Characterization of impurities in Teneligliptin hydrobromide hydrate by using LCMS/MS and NMR
Maruthi R*, Chandan R. S1, Anand Kumar Tengli2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru-570015, Karnataka.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: maruthireddy666@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
An accurate and lively LC-MS/MS and NMR analytical methods have been developed for recognition and characterization of key impurities in Teneligliptin. Teneligliptin is an anti-diabetic drug used to treat Diabetes mellitus Type II and three unknown impurities were detected in Teneligliptin bulk drug substance using RP-UFLC method at RT 4.02 min, 5.09 min and 6.2 min. These impurities were isolated by preparative HPLC and further characterized by using LC-MS/MS and NMR techniques. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using C18 reverse phase column and with Methanol and Ammonium Formate (80:20) as a mobile phase. The flow rate was maintained at 0.5mL/min with injection volume as 10 µL. The separations were achieved with binary gradient program and the column is maintained with ambient temperature. The MS conditions adopted for this analysis with scan range of m/z = 50 to 500 with dwell time 3 seconds. NMR was carried out using DMSO as solvent. Based on spectral data, the impurities have been characterized as IMP 3, IMP 5 and IMP E.
KEYWORDS: Teneligliptin, LC-MS/MS, Diabetes mellitus, DMSO and Preparative HPLC, NMR.
INTRODUCTION:
The most typically detailed unfavorable responses incorporate hypoglycemia, clogging, and feeling of developed stomach area, stomach distress, sickness, stomach torment, meteorism, stomatitis, skin irritation, rash, pruritus, dermatitis and disquietude. [1-4]
Fig 1: Structure of Teneligliptin
EXPERIMENTAL:
Chemicals and Reagents:
Teneligliptin (99%pure) samples provide by Micro Labs Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore. HPLC grade Acetonitrile was procured from Merck. Analytical reagent grade Ammonium Acetate was purchased from Loba Chemie. DMSO was procured from Merck.
Instrumentation:
Chromatographic separations were obtained using Shimadzu UFLC LC 20 AD with Photo diode array detector. For data analysis LC solutions software is used. For weighing samples Shimadzu electronic weighing balance was used and for sonication of samples and mobile phase Mark ultra sonicator was used.
LC-MS/MS was performed by using Shimadzu LC-MS/MS 8030 system with triple Quadra pole mass spectrometry. NMR was performed on FT NMR spectrometer system – 400MHz (Make: Agilent USA model: 400 MRDD2).
HPLC Experiment:
Chromatography was carried out on a Phenomenex C18 column (5µ, 230*4.6mm) with ambient temperature using Shimadzu LC-20AD. Separations were observed at 246nm. Injection volume was 10µL and the flow rate was 1.0mL/min with binary gradient programming. Mobile phase consists of Methanol, Acetonitrile and Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (40:20:40 v/v/v/). The pH is changed in accordance with 4.6 using orthophosphoric acid.[5-10]
LCMS and LCMS/MS Experiment:
LC-MS/MS was performed by using Shimadzu LC-MS/MS 8030 system with triple Quadra pole mass spectrometry.[11, 12]
NMR Experiment:
NMR was performed on FT NMR spectrometer system – 400MHz (Make: Agilent USA model: 400 MRDD2).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The LCMS/MS spectra (Fig 2) of Teneligliptin key impurities showed peaks at RT 3.3 min displayed the protonated molecular ion (M++) at m/z = 426.58, this is corresponding to the molecular formula C22H31N6OS+.
Fig. 2: HPLC Spectrum of Teneligliptin
POSITIVE IONIZATION:
Teneligliptin (Mol weight: 426.58 g/mol; (M+2))
Fig 3: LCMS/MS spectra of Teneligliptin
Fig 4: LCMS/MS spectra of IMP 3
Fig 5: Structure of IMP 3
Fig 6: LCMS/MS spectra of IMP 5
Fig 7: Structure of IMP 5
Fig 8: LCMS/MS spectra of IMP E
Fig 9: Structure of IMP E
Fig 10: Mass fragmentation of Teneligliptin
NMR Study of Teneligliptin key impurity:
The NMR data (1H, 13C) of Teneligliptin impurity was recorded in DMSO at 400MHz for H1 and 100MHz for 13C on Agilent FT-NMR 400MHz spectrometer.
Fig 11: 1H NMR of Teneligliptin
The proton NMR spectrum (Fig 11) of Teneligliptin has showed C=C-CH3 peaks at 1.9ppm, R2 N-CH3 proton peaks from 2 to 3ppm(α to nitrogen C is attached to nitrogen), ArNH2 peaks from 3 to 5ppm, Ar-H peaks from 6 to 7ppm and R-C=o-NH2 peaks from 7 to 8ppm.
Fig 12: 13C NMR of Teneligliptin
The C- NMR of Teneligliptin (Fig 12) has showed R-CH3 peak at 13.7ppm, R-CH2-NH2 peaks from 30 to 65ppm, C=C peaks from115 to 140ppm, C in aromatic ring shows peaks from 125 to 150ppm and RNC=O gives peak at 169.
Fig: 13 1H NMR of IMP E
The proton NMR spectrum (Fig 13) of Teneligliptin has showed C=C-CH3 peaks at 1.7ppm, R2 N-CH3 proton peaks from 2 to 3ppm(α to nitrogen C is attached to nitrogen), ArNH2 peaks from 3 to 5ppm, Ar-H peaks from 6 to 7ppm, Ar-OH peak at 12.01ppm and R-C=O-NH2 peaks from 7 to 8ppm.
Fig: 14 13C NMR of IMP E
The C- NMR of Teneligliptin (Fig 14) has showed R-CH3 peak at 13.138ppm, R-OH peak at 29, R-CH2-NH2 peaks from 30 to 65ppm, C=C peaks from115 to 140ppm, C in aromatic ring shows peaks from 120 to 150ppm and RC=O gives peak at 171.
Fig: 15 1H NMR of IMP 3
The proton NMR spectrum (Fig 15) of Teneligliptin has showed C=C-CH3 peaks at 1.7ppm, R2 N-CH3 proton peaks from 2 to 3ppm(α to nitrogen C is attached to nitrogen), ArNH2 peaks from 3 to 5ppm, Ar-H peaks from 6 to 7ppm and R-C=O-NH2 peaks from 7 to 8ppm.
Fig: 16 13C NMR of IMP 3
The C- NMR of Teneligliptin (Fig 16) has showed R-CH3 peak at 14.7ppm, R-CH2-NH2 peaks from 30 to 65ppm, C=C peaks from115 to 140ppm, C in aromatic ring shows peaks from 120 to 150ppm and RNC=O gives peak at 169.
Fig: 17 1H NMR of IMP 5
The proton NMR spectrum (Fig 17) of Teneligliptin has showed C=C-CH3 peaks at 1.763ppm, R2 N-CH3 proton peaks from 2 to 3ppm(α to nitrogen C is attached to nitrogen), ArNH2 peaks from 3 to 5ppm, Ar-H peaks from 6 to 7ppm and R-C=O-NH2 peaks from 7 to 8ppm.
Fig: 18 13C NMR of IMP 5
The C- NMR of Teneligliptin (Fig 18) has showed R-CH3 peak at 12.138ppm, R-CH2-NH2 peaks from 30 to 65ppm, Peak at 81ppm is solvent peak, C=C peaks from115 to 140ppm, C in aromatic ring shows peaks from 120 to 150ppm and RNC=O gives peak at 169.
CONCLUSION:
A rapid and precise LC-MS/MS and NMR method was developed for identifying impurities in Teneligliptin Hydrobromide Hydrate. Combination of these methods enabled a complete structural prediction of three major impurities which are present in very low levels before isolation and purification. After isolation these impurities were subjected to NMR and structure was elucidated.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors have no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
We would like to thank the Principal, JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru and JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru for providing the facilities in successfully completion of the research work.
REFERENCES:
1. Luhar SV, Pandya KR, Jani GK, Sachin B, Narkhed S: Simultaneous estimation of teneligliptin hydrobromide hydrate and its degradation product by RPHPLC method. J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res. 2016; 6(3):254-61.
2. Kumar TG, Vidyadhara S, Narkhede NA, Silpa YS, and Lakshmi MR: Method development, validation, and stability studies of teneligliptin by RP-HPLC and identification of degradation products by UPLC tandem mass spectroscopy. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology. 2016 Dec 1; 7(1):27.
3. Patil MD, Bapna M, Shah P, and Khoja SS: Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Metformin Hydrochloride and Teneligliptin Hydrobromide Hydrate in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res. 2017; 7(2):200-108.
4. Yadav N, Goyal A: Method development and validation of Teneligliptin in pharmaceutical dosage form by UV spectrophotometric methods. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Analysis. 2017; 4(3):54-8.
5. Patel KB, Joshi HV, Shah UA, Patel JK: Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Teneligliptin Hydrobromide Hydrate and Metformin Hydrochloride in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Pharma Science Monitor. 2017 Oct 1; 8(4).
6. Shaikh AR, Ahmed BA, Ibrahim M: A Validated Stability Indicating Rp–Hplc Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Metformin and Teneligliptin in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.
7. Sunitha PG, Karthikeyan R, Ranjith Kumar B, Muniyappan S: Quantitative Estimation of Teneligliptin By Validated Colorimetric and FTIR Spectroscopic Methods.
8. Chitlange SS, Rawat DG, Gandhi SP: Estimation of Anti Diabetic Teneligliptin in Bulk and Formulation by Densitometric and Spectrophotometric Method. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2017 Jul 4; 7(4):556-66.
9. Patil D, Ahmad S, Shastry VM, Mujawar T, Thakare L: Analytical method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of Metformin and Teneligliptin by RP-HPLC in bulk and tablet dosage forms. Journal of Pharmacy Research Vol. 2017 Jun; 11(6):676-81.
10. Sen AK, Hinsu DN, Sen DB, Zanwar AS, Maheshwari RA: Analytical method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of Teneligliptin hydrobromide hydrate and Metformin hydrochloride from its pharmaceutical dosage form by three different UV spectrophotometric methods.
11. Kumar TG, Vidyadhara S, Narkhede NA, Silpa YS, Lakshmi MR. Method development, validation, and stability studies of teneligliptin by RP-HPLC and identification of degradation products by UPLC tandem mass spectroscopy. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology. 2016 Dec 1;7(1):27.
12. Ali F, Nandi U, Trivedi M, Prakash A, Dahiya M, Sahu PL, Kumar R, Singh GN. Quantitative characterization and pharmaceutical compatibility between teneligliptin and widely used excipients by using thermal and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry techniques. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2018 Apr 1; 132(1):385-96.
Received on 21.12.2019 Modified on 23.02.2020
Accepted on 10.04.2020 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(8):3569-3576.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00631.9