Carbopol 940 Vs Carbol 904: A better Polymer for Hydrogel Formulation
Aditya Sharma, Jashanpreet Kaur, Anju Goyal
Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: anju.goyal@chitkara.edu.in
ABSTRACT:
Hydrogels are described as three dimensionally organized hydrophilic polymers which distend in water and can withhold massive proportions of water besides altering their shape as they represent bodily or chemical cross-links of man or woman polymeric chains. In this article, formulation, characterization and evaluation method of hydrogel with carbopol 940 and 904 has been described.
KEYWORDS: Hydrogels, Hydrophillic polymers, Polymeric chains, Carbopol.
INTRODUCTION:
Hydrogels are described as three dimensionally organized hydrophilic polymers which distend in water and can withhold massive proportions of water besides altering their shape as they represent bodily or chemical cross-links of man or woman polymeric chains3.
Advantages:
1. Entrapment is viable for microbial cells inside polyurethane hydrogel beads ensuing in lesser toxicity.
2. Better affected person compliance.
3. Hydrogels are no longer greasy in nature due to excessive water content.
4. Hydrogels are washable i.e. convenient to remove.
5. Increase drug house time
6. Increase tissue permeability
7. These are effortlessly adjustable
8. Evaporation of water from the floor of pores and skin presents cooling effect
9. These are typically biocompatible.
Disadvantages:
1. Hydrogels can be expensive.
2. Sterilization is difficult.
3. Fragile in nature.
Desired Characteristics of Hydrogels1,2,3
1. Odourless, colourless and most importantly non-toxic.
2. Hydrogels want to be each bodily and chemically secure
3. Biodegradable via nature
4. Swelling index wishes to be superior
5. pH should stay impartial on swelling of hydrogel in water
6. High sturdiness and balance upon storage
Classification of Hydrogels:
There are a variety of approaches to classify the hydrogels as proven in discern 1.
Figure 1: Classification of Hydrogels
Stimuli Response of Hydrogel:
Figure 2: Stimuli Response Swelling Hydrogel
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Materials:
Carbopol 940, Carbopol 934 and Triethanolamine have been bought from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. Triethanolamine was once bought from Thermo Fisher Scientific India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Methods:
Formulation of Hydrogels:
The gel forming polymer was once dispersed in water for 1.5 hours with non-stop agitation by means of the use of magnetic stirrer (Remi Elektrotechnik Limited, Vasai, India) in order to reap a uniform dispersion4. When stirring was once entire the dispersion was once allowed to stand for 15 minutes to expel the entrapped air4. To this dispersion, 1%v/v triethanolamine used to be steadily delivered till a suitably viscous hydrogel used to be received4. The composition was once tabulated in desk 1.
Figure 3: Hydrogel Formulation Process
Table 1: Hydrogel Formulation with Carbopol 940 and Carbopol 934
|
S. No. |
Ingredients |
F1 |
F2 |
|
1. |
Carbopol 940 |
0.5 g |
|
|
2. |
Carbopol 934 |
|
0.5 g |
|
3. |
Triethanolamine |
1% v/v |
1% v/v |
|
4. |
Water |
50 ml |
50 ml |
Evaluation of Hydrogel:
Organoleptic characteristics:
The appearance, shade and texture of hydrogel formulations have been evaluated visually. The texture of hydrogels was once evaluated with the aid of checking the presence of coarse particles (grittiness) with the aid of rubbing a small quantity of gel between the thumb and index finger.
Viscosity:
The viscosity of formulated hydrogels used to be decided the usage of Brookfield viscometer (model DV-11+ Pro) with spindle #64. The viscosity was once measured at 50 RPM5.
pH:
The pH of hydrogel formulations was once measured with the aid of a digital pH meter by using dipping the glass electrode absolutely into the gel.
Spreadability:
The spreadability of hydrogels was once evaluated via measuring the spreadability diameter of 1g hydrogel between 2 glass plates. 1g of weight used to be saved on the plates for 1 minute so that gel spreads evenly between the plates3. The gel spreadability was once decided the usage of the following equation:
S=ML/T
Where S=spreadability, M=weight tied to higher slide, L=length of glass slide and T=time taken by way of the slide to separate from3.
Skin infection test:
To function this test, 10 volunteers have been chosen for every organized hydrogel with their due consent. The hydrogel used to be utilized to the again of the hand over a small region of almost 2 rectangular inches. Then every man or woman was once examined for any kind of inflammation or lesion.
Stability study:
The steadiness research of the organized formula of hydrogels have been carried out at room temperature (25℃/ 60% RH), for the evaluation of the bodily look with the freshly organized components4,6.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Organoleptic characteristics:
The gel formulations viz. F1 and F2 have been evaluated for their bodily characterization like the appearance, color and homogeneity. The bodily look was once suitable and additionally the texture of each the gel formulations used to be smooth. It used to be hardly ever challenging to choose the superiority of the method by means of simply going with the organoleptic characteristics.
Viscosity:
The values of the viscosity had been 9070 cP and 8902 cP for the carbopol 940 (F1) and carbopol 934 (F2) primarily based hydrogel formula respectively3,9,6. The viscosity of F1 was once barely higher than F2. For incorporating a drug in the formulation, the F2 system is desired due to the fact higher viscosity can lead to stress in the shape which can minimise the drug launch4,6,7.
pH:
Both formulations confirmed pH values i.e. 7.46 and 7.11 for F1 and F2 respectively. The values have been close to to the impartial pH or in accordance with the pH of the pores and skin it really is why no pores and skin inflammation used to be suggested when pores and skin inflammation find out about was once being carried out3,7. From the consequences received higher is to pick out F2 system due to the fact the pH price is plenty nearer to the fee of impartial pH i.e. 78.
Spreadability:
Spreadability values make a contribution to efficacy of the method6. The fee of spreadability used to be greater in case of F2 formula with 5.33g.cm/sec whilst decrease in F1 method with 5.12g.cm/sec3,4,8,9.
Skin infection test:
The organized hydrogels have been evaluated for their pores and skin irritant impact (3). No character volunteer confirmed any variety of pores and skin inflammation indicating that the organized hydrogel formulations had been safe4,6.
Table 2: Evaluation Parameters for F1 and F2 Hydrogel Formulation
|
Parameters |
F1 |
F2 |
|
Appearance |
Translucent |
Translucent |
|
Colour |
Colourless |
Colourless |
|
Homogeneity |
Smooth |
Smooth |
|
Viscosity (cP) |
9070 |
8902 |
|
pH |
7.46 |
7.11 |
|
Spreadability (g.cm/sec) |
5.12 |
5.33 |
|
Skin irritation |
NIL |
NIL |
Stability Testing:
The steadiness trying out used to be carried out for each the gel formulations at 25 ℃/ 60% RH in order to ensure its security and high-quality throughout the shelf existence4,6. On the completion of the study, i.e. after 1 month no alternate in appearance, colour, viscosity, homogeneity, pH of the gels used to be observed. No pores and skin inflammation was once detected. Results of the learn about had been described in desk three and desk four for carbopol 934 and carbopol 940 formula respectively and this indicated that each the hydrogel formulations had been stable. But the F1 system showed much less version in the values of pH and viscosity as in contrast to the F2 formulation, consequently F1 method is higher for drug incorporation as the balance of F1 method will be little bit on the greater side.
Table 3: Stability Study for Carbopol 934 primarily based Hydrogel Formulation (F2)
|
Parameters |
0 day |
30 days |
|
Physical Appearance |
Translucent, Colourless |
Translucent, Colourless |
|
pH |
8902 |
8900 |
|
Viscosity (cP) |
7.11 |
7.12 |
|
Homogeneity |
Smooth |
Smooth |
|
Skin irritation |
NIL |
NIL |
Table 4: Stability Study for Carbopol 940 primarily based Hydrogel Formulation (F1)
|
Parameters |
0 day |
30 days |
|
Physical Appearance |
Translucent, Colourless |
Translucent, Colourless |
|
pH |
7.46 |
7.51 |
|
Viscosity (cP) |
9070 |
9081 |
|
Homogeneity |
Smooth |
Smooth |
|
Skin irritation |
NIL |
NIL |
CONCLUSION:
Hydrogel formulations had been organized the usage of the polymers carbopol 940 and carbopol 934. Both these carbopols are the most broadly used polymers in hydrogel method preparation. However, there is constantly a predicament of which one to pick amongst these. To get out of this quandary two hydrogel formulations have been prepared, one the use of carbopol 940 (F1) and the different the usage of carbopol 940 (F2). Both the formulations have been evaluated with the aid of following more than a few parameters such as the bodily appearance, homogeneity, pH, viscosity, spreadability, skin inflammation and balance testing. two from the consequences received mainly the viscosity and pH research it was once concluded the hydrogel system (F2) used to be a great deal extra higher as in contrast to the components (F1). In future if any hydrogel is to be organized containing a drug carbopol 934 polymer ought to be desired until any drug excipient incompatibility occurs.
ACKNOWLEGEMENT:
The authors are very an awful lot grateful to the Director of Chitkara College of Pharmacy for presenting integral services to elevate out the lookup work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Ahmed E. Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research. 2015; 6(2): 105-121.
2. Ahmad S, Ahmad M, Manzoor K, Purwar R, Ikram S. A Evaluation on present day improvements in herbal gums primarily based hydrogels: Preparations and applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019; 136: 870-890.
3. Ubaid M, Ilyas S, Mir S, Khan A, Rashid R, Khan M et al. Formulation and in vitro assessment of carbopol 934-based modified clotrimazole gel for topical application. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2016; 88(4): 2303-2317.
4. Jilsha G, Viswanad V. Nanosponge Loaded Hydrogel of Cephalexin for Topical Delivery. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2015; 6(7): 2781-89.
5. Chaudhary H, Rohilla A, Rathee P, Kumar V. Optimization and system sketch of carbopol loaded Piroxicam gel the usage of novel penetration enhancers. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2013; 55: 246-253.
6. Cevc G, Blume G, Schätzlein A. Transfersomes-mediated transepidermal shipping improves the regio-specificity and organic pastime of corticosteroids in vivo. Journal of Controlled Release. 1997; 45(3): 211-226.
7. Aiyalu R, Govindarajan A, Ramasamy A. Formulation and contrast of topical natural gel for the therapy of arthritis in animal model. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016; 52(3): 493-507.
8. Dandagi P, Pandey P, Gadad A, Mastiholimath V. Formulation and Evaluation of Microemulsion Based Luliconazole Gel for Topical Delivery. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2020; 54(2): 293-301.
9. Mahinroosta M, Jomeh Farsangi Z, Allahverdi A, Shakoori Z. Hydrogels as wise materials: A short evaluation of synthesis, houses and applications. Materials Today Chemistry. 2018; 8:42-55.
Received on 29.03.2020 Modified on 26.05.2020
Accepted on 10.06.2020 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2021; 14(3):1561-1564.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00275.4