of cancer, and also enhances the surveillance stretch. Thus amygdalin shows a potential effect on anti-cancer activity10. Furthermore, in recent years, studies reported beneficial action on several other cancers as well, which includes prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer, bladder cancer, and colon cancer. The main mechanism of action by which amygdalin shows its unique anticancer activity includes inducing apoptosis and inducing a reduction of the tumor by inhibiting the cell cycle and reducing tumor cell metastasis.
Pharmacological activity:
Amygdalin is one of the ingredients of the san she Dan Bei Ye formula used as Chinese medicine for the treatment of asthma, relieve cough, and relaxing the bowels, as well as for constipation15.
Antifibrosis effect:
Amygdalin has an anti-fibrosis action and has been shown its inhibitory effect on various fibrosis such as liver fibrosis, renal fibrosis, pancreatic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and renal interstitial fibrosis.
Renal fibrosis:
The pathogenicity of renal fibrosis can be described by excessive production and accumulation of extracellular matrix(ECM), thereby responsible for tissue scarring and fibrotic lesion16. Renal interstitial fibroblasts remain essential effector cells responsible for the overproduction of the extracellular matrix in the fibrotic kidney and their activation as a major event of chronic fibrosis pathogenesis17. Treatment with amygdalin of the cultured renal intestinal fibroblasts inhibited the production and proliferation of transforming growth factors (TGF-β). Delivering of amygdalin to rat model causes the elimination of extracellular matrix aggregation and reduces renal impairment on 3rd week generally, additionally, it reduces kidney fibroblast stimulation and also rats renal interstitial fibrosis18.
Liver fibrosis:
Hepatic stellate cells are essentials for excretion and regulating the production of ECM who’s excessive generation and accumulation is the main reason for the pathophysiology of liver fibrosis.12,19. TGF-β1 mediated pathway is responsible for the development of cells, HSC activation, ECM remodeling, collagen accumulation, also various hepatic fibrosis processes20. Furthermore HSC activation can secrete TGF-β, give rise to the production of ECM, and release cytokines and chemokines associated with hepatic fibrogenesis21. TGF-β is a crucial intermediator for hepatic fibrosis and the connective tissue growth factor is the main tissue alteration and fibrosis mediator which functions for TGF-β downstream. As a consequence, both take part in the progression of liver fibrosis. Thus treatment with amygdalin reduces mRNA (200µg/ml), degree of CTGF and TGF-β, and protein expression as a result amygdalin could be an innovative treatment for liver fibrosis12.
Anti-inflammatory:
Inflammation is a key physiologic defensive system that helps the body against infections, burns, harmful chemicals, allergens, and other noxious stimuli22. Macrophages induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL- 6, and IL- 12, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL-23, chemokine 2, and chemokine 5 which plays a vital role in innate immunity and also activates the downstream pathways of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) and p38 throughout the inflammatory response. Overactivation of p38 MAPK/NF-B communication performs salient role in inflammatory disorders23,24. Amygdalin reduces the synthesis of prostaglandins E2 , cyclooxygenase (COX1 and COX2), shows decreased expression of IL-23, IL-17A, chemokine 2, chemokine 5 mRNA, and p-p38 protein grade, also nitric oxide synthase mRNA in BV2 microglial cells of a mouse in in-vitro studies 16. In in-vivo, the amygdalin has a defensive effect against inflammation associated with disease and decreased TNF, IL-1, IL-6, soluble intracellular adhesion molecules-1, and NF-kB12.
Toxicity of Amygdalin:
The oral route of administration has a lethal dose (LD50) of 880mg/kg body weight in mice 25. whereas the LD50 of intravenous injection was found to be 25gm/kg and for the intraperitoneal route, LD50 was found to be 8g/kg which shows the oral route of administration is more toxic when compared to intravenous and intraperitoneal 26. This effect of toxicity due to the formation of hydrocyanic acid which is produced by intestinal microbes that hydrolyze the amygdalin into hydrocyanic acid 27. This was proved when mice were treated by inhibition of intestinal microbes and administered 300 mg/kg had no death occurred when compared to untreated mice which have a mortality rate of 60% at the same dose. Humans when administered 4 gm of amygdalin per day continuously for half a month lead to systemic toxicity. In the case of intravenous, the toxicity occurred in a month. However, after the withdrawal of the drug this toxicity can be reversed. The ideal amount of oral dose of amygdalin daily without toxicity is 0.6 to 1gm8.
Antitumor activity of Amygdalin:
Amygdalin was initially extracted out of bitter almond during the 1830s by Robiquet and Boutron-charlard28. This was first tried by a Russian doctor for the treatment of cancer in 1845 based on the rationale that amygdalin was hydrolyzed and treated for cancer cells because of their differential enzymatic profile and liberation of cyanide which causes the killing of cancer cells15,29. Subsequently in the 1850s, intravenous amygdalin entitled as a patent. However USA national cancer institute analysis exhibits that, oral and IV type of amygdalin produced by Mexico didn’t comply with the American drug manufacture standard8. Consequently in 1892 the use of amygdalin for the treatment of cancer is removed in Germany, it was found to be too toxic and ineffective 15,30. Amygdalin at foremost utilized in America for cancer therapy during 1920s by Dr. Krebs and his son Ernst. They formulated a decreased toxic intravenous variety of amygdalin and laetrile, patented in 1950s. In 1961 an amygdalin derivative called hexuronic acid was granted permission and used as a preservative in food products. It has been recorded that 70,000 American cancer victims were reported to use amygdalin as a complementary and alternative medication in 1978 being the most common anticancer technique in the 1970s 31. Later in 1979 amygdalin was found to be toxic by the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Subsequently in the year 1980 amygdalin was prescribed for the treatment of advanced stages of cancer8,20. Mexico produces large amount of amygdalin towards the manifestation of cancer. The latest evidence has provided sufficient evidence for the activity of amygdalin in cancer treatment. cyanogenic sugar a glycoside derivative is also considered as an alternative for anticancer treatment.
Amygdalin produces antitumor activity by various mechanisms:
Apoptosis:
Apoptosis is a common defence mechanism that leads to programmed cell death. This mechanism takes place in different pathological situations which includes removal of dead /damaged cells, such as shrinkage of cells, condensation of chromatin, and inter-nucleosomal DNA fragments and causes the formation of apoptotic bodies10,32. Members of the Bcl2 family and caspases (cysteine proteases) are 2 major classes of proteins that take part in apoptosis. However, bcl2 family is of two classified types which bcl2, antiapoptotic proteins, and Bax, a pro-apoptotic protein. One way to estimate the induction of apoptosis in several tissues is the ratio of bcl2 to Bax10,21.In the aspect of caspases, caspases-3 activation is considered as the primary mechanism of apoptosis. Several studies proved that apoptosis of cancer cells results in the reduction of the tumor. Anti-tumor drugs are involved in apoptosis of cancer by damaging, inhibiting DNA synthesis, removal of intracellular nucleotide pool, and damaging mitotic apparatus. A study conducted by Chen et al and involved a decrease in the level of Bcl-2 and an increase in the level of Bax when treated with amygdalin in HeLa cells 10,33.
Figure 1. Antitumor mechanism of amygdalin
Role of Amygdalin in prostate cancer cells:
In developing countries, prostate cancer comes in second place in the structure of oncological diseases34. A study was conducted by using DU1455 and LNCAP prostate cancer cells and treatment with amygdalin exhibited decreased level of Bcl-2 mRNA, protein expression and also increase of Bax mRNA and protein expression in a concentration-dependent manner additionally elevated the level of caspases 3 enzymes10.
Role of Amygdalin in breast cancer:
The uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells in the milk producing glands of the breast or in the passages that carry milk to the nipples characterises breast cancer35. A study conducted by Lee and Moon on apoptotic and anti-tumor behavior of amygdalin on various cell lines such as ER-positive MCF-7, TNBC M5-MB-231, and HS578T36 and found that mitochondrial activity triggers apoptosis by mechanisms such as molecular events such as ex-proteins binding with Bcl2 (Bax) and caspase 3 activations37. PARP (poly (ADP-ribose)polymerase) acts as a substrate for caspase 3 in apoptosis and also in pp3821 involve in signaling mechanisms38,39. Thus, by using the property of amygdalin to regulate apoptotic proteins and signaling molecules determination of PARP, procaspase 3 mitochondrial protein which involves apoptosis i.e, Bcl2 and Bax in TNBC-HS578T alls. Lee and Moon proved amygdalin increases the amount of pro-apoptotic Bax protein and caspase 3 and decreases the level of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2. Also, the study proved the activation of the P38 MAPK signaling molecule, a pro-apoptotic protein, and also the activity of caspase 3 in HS578T cells of breast cancer5. Amygdalin suppresses the growth of cancer cells and activity is dependent on concentration and duration of treatment in a study by using T47D and MCI7 human breast cancer cell lines and found that MCF-7 was 6 times/6 fold higher in untreated cell lines by estimates the glutathione levels and similarly in case of TD7D it was 2.1 times higher in untreated cell lines40. Amygdalin also inhabits several cells such as U87-MG brain glioblastoma, MDA-MB-231, MCF7 breast adenocarcinoma5, 41.
Role of Amygdalin in cervical cancer:
Cervical cancer is the world’s fourth most common cancer among women42. According to estimates cervical cancer affects between 500,00 and 300,000 women per year43. Studies also reported that Amygdalin mediated apoptosis by increasing the level of Bax and decreasing the level of Bcl2 and procaspase-3 in the concentration-dependent manner of HeLa cell lines in human cervical cancer44.
Role of Amygdalin in the reduction of tumor by inhibition of cell cycle.
The pathway involved is protein kinase B(Akt) mammalian target of rapamycin, (MTOR), also plays a significant role in castration-resistant diseases and also in prostate cancer. During castration-resistant diseases the study conducted by PC3, DU145 cell line, and castration sensitive LNCaP cell lines, amygdalin reduced cell count in a concentration-dependent manner. This study showed a reduction in the growth of above cells and stop their colony formation without any signs of toxicity and found to inhibit G2/M phase and S phase of cell cycles and increased in several phases and G0/G1 which is estimated by flow cytometry, this led to the proof to downregulate the cell cycle proteins such as cyclin-dependent kinases1 (cdk1),(cdk2),cdk4 & cyclin A, B & D3 when administered for two weeks by Amygdalin45. It reduced the mRNA levels of exonuclease-1, ATP binding cassette, subfamily F, member2 recombinant meiotic recombination 11 homology topoisomerase1 &FK506 binding protein 12-rapamycin associated protein 1 during a study of human colon cells (SNU-C4)and it led to the decrease of genes encoding the cell cycle in SNU-C4 cancer cells46. Amygdalin reduced G2, M, S phase and led to the delay in cell progression and G0/G1 phase when studied in UMUC3, RT112&TCCSUP bladder cancer cell lines when given (1-10mg/ml), it may also suppress cancer growth by down-regulation of cdk2 & cycling 47,48. The cytotoxic and antiproliferative effect was seen in oral SCC cell lines when amygdalin was administered 10-200mg/ml and also decreased the viability of KB cells by concentration dependant manner12. Amygdalin can also be used in bladder cancer treatment since it can act on bladder cancer cell lines such as UMUC-3, TCCSUP & RT112 during in-vitro studies, when administered after 24 h it arrests the G0/G1 phase in UMUC3 & TCCSUP cell lines in the RTT2cell lines it inhibits the S phase first after two weeks of treatment it alters G0/G1 as well and thus proves its effect on mitosis by altering the cell cycle 5,49. Amygdalin was also used for renal cancer since it showed a promising effect on RCC cells by inhibiting its activity by altering the cell cycle and possibly by increasing the number of cells in the G1 phase and vise versa in the S phase 47. In the RCC cell lines decrease in CDK1 & cyclin B which is the protein required for entering the mitotic phase is observed and it may also directly or indirectly influence change in CDK2 and cyclin A levels, which increase theG1 phase cells 45. RCC cell activity inhibition is also based on a protein P19 which is responsible for the inhibition process of cells from the G1 to S phase which leads to the ceasing of the proliferation process5.
Amygdalin reducing metastasis of tumor cells:
The FAK is a protein that is linked with integrin was found necessary for the movement of urothelial cancer cells. The blocking of FAK could stop the movement of cells during migration in-vitro. Tumor metastasis is associated with integrin β1 and β4 and FAK can be triggered led to an increased β-catenin level further which stimulates, the release of ILK for the initiation of downstream signaling of AktmTOR, leading to a proliferation of cells, adhesion, and metastasis. Whereas β2 leads to activation of migration-associated protein by targeting the nucleus specifically and leads to the growth of cancer50. Amygdalin downregulated the expression integrin β1, β4, βcatenin, FAK, p- FAK, ILK, and upregulated E-cadherin levels in lung cancer cells H1299/M and PA/M and lead to suppression of cell proliferation50. Amygdalin reduces cell adhesion in cell lines of the bladder such as TCCSUP, UMUC3 and RT112 which leads to a decrease in the binding affinity to immobilized collagen45. Amygdalin (1000 to 2000mg/kg i.p ) when administered in CD8F1 mice hybrid reduced tumor volume at an incidence of 33%, in an average period of 10 months the mammary tumor study also decreased the rate of lung matter metastasis from 90 to 22% 12,15.
Recent Research Updates of Amygdalin on the antitumor effect:
Bladder cancer:
Makarewicz et al studied the effect of amygdalin in ILK, FAK and α-β subtypes of integrin detected binding of cancer cells to a vascular endothelial cell or immobilized collagen migration in cell lines such as RT112 and also with UMUC-3 for a period of 24hrs to 48hrs is treated by amygdalin. This study resulted in stopping the ability of integrin on cell migration and attachment with UMUC3 and RT112 cells after the treatment of amygdalin and also the amount of prevalence was found to be decreased the levels of ILK , integrin α and β levels, and decrease in FAK levels 48,52. Makarevic J et al conducted an in vitro study by using cell lines such as TCCSUP, UMUC-3 and also RT112 when treated with various concentrations of amygdalin resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation in all of the above cells lines by blocking the G0&G1 phase in the cell cycle 47. Amygdalin can be used for specific targeting on the tumor site by a therapy called antibody directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADCPT). This treatment thus proves to show activity towards the treatment of bladder cancer with reduced side effects and also can be given as a combinational treatment with chemotherapeutics. To examine this Syringes et al combined β-glucosidase with mab (cancer-associated monoclonal and HMFGI) to determine the specificity and cytotoxicity using HT1376 cell lines. This study discovered that an increased quantity of amygdalin is required for cytotoxisc effect in HT1373 cell lines but when given with HMFG1-β glucosidase it showed 36-fold increased cytotoxic effect. The mab enzyme conjugate also found that, effect of amygdalin in the treatment of bladder cancer is by lowering the mobility of cancer cells and also arresting cell cycle by binding with HMFG-1 β-glucosidase 53,54.
Renal cancer
Juengel et al conducted a study on renal carcinoma which is the second most renal cancer in china by using RCC A498, CAKT1, and KTC26 cell lines. When administered with amygdalin for 24 and 48 hrs, results were evident that, amygdalin targets cell cycle and blocks G2 and M phase in CKKAI1 A498 cell lines and s phase in KTC cell lines. Besides there was rise in the total amount of cells found in the s phase and reduction in the multiplication rate and growth of RCC cell. Sequentially it was found that amygdalin may also reduce cell cycle activators such as cyclinβ, CDK-1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin and downgrade the chemo-tactic invasive activity of cancer cells, decreased the level of integrin α5 and α6, also showed a decreased level of binding of tumor cells to collagen. In this study, untreated cells used as control 52, 55.
Lung cancer:
It has become commonly occurring recurrent class of disease globally. Lung cancer is now the leading cause of cancers-related death in the world56. When concentrated mainly on amygdalin action on lung cancer and treated using H1299/M and PA/M in-vitro cell lines it inhibited cell multiplication, protrusion, and emigration. Further, it will suppress integrins like β1, β4, β- catenin, FAK, & ILK components that aid metastasis of cancer cells, elevate cadherin E factor which suppresses metastasis, and decrease AKT, RICTOR phosphorylation, thus by hindering AKT-mTOR activity. Thus this evidence supports that amygdalin shows antimetastatic action for NSCLC and reduces lung cancer by blocking AKT- mTOR pathway52, 57.
Other tumors:
Table 1. Other antitumor effect and mechanism of amygdalin
|
Drug name |
Type of cancer |
Mode of action |
|
|
Prostate |
Cdk1 ↑ , cdk2 ↓ ,cdk4 ↓ G0/G1phase ↑ ,G2/M ↓ Cyclin A ↓ , cyclin B ↓ s phase ↓ Cyclin D3 ↓ , p19 ↓, p27 ↓
p-AKT ↓, p-RICTOR ↓ , p-Raptor ↓ AKT/mTOR ↓
Bcl-2↓ , Bax ↑, Caspase-3↑ |
|
Amygdalin |
Cervix uteri |
Bcl2 ↓ , Bax ↑ , Caspase-3 ↑
|
|
|
Colon |
Cell cycle-related genes:EXO1 ↓ , ABCF2 ↓ , MRE11A ↓ TOPI ↓ , ATP- binding cassette ↓ , subfamily F ↓ |
|
|
Hemopoietic system |
Combined with β glucosidase Bcl-2 ↓ , Bax↑ |
Current clinical research on amygdalin:
Blood samples were collected from participants treated with Amygdalin during clinical trials and estimated high cyanide content that is 2.1 mg/ml and it showed few clinical side effects when given orally at the dose of (0.5gm). Few of the patients developed symptoms of cyanide poisoning when administered Amygdalin at an increased dose of 1gm orally. The concentration of cyanide in blood was increased to 3.5mg/ml. This study suggested that amygdalin would be administered only in the advanced stages of cancer 52,58. The digestion parameter was studied for amygdalin from an in-vitro model for the evaluation of GIT for humans and lead to the in-depth knowledge that, it gets degraded by the presence of two main digestive enzyme products such as prunasin & glucose. Then, in the small intestine mandelonitrile was formed by conversion of prunasin which finally gets converted as hydroxyl mandelonitrile and this showed that amygdalin was nontoxic to human and cyanide formation was due to the type of microorganism in the intestine. However further research is needed in this field 52, 59.
CONCLUSION:
Typically, Amygdalin has employed for the treatment of asthma, nausea, bronchitis, leprosy, etc. Along with in-vitro studies various other studies have suggested that amygdalin shows promising effect towards antitumor and anti-cancer activity, besides it also functions as antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppression, and analgesic medication by inducing apoptosis, inhibiting tumor cell growth, reducing tumor cell metastasis. Furthermore, number of observational studies reported that the compound shows a wide range of effects on breast cancer, lung cancer, renal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer also. Hence Amygdalin could be a potential therapeutic agent for numerous cancer classes.
REFERENCES:
1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21601
2. Soni A, Femida P, Sharma P. In-vitro cytotoxic activity of plant saponin extracts on breast cancer cell-line. Rese Jour of Pharmac and Phytoch. 2017;9(1): 17.doi:10.5958/0975-4385.2017.00003.6.
3. Praveena CH, Pramod K, Ajithkumar KC. Dendritic cell vaccine for cancer therapy. Rese Jour Pharmacol and Pharmacod. 2016;8(3): 141.doi:10.5958/2329-5836.2016.00026.4.
4. Prabha SB, Rao M, Kumar MRR. Evaluation of in vitro Antioxidant, Antibacterial and Anticancer activities of leaf extracts of Cleome rutidosperma. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2017;10(8): 2492.doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00440.1
5. Liczbiński P, Bukowska B. Molecular mechanism of amygdalin action in vitro: review of the latest research. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2018 Jun;40(3):212–8. doi:10.1080/08923973.2018.1441301.
6. Savic IM, Nikolic VD, Savic-Gajic IM, Nikolic LB, Ibric SR, Gajic DG. Optimization of technological procedure for amygdalin isolation from plum seeds (Pruni domesticae semen). Front Plant Sci [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Jan 29];6. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2015.00276/full. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00276.
7. Jaszczak-Wilke E, Polkowska Ż, Koprowski M, Owsianik K, Mitchell AE, Bałczewski P. Amygdalin: Toxicity, Anticancer Activity and Analytical Procedures for Its Determination in Plant Seeds. Molecules. 2021 Jan;26(8):2253. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00276.
8. Song Z, Xu X. Advanced research on anti-tumor effects of amygdalin. Journal of cancer research and therapeutics. 2014 Aug 1;10:C3–7. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.139743.
9. Suchard JR, Wallace KL, Gerkin RD. Acute cyanide toxicity caused by apricot kernel ingestion. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Dec;32(6):742–4. doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70077-0.
10. Chang H-K, Shin M-S, Yang H-Y, Lee J-W, Kim Y-S, Lee M-H, et al. Amygdalin induces apoptosis through regulation of Bax and Bcl-2 expressions in human DU145 and LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2006 Aug;29(8):1597–602. doi:10.1248/bpb.29.1597.
11. Ioannis P, Anastasis S, Andreas Y. Tripterygium Wilfordii Extract (Triptolide) and Amygdalin Promotes Cell death in Cancer Cells: True or a Myth. AJCP. 2015 Sep 5;3(4):77–83. doi:10.12691.
12. He X-Y, Wu L-J, Wang W-X, Xie P-J, Chen Y-H, Wang F. Amygdalin - A pharmacological and toxicological review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020 May 23; 254:112717. do: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112717.
13. Chandrasekar R, Sivagami B, Babu MN. A Pharmacoeconomic Focus on Medicinal Plants with Anticancer Activity. Rese Jour of Pharmac and Phytoch. 2018;10(1):91. doi:10.5958/0975-4385.2018.00015.8.
14. Park H-J, Yoon S-H, Han L-S, Zheng L-T, Jung K-H, Uhm Y-K, et al. Amygdalin inhibits genes related to cell cycle in SNU-C4 human colon cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep 7;11(33):5156–61. doi: 10.3748/wjg. v11.i33.5156.
15. Perez JJ. Amygdalin analogs for the treatment of psoriasis. Future Med Chem. 2013 May;5(7):799–808. doi:10.4155/fmc.13.27
16. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. J Pathol. 2008 Jan;214(2):199–210. doi:10.1002/path.2277.
17. Boor P, Ostendorf T, Floege J. Renal fibrosis: novel insights into mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010 Nov;6(11):643–56. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2010.120.
18. Guo J, Wu W, Sheng M, Yang S, Tan J. Amygdalin inhibits renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease. Mol Med Rep. 2013 May;7(5):1453–7. doi:10.3892/mmr.2013.1391.
19. Chen L, Li L, Chen J, Li L, Zheng Z, Ren J, et al. Oleoylethanolamide, an endogenous PPAR-α ligand, attenuates liver fibrosis targeting hepatic stellate cells. Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 15;6(40):42530–40. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6466.
20. Wang R, Zhang D, Tang D, Sun K, Peng J, Zhu W, et al. Amygdalin inhibits TGFβ1-induced activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in vitro and CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats in vivo. International Immunopharmacology. 2021 Jan 1; 90:107151. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107151.
21. Kisseleva T, Brenner DA. Anti-fibrogenic Strategies and the regression of fibrosis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;25(2):305–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2011.02.011.
22. Yahfoufi N, Alsadi N, Jambi M, Matar C. The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory role of polyphenols. Nutrients. 2018 Nov;10(11):1618. doi:10.3390/nu10111618
23. Boshtam M, Asgary S, Kouhpayeh S, Shariati L, Khanahmad H. Aptamers Against Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines: A Review. Inflammation. 2017 Feb;40(1):340–9. doi:10.1007/s10753-016-0477-1.
24. Zhang A, Pan W, Lv J, Wu H. Protective Effect of Amygdalin on LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Inhibiting NF-κB and NLRP3 Signaling Pathways. Inflammation. 2017 Jun;40(3):745–51.doi:10.1007/s10753-017-0518-4.
25. Adewusi SRA, Oke OL. On the metabolism of amygdalin. 1. The LD50 and biochemical changes in rats. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology [Internet]. 2011 Feb 13 [cited 2021 Feb 11]; Available from: https://cdnsciencepub.com. doi:10.1139/y85-177.
26. Rauws AG, Olling M, Timmerman A. The pharmacokinetics of prunasin, a metabolite of amygdalin. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1982 Oct;19(8):851–6. doi:10.3109/15563658208992518.
27. Carter JH, McLafferty MA, Goldman P. Role of the gastrointestinal microflora in amygdalin (laetrile)-induced cyanide toxicity. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1980 Feb 1;29(3):301–4. doi:10.1016/0006-2952(80)90504-3.
28. Blaheta RA, Nelson K, Haferkamp A, Juengel E. Amygdalin, quackery or cure?. Phytomedicine. 2016 Apr 15;23(4):367-76. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2016.02.004
29. Rauws AG, Olling M, Timmerman A. The pharmacokinetics of amygdalin. Archives of toxicology. 1982 Mar 1;49(3-4):311-9.doi: 10.1007/bf00347879.
30. Gottlieb AB. Psoriasis: emerging therapeutic strategies. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2005 Jan;4(1):19-34.doi:10.1038/nrd1607.
31. Milazzo S, Horneber M. Laetrile treatment for cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 28;(4). doi :10.1002/14651858.
32. Wyllie AH, Kerr JR, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. International review of cytology. 1980 Jan 1; 68:251-306. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62312-8
33. Fisher DE. Apoptosis in cancer therapy: crossing the threshold. Cell. 1994 Aug 26;78(4):539–42.doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90518-5
34. Kulchenko NG, Kostin AA, Chibisov SM, Eremina IZ, Tolkachev AO, Syatkin SP, et al. Modern Principles of Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2017;10(3):696. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00130.5
35. Dange VN, Shid SJ, Magdum CS, Mohite SK. A Review on Breast cancer: An Overview. Asian Jour Pharmac Rese. 2017;7(1): 49-51.doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2017.00008.9.
36. Lee HM, Moon A. Amygdalin Regulates Apoptosis and Adhesion in Hs578T Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2016 Jan;24(1):62–6. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2015.172
37. Fernald K, Kurokawa M. Evading apoptosis in cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 2013 Dec;23(12):620–33.doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.07.006
38. Lazebnik YA, Kaufmann SH, Desnoyers S, Poirier GG, Earnshaw WC. Cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase by a proteinase with properties like ICE. Nature. 1994 Sep;371(6495):346-7.doi:10.1038/371346a0
39. Xia Z, Dickens M, Raingeaud J, Davis RJ, Greenberg ME. Opposing effects of ERK and JNK-p38 MAP kinases on apoptosis. Science. 1995 Nov 24;270(5240): 1326-31.doi: 10.1126/science.270.5240.1326
40. Salama R, Ramadan A, Alsanory T, Herdan M, Fathallah O, Alsanory A. Experimental and therapeutic trials of amygdalin. Int J Biochem Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 28;1(1):21-6. doi: 10.18689/ijbp-1000105
41. Moon J-Y, Kim S-W, Yun G-M, Lee H-S, Kim Y-D, Jeong G-J, et al. Inhibition of cell growth and down-regulation of telomerase activity by amygdalin in human cancer cell lines. Animal Cells and Systems. 2015 Sep 3;19(5):295–304. doi:10.1080/19768354.2015.1060261
42. Vu M, Yu J, Awolude OA, Chuang L. Cervical cancer worldwide. Current problems in cancer. 2018 Sep 1;42(5):457-65. doi:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.06.003
43. Vijay A, Sona VP, Radha A, Moorthi PV. A Review on Advancement Perspectives in Cervical Cancer. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017 Dec 30;10(12):4410–4. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00813.7
44. Chen Y, Ma J, Wang F, Hu J, Cui A, Wei C, Yang Q, Li F. Amygdalin induces apoptosis in human cervical cancer cell line HeLa cells. Immunopharmacology and immunotoxicology. 2013 Feb 1;35(1): 43-51.doi:10.3109/08923973.2012.738688
45. Makarević J, Tsaur I, Juengel E, Borgmann H, Nelson K, Thomas C, et al. Amygdalin delays cell cycle progression and blocks growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro. Life Sci. 2016 Feb 15; 147:137–42.doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.01.039
46. Park J-H, Seo B-I, Cho S-Y, Park K-R, Choi S-H, Han C-K, et al. Single Oral Dose Toxicity Study of Prebrewed Armeniacae Semen in Rats. Toxicol Res. 2013 Jun;29(2):91–8.doi:10.5487/TR.2013.29.2.091
47. Makarević J, Rutz J, Juengel E, Kaulfuss S, Reiter M, Tsaur I, Bartsch G, Haferkamp A, Blaheta RA. Amygdalin blocks bladder cancer cell growth in vitro by diminishing cyclin A and cdk2. PloS one. 2014 Aug 19;9(8): e105590.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105590
48. Makarević J, Rutz J, Juengel E, Kaulfuss S, Tsaur I, Nelson K, Pfitzenmaier J, Haferkamp A, Blaheta RA. Amygdalin influences bladder cancer cell adhesion and invasion in vitro. PloS one. 2014 Oct 15;9(10): e110244.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110244
49. Gogolin S, Ehemann V, Becker G, Brueckner LM, Dreidax D, Bannert S, Nolte I, Savelyeva L, Bell E, Westermann F. CDK4 inhibition restores G₁-S arrest in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cells in the context of doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. Cell cycle. 2013 Apr 1;12(7): 1091-104.doi:10.4161/cc.24091
50. Haque I, Subramanian A, Huang CH, Godwin AK, Van Veldhuizen PJ, Banerjee S, Banerjee SK. The role of compounds derived from natural supplement as anticancer agents in renal cell carcinoma: a review. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018 Jan;19(1):107.doi:10.3390/ijms19010107.
51. Stock CC, Martin DS, Sugiura K, Fugmann RA, Mountain IM, Stockert E, et al. Antitumor tests of amygdalin in spontaneous animal tumor systems. J Surg Oncol. 1978;10(2):89–123.doi:10.1002/jso.2930100203
52. Shi J, Chen Q, Xu M, Xia Q, Zheng T, Teng J, et al. Recent updates and future perspectives about amygdalin as a potential anticancer agent: A review. Cancer Med. 2019 Jun;8(6):3004–11.doi:10.1002/cam4.2197
53. Li Y-L, Li Q-X, Liu R-J, Shen X-Q. Chinese Medicine Amygdalin and β-Glucosidase Combined with Antibody Enzymatic Prodrug System As A Feasible Antitumor Therapy. Chin J Integr Med. 2018 Mar;24(3):237–40.doi:10.1007/s11655-015-2154-x
54. Syrigos KN, Rowlinson-Busza G, Epenetos AA. In vitro cytotoxicity following specific activation of amygdalin by beta-glucosidase conjugated to a bladder cancer-associated monoclonal antibody. Int J Cancer. 1998 Dec 9;78(6):712–9. doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981209)78:6<712: AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-D
55. Wang Y, Dong D, Jiang S, Zhang E, Zheng W, Mao L, et al. miR-216b Post-Transcriptionally Downregulates Oncogene KRAS and Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Invasion in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. CPB. 2018;49(5):1755–65.doi:10.1159/000493621
56. Bai J, Duan J, Liu R, Du Y, Luo Q, Cui Y, et al. Engineered targeting tLyp-1 exosomes as gene therapy vectors for efficient delivery of siRNA into lung cancer cells. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Jul 1;15(4):461–71.doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2019.04.002
57. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AA. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. InMayo clinic proceedings 2008 May 1 (Vol. 83, No. 5, pp. 584-594). doi:10.4065/83.5.584
58. Moertel CG, Ames MM, Kovach JS, Moyer TP, Rubin JR, Tinker JH. A pharmacologic and toxicological study of amygdalin. JAMA. 1981 Feb 13;245(6):591–4. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03310310033018
59. Shim S-M, Kwon H. Metabolites of amygdalin under simulated human digestive fluids. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2010 Dec;61(8):770–9.doi:10.3109/09637481003796314.
Received on 02.03.2021 Modified on 12.08.2021
Accepted on 07.01.2022 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2022; 15(11):5373-5380.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00906