Determination of In vitro antidiabetic potential of Aqueous and Ethanol extracts and isolated fraction of Zanthoxylum armatum DC stem bark
K. Keerthana1, G. Jothi2
1Research Scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College (Autonomous), (Affiliated to Bharadidasan University), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India – 620005.
2Assistant Professor in Biochemistry, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College (Autonomous), (Affiliated to Bharadidasan University), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India – 620005.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: jothi173@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder affecting 25% of the world population. It occurs due to deficiency or insensitivity of insulin leading to increased blood glucose level and its consequent complications. Inhibition of carbohydrate hydrolyzing enzymes such as α – amylase, α – glucosidase and α- sucrase can be one of the important strategies to lower blood glucose levels. But these inhibitors that are used in clinical practice for management of diabetes are known to be associated with various gastrointestional side effects. Therefore, it is the need of time to identify and explore the drugs from natural sources without side effects. Aim: In the present study, a commonly available species of Rutaceae - Zanthoxylum armatum DC was selected and explored for its anti-diabetic potentials employing in-vitro methods. Methods: Inhibitory potential of aqueous extract, ethanol extract and isolated fraction of bark of Z. armatum on α – amylase, α – glucosidase and α- sucrase enzyme was determined. Result: Aqueous bark extract exhibited potential inhibitory effect against glucose hydrolysing enzymes in a concentration dependent manner compared to ethanol extract and isolated fraction. The isolated fraction showed significantly higher glucose binding capacity and strong hindrance to diffusion of glucose across a dialysis membrane. Conclusion: The results indicated that aqueous bark extract and isolated fraction of Z.armatum possess good glucose absorption inhibitory activity.
KEYWORDS: α – amylase, α – glucosidase, α- sucrase, glucose adsorption, glucose bounding capacity, glucose diffusion retardation index, Zanthoxylum armatum DC.
INTRODUCTION:
Existing lines of treatment for diabetes with the administration of synthetic drugs or insulin therapy has its own shortcomings like ineffectiveness on oral administration, short shelf life, fatal hypoglycemia on excess dosage and development of resistance on prolonged usage. Because of these limitations, many diabetic patients are inclining towards the alternative therapies that include diet, food supplements and herbal medicines.
Traditional antidiabetic plants are considered to be useful sources for developing new oral hypoglycemic drug. There are many hypoglycemic plants known through the folklore but their introduction into the modern therapy system awaits in vitro and in vivo testing3. Literature review showed that plant species belonging to Rutaceae such as Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides4, Aegle marmelos5, Murraya koienigii6,7, Clausena anisa8 and Limonia acidissima Linn9 and alkaloids isolated from the Rutaceae plants are well documented for their antidiabetic activity. Hence the present investigation is aimed to identify and develop a novel antidiabetic herbal drug from common plant sources belonging to the family Rutaceae. Zanthoxylum armatum DC. (Z.armatum) commonly called as ‘Timur’ in Tamil, and ‘Tejohva’ in Ayurveda were selected. In traditional system of medicine (Ayurveda), stem bark of Z.armatum is used for treating Amavata, Kasa and Aruci10. Aqueous and ethanol extract of test drug had high extractive value compared to other extracts (results not presented) and as isolated fraction is rich in alkaloid – known for its antidiabetic potential, the present investigation aims in evaluating the in vitro antidiabetic potential of aqueous, ethanol and isolated fraction of stem bark of Z.armatum.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Identification and Authentification:
Stem bark of Z. armatum was collected from Palampur District of Himachal Pradesh, identified with the help of Flora of Presidency of Madras11 and authenticated with the help of CSIR - Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh.
Sample Preparation:
Preparation of Aqueous Extract:
The stem bark of the plant was collected during their blooming period, cleaned, shade dried and coarsely powered. 200g of coarse powder of stem bark Z.armatum was boiled in 1200ml of water. The contents were reduced to one third and filtrate was evaporated to dryness. Paste form of the extract obtained was stored in an airtight container at 4°C. The aqueous extract was then subjected to further analysis.
Preparation of Ethanol Extract:
The stem bark of the plant materials under study were shade dried and powdered coarsely. About 500gms of plant material was soaked in ethanol for 48hrs. After 48 hrs of soaking the solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure at 50°C and dried in vacuum. The ethanol extract was then subjected to further analysis.
Isolation of bioactive fraction12
Coarsely powdered plant material (Bark) was soaked in Petroleum ether for 48 hours. Filtered and the residue was soaked in acetone for 48 hours. Again it was filtered and the extract was evaporated to dryness which was further packed in column for isolation of bioactive fraction. The concentrated acetone extract after removal of the solvent was loaded on a preparative column using silica gel wetted with petroleum ether as the stationary phase. A gradient elution starting with 100% petroleum ether to 100% ethyl acetate was chosen as the eluting medium. At mobile phase Pet.ether: Ethyl acetate - 75:25, an orange fraction obtained were checked for the presence of alkaloid using TLC using mobile phase - chloroform: methanol in ratio of 10:1 on spraying with Dragondroff’s Reagent. A single orange colour spot was identified with Rf value of 0.35 confirms the presence of alkaloids.
In Vitro antidiabetic studies:
In vitro antidiabetic assay of extracts and isolated fraction (Skimmianine) of Z. armatum were determined by evaluating following parameters a-amylase inhibitory activity13, a-glucosidase inhibitory activity14, a -sucrase inhibitory activity15, glucose adsorption capacity13 and glucose diffusion13 using standard textual procedure.
Statistical Analysis:
All determinations were done in triplicate and results were expressed in mean ± standard error mean (SEM).
RESULTS:
Table – 1 Inhibition of alpha amylase enzyme by aqueous, ethanol extract and isolated fraction of Z. armatum DC. (Stem bark).
|
S. No |
Aqueous extract |
Ethanol extract |
Isolated fraction |
|||
|
Concentration (mg/mL) |
% Inhibition |
Concentration (µg /mL) |
% Inhibition |
Concentration (µg /mL) |
% Inhibition |
|
|
1. |
2 |
11.76 ± 1.96 |
100 |
18.09 ± 1.45 |
20 |
15.15± 1.75 |
|
2. |
4 |
33.33 ± 2.99 |
200 |
36.19 ± 1.98 |
40 |
27.27± 3.03 |
|
3. |
6 |
52.94 ± 1.96 |
300 |
59.04 ± 1.45 |
60 |
42.42± 1.75 |
|
4. |
8 |
68.62 ± 1.13 |
400 |
69.52 ± 1.09 |
80 |
60.61± 6.31 |
|
5. |
10 |
78.43 ± 1.13 |
500 |
74.28 ± 0.95 |
100 |
78.79± 4.63 |
|
|
IC50 Value - 5.8mg |
IC50 Value- 280 µg |
IC 50 Value - 69 µg |
|||
Values are expressed as ± SEM; (n = 3)
α-amylase inhibitory action of aqueous, methanol bark extract and isolated fraction rich in skimmianine of Z. armatum were assayed and the results were tabulated in Table - 1. Extracts and skimmianine showed potent inhibitory action against α-amylase activity in dose dependant manner. The maximum inhibition of aqueous extract was 78.43±1.13% at 10mg/mL, ethanolic extract was 74.28±0.95% at 500μg/mL, while for isolated fraction-skimmianine it was 78.79±4.63% at 100μg/mL. The IC50 values were 5.8mg, 280µg and 69µg for aqueous, ethanol and isolated fraction (Skimmianine) respectively.
Table – 2 Inhibition of alpha glucosidase enzyme by aqueous, ethanol extract and isolated fraction of Z. armatum DC. (Stem bark).
|
S. No |
Aqueous extract |
Ethanol extract |
Isolated fraction |
|||
|
Concentration (mg/mL) |
% Inhibition |
Concentration (µg /mL) |
% Inhibition |
Concentration (µg /mL) |
% Inhibition |
|
|
1. |
2 |
9.89 ± 1.49 |
200 |
13.49 ± 1.85 |
20 |
12.80 ± 1.81 |
|
2. |
4 |
22.53 ± 1.38 |
400 |
26.19 ± 1.73 |
40 |
30.19 ± 2.42 |
|
3. |
6 |
35.35 ± 1.29 |
600 |
40.740 ± 1.59 |
60 |
47.58 ± 1.94 |
|
4. |
8 |
48.35 ± 1.38 |
800 |
58.200 ± 1.50 |
80 |
62.08 ± 1.33 |
|
5. |
10 |
65.20 ± 1.76 |
1000 |
72.750 ± 2.46 |
100 |
81.64 ± 1.46 |
|
|
IC50 Value - 8.3mg |
IC50 Value-315µg |
IC 50 Value - 65 µg |
|||
Values are expressed as ± SEM; (n = 3)
Table 2 indicates the α - glucosidase inhibitory activity of bark extract of Z.armatum. There was a dose dependent increase in the inhibitory activity against α – glucosidase. At a maximum concentration of 10 mg, the aqueous bark extract showed 65.20±1.76% of inhibition. Ethanol and isolated fraction exhibited 74.28±0.95% and 81.64±1.46% at maximum concentration of 1000µg and 100µg respectively. The extracts exhibited an IC50 value at 8.3mg/mL for aqueous, 315µg/mL for ethanol and 69 µg/mL for isolated fraction (skimmianine). Aqueous extract, ethanol extract and skimmianine isolated from bark of Z.armatum showed significant inhibition of α - sucrase which were depicted in Table 3. Among the extracts and isolated fraction, ethanol extract showed potent α - sucrase inhibitory activity at a dose level of 250µg concentration with an IC50 value of 190µg/ml. Where as aqueous extract showed IC50 at 210mg/mL and isolated fraction at 380µg/mL.
Table – 3 Inhibition of alpha sucrase enzyme by aqueous, ethanol extract and isolated fraction of Z. armatum DC. (stem bark).
|
S. No |
Aqueous extract |
Ethanol extract |
Isolated fraction |
|||
|
Concentration (mg/mL) |
% Inhibition |
Concentration (µg /mL) |
% Inhibition |
Concentration (µg /mL) |
% Inhibition |
|
|
1. |
100 |
24.87 ± 3.72 |
50 |
15.34 ± 1.33 |
100 |
9.52 ± 1.06 |
|
2. |
200 |
44.97 ± 1.331 |
100 |
28.57 ± 2.12 |
200 |
24.34 ± 1.62 |
|
3. |
300 |
60.32 ± 1.91 |
150 |
44.97 ± 1.62 |
300 |
38.095 ± 1.59 |
|
4. |
400 |
74.07 ± 1.62 |
200 |
55.56 ± 1.59 |
400 |
53.438 ± 1.33 |
|
5. |
500 |
84.65 ± 0.81 |
250 |
71.43 ± 1.86 |
500 |
70.899 ± 1.11 |
|
|
IC50 Value - 210mg |
IC 50 Value- 190µg |
IC 50 Value - 380µg |
|||
Values are expressed as ± SEM; (n = 3)
Table – 4 Glucose bounding capacity by various extracts of Z.armatum DC. (Stem bark)
|
S.No |
Glucose concentration (mM) |
Aqueous (mM) |
Ethanol (mM) |
Isolated fraction (mM) |
|
1 |
5 |
3.87 ± 0.17 |
3.34 ± 0.14 |
1.70 ± 0.10 |
|
2 |
10 |
7.31 ± 0.26 |
6.26 ± 0.40 |
5.99 ± 0.40 |
|
3 |
20 |
15.82 ± 0.12 |
15.13 ± 0.39 |
12.25 ± 0.95 |
|
4 |
50 |
43.18 ± 0.67 |
38.95 ± 0.95 |
29.71 ± 1.19 |
|
5 |
100 |
82.13 ± 2.00 |
72.88 ± 2.78 |
60.46 ± 1.39 |
Values are expressed as ± SEM; (n = 3)
Table – 5 Inhibition of glucose diffusion by various extracts of Z. armatum DC. (Stem bark)
|
Time (Min) |
Control |
Aqueous extract |
Ethanol extract |
Isolated fraction |
|||
|
Glucose (mM) |
Glucose (mM) |
GDRI % |
Glucose (mM) |
GDRI % |
Glucose (mM) |
GDRI % |
|
|
30 |
2.21 ± 0.05 |
1.96 ± 0.02 |
88.7 |
1.62 ± 0.12 |
73.3 |
1.91 ± 0.08 |
86.4 |
|
60 |
2.87 ± 0.13 |
2.32 ±0.15 |
80.1 |
1.88 ± 0.23 |
65.5 |
2.16 ± 0.18 |
75.3 |
|
120 |
4.03 ± 0.17 |
3.01±0.11 |
74.7 |
2.41±0.19 |
59.8 |
2.62 ± 0.13 |
65.1 |
|
180 |
4.71 ± 0.23 |
3.16±0.08 |
67.1 |
2.46±0.15 |
52.2 |
2.19 ± 0.23 |
46.5 |
Values are expressed as ± SEM; (n = 3)
Data in Table 4 and 5 indicates the glucose adsorption and glucose diffusion inhibition capacity of test drug. There was a significant increase in the glucose adsorption capacity of extracts and isolated fraction of bark of Z. armatum at 50mM and 100mM glucose solution. Aqueous extract was found to be more potent in glucose bounding capacity when compared to ethanol extract and isolated fraction. Glucose diffusion was significantly decreased in the plant containing system compared to control at each intervals of time. The diffusion of glucose was time dependent and more amount of glucose was found in dialysate with increase in time from 0 to 180 min.
DISCUSSION:
In diabetes, postprandial blood glucose level is controlled by inhibiting carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes such as α-amylase, α-glucosidase and sucrase. This inturn reduces carbohydrate digestion and causes reduction in the rate of glucose absorption14. Several studies have been reported on the beneficial effect of plant fibers in controlling the blood glucose concentrations15 (Honda and Hara, 1993). Aqueous extract of bark of Z.armatum was found to have potent inhibitory effect against α-amylase, α-glucosidase, α-sucrase and glucose adsorption. The aqueous, ethanol extract Skimmianine rich fraction of bark of Z. armatum was effective in adsorbing glucose at both low and higher concentration of glucose used in the study (5, 10, 50, 100mM/L-1). Adsorption capacities of the sample was found to be directly proportional to molar concentration of glucose in the medium resulting in increased glucose binding with the plant extract16. All the plant extract showed significantly higher glucose adsorption at 100mM glucose concentration. It was hence considered that Z. armatum might help to retain the glucose in the intestinal lumen even at a low glucose concentration.
Glucose Diffusion Retardation Index (GDRI) was calculated on the basis of the retardation of glucose diffusion. The GDRI of the plant showed significantly higher inhibition of 88.7% (aqueous extract), 73.3% (ethanol extract) and 86.4% (isolated fraction) at the end of 30 min. than the control and diminish over time but diffusion of glucose was retarded compared to control. GDRI is a useful in vitro index to predict the effect of plant on the delay in glucose adsorption in the gastrointestinal tract1 (Rajiv Gandhi and Sasikumar, 2012). It was evident from the results that the extract possesses inhibitory effect on glucose diffusion over time than the control due to its phytoconstituents present in it.
CONCLUSION:
Management of diabetes without side effects is still a challenge to the medical community. It was proposed that inhibitory activity of carbohydrates digesting enzymes such as α – amylase, α – sucrase and α – glucosidase would delay the degradation of carbohydrate, and thereby results in the reduction of postprandial blood glucose level elevation. In conclusion, the aqueous, ethanol and isolated fraction of bark of Z. armatum have significant potential in inhibiting α – amylase, α – glucosidase, α – sucrase activity, glucose adsorption and diffusion of glucose even at lower concentration. From the results of in vitro studies, it is found that stem bark of Z. armatum might be a potent drug source for controlling postprandial glucose level in diabetic patients. Further, in depth and molecular studies in the extracts and isolated fraction are required to substantiate the mechanism of action of the plant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
The authors express sincere thanks to University Grant Commission (UGC) for providing financial support to carry out the study under Major Research Project Scheme (F. No 43 - 40/2014 (SR) (05/08/2015)).
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS:
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Rajiv Gandhi G, and Sasikumar P, Antidiabetic effect of Merremia emarginata Burm. F. in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats.
2. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2012; 2:281-286.
3. American Diabetes Association. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(2):296-309.
4. Zimmet PZ. Diabetes epidemiology as a tool to trigger diabetic research and care. Diabeteologia. 1999; 42: 499-518.
5. Aloke C, Nwachukwu N, Ugwuja EI, Idenyi JN, Nwachi EU, Obasi IO and Oga O. Effects of Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides leave on blood Glucose, lipid profile and some liver enzymes in alloxan Induced diabetic rats. International Journal of Science and Nature. 2012; 3(3): 497-501.
6. Narender, Shweta S, Tiwari P, Papi Reddy K, Khaliq T, Prathipati P, et al. Antihyperglycemic and antidyslipidemic agent from Aegle marmelos. Bioorganic and Med Chem Letters 2007; 1808–1811.
7. Yadav S, Vats V, Dhunnoo Y and Grover JK, Hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic activity of Murraya koenigii leaves in diabetic rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2002; 82(2-3):111-6.
8. Dineshkumar B. Analava Mitra and Manjunatha Mahadevappa. Antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effects of mahanimbine (carbazole alkaloid) from Murraya koenigii (Rutaceae) leaves. International Journal of Phytomedicine. 2010; 2: 22-30.
9. Ojewole JA. Hypoglycaemic effect of Clausena anisata (Willd) Hook methanolic root extract in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2002; 81(2): 231-7.
10. Kumawat, Bhupendra Kumar, Chand, Tara Singh and Yogendra. Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic effects of alcoholic and aqueous stem bark extracts of Limonia acidissima, Linn. in alloxan induced diabetic rats. International Journal of Phytomedicine. 2012; 4(2): 187.
11. Tejovati; In The Ayurvedic pharmacopoeia of India. Government of India, Ministry of Health and family welfare, Department of Indian systems of medicine and Homeopathy, New Delhi. (I edn) 1999, Part – I, Vol – II: 160-161.
12. Gamble JS. 1997. Flora of Presidency of Madras, Botanical survey of India. Adlard and Sons Ltd., London. Vol I. 149-150.
13. Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1984, 1-89.
14. Ou S, Kwok K, Li Y and Fu L. In vitro study of possible role of dietary fiber in lowering postprandial serum glucose. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001; 49: 1026-29.
15. Dahlqvist A. Method for assay of intestinal disaccharides. Analytical Biochemistry. 1964; 7: 18 –25.
16. Honda M and Hara Y. Inhibition of rat small intestinal sucrase and a-glucosidase activities by tea polyphenols. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 1993; 57: 123-4.
17. Faiyaz Ahmed NS, Siddaraju and Asna Urooj. In vitro hypoglycemic effects of Gymnema sylvestre, Tinospora cordifolia, Eugenia jambolana and Aegle marmelos. Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals. 2011; 2(2): 52 -55.
Received on 24.09.2019 Modified on 18.11.2019
Accepted on 13.01.2020 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(8):3681-3684.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00651.4