Green synthesis of Zirconia nanoparticles based on ginger root extract: Optimization of reaction conditions, application in dentistry
Thyagarajan R.*, Narendrakumar G., Rameshkumar V., Varshiney M.
Department of Biotechnology, School of Bio and Chemical Engineering,
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai – 600119.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: thyagarajen@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Zirconia nano particles were synthesized from Zirconium oxychloride octahydrate using the extract of Zingiber officinale by Green synthesis. The synthesis was confirmed by the color change from pale yellow to pink. The synthesized nano particles were characterized by UV-visible spectrophotometer, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-ray Diffraction (XRD). The nanoparticles were found to be tetragonal with the XRD results. As an application in Dentistry, the activity of the zirconia nanoparticles were checked using well diffusion method with an oral bacterium, Streptococci mutans, and found the nano particles were inhibiting the growth of the bacterium.
KEYWORDS: Zirconia, Response surface methodology, characterization, Dental specimens, nanoparticles.
1. INTRODUCTION
The production of nanometer-sized metals has been the emphasis of much attention in industry and academia due to their significant properties (physical, chemical and biological)1-4. Recently, the production of nanoparticles using plant materials has boosted the significance because of simple, cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and dependable approaches5-9. The recent approach to improve the properties of acrylic resins is the addition of zirconium oxide (zirconia, ZrO2) as filler. Studies have shown that zirconia is biocompatible and additional advantage of zirconia as filler over other metal fillers is superior esthetics10. Zirconia is an oxide extensively used in structural (complex polymorphism with cubic, tetragonal, orthorhombic and monoclinic) and functional roles such as heat stabilizers 11,12 catalyst 13-16 dental prosthetics 17-21 and Photocatalytic water decontamination 22. This refractory material exhibits relatively high toughness and oxidation resistance, making it suitable in applications ranging from cutting tools, bone prostheses to thermal barrier coatings.
Its high ionic conductivity has led to its widespread use as an oxygen sensor in automobile emissions systems and as an electrolyte in solid-oxide fuel-cells 23-26. The chemical constituents of plant extracts act as reducing agents as well as stabilizing agent for the nano-particle synthesis27-29. Biomolecules from plant extracts reduces metal ions to nanoparticles in a single step30-32. The process is quick, easy and can readily be scaled up. The process also has an added advantage of being eco-friendly and to explore importance of medicinal plants33-36.
In the present study, Zirconium nanoparticles (ZrNp) were firstly synthesized using extracts of Zingiber officinale roots, which is plentifully available in Tamilnadu, India. Characterizations such as FT-IR, SEM and XRD were exercised to analysis the prepared material in terms of dimensions, morphology, arrangement and structure. Furthermore, based on the Spectrophotometric and FT-IR analysis, a possible production method was proposed. Finally, they were used to evaluate their activity against dental pathogens.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
2.1 Materials:
The root of Zingiber officinale was collected from the markets of Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. Botanist in Sathyabama Institute of Science and technology confirmed their biological properties. The analytical grade zirconyl chloride octahydrate (ZrOCl2·8H2O) used was purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
2.2 Zingiber officinale extract preparation:
The ginger root was washed many times with tap water followed by distilled water. After drying using homogenizer the extract was separated from the biomass.
2.3 Response surface methodology:
The synthesis conditions were determined from a Central composite design with three central points37-40. The factors and levels varied are shown in Table 1.
The general polynomial equation was used
Equation Y= β0 + β1 X1 + β2X2 + β3X3 + β11X21 + β22X22 + β33X23 + β12X1X2 + β13X1X3 + β23X2X3 (1)
where Y is predicted response; X1, X2, X3 are independent variables; β0 is an offset term; β1, β2, β3 are coefficients of linear effects; β11, β22, β33 are coefficients of squared effects; β12, β13, β23 are coefficients of interaction terms
Table-1 Factors and levels of the design applied to the synthesis of zirconia nanoparticles using Zingiber officinale root extracts.
2.4 Green synthesis of zirconia nanoparticles:
According to the Table-2 design of experiment (DoE) from design Expert version 7.0.0 different combination of 0.3M of Zirconium oxychloride [ZrOCl2.8H2O] solution (in distilled water) and ginger extract was added with different time interval. The color changed from pale yellow to mild pink indication the reduction reaction and the FT-IR results confirmed the presence of Zirconia.
2.5 Zirconia Characterization:
Characterization of the zirconium nanoparticles were done with UV-vis spectrophotometry (Cary Varian 300), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscope, X-ray Diffraction.
2.6 Dental sample analysis:
Streptococci mutans strain was purchased from MTCC and sub culture of the organism according to the prescribed instructions.
i) A lawn of the organism is made and well was cut and the sample was loaded and checked for activity using well diffusion method.
ii) Zone of inhibition was found and noted.
Table-1 Factors and levels of the design applied to the synthesis of zirconia nanoparticles using Zingiber officinale root extracts
|
Factor |
Name |
Actual |
Coded |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
||
|
Low |
High |
Low |
High |
||||
|
A |
Concentra-tion |
0.1 |
0.5 |
-1 |
1 |
0.3 |
0.165269 |
|
B |
Ginger Extract |
25 |
100 |
-1 |
1 |
62.5 |
30.98786 |
|
C |
Time |
5 |
15 |
-1 |
1 |
10 |
4.131715 |
3. RESULTS:
From the ginger root, the extract was separated and used for the synthesis of zirconia. Using the design of experiment provided. On the basis of DoE, the combination was done and the results were analyzed using UV- Vis spectrophotometry (Figure -1) and further confirmed using FT-IR.
Figure -1 UV-VIS spectrometric results for Zirconia nanoparticles
Table 2 Design of Experiments with response (Actual and Predicted)
|
Std |
Run |
Factor 1 A:Concentration |
Factor 2 B:Extract |
Factor 3 C:Time |
Response |
|
|
Actual |
Predicted |
|||||
|
1 |
15 |
0.1 |
25 |
5 |
6.3 |
6.0 |
|
2 |
2 |
0.5 |
25 |
5 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
|
3 |
16 |
0.1 |
100 |
5 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
|
4 |
13 |
0.5 |
100 |
5 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
|
5 |
7 |
0.1 |
25 |
15 |
5.4 |
5.3 |
|
6 |
3 |
0.5 |
25 |
15 |
6.1 |
5.9 |
|
7 |
19 |
0.1 |
100 |
15 |
6.2 |
6.1 |
|
8 |
20 |
0.5 |
100 |
15 |
5.6 |
5.7 |
|
9 |
1 |
-0.04 |
62.5 |
10 |
5.8 |
5.9 |
|
10 |
8 |
0.64 |
62.5 |
10 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
|
11 |
17 |
0.3 |
-0.57 |
10 |
6.3 |
6.5 |
|
12 |
4 |
0.3 |
125.57 |
10 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
|
13 |
18 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
1.59 |
5.9 |
6.0 |
|
14 |
12 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
18.41 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
|
15 |
6 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
10 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
|
16 |
5 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
10 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
|
17 |
11 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
10 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
|
18 |
10 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
10 |
7.8 |
7.6 |
|
19 |
9 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
10 |
7.8 |
7.6 |
|
20 |
14 |
0.3 |
62.5 |
10 |
7.4 |
7.6 |
Figure 2. Contour plot showing different interaction between the factors
Optimization of process parameters on zirconia production using RSM:
The production of zirconia was optimized various parameter such as Factor 1 A: Concentration, Factor 2 B:Extract, Factor 3 C:Time using response surface methodology (RSM) using Central composite design (CCD). The model used was quadratic and 20 runs trial was performed. The productivity was calculated for the design of experiment that was given by Design expert software (Table 2). The response was estimated by FT-IR was displayed as contour plot and surface plot.
R1= 7.629 + 0.0785A -0.112 B -0.1518 C-0.25AB -0.025AC+0.225+BC-0.549A2-0.4784 B2 - 0.655 C2 (1)
The effect of concentration of the substrate (A) with respect to Extract concentration (B) express that as the production of zirconia significantly (Figure 4a), the extract concentration plays an significant role in the zirconia production with respect to concentration of substrate (Figure 4b),
The R2 value was 98.99% compared to Adjusted R2 of 97.83% with respect to the predicted R2 of 95.88% confirms the fitness of the test (Table 3).
Figure 3. FTIR of the ginger extract which was lyophilized over night. X-axis is the wavenumber and Y-axis is the % transmittance. Bands observed at 3313.71 cm-1 and 1670 cm-1 are assigned to the bending and stretching vibrations of the O-H bond due to absorbed water molecules. The band at 1336.67 cm-1 is attributed to the absorption of non-bridging OH groups. The sharp band at 750.31 cm-1 is the characteristic band/ peak of ZrO2. 25,32
Table 3. ANOVA Table
|
Source |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F Value |
p-value Prob > F |
|
|
Model |
13.08262 |
9 |
1.453625 |
50.23287 |
< 0.0001 |
Significant |
|
A-Concentration |
0.08426 |
1 |
0.08426 |
2.911759 |
0.1187 |
|
|
B-Extract |
0.172836 |
1 |
0.172836 |
5.972693 |
0.0346 |
|
|
C-Time |
0.314579 |
1 |
0.314579 |
10.87089 |
0.0081 |
|
|
AB |
0.5 |
1 |
0.5 |
17.27849 |
0.0020 |
|
|
AC |
0.005 |
1 |
0.005 |
0.172785 |
0.6864 |
|
|
BC |
0.405 |
1 |
0.405 |
13.99557 |
0.0038 |
|
|
A2 |
4.345189 |
1 |
4.345189 |
150.1566 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
B2 |
3.29814 |
1 |
3.29814 |
113.9737 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
C2 |
6.185973 |
1 |
6.185973 |
213.7685 |
< 0.0001 |
|
|
Residual |
0.289377 |
10 |
0.028938 |
|||
|
Lack of Fit |
0.156044 |
5 |
0.031209 |
1.170329 |
0.4336 |
not significant |
|
Pure Error |
0.133333 |
5 |
0.026667 |
|||
|
Cor Total |
13.372 |
19 |
||||
|
Std. Dev. |
0.170111 |
R2 |
0.978359 |
|||
|
Mean |
6.48 |
Adj R2 |
0.958883 |
|||
|
C.V. % |
2.625168 |
Pred R2 |
0.891925 |
|||
|
PRESS |
1.445183 |
Adeq Precision |
18.70934 |
|||
Figure 3. FT IR results
Figure 4 . Under 20000 X of magnification the size of the nano particles were measured
Figure 5. XRD results
The ultrafine particles (nano particles) were found to be in cubic phase ranging from 140nm to 585nm in size27. Heinz et al., 201736 stated that the nanoparticles synthesized was 200nm range in size with spherical and irregular morphology because other phenomena like transparency, turbidity, stable dispersion etc., extends the upper limit are occasionally considered, the use of the prefix nano is accepted for dimensions smaller than 500nm, provided reference to the definition is indicated.)
Figure 5. (101) is the peak for zirconium nano particles obtained at 45º which this the particle size can be calculated Using Scherrer equation D=0.9λβcosθ (1) where θ is the angle, D is the size if the particle, β is the wave breadth, λ is the wavelength18, 24. The peaks are overlapping because the sample is a tetragonal doublet.
Figure 6: Activity of Zirconia nanoparticles against S. mutans (oral bacteria)
Figure 6 shows The zone of clearance appeared 24 hours after performing well diffusion method. The diameter of the well is 0.7cm and the diameter of the zone of clearance is 22mm. Area of the zone 10.318cm²
4. CONCLUSION:
The method proposed for the synthesis of zirconia nanoparticles using Zingiber officinale root extract was effective, and materials with monoclinic phases were obtained that was confirmed using XRD. The Central composite design showed significant composition of concentration of zirconium oxide, quantity of ginger root extract and time duration required for the formation of nanoparticle. The results were confirmed using FT-IR. The nanoparticles presented a crystallite size ranging from 295 to 583 nm using Scanning electron microscopy. After confirming the presence of the nano particles, it was subjected to Streptococci mutans to check the activity. The nano particles have acted on the S.mutans and they have lysed or inhibited the organism. This was performed with well diffusion method. Hence, zirconia nano particles can be used in dentistry to make temporary hollis.
5. REFERENCES:
1. Kontonasaki E, Giasimakopoulos P, Rigos AE. Strength and aging resistance of monolithic zirconia : an update to current knowledge, Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2020;56: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.09.002.
2. Deng W, Shi L, Yao J, Zhang Z, A review on transesterification of propylene carbonate and methanol for dimethyl carbonate synthesis, Carbon Resour. Convers. 2019; 2: 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2019.10.004.
3. Nagarajan B, Hu Z, Song X, Zhai X, Wei J. Development of Micro Selective Laser Melting: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives, Engineering. 2019; 5: 702–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.002.
4. Hattal A, Chauveau T, Djemai M, Fouchet JJ, Bacroix B, Dirras G. Effect of nano-yttria stabilized zirconia addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V parts manufactured by selective laser melting, Mater. Des. 2019; 180: 107909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107909.
5. Peron M, Torgersen J, Berto F. Effect of Zirconia ALD coating on stress corrosion cracking of AZ31 alloy in simulated body fluid, Procedia Struct. Integr. 2019; 18: 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.198.
6. Sharma G, Kumar A, Sharma S, Naushad M, Prakash Dwivedi R, ALOthman ZA, Mola GT. Novel development of nanoparticles to bimetallic nanoparticles and their composites: A review, J. King Saud Univ. - Sci. 2019;31: 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.06.012.
7. Rahmawati F, Zuhrini N, Nugrahaningtyas KD, Arifah SK, Yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) film produced from an aqueous nano-YSZ slurry: preparation and characterization, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019; 8: 4425–4434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.07.054.
8. Zhu Y, Li Z, Chen J. Applications of lignin-derived catalysts for green synthesis, Green Energy Environ. 2019;4: 210–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2019.01.003.
9. Yagawa S, Komine F, Fushiki R, Kubochi K, Kimura F, Matsumura H, Effect of priming agents on shear bond strengths of resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material, J. Prosthodont. Res. 2018; 62: 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.011.
10. Aboushahba M, Katamish H, Elagroudy M. Evaluation of hardness and wear of surface treated zirconia on enamel wear. An in-vitro study, Futur. Dent. J. 2018; 4: 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2017.10.001.
11. Hansen TL, Schriwer C, Øilo M, Gjengedal H. Monolithic zirconia crowns in the aesthetic zone in heavy grinders with severe tooth wear – An observational case-series, J. Dent. 2018; 72: 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.013.
12. Hanafy MH, Myconanotechnology in veterinary sector: Status quo and future perspectives, Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2018; 6: 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.11.003.
13. Tischler M, Patch C, Bidra AS, Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study, J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018; 120: 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.010.
14. Li M, Huang Z, Dong T, Tang C, Lyu B, Yuan J. Surface quality of Zirconia (ZrO2) parts in shear-thickening high-efficiency polishing, Procedia CIRP. 2018; 77: 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.256.
15. Bidra AS, Tischler M, Patch C. Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study, J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018;119: 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.004.
16. Kuntz M, Krüger R, The effect of microstructure and chromia content on the properties of zirconia toughened alumina, Ceram. Int. 2018; 66: 2011–2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.146.
17. Tao L, Yan TH, Li W, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Liu YM, Wright MM, Li ZH, He HY, CaoY. Toward an Integrated Conversion of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and Ethylene for the Production of Renewable p-Xylene, Chem. 2018; 4: 2212–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.07.007.
18. Nayantara, P. Kaur, Biosynthesis of nanoparticles using eco-friendly factories and their role in plant pathogenicity: a review, Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2018; 2: 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2018.09.003.
19. Rosa M, Barou C, EspositoV. Zirconia UV-curable colloids for additive manufacturing via hybrid inkjet printing-stereolithography, Mater. Lett. 2018;205: 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.096.
20. Alami AH, Assad MA, Aokal K, Rajab B, Alawadhi H. Application of Icosahedral Phase Compound for Mesoporous Layer Material in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells, Procedia Eng. 2017; 204: 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.126.
21. Yin L, Nakanishi Y, Alao AR, Song XY, Abduo J, Zhang Y. A Review of Engineered Zirconia Surfaces in Biomedical Applications, Procedia CIRP. 2017; 65: 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.057.
22. Bhaskaruni SVHS, Maddila S, Gangu KK, Jonnalagadda SB, A review on multi-component green synthesis of N-containing heterocycles using mixed oxides as heterogeneous catalysts, Arab. J. Chem. 2017: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.09.016.
23. Kho ET, Tan TH, Lovell E, Wong RJ, Scott J, Amal R. A review on photo-thermal catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide, Green Energy Environ. 2017; 2: 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2017.06.003.
24. Alper E, Yuksel Orhan O, CO2 utilization: Developments in conversion processes, Petroleum. 2017; 3: 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.003.
25. Ríos Szalay E, Garcilazo Gómez A, J. Guerrero Ibarra, I. Meade Romero, K. Miguelena Muro, Comparative study of displacement resistance of four zirconia cements, Rev. Odontológica Mex. 21 (2017) e227–e232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2018.01.012.
26. Milewski J, Wejrzanowski T, Szabłowski, R. Baron, A. Szczȩśniak, K. Ćwieka, Development of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells at Warsaw University of Technology, Energy Procedia. 142 (2017) 1496–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.598.
27. Sapountzi FM., Gracia JM, Kee CJ. Weststrate, H.O.A. Fredriksson, J.W. (Hans. Niemantsverdriet, Electrocatalysts for the generation of hydrogen, oxygen and synthesis gas, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2017; 56: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2016.09.001.
28. Chau NDQ, Reina G, Raya J, Vacchi IA, Ménard-Moyon C, Nishina Y, Bianco A. Elucidation of siRNA complexation efficiency by graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, Carbon N. Y. 2017; 122: 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.016.
29. Ríos Szalay E, Garcilazo Gómez A, Guerrero Ibarra J, Meade Romero I, Miguelena Muro K, Estudio comparativo de la resistencia al desplazamiento de cuatro cementos en zirconia, Rev. Odontológica Mex. 2017; 21: 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rodmex.2018.01.003.
30. Kamada K, Taira Y, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Evaluation of five primers and two opaque resins for bonding ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite, J. Dent. Sci. 2017; 12: 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.05.004.
31. Keraani A, Rabiller-Baudry M, Fischmeister C, Delaunay D, Baudry A, Bruneau C, Renouard T. First elaboration of an olefin metathesis catalytic membrane by grafting a Hoveyda–Grubbs precatalyst on zirconia membranes, Comptes Rendus Chim. 2017;20: 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2017.04.003.
32. Denkena B, Breidenstein B, Busemann S, Lehr CM, Impact of Hard Machining on Zirconia Based Ceramics for Dental Applications, Procedia CIRP. 2017; 65: 248–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.055.
33. AlSabban B, Falivene L, Kozlov SM, Aguilar-Tapia A, Ould-Chikh S, Hazemann JL, Cavallo L, Basset JM, Takanabe K, In-operando elucidation of bimetallic CoNi nanoparticles during high-temperature CH4/CO2 reaction, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017; 203: 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.076.
34. Tran PH, Nguyen TDT, Tu TAT, Le TN, Magnetically recoverable γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles as a highly active catalyst for Friedel-Crafts benzoylation reaction under ultrasound irradiation, Arab. J. Chem. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.04.008.
35. Gamal R, Gomaa YF, Abdellatif MA, Microtensile bond strength and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of zirconia bonded to dentin using two self-adhesive resin cements; effect of airborne abrasion and aging, Futur. Dent. J. 2017; 3: 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fdj.2017.07.002.
36. Heinz H, Pramanik C, Heinz O, Ding Y, Mishra RK, Marchon D, Flatt RJ, Estrela-Lopis I, Llop J, Moya S, Ziolo RF. Nanoparticle decoration with surfactants: Molecular interactions, assembly, and applications, Surf. Sci. Rep. 2017; 72: 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2017.02.001.
37. Preethi TV, Kathireshan AK, NarendrakumarG. Statistical optimization of cultural parameters influencing laccase production by Pleurotus ostreatus PKN 04 using response surface methodology, J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2016; 6: 576–584.
38. Vidhyalakshmi R, Valli Nachiyar C, Narendra Kumar G, Swetha S. Bacillus circulans exopolysaccharide: Production, characterization and bioactivities, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;87: 405–414.
39. Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam SKR, Narendrakumar G. Evaluation of phytase production by Hypocrea lixii SURT01 in submerged and solid-state fermentations, Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2014; 6: 4–7.
40. Arunkumar T, Narendrakumar G, Anand DA. Statistical Evaluation of Medium Components by Plackett-Burman method for Laccase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa ADN04 using Submerged Fermentation, Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2017;10: 1115-1118. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2017.00201.3.
Received on 30.10.2020 Modified on 24.05.2021
Accepted on 21.10.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2022; 15(11):5314-5320.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00895