Evaluation of Antidiabetic and Antioxidant potential of some Novel Ethoxylated head of α, β-unsaturated Ketones

 

Lakshminarayanan B1,2, Kannappan N2, Subburaju T1

1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Ahalia School of Pharmacy, Palakkad - 678557, Kerala, India

2Department of Pharmacy, Annamalai University, Chidambaram - 608002, Tamilnadu, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: blnrxpharma@gmail.com, lakshmi.narayanan@ahalia.ac.in

 

ABSTRACT:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vivo antidiabetic and in vitro antioxidant activity of newly synthesized α, β-unsaturated ketones with ethoxy head. Eleven newly synthesized compounds (E1 - E11) were taken to evaluate for their in vitro antioxidant activity by DPPH and hydrogen peroxide assay method and six compounds which contain electron donating groups were selected for screening of in vivo antidiabetic potential by high fat diet, streptozotocin induced diabetes in Albino Wistar rats. The compounds containing electron donating groups were found to be good antioxidants when compared to standard ascorbic acid. All the selected compounds were found to be effective for antidiabetic activity. Amongst them compound E4 shows more prominent antidiabetic activity when compared to standard metformin.

 

KEYWORDS: α, β-unsaturated ketones, Electron donating groups, Electron withdrawing groups, Antidiabetic activity, Antioxidant activity.

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

Chemically chalcones are α, β-unsaturated ketones which play a major role in designing and synthesis of new chemical entity (NCE). Chalcones are synthesized by Claisen–Schmidt condensation which involves a reaction between aromatic aldehydes and ketones in presence of base followed by dehydration. These chalcones nucleus are abundant in edible plants and are considered to be the precursors for biosynthesis of flavonoids and isoflavonoids. This nucleus is found in many natural products mainly in flavonoid family. It is also an important intermediate for many heterocyclic compounds such as pyrazolines, thiazines, oxazines and isoxazolines etc.1-6 Many flavonoids and other compounds which contain this moiety have been reported with a wide spectrum of biological activities.7-20

 

Number of diseases are reported to be due to the chemicals which induce oxidative stress were not balanced with antioxidant homeostatic phenomenon in our body. Due to the depletion of dietary antioxidants and elevated level of oxidative stress pronounced the generation of free radicals which can leads to many pathological conditions in the body.21 Free radicals play a major role in many diseases like heart disease, cancer, diabetes, strokes, Parkinson’s diseases and allergies.22

 

Oxidative stress contributes in the development of diabetes mellitus (DM) and also shows important role during DM, including diminishing of insulin action and raise of the complication rate. Antioxidants have already shown to be potential in the treatment of DM both type 1 and type 2. Most of the studies have shown relationship between oxidative strain and DM along with their impediments related to heart, liver kidney and eye. Thus, oxidative stress seems to be more worrying in metabolic disorders of type 2 diabetes. Antioxidants are preventing the development of chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.23

 

DM is a progressive disorder characterized by hyperglycaemia associated with malfunctioning of the vital organs of the body due to biochemical alterations of glucose, lipid and protein metabolism.24 Hyperglycemia generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can leads to the destruction of normal function of cells. Earlier literature states that diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin (STZ) in experimental animals, resembles type 2 diabetes in humans.25 Many molecules which contain chalcones as a basic structure have been reported to be effective antioxidants26,27 and antidiabetic agents.28-30

 

Therefore in the present study, all the newly synthesized compounds are evaluated for antioxidant potential by DPPH (2,2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assay method. The chalcones with electron donating groups (EDG) possess enhanced antidiabetic activity when compared to other substituents.31 Therefore among all the synthesized compounds, only the compounds with EDG (E1, E2, E3, E4, E9 and E10) were selected for their investigation of antidiabetic potentials by HFD-STZ induced diabetics in Albino Wistar rats. Graphical abstract of the present study is given in Figure. 1.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals and reagents:

All the chemicals and reagents used in this study are of analytical grade. Streptozotocin and other chemicals used for this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Disodium hydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate were obtained from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. Metformin was procured as marketed formulation from Sun Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai, India.

 

Acute toxicity evaluation:

The acute toxicity evaluation was performed according to OECD-423 guidelines and used for the estimation of LD50 of synthesized compounds for biological evaluation.32-34 The Swiss albino mice (n = 6) of either sex were selected randomly and fasted for 24 h with free access to water only. The different synthetic compounds were suspended in normal saline: Tween 80 (95:5) which was administered orally at the dose of 5mg/kg b.w initially and the incidence of mortality were observed for three days. Further the study was repeated with higher doses such as 50, 300 and 2000mg/kg. b.w. From acute toxicity study, it was observed that there were no signs and symptoms of acute toxicity at the doses used. Therefore the antidiabetic activity of synthesized compounds was carried out at the dose of 200mg/kg b.w. (i.e 1/10 of the 2000mg/kg b.w.) as per OECD guidelines. 

 

Animals:

Healthy adult male Wistar rats weighing between 160 – 190gm were used for the antidiabetic studies. The experiments were carried out after the due approval from Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), Aditya Bangalore Institute of Pharmacy Education and Research, Bangalore. IAEC guidelines were followed for the maintenance of animals and the research work was approved by IAEC No. 115/1611/CPCSEA.

 

Synthesis and characterization of ethoxylated head of α, β-unsaturated ketones:

Eleven different compounds of α, β-unsaturated ketones with ethoxy head were obtained from the reactions of 4-ethoxyacetophenone and different para substituted benzaldehydes in presence of base and ethanol by Claisen-Schmidt method. Synthesis and characterization of these compounds were published by B Lakshminarayanan et al in 201935 and depicted in Figure. 2. All the 11 compounds (E1 to E11) were selected for in vitro antioxidant activity and the compounds of α, β-unsaturated ketones with ethoxy group at one end and electron donating group on the other end (E1, E2, E3, E4, E9 and E10) were selected for their in vivo antidiabetic potential.

 

 

In vitro antioxidant activity:

DPPH free radical scavenging activity:

All the 11 compounds were selected for in vitro antioxidant activity by scavenging of DPPH free radical.36 Different concentrations of standard ascorbic acid and synthesized compounds (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 µg/ml) were prepared from stock solution (100µg/ml) using distilled methanol. One ml of each compound solution was taken in individual test tubes; 4ml of 0.004% methanol solution of DPPH was added and shaken vigorously. After 30 min of incubation in dark at room temperature, the absorbance was measured against a blank at 517 nm using UV – VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1800) and the percentage radical scavenging activity was calculated by using the formula [(A0 – A1)/A0] x 100, where A0 is the absorbance of blank, A1 is the absorbance of the synthesized compounds/standard. The graph was plotted between percent inhibition and concentrations of the sample/standard to obtain the amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease 50% from the initial concentration of DPPH free radicals. IC50 values were calculated from calibration curve and defined as the concentration of test/standard compound required to achieve half maximal inhibition.37-39

 

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) radical scavenging activity:

A solution of hydrogen peroxide (20 mM) was prepared in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (pH 7.4). Different concentrations of standard ascorbic acid and synthesized compounds (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50µg/ml) were prepared from stock solution (100µg/ml) using distilled methanol. One ml of each compound solution was taken in individual test tubes; 2ml of hydrogen peroxide solution in PBS added to all the test tubes. Absorbance of hydrogen peroxide at 230nm was determined after 10 minutes against a blank solution containing phosphate buffer without hydrogen peroxide.40,41 The percentage scavenging activity and IC50 values were measured and calculated by using the formula mentioned in DPPH assay method.

 

In vivo antidiabetic activity of various compounds with EDG using HFD-STZ induced diabetics in rats:

Anti-diabetic activity of synthesized compounds with EDG (E1, E2, E3, E4, E9 and E10) is tested as per the standard method described42 by using male Wistar rats (160 – 190g).

 

Induction of diabetes:

High fat diet (HFD) was freshly prepared every day as per the method of Devi et al.43 Control animals were provided with normal pellet chow (Lipton, India). After 3 days on high fat diet, animals were fasted overnight and diabetes is induced by STZ (50 mg/kg b.w.) intravenously. The STZ was freshly dissolved in citrate buffer (0.01 M/L, pH 4.5) and kept on ice prior to use. One week after STZ administration, the rats with fasting blood glucose concentrations of over 200 mg/dl were considered to be diabetic and were used in the experiments.

 

Experimental design:

Animals were divided into nine groups of six (n=6) in each.  Group 1 treated as normal control (vehicle) received 1.0 ml of 0.5% CMC. Group 2 treated as diabetic control. Group 3 treated as diabetic animals received metformin (50 mg/kg b.w.). Groups 4 to 9 diabetic animals received various compounds of E1, E2, E3, E4, E9 and E10 in a single dose of 200 mg/kg b.w. per oral respectively for 7 days continuously. Body weight, food and water intake were monitored daily for 21 days.  Blood was withdrawn from the tail vein or retro orbital vein each time and blood glucose was measured at 0, 7th, 14th and 21st day by blood glucose monitoring system.

 

Statistical Analysis:

Values are expressed as mean±SEM. The statistical analysis was carried out using one way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests using Instat-3 software package (Graph pad), Prism Ltd, USA and values at p<0.05 were considered as significant.

 

RESULTS:

In vitro antioxidant activity:

The scavenging of DPPH radical by synthesized compounds and standard ascorbic acid was determined by decrease in absorbance at 517 nm. The DPPH radical scavenging activity and IC50 values were recorded for each compound and shown in the Table 1.

 

Hydrogen peroxide free radicals are not very reactive, but sometimes it is toxic to cell because it may give rise to hydroxyl radical in the cells. Therefore removing of hydrogen peroxide free radicals is very important for antioxidant defence in cell. The H2O2 free radicals scavenging ability and IC50 values of synthesised compounds and standard were given in Table 2 and compared with standard ascorbic acid.

 

 

 

Table 1: Antioxidant activities of synthesized compounds (E1 – E11) using DPPH radical scavenging method.

Compounds

DPPH radical scavenging activity %

IC50 (µg/ml)

10 µg/ml

20 µg/ml

30 µg/ml

40 µg/ml

50 µg/ml

E1

35.24

42.13

49.51

50.29

50.19

41.97

E2

48.93

54.27

56.01

60.09

62.81

10.45

E3

43.49

49.51

52.13

55.04

57.37

25.69

E4

50.29

55.43

59.32

63.10

67.28

8.34

E5

34.27

35.53

36.31

35.63

42.23

112.62

E6

32.23

33.49

34.56

36.01

36.89

172.00

E7

18.54

20.19

21.84

22.13

22.91

320.90

E8

20.58

22.52

23.00

23.98

24.17

371.87

E9

45.92

54.85

57.47

60.87

61.06

13.50

E10

45.63

49.12

52.42

55.92

58.54

23.31

E11

22.42

21.65

24.85

25.53

26.89

246.50

Ascorbic acid

55.53

61.94

65.14

69.80

71.06

7.94

Table 2: Antioxidant activities of synthesized compounds (E1 – E11) using H2O2 radical scavenging method.

Compounds

H2O2 radical scavenging activity %

IC50 (µg/ml)

10 µg/ml

20 µg/ml

30 µg/ml

40 µg/ml

50 µg/ml

E1

31.92

36.87

37.32

39.47

41.00

91.40

E2

49.91

50.98

52.42

54.67

56.74

13.35

E3

39.02

42.62

44.60

46.13

48.02

57.58

E4

52.24

53.05

54.04

55.93

56.20

10.05

E5

17.17

19.33

21.85

21.94

21.85

301.54

E6

12.05

13.30

14.92

14.83

14.83

545.00

E7

10.70

10.88

11.33

12.41

14.65

453.77

E8

10.52

11.87

12.32

12.85

12.94

793.00

E9

45.77

48.38

52.24

53.68

54.31

26.54

E10

43.61

45.05

49.55

52.15

54.40

34.50

E11

8.99

7.19

10.52

12.32

14.02

292.99

Ascorbic acid

52.78

55.48

56.11

57.19

60.16

8.75

 

 

Antioxidant results revealed that among all the tested compounds, E4, E2 and E9 with an IC50 value of 8.34, 10.45 and 13.50 respectively showed good antioxidant activity which is compared to standard ascorbic acid (IC50 value of 7.94) in DPPH assay. Also with H2O2 free radical scavenging method it was found that E4 and E2 has good antioxidant activity with IC50 values of 10.05 and 13.35 respectively when compared to standard ascorbic acid (IC50 value of 8.75).

 

 

In vivo antidiabetic activity:

The selected synthesized compounds were screened for in vivo antidiabetic activity by streptozotocin induced diabetic model in Albino rat. The changes in body weight, water and food intake in STZ induced diabetic rats before and after oral treatment with vehicle, various compounds and metformin for 3 weeks were given in Table 3. Effect of various compounds with EDG and metformin on the blood glucose level in STZ induced diabetic rats were presented in Table 4.

 

 

Table 3: Body weight, water and food intake in STZ induced diabetic rats before and after oral treatment with vehicle, various compounds and metformin for 3 weeks.

Treatment / Groups

Body weight (gm)

Water intake(ml/100 g b.w. of rat/day)

Food intake (g/100 g b.w. of rat/day)

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Normal

179.05 ± 2.18

183.06 ± 3.18

166.08 ± 4.51

170.02 ± 1.43

32.33 ± 1.08

34.46 ± 0.19

Diabetic

179.18 ± 4.02

158.19 ± 1.09

158.19 ± 1.96

179.12 ± 2.35

33.46 ± 3.19

38.48 ± 2.18

E1

161.04 ± 2.43

166.23 ± 1.95*

172.97 ± 3.52

163.35 ± 5.64

41.14 ± 3.46

38.13 ± 4.15

E2

174.48 ± 2.65

176.08 ± 3.46*

167.36 ± 2.46

156.46 ± 3.69*

41.42 ± 4.48

36.14 ± 1.87

E3

182.63 ± 1.35

188.02 ± 4.38*

162.35 ± 2.87

160.67 ± 2.86*

34.46 ± 1.95

32.31 ± 4.06

E4

160.18 ± 3.02

168.18 ± 1.07*

163.12 ± 2.21

152.19 ± 1.86*

42.28 ± 2.31

31.46 ± 0.17*

E9

169.15 ± 3.03

171.21 ± 1.08*

156.29 ± 1.83

149.12 ± 2.45*

36.38 ± 2.38

32.36 ± 3.21

E10

176.13 ± 1.85

181.04 ± 2.31*

162.15 ± 5.64

122.97 ± 3.52*

40.14 ± 3.25

39.23 ± 2.5

Metformin

186.35 ± 2.46

198.43 ±3.86*

159.26 ± 3.76

121.02 ± 3.57*

46.14 ± 3.19

30.08 ± 0.98*

 

 

Values are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6). *P < 0.05, compared to diabetic control group

 

The body weight of all the tested compounds and metformin were increased when compared to diabetic control. Body weight of E4 and metformin treated group was much higher when compared to that of the same before the treatment. Food and water intake of all the tested groups and metformin treated group were decreased when compared to that of the same before the treatment. Metformin and E10 treated groups showed much difference of water intake when compared to before the treatment. Water intake of all the compounds and metformin treated groups showed significant except E1 treated group when compared to diabetic control. On the other hand food intake of metformin and E4 treated groups showed significant when compared to diabetic control.

 

 

 

Table 4: Effect of various compounds with EDG on blood glucose level in STZ induced diabetic rats.

Treatment / Group

Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl)

% activity

0 day

7 day

14 day

21 day

Normal control

75.6 ± 8.6

77.8 ± 1.6

76.4 ± 2.3

78.6 ± 1.4

---

Diabetic control

257.4 ± 4.1

259.7 ± 3.6

256.4 ± 4.6

259.7 ± 3.8

---

E1 (200 mg/kg b.w.)

262.3 ± 6.4

246.4 ± 6.2

226.5 ± 2.3

216.5 ± 4.4

15.52

E2 (200 mg/kg b.w.)

276.7 ± 3.5

258.5 ± 4.8

229.6 ± 4.7

204.6 ± 5.2

20.54

E3 (200 mg/kg b.w.)

271.8 ± 5.6

218.4 ± 6.7*

191.3 ± 4.1*

151.1 ± 2.8*

41.26

E4 (200 mg/kg b.w.)

274.6 ± 6.3

233.5 ± 4.8*

198.8 ± 5.4*

128.6 ± 3.9*

51.34

E9 (200 mg/kg b.w.)

268.8 ± 4.6

239.4 ± 5.7

223.3 ± 7.2

201.1 ± 3.8

17.06

E10 (200 mg/kg b.w.)

269.9 ± 6.4

201.7 ± 5.2*

186.2 ± 3.8*

139.6 ± 5.7*

45.31

Metformin (50 mg/kg b.w.)

265.4 ± 2.3

196.7 ± 4.7*

154.5 ± 3.9*

106.4 ± 2.7*

58.35

 

 

Values are expressed as mean±SEM (n=6). *P < 0.05, compared to diabetic control group.

 

From the results, compound E4 showed high, E10 and E3 showed moderate significant activity when compared with standard. The percentage antidiabetic activity of the compounds E4, E10 and E3 have 51.34%, 45.31% and 41.26 % respectively when compared to standard metformin which has 58.35 % activity. Other compounds E1, E2 and E9 have less significant activity when compared to standard metformin.

 

DISCUSSION:

Tested compounds, E4, E2 and E9 showed good antioxidant activity when compared to standard ascorbic acid in DPPH assay and H2O2 free radical scavenging method. The better antioxidant activities of E4, E2 and E9 may be due to the presence of electron donating –N(CH3)2, OCH3 and OH group on B ring. On the other hand, compounds E1, E3, E10 in the order of E10>E3>E1 showed moderate antioxidant activity in both DPPH and hydrogen peroxide assay methods. Other compounds like E5, E6, E7, E8 and E11 showed low antioxidant activities. The low activities of these compounds may be due to the presence of electron withdrawing NO2, Cl, F, Br and CF3 groups on B ring. The parent compound E1 which has no substitution on B ring showed lower antioxidant activity when compared to substitution with EDG on B ring. On the other hand E1 showed better activity then the compound with EWG on B ring.

 

Nowadays management of diabetes is a need for everyone and it is the challenge in the medical community. STZ is widely used as an agent for the development of experimental diabetes to induce selective dysfunctioning of pancreatic β-cells and the destruction is almost complete.44,45 The cytotoxic action of STZ is mediated by reactive oxygen species, with a simultaneous massive increase in cytosolic calcium concentration, leading to a rapid destruction of β-cells.46

The present study revealed that the synthesized compound E4 have highly, E10 and E3 have moderate and E1, E2 and E9 have less significant antidiabetic activity when compared to standard. The percentage increase of blood glucose level was found to be in the order of E1 > E9 > E2 > E3 > E10 > E4 > Metformin. Synthesized compound of α, β-unsaturated ketone with ethoxy group at A ring and dimethyl amino group on B ring (E4) showed high activity than other group attached in ring B. Compounds end with ethyl (E10) and methyl group (E3) also possess a significant antidiabetic activity when compared to standard metformin. Ethoxy head of α, β-unsaturated ketone with substitution at para position in ring B showed increased activity when compared to unsubstituted parent compound (E1). Compounds which contains electron donating group increased the electron density of the molecule and it may help to transport the glucose to muscle and adipose tissue from blood by enhancing the synthesis of glucose transporter or by stimulating the release of insulin into the blood steam and increases glucose utilisation in muscles.31 It is interesting to note that the antidiabetic activity increases with increasing electron donating capacity of the substituting group in ring B.

 

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, results of antioxidant activities of synthesized compounds by DPPH and hydrogen peroxide assay methods confirms that the compounds with electron donating groups possess good antioxidant activity than the compounds with electron withdrawing groups when compared to standard. The results of the antidiabetic study revealed that the compounds tested showed moderate to good antidiabetic activity depends on the electron donating group attached to it.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT:

The authors express their sincere thanks to The Principal, Ahalia School of Pharmacy, Palakkad, Kerala and Dr. N. Venkatesan, Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Aditya Bangalore Institute of Pharmacy Education and Research, Yelahanka, Bangalore, India to carry out this research project.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

ABBREVIATIONS:

NCE: New chemical entity; DM: Diabetes mellitus; HFD: High fat diet; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; STZ: Streptozotocin; DPPH: 2,2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; H2O2: Hydrogen peroxide; EDG: Electron donating group; EWG: Electron withdrawing group; OECD: Organization of economic co-operation and development; LD50: Lethal dose 50; IAEC: Institutional animal ethics committee; CPCSEA: Committee for the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals; IC50: Inhibitory concentration 50; PBS: Phosphate buffer Saline; CMC: Carboxy methyl cellulose; SEM: Standard error of the mean; ANOVA: Analysis of variance; FBG: Fasting blood glucose.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Ramesh. B  Azma Yasmeen, Shivakumar Swamy and Someswara Rao. B. Synthesis and Anti-inflammatory Activity of Some New 2-Pyrazoline Derivatives. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2010; 3(2): 625 - 626.

2.      Ishwar Bhat K, Abhishek K. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Some Novel Pyrazoline Derivatives Derived from Chalcones. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(5): 1344-6.

3.      Dale S, Maria S, Lisbeth M et al. Transcription factors of lotus: Regulation of isoflavonoid biosynthesis requires coordinated change in transcription factor activity. American Society of Plant Biologists. 2012; 59: 531-47.

4.      Xuan F, Juhua F, Zhenhua D et al. Enantioselective synthesis of 2-substituted-1,5-benzodiazepines through domino reaction of o-phenylenediamine and chalcones derivatives. Eur J Chem. 2011; 2011: 5233-6.

5.      Saktinathan SP, Vanangamudi G, Thirunarayan G. Synthesis, spectral studies and antimicrobial activities of some 2-naphthyl pyrazoline derivatives. Spectrochimica Acta part A: Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2012; 95: 693-700.

6.      Sashidhara KV, Kumar M, Kumar A. A novel route to synthesis of flavones from salicylaldehyde and acetophenone derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 2355-9.

7.      Pankaj Kumar, Abhishek Kumar, Jean Sandra pinto et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Pyrimidine Derivatives via Pyrrolyl Chalcones. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(5): 1392-4.

8.      Della G, Thomas P, Fakhrya A et al. Cholinesterase inhibitory activities of selected halogenated thiophene chalcones. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2019; 19: 1-5.

9.      Panigrahi N, Ganguly S, Panda J. Ultrasound assisted synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial evaluation of novel oxazolidinone- biphenyl chalcone hybrid derivatives. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2019; 53(2): 286-300.

10.   Mathew B, Mathew GE, Ucar G et al. Monoamine oxidase inhibitory activity of methoxy-substituted chalcones. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017; 104: 1321-9.

11.   Lokesh BVS, Rajendra Prasad Y, Basha Shaik A. Synthesis and biological activity of novel 2,5-dichloro-3-acetylthiophene chalcone derivatives. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2017; 51(4s): s679-s690.

12.   Mathew B, Abitha H, Suresh J et al. Monoamine oxidase inhibitory action of chalcones: A mini review. Cent Nerv Sys Agent. 2016; 16(2): 120-36.

13.   Wang L, Chen G, Lu X et al. Novel chalcones derivatives as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 inhibitor: Synthesis, anti-invasive and anti-angiogenic properties. Eur J Med Chem. 2015; 89: 88-97.

14.   Abdellatif KR, Elshemy HA, Salama SA, Omar HA. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of novel 4'-fluoro-2'-hydroxy-chalchone derivatives as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2014; 8: 1-8.

15.   Singh P, Anand A, Kumar V. Recent developments in biological activities of chalcones: A mini review. Eur J Med Chem. 2014; 85: 758-77.

16.   Lahsasni SA, Al Korbi FH, Aljaber NA. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of antioxidant activities of some novel chalcones analogues. Chem Cent J. 2014; 8: 32.

17.   Abraham GR, Aguilar HM, Romero NC et al. Synthesis and anti-inflammatory activity of three nitro chalcones. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013; 23: 5519-22.

18.   Lakshminarayanan B, Rajamanickam V, Subburaju T, Pradeep Rajkumar LA. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of some 3-(5-Phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1-substituted pyrazol-3-yl) chromen-2-one. E-Journal of Chemistry. 2010; 7(2): 383-90.

19.   Lunkad AS, Kothawade SN, Jadhav DV et al. Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity of Some New Chalcones Containing Benzofuran and Benzofuran Schiff Bases. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2015; 8(3): 276-9.

20.   Jennifer Fernandes, Abhishek Kumar and Pankaj Kumar. Synthesis and Biological Activity of Some Novel Quinolinyl Chalcones Derived from N-Substituted 2-Quinolones. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2013; 6(12): 1336-9.

21.   Tiwari AK. Imbalance in antioxidant defence and human diseases: Multiple approach of natural antioxidants therapy. Current Science (India). 2001; 81(9): 1179-87.

22.   Suzen S. Antioxidant activities of synthetic indole derivatives and possible activity mechanisms. Top Heterocycl Chem. 2007; 11: 145-78.

23.   Asmat U, Abad K, Ismail K. Diabetes mellitus and oxidative stress - A concise Review. Saudi Pharm J. 2016; 24: 547-53.

24.   Lebovitz HE. Oral antidiabetic agents. In: Kahn, CR, Weir, GC (Eds.) Joslin's Diabetes Mellitus. 1994; 13(29): 508-24.

25.   Wolff SP. Diabetes mellitus and free radicals. Br Med Bull. 1993; 49: 642-52.

26.   Anto RJ, Sukumaran K, Kuttan G et al. Anticancer and antioxidant activity of synthetic chalcones and related compounds. Cancer lett. 1995; 97(1): 33-7. 

27.   Sharma A, Bharadwaj S, Maan SA et al. Screening of antioxidant activity: An overview. Pharmacogn Rev. 2007; 1: 232-8.

28.   Hsieh CT, Hsieh TJ, El Shazly M et al. Synthesis of chalcone derivatives as potential antidiabetic agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012; 22(12): 3912-5.

29.   Satyanarayana M, Tiwari P, Tripathi BK et al. Synthesis and antihyperglycaemic activity of chalcone based aryloxypropanolamines. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004; 12: 883- 9.

30.   , , Flavone based novel antidiabetic and antidyslipidaemic agents. J Med Chem. 2012; 55: 4551-7.

31.   Mahapatra DK, Vivek A, Sanjay KB. Chalcones and their therapeutic targets for the management of diabetes: Structural and pharmacological perspectives. Eur J Med Chem. 2015; 92: 839-65.

32.   Shab MA Ayub, Garg SK, Garg KM. Sub-acute toxicity studies on pendimethalin in rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 1997; 29(5): 322-4.

33.   Burger C, Fischer DR, Cordenunzzi DA et al. Acute and sub-acute toxicity of the hydroalcoholic extract from Wedelia paludosa (Acmela brasilinsis) (Aastraceae) in mice. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2005; 8(2): 370-3.

34.   Akhila JS, Shyamajith, Deepa, Alwar MC. Acute toxicity studies and determination of median lethal dose. Curr Sci. 2007; 93: 917-20.

35.   Lakshminarayanan B, Seung Cheol Baek, Kannappan N et al. Ethoxylated head of chalcones as a new class of multi-targeted MAO inhibitors. ChemistrySelect. 2019; 4: 6614-9.

36.   Kaushik N, Kumar N, Kumar A. Synthesis, antioxidant and antidiabetic activity of 1-[(5-subtituted phenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]-5-phenyl-1H-tetrazole. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2016; 78(3): 352-9. 

37.   Kaushik N, Kumar N, Kumar A. Synthesis of substituted 5-phenyl-1-(5-phenyl)-isoxazol-3-yl)-1H-tetrazole as antioxidant agents. J Adv Sci Res. 2015; 6: 14-9.

38.   Kaushik N, Kumar N, Kumar A. Synthesis of triazolothiadiazine derivatives as antioxidant agents. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015; 7: 120-3.

39.    Malladi SR, Anisetti R, Rao PR. A facile synthesis, in vitro anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of novel benzimidazolylpyrano[2,3-d][1,3]thiazolocarbonitriles. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2014; 76(6): 510-8.

40.   Jeyaprakasha GK, Jaganmohan RL, Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activities of flavidin in different in vitro model systems. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004; 12(19): 5141-6.

41.   Babu BH, Shylesh BS, Padikkala J. Antioxidant and hepatoprotective effect of Alanthus icicifocus. Fitoterapia. 2001; 72: 272-7.

42.   Singh AK, Sing J. Evaluation of anti-diabetic potential of leaves and stem of Flacourtia jangomasin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Ind J Pharmacol. 2012; 42(5): 301-5.

43.   Devi R, Sharma DK. Hypolipidemic effect of different extracts of clerodendron colebrookianum walp in normal and high-fat diet fed rats. J Pharmacol. 2004; 90(1): 63-8.

44.   Rerup CC. Drugs producing diabetes through damage of the insulin secreting cells. Pharmacol Rev. 1970; 22(4): 485-518.

45.   Lenzen S, Panten U. Alloxan: History and mechanism of action. Diabetologia. 1988; 31(6): 337-42.

46.   Szkudelski T. The mechanism of alloxan and steptozotocin action in β-cells of the rat pancreas. Physiol Res. 2001; 50(6): 537-46.

 

 

 

 

Received on 03.08.2019            Modified on 05.09.2019

Accepted on 18.10.2019           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(4): 1955-1960.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00352.2