A new functional food ingredient enriched by Phytoecdisteroids and Polyphenols from quinoa grains (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

 

Zorin S.N., Sidorova Yu. S., Petrov N.A., Perova I.B., Malinkin A.D., Bokov D.O.*, Bessonov V.V., Mazo V.K.

Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, 2/14,

Ustyinsky PR., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: fmmsu@mail.ru

 

ABSTRACT:

Objective: Quinoa grains (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) contain a large number of secondary metabolites. Phytoecdysteroids and polyphenols, secondary metabolites, are of great interest for research today. The aim of the study is a method development for the extraction of biologically active substances (BAS) from quinoa grains to obtain a functional food ingredient (FFI) enriched with phytoecdysteroids and polyphenols. Materials and methods: The content of phytoecdysteroids at each stage of quinoa extract production was determined by two methods: HPLC with a spectrophotometric detector and HPLC with a mass spectrometer. The content of total polyphenols was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method. The flavonoid profile was determined using a liquid chromatography system with a diode array spectrophotometric detector and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detector. Results: The chosen technological scheme for the production of FFI can concentrate more than 200 times the major phytoecdysteroid 20-hydroxyecdysone major in quinoa in the final product relative to the raw material. The maximum yield of flavonoids in the final product was observed in cases of 20 and 40% ethanol extraction. Conclusion: These results lead to the conclusion that highly enriched sources of BAS can be obtained using fairly simple technological approaches and commercially available reagents from quinoa grains.

 

KEYWORDS: Phytoecdysteroids, Polyphenols, Water-alcohol extraction, Ultrafiltration, HPLC-MS analysis.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is a dicotyledonous plant of the Chenopodiaceae family. Quinoa is one of the oldest crops in the Andean region of South America, grown for about 7000 years.1 Quinoa is not grains like typical grains (monotone plants). It's more like a fruit. It is also often called a pseudo-seed plant because of its unusual composition. Quinoa grains and sprouts are used as food. The use of quinoa in the world is rapidly expanding. Whereas previously it could only be purchased at organic or health food stores, now it can be found in almost every grocery store.

 

Quinoa grains have a high protein content (15 percent on average) of high biological value. This means that they have a well-balanced amino acid composition (close in amino acid ratio to cow's milk casein). The content of sulfur-containing amino acids (cysteine and methionine) in quinoa grains is significantly higher in comparison with the concentration of these amino acids in other cereal plants.2,3 This phenomenon is probably related to the fact that this crop originally grew and cultivated in areas with volcanic soil.4 The solubility of quinoa proteins can be enhanced by enzymatic hydrolysis. This determines its prospects for use as an ingredient in beverage mixtures5. Quinoa grains are highly nutritious food product; possess wide range of biological properties and was chosen by FAO as one of the crops that able to provide food security in the future.6-8

 

The main carbohydrate of quinoa grains is starch. It is about 58.1-64.2% dry matter of grain. Quinoa grains are rich in vitamins, trace elements, mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids.9-10 The microelement composition of quinoa grains is mainly calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, and zinc. Iron compounds in quinoa have high solubility and digestibility.11 The vitamins are α-carotene and niacin. In addition, thiamine, folic acid (78.1mg per 100g), vitamin C (16.4 mg per 100g), vitamins B2, A, and E. are contained in significant quantities in quinoa. The fat content of quinoa is 14.5% on average, of which 70% is poly and monounsaturated fatty acids (linoleic and oleic acids are about 38.9% and 27.7% respectively). The presence of tocopherols in quinoa reduces the risk of oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids.12 Quinoa contains a large number of secondary metabolites (fatty acids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and phytoecdysteroids). The high content determines a wide range of biological activity: antidiabetic, antitumor, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulating.1,13-15

 

Phytoecdysteroids are interesting to study. These are secondary metabolites first discovered in the whole quinoa plant in 198416. Phytoecdysteroids are polyhydroxylated steroids, insect molting hormones, and secondary plant metabolites. They protect plants from insects and nematodes.17-19 The pharmacological activity of phytoecdysteroids is very wide. They exhibit adaptogenic properties, accompanied by increased productivity, improved cognitive functions, and anxiolytic effect. Also, taking phytoecdysteroids reduces glycemia, cholesterolemia. Phytoecdysteroids have an anabolic effect. They find prophylactic use in osteoporosis and other diseases.20-24 Phytoecdysteroids are found in more or less quantities in many wild plant species. However, they are almost absent or contained in very small amounts in cultivated agricultural plant species. In addition to quinoa, spinach, several plants of the Chenopodiaceae family25,26, and champignons (“food plants”) also contain phytoecdysteroids.27 The main phytoecdysteroid, 20-hydroxyecdysone (30μg/g), was found in quinoa seeds.15,28 Several minor compounds (3-9μg/g) such as makisterone A, 24-epi-makisterone A, 24 (28)-dehydromakisterone A, and 20,26-dihydroxyecdysone have also been detected. It was later shown that quinoa flour contains the unique ecdysteroid kancollasterone.29

 

Other important secondary metabolites in quinoa are polyphenolic compounds. About 29 species of phenolic acids have been identified in quinoa. Two large groups can be distinguished among them: acids structurally similar to benzoic acid and acids structurally similar to cinnamic acid. The following acids of the benzoic acid group have been identified in quinoa grains: 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, gallic acid, 1-O-galloyl-β-D- glycoside, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, vanilla acid, vanilla acid glycosyl ester, vanilla acid 4-O-glycoside, vanillin. Cinnamic acid analogs are identified in quinoa grains. These include caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, cinnamic acid, o-coumaric acid, p-coumaric acid, p-coumaric acid glycoside, 8,5'-diferulic acid, ferulic acid, isoferulic acid, 4'-geranyloxyferulic acid, rosmarinic acid, sinapinic acid.

 

The main aglycones of flavonoids identified in quinoa are kaempferol and quercetin. In addition to them, aglycones of acacetin, myricetin, daidzein, and genistein were also identified. Flavones, flavonols, flavanones, flavonols, and isoflavones stand out structurally among flavonoids in quinoa. The following flavones have been identified: orientin and vitexin. Among flavonols: kaempferol and its derivatives, myricetin, quercetin and its derivatives, rutin. Among the flavanones: hesperidin, neohesperidin, naringin. Among the flavanols: catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin. Among isoflavones: biochanin A, daidzein, genistein, prunetin, puerarin.30-33 All compounds have a wide range of biological effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumoral, protective, neuroprotective, etc.

 

The objective of the study is to develop an effective method of extraction from quinoa grains in the laboratory to obtain a functional food ingredient (FIU) enriched with phytoecdysteroids and polyphenols.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We used commercial black quinoa grains pre-milled in a laboratory blender (“FimarFRI, Italy”) and sieved through a sieve to select flour fraction with particle diameter less than 0.35mm. Rectified ethyl alcohol (National Standard, GOST R 51723-2001, ethyl alcohol drinking 95%) was used as an extractant.

 

Extraction:

Extraction was performed with water-alcohol solutions at ethanol concentrations of 0, 20, 40, and 60% at 24-26℃. 1000ml of extractant was added to 25g of quinoa grinding grains. Then it was thermoregulated for 60 min with constant stirring using a top-drive stirrer. The resulting mixture was centrifuged for 30 min (BEKMANJ-6B centrifuge) at 4000rpm. The supernatant was selected. 300ml of the corresponding extractant was added to the sludge. Then the extraction was repeated. The supernatants obtained were combined.

 

Membrane treatment:

The obtained extract was subjected to ultrafiltration in a tangential flow at a membrane filtration unit based on the ASF-018 filter holder (VLADISART, RF) through a membrane with a pore diameter of 10 kD with a collection of low-molecular fraction. The collected low-molecular fraction (LMF) was concentrated by reverse osmosis method on the unit with the filter “URF-1812” roll membrane. Ethanol was removed on the rotary evaporator using an alcoholic extractant.

 

Hydrophobic sorbent purification:

Additional purification of LMF was carried out on a preparative column with a hydrophobic sorbent C18 (4.5×9cm). Aqueous extract of LMF was applied on the column, washing off the complex of polyphenols and phytoecdysteroids, which was trapped by sorbent 75% ethyl alcohol. Then the alcohol was removed on the rotary evaporator. The final dry product was obtained from its aqueous solution by lyophilization (lyophilic drying LS-500, PRINTEKH production, RF).

 

Figure 1 shows scheme for obtaining FPI from quinoa grains.

 

Milled and sifted quinoa grains (less than 0.35 mm)

 

Water or aqueous alcohol extraction for 1 hour at 25℃

 

Centrifugation

 

Reextraction

 

Ultrafiltration (10 kDa), reverse osmosis

 

Rotary alcohol removal

 

Chromatographic purification on a C18 column

 

Rotary alcohol removal, lyophilization

 

FFI enriched with phytoecdisteroids and polyphenols

Figure 1: Scheme for obtaining FFI.

 

 

Methods of biologically active substances analysis:

Phytoecdysteroids at each stage of FFI production were determined by two methods: HPLC with a spectrophotometric detector and HPLC with a mass spectrometer (HPLC-MS). The main criteria for choosing the optimal method for further research were the accuracy of the method and simplicity. 20-hydroxyecdysone (98%, manufactured by Scientific GmbH, Germany) was used as a standard sample.

 

Analysis of the content of 20-hydroxyecdysone by HPLC with a spectrophotometric detector:

20-hydroxyecdysone was determined by reverse phase HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C18 (250×4.6mm, 5μm) with a precolumn with pretreatment on a polyamide sorbent according to the procedure34 with minor modifications). The geometric parameters of the sample preparative column have been changed. The flush was carried out with the sorbent being dried by blowing. The determination of the final volume was carried out by weighing the combined flush on an analytical balance. Conditions: elution rate – 0.75ml/min; UV detector (UV/VIS) – 151, 243nm; mobile phase A – 20% acetonitrile, mobile phase B – 60% acetonitrile; elution program – linear-gradient B from 0 to 30%, 15 min. Figure 2 shows an HPLC chromatogram of a standard sample 20E and dry FFI.

 

 

 

Figure 2: Chromatograms 20E (10μg /ml) and FFI.

 

Analysis of 20-hydroxyecdysone by HPLC-MS:

The 20E content was determined by HPLC-MS using 1100 chromatograph with 6410 mass detector (Agilent Technologies). Column: Poroshell 120 EC-C18 3.0×50 mm, 2.7μm (Agilent Technologies). Gradient elution was performed with a mixture of 0.1% solution of formic acid in water (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B) with a flow rate of 0.4ml/min according to the following scheme: 0 min – 5% eluent B, 5 min – 27% eluent B, 5.5 min – 90% of eluent B, 8.5 min – 90% eluent B, 9.5 min – 5% eluent B, 13.5 min – 5% eluent B. The following parameters of the mass detector were selected: atomizing gas pressure of 2.8 bar; drying gas temperature 350°C; flow rate of drying gas 10 l/min; polarity is positive; capillary voltage 4000 V; voltage on the fragmenter 98 V; recorded mass transitions in the MS/MS mode 481.3 → 445.4 with a collision energy of 8 eV (used for quantitative analysis), 481.3 → 371.4 with a collision energy of 12 eV (used for qualitative confirmation). Additional dilution of the extract before analysis was carried out with a 50% solution of methanol in water to a concentration falling in the range from 0.01 to 5μg/ml (calibration range). The sample was then vortexed and centrifuged with a relative centrifugation force of 18,407 g for 10 min. After centrifugation, it was poured into a vial for HPLC analysis. Figure 3 shows a typical HPLC-MS chromatogram of a finished FFI sample and a standard 20E sample.

 

 

Figure 3: Chromatogram A - standard sample 20E (0.5μg/ml); Chromatogram B is a sample of dry FFI obtained by extraction with 40% ethanol.

 

Determination of total polyphenols:

Total polyphenols were determined spectrophotometrically by the method of Folin-Ciocalteu35. which is often used in the analysis of plant materials and medicinal plant raw materials36-42. 2.0 ml of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu solution was added to 400μl of the sample and incubated for 5 min. Then 1.6ml of 7.5% Na2CO3 was added and the samples were incubated for 1 hour in a dark place. The optical density of the solutions was measured at a wavelength of 765nm using a SpectroQuest 2800 spectrophotometer (UNICO, USA). Gallic acid was determined in solutions using a calibration curve obtained using the standard of gallic acid (97.5%, Sigma, USA).

 

Determination of the total content and profile of individual flavonoids:

The flavonoid profile was determined using an Agilent 1200 liquid chromatography system with a diode array spectrophotometric detector (DMD) and an Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole triple quadrupole mass spectrometric (MS) detector. HPLC-DMD conditions: stationary phase – Phenomenex Luna C18 column 150×4.6mm (5μm); mobile phase A – 0.1% solution of formic acid in water, phase B – 0.1% solution of formic acid in acetonitrile; gradient elution: 0 min – 15% B, 5 min – 20% B, 20 min – 30% B, 40 min – 60% B, 41–50 min – 15% B; the elution rate of 0.5ml/min; column temperature 40ºС; sample volume 5µl; detection at λ = 350nm (flavonol glycosides) and λ = 370nm (flavonols); spectra were recorded in the wavelength range of 200-400nm. MS conditions: electrospray ionization in the registration mode of positive ESI/MS+ and negative ESI/MS ions; the capillary voltage is +3500 V and -2500 V, respectively; dryer gas flow 9 l/min; temperature 325ºC; spray pressure 0.27 kPa. Data processing was performed using MassHunter Workstation Software Qualitative Analysis Version B.02.00. The flavonoid content was calculated by the external standard method. Commercially available pure substances rutin (≥94%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), kaempferol-3-glucoside (≥95%, PhytoLab, Germany), and isoquercitrin (≥94%, HWI ANALYTIK GMBH, Germany) were used as standard samples. The arithmetic average of the results of three parallel measurements was taken as the final result. A typical chromatogram of the obtained FFI (20% aqueous-alcoholic extractant) is presented in Figure 4. Identification of flavonoids was carried out according to retention times, UV, and mass spectra compared with published data31-43.10 individual flavonol glycosides (Table 1), the main of which were quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside, quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl- (1 → 6) -β-D-galactopyranoside and kaempferol-3-O- (2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl) -β-D-galactopyranoside, found in quinoa extracts. Phenolic acids, such as isomers of unidentified derivatives of ferulic acid with m/z 692/690 [M + H]+/[M - H], as well as a small amount of free ferulic acid are found in quinoa extracts.


 

Figure 4: Chromatogram of FFI (20% alcohol) at λ = 350nm. The peak numbers in the chromatogram correspond to the numbers of flavonoids in Table 1.

 

Table 1: Retention parameters, absorption maxima and masses of flavonoids in quinoa extracts

no

Flavonoid

Rt, min

(±0,2 min)

λmax, nm

(±2 nm)

ESI/MS+

Detectable ion

ESI/MS-

Detectable ion

1

Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl- (1 → 2) -O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl- (1 → 6) -β-D-galacto-pyranoside + hexose

13.8

255, 266, 354

905.4, 773.3, 611.2, 465.2, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – apiose * + Н]+, [M – apiose – galactose + Н]+, [M – apiose – galactose – rhamnose]+, [M – apiose – galactose – rhamnose – hexose]+

903.3

[M – H]-

2

Quercetin-3-O- (2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl) -β-D-galactopyranoside

14.4

256, 268, 354

757.4, 611.3, 465.2, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – rhamnose + Н]+, [M – 2 rhamnose + Н]+, [M - 2 rhamnose – galactose + H]+

755.4

[M – H]-

3

Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl- (1 → 2) -O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl- (1 → 6) -β-D-galactopyranoside

15.1

256, 268, 354

743.3, 611.3, 465.2, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – apiose + Н]+, [M – apiose – rhamnose + Н]+, [M – apiose – rhamnose – galactose]+

741.2

[M – H]-

4

Kaempferol-3-O- (2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl) -β-D-galactopyranoside

16.1

266, 348

741.4, 595.3, 449.2, 287.2

[M + H]+, [M – rhamnose + Н]+, [M – 2 rhamnose + Н]+, [M - 2 rhamnose – galactose + H]+

739.2

[M – H]-

5

Kaempferol-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl- (1 → 2) -O-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl- (1 → 6) -β-D-galactopyranoside

17.1

258, 264, 352

727.3, 595.1, 449.2, 287.2

[M + H]+, [M – apiose + Н]+, [M – apiose – rhamnose + Н]+, [M – apiose – rhamnose – galactose]+

725.2

[M – H]-

6

Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl- (1 → 2) -β-D-galactopyranoside

597.2, 465.1, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – apiose + Н]+, [M – apiose – galactose + Н]+

595.2

[M – H]-

7

Isorhamnetin-3-O- (2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl) -β-D-galactopyranoside

771.3, 625.2, 479.2, 317.2

[M + H]+, [M – rhamnose + Н]+, [M – 2 rhamnose + Н]+, [M - 2 rhamnose – galactose + H]+

769.2

[M – H]-

8

Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl- (1 → 2) -β-D-glucopyranoside

17.3

256, 264, 356

597.1, 465.2, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – apiose + Н]+, [M – apiose – glucose + Н]+

595.2

[M – H]-

9

Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosyl- (1 → 2) -β-D-glucuronide

18.0

256, 266, 354

611.3, 479.2, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – apiose + Н]+, [M – apiose – glucuronic acid + Н]+

609.2

[M – H]-

10

Quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucuronide

21.0

256, 266, 356

479.2, 303.2

[M + H]+, [M – glucuronic acid + Н]+

477.1

[M – H]-

 

Table 2: The yield of 20E hydroxyecdysone according to the stages of the isolation process

No

Extraction stage

Yield (%) relative to the raw extract

The composition of the extractant (% alcohol in water)

0

20

40

60

1

Quinoa grains

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

2

Ultrafiltrate 10kD

85.8

85.8

88.6

77.1

74.0

3

Concentrate after reverse osmosis

73.3

73.3

73.0

70.3

83.3

4

After C18 and rotary evaporator

68.3

68.3

69.4

67.6

67.9

5

Dry product

52.2

52.2

56.1

54.5

56.2

 

Table 3. The content of 20E in dry FFI from quinoa grains

No

The composition of the extractant

(% alcohol in water)

20Е. mg/g

Concentration degree 20E relative to quinoa content in grain

HPLC-UV

HPLC-MS

Product 1

0

35.5±1.8

34.9±0.8

139

Product 2

20

36.9±1.8

36.4±0.8

143

Product 3

40

37.2±1.9

35.7±0.8

140

Product 4

60

30.8±1.5

31.4±0.7

123

 

Table 4: Content of flavonoids (g/100g)

Quinoa flavonoids

Total content

1*

2*

3*

Concentration rate flavonoids

Quinoa grains

0.0946±0.002

0.0357±0.0006

0.0296±0.0006

0.0173±0.002

Product 1

13.90±9.36

5.15±0.14

4.49±0.12

2.51±0.07

147

Product 2

23.00±0.48

8.66±0.18

6.67±0.14

4.41±0.09

243

Product 3

25.15±0.52

9.41±0.20

7.29±0.15

4.38±0.10

266

Product 4

21.41±0.60

8.15±0.19

6.36±0.13

3.75±0.08

226

* Notes:

1 – Quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

2 – Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosil-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosil-(1→6)-β-D-galactopyranoside

3 – Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

In quinoa grain, the content of 20-hydroxyecdysone was 255±9 μg/g grain. Table 2 presents the results characterizing the amount of 20E obtained in the process of isolation (in stages) and expressed as a percentage of their relative initial content in the grain (i.e. yield). The obtained FFI were powders of light yellow color, well soluble in water.

 

Table 3 presents data on the content of 20E in the final products obtained using various extractants and, accordingly, the degree of their concentration (by HPLC-UV and HPLC-MS methods).

 

The obtained dry FPI contained high weight concentrations of 20 hydroxyecdysone. The data obtained by HPLC with spectrophotometric detection and HPLC-MS correspond to each other (within measurement error limits, Table 3). The obtained result shows that the use of a simple analysis by the HPLC method with a spectrophotometric detector allows obtaining reliable data comparable to the results of the HPLC-MS method. The multiplicity of its concentration is also shown in relation to the quinoa content of the original grains. The total content of 20E in grains corresponds to the average amount of the substance entering the water-alcoholic mixture at the first stage of the technological process). Table 4 shows the flavonoid content in quinoa grains.

 

The selected technological scheme for obtaining FFI can concentrate the 20E phytoecdysteroid in major for quinoa more than 200 times in the final product relative to the raw material. Tables 5, 6, 7, 8 show the results of determining the profile of flavonoids in liquid samples: total flavonoid content and three most typical individual substances from quinoa31 at all stages of the extraction process.


 

Table 5: Profile of flavonoids in water extraction and % yield relative to the original extract.

S. No

Faction

Total content

1*

2*

3*

yield %

1

Original Extract

26.04±0.78

9.92±0.24

8.18±0.19

5.21±0.12

100.0

2

Ultrafiltration 10kD

22.25±0.56

8.60±0.21

6.92±0.16

4.68±0.11

85.5

3

Concentrate after reverse osmosis

17.35±0.45

6.81±0.18

5.54±0.14

3.28±0.09

66.6

4

Purified preparation after C18 and rotor evaporator

13.90±0.36

5.15±0.14

4.49±0.12

2.51±0.07

53.4

* Notes:

1 – Quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

2 – Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosil-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosil-(1→6)-β-D-galactopyranoside

3 – Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

 

Table 6: Profile of flavonoids at extraction by 20% alcohol (mg) and % yield relative to the original extract.

Stage number

Faction

Total content

1*

2*

3*

yield %

1

Original Extract

30.86±0.71

11.68±0.26

10.03±0.22

5.59±0.13

100.0

2

Ultrafiltration 10kD

26.60±0.59

10.26±0.23

8.74±0.19

5.13±0.11

86.2

3

Concentrate after reverse osmosis

21.78±0.52

8.29±0.20

6.39±0.15

3.97±0.08

70.6

4

Purified preparation after C18 and rotor evaporator

23.00±0.48

8.66±0.18

6.67±0.14

4.11±0.09

74.5

* Notes:

1 – Quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

2 – Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosil-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosil-(1→6)-β-D-galactopyranoside

3 – Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

Table 7: Profile of flavonoids at extraction by 40% alcohol (mg) and % yield relative to the original extract.

S. No

Faction

Total content

1*

2*

3*

yield %

1

Original Extract

32.49±0.81

12.15±0.30

9.55±0.24

6.08±0.15

100.0

2

Ultrafiltration 10kD

27.57±0.63

12.99±0.30

9.88±0.23

6.59±0.15

84.9

3

Concentrate after reverse osmosis

25.44±0.61

9.59±0.23

7.43±0.16

4.48±0.10

78.3

4

Purified preparation after C18 and rotor evaporator

25.15±0.52

9.41±0.20

7.29±0.15

4.38±0.10

77.4

* Notes:

1 – Quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

2 – Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosil-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosil-(1→6)-β-D-galactopyranoside

3 – Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

 

Table 8: Profile of flavonoids in extraction with 60% alcohol (mg) and % yield relative to the original extract.

S. No

Faction

Total content

1*

2*

3*

yield %

1

Original Extract

33.40±0.90

12.70±0.32

9.91±0.25

6.10±0.15

100.0

2

Ultrafiltration 10kD

27.71±0.72

10.42±0.27

8.00±0.21

5.39±0.14

83.0

3

Concentrate after reverse osmosis

24.00±0.58

13.39±0.37

10.43±0.23

6.17±0.14

71.8

4

Purified preparation after C18 and rotor evaporator

21.41±0.60

8.15±0.19

6.36±0.13

3.75±0.08

64.1

*Notes:

1 – Quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

2 – Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosil-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosil-(1→6)-β-D-galactopyranoside

3 – Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

Table 9: Total content determined by Foline in and HPLC method and flavonoid profile in dry FFI.

Extractant composition (% alcohol in water)

Polyphenols, mg/g (in terms of gallic acid)

Contents, determined by HPLC

1*

2*

3*

Concentration rate

1

0

24.27±0.11

17.67

6.72

5.55

3.33

271

2

20

24.23±0.10

20.41

7.72

6.48

3.58

265

3

40

20.64±0.11

18.82

7.07

5.98

3.25

232

4

60

23.51±0.11

17.01

6.51

5.53

3.00

204

* Notes:

1 – Quercetin-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

2 – Quercetin-3-O-β-D-apiofuranosil-(1→2)-O-α-L-rhamnopyranosil-(1→6)-β-D-galactopyranoside

3 – Kaempferol-3-O-(2,6-di-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside

 

 


The maximum yield of flavonoids in the final product was observed in cases of 20 and 40% alcohol extraction. The minimum yield of flavonoids from the feedstock to the final product was at the aqueous extraction (as for the 20 hydroxyecdysone). Table 9 shows the results of flavonoids determination in lyophilized FFI, % yield from the initial raw materials.

 

The content of flavonoids in the extract obtained at the 1st stage, as well as the frequency of concentration was taken as 100%. The concentration rate was 200 to 270 times and was comparable to the values obtained for 20E in the same samples. Relatively small values of BAS yield from the feedstock (from 53 to 77%) can be explained not only by incomplete extraction at the first stage, but also by inevitable losses at subsequent stages. The values of these losses are primarily related to the characteristics of the equipment used (volumes of pipelines, membranes, lyophilisation tanks, etc.) .These values will decrease as the quantity of raw materials processed increases (in %).

 

CONCLUSION:

The results obtained allow us to conclude that highly enriched sources of different BAS (phytoecdysteroids, flavonoids, polyphenols) can be obtained from quinoa grains using rather simple technology and commercially available reagents. This technique can be simply scaled to pilot or industrial production conditions. It does not require special biotechnological equipment and uses available raw materials and reagents.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

None.

 

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS:

All authors contributed equally to this work.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

The study was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 19-16-00107 “New functional food ingredients of adaptogenic action for the enhancement of working capability and cognitive potential of human organism”.

 

Also we would like to thank Konstantin Isaakovich Eller, M.D. in Chemistry, Head of the Laboratory of Metabolic and Proteomic Analysis of Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety for valuable advices and constant help.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Vega‐Gálvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, Uribe E, Puente L, Martínez EA. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2010; 90(15): 2541-2547.

2.      Abugoch LE. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2009; 58: 1-31.

3.      Jancurová M, Minarovičová L, Dandar A. Quinoa – a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2009; 27(2): 71-79.

4.      Graf BL, Rojas‐Silva P, Rojo LE, Delatorre‐Herrera J, Baldeón ME, Raskin I. Innovations in health value and functional food development of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2015; 14(4): 431-445.

5.      Aluko RE, Monu E. Functional and bioactive properties of quinoa seed protein hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science. 2003; 68(4): 1254-1258.

6.      Jacobsen SE. The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International. 2003; 19(1-2): 167-177.

7.      Choudhary S, Mathur P. Assessment of Protective Role of Quinoa against Sodium Fluoride Induced Skeletal Deformities in Mice Fetuses. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(5): 2129-2134.

8.      James LEA. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. 2009; 58: 1-31.

9.      Hu Y, Zhang J, Zou L, Fu C, Li P, Zhao G. Chemical characterization, antioxidant, immune-regulating and anticancer activities of a novel bioactive polysaccharide from Chenopodium quinoa seeds. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2017; 99; 622-629.

10.   Miranda M, Delatorre-Herrera J, Vega-Gálvez A, Jorquera E, Quispe-Fuentes I, Martínez EA. Antimicrobial potential and phytochemical content of six diverse sources of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Agricultural Sciences. 2014; 5(11): 1015-1024.

11.   Svanberg VUlf, Sandberg A-S, Ruales JS. Processing of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): effects on in vitro iron availability and phytate hydrolysis. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 1999; 50(3): 203-211.

12.   Peiretti P G, Gai F, Tassone S. Fatty acid profile and nutritive value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds and plants at different growth stages. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2013; 183(1-2): 56-61.

13.   Yao Y, Yang X, Shi Z, Ren G. Anti‐inflammatory activity of saponins from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds in lipopolysaccharide‐stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages cells. Journal of Food Science. 2014; 79(5): 1018-1023.

14.   Yao Y, Shi Z, Ren G. Antioxidant and immunoregulatory activity of polysaccharides from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(10): 19307-19318.

15.   Kumpun S, Maria A, Crouzet S, Evrard-Todeschi N, Girault J P, Lafont R. Ecdysteroids from Chenopodium quinoa Willd., an ancient Andean crop of high nutritional value. Food Chemistry. 2011; 125(4): 1226-1234.

16.   Bathory M, Toth I, Szendrei K, Rattai M, Minker E, Blazso G. Determination and isolation of ecdysteroids in native goosefoot species. Herba Hungarica. 1984; 23: 131-145.

17.   Volodin VV, Mataev SI. Ecdysteroid-containing plants – sources of new adaptogens. Bulletin of Biotechnology and Physico-Chemical Biology named after Yu. A. Ovchinnikov. 2011; 7(2): 52-59.

18.   Kapur P, Wuttke W, Jarry H, Seidlova-Wuttke D. Beneficial effects of β-Ecdysone on the joint, epiphyseal cartilage tissue and trabecular bone in ovariectomized rats. Phytomedicine. 2010; 17(5): 350-355.

19.   Seidlova-Wuttke D, Christel D, Kapur P, Nguyen B T, Jarry H, Wuttke W. β-Ecdysone has bone protective but no estrogenic effects in ovariectomized rats. Phytomedicine. 2010;17(11): 884-889.

20.   Graf BL, Poulev A, Kuhn P, Grace MH, Lila MA, Raskin I. Quinoa seeds leach phytoecdysteroids and other compounds with anti-diabetic properties. Food Chemistry. 2014; 163: 178-185.

21.   Rharrabe K, Sayah F, Lafont R. Dietary effects of four phytoecdysteroids on growth and development of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Journal of Insect Science. 2010; 10(1): 13.

22.   Gorelick-Feldman J, MacLean D, Ilic N, Poulev A, Lila MA, Cheng D, Raskin I. Phytoecdysteroids increase protein synthesis in skeletal muscle cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008; 56(10): 3532-3537.

23.   Kizelsztein P, Govorko D, Komarnytsky S, Evans A, Wang Z, Cefalu W T, Raskin I. 20-Hydroxyecdysone decreases weight and hyperglycemia in a diet-induced obesity mice model. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2009; 296(3): E433-E439.

24.   Foucault AS, Even P, Lafont R, Dioh W, Veillet S, Tomé D, Quignard-Boulangé A. Quinoa extract enriched in 20-hydroxyecdysone affects energy homeostasis and intestinal fat absorption in mice fed a high-fat diet. Physiology Behavior. 2014; 128: 226-231.

25.   Bhatt DY, Pandya SS. Pharmacognostic and Preliminary Phytochemical Studies on the Leaf of Beta vulgaris Linn. (Chenopodiaceae). Res. J. Pharmacognosy Phytochem. 2015; 7(3): 163-166.

26.   Kumar V, Sharma A, Kaur H, Thukral A K, Bhardwaj R. Phytochemical profiling of the leaves of Chenopodium and Polygonum using GC-MS. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(12): 1629-1632.

27.   Findeisen E. Ecdysteroide in der menschlichen Nahrung (Doctoral dissertation, Verlag nicht ermittelbar). University of Marburg. 2004.

28.   Graf BL, Rojo LE, Delatorre‐Herrera J, Poulev A, Calfio C, Raskin I. Phytoecdysteroids and flavonoid glycosides among Chilean and commercial sources of Chenopodium quinoa: variation and correlation to physico‐chemical characteristics. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2016; 96(2): 633-643.

29.   Dini I, Tenore GC, Dini A. Nutritional and antinutritional composition of Kancolla seeds: an interesting and underexploited and in food plant. Food Chemistry. 2005; 92(1): 125-132.

30.   Han Y, Chi J, Zhang M, Zhang R, Fan S, Huang F, Liu L. Characterization of saponins and phenolic compounds: antioxidant activity and inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase in different varieties of colored quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2019; 83(11): 2128-2139.

31.   Lin M, Han P, Li Y, Wang W, Lai D, Zhou L. Quinoa secondary metabolites and their biological activities or functions. Molecules. 2019; 24(13): 2512.

32.   Carciochi RA, Manrique GD, Dimitrov K. Optimization of antioxidant phenolic compounds extraction from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seeds. Journal of food science and technology. 2015; 52(7): 4396-4404.

33.   Gómez-Caravaca AM, Iafelice G, Lavini A, Pulvento C, Caboni MF, Marconi E. Phenolic compounds and saponins in quinoa samples (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) grown under different saline and nonsaline irrigation regimens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012; 60(18): 4620-4627.

34.   Olennikov DN, Kashchenko NI. Method of the rapid analysis of 20-hydroxyecdysone content in plants and ferns using solid-phase extraction on polyamide and microcolumn HPLC-UV. Khimiya Rastitel'nogo Syr'ya. 2018; (3); 41-52.

35.   Petrov NA, Sidorova YS, Perova IB, Kochetkova AA, Mazo VK. The complex of bilberry polyphenols, sorbed on the buckwheat flour as a functional food ingredient. Voprosy pitaniia. 2019; 88(6): 63-71.

36.   Raj B, John S, Rasheed A A. Pharmacognostic and Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of Ampelocissus indica including Antioxidant Activity. Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem. 2020; 12(2): 80-82.

37.   Killedar SG, More HN. Seasonal Variation of Tannin Content in Different Parts of Memecylon umbellatum Burm. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2011; 4 (1): 78-81.

38.   Badmanaban R, Ali R, Mathew M, Reji S E, Issac A. Comparative Studies on Total Polyphenols, Flavanoids and Antioxidant Potential of some Marketed brands of packed Green Tea. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(7): 3179-3183.

39.   Patidar P, Dashora K. Development of UV Spectroscopy Fingerprinting Method of Total Polyphenols as Tannic Acid in Manibhadra yoga. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2014; 4(1): 28-30.

40.   Abdeldjabbar M, Messaouda D, Zhour R, Cheyma B. Comparative Analysis of Total Phenolics, Flavonoid content and Antioxidant profile of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) with different watering water from Oued Soufin Algeria. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2020; 13(1): 28-32.

41.   Patidar P, Dashora K. Spectrophotometric Estimation of Total Polyphenols as Tannic Acid in Ayurvedic Formulation Astangavaleha. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2014; 4(1): 42-44.

42.   Guemari F, Laouini S E, Rebiai A, Bouafia A. Phytochemical screening and Identification of Polyphenols, Evaluation of Antioxidant activity and study of Biological properties of extract Silybum marianum (L.). Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2020; 13(3), 190-197.

43.   Balakrishnan G. Quinoa phenolic compounds: Stability during commercial processing, in vitro gastrointestinal digestion, and storage (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida. 2016.

 

 

 

 

Received on 16.10.2020           Modified on 21.12.2020

Accepted on 19.01.2021         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2021; 14(8):4321-4328.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00750