In-vitro Antioxidant, Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities of Banana leaves (Musa acuminata) and Olive leaves (Olea europaea L.) as by-products

 

Zeinab A. Salama1, Ahmed M. Aboul-Enein2, Alaa A. Gaafar1*, Mohsen S. Asker3,

Hanan F. Aly4, Habiba A. Ahmed1

1Plant Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre (NRC), 12622, Egypt

2Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613, Egypt

3Microbial Biotechnology Department, National Research Centre (NRC), 12622, Egypt

4Therapeutic Chemistry Department, National Research Centre (NRC), 12622 Giza, Egypt

*Corresponding Author E-mail: dr.gaafar2308@hotmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

This study was designed to examine the in-vitro chemical components and their bioactivity as an antioxidant, antimicrobial and anticancer agents for olive leaves (OL) and banana leaves (BL) extracts. Searching for new and cheap sources of important compounds are still not yet discovered. Banana and olive leaves as a source of important and economical compounds are potential for such a purpose. Proximate analysis, Aqueous, methanol, ethanol and acetone extracts of both banana leaves (BL) and olive leaves (OL) were evaluated for their antioxidant, antimicrobial and antitumor agents. Total phenolic (TP), total flavonoids (TF) and total tannins (TT) were determined in their extracts. In addition, HPLC identification for phenolic compounds. Our findings indicate that banana acetone extract possesses a high content of phenolic, flavonoids and tannins. While these compounds were high in methanolic extract of olive leaves. Banana leaves showed high content in phenolic compounds, especially vanillic and ferulic acids. While, protocatechuic, chyrsin, syringic, gallic and ellagic were mostly found in olive leaves. Banana and olive leave acetone extracts found to have considerable antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Banana leaves acetone extract also presented vigorous activity against breast and liver hepatocellular tumor cell lines. This study concludes that the fruit leaves are a potential source for bioactive metabolites and can be used in the pharmaceutical industry as antimicrobial and antitumor materials. Besides recycling waste to reduce environmental pollution.

 

KEYWORDS: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, Antitumor, Banana, and Olive leaves.

 

 


1. INTRODUCTION:

Recently, the demand for olive leaf extract has increased for use in foodstuffs, Food Additives, and functional food materials1, hence, important scientific and technical efforts have been made to determine the value of this agricultural waste2. This demonstrates the great economic of this crop and the possible benefit to be derived from the utilization of any of its byproducts.

 

 

 

Olea europaea L. (Oleaceae) is considered one of the most important fruit  In Mediterranean, areas there are approximately eight million hectares of cultivated olive trees (98% of the world crop). The Olive leaves are considered one of the byproducts of farming of the olive grove which they accumulate during pruning of the olive trees3,4,5. Therefore, in the scientific community, the Olea europaea L. leaves have attracted growing interest. Recently, The scientific researchers paid attention of olive leaves for using as foodstuff, food additives and function food1, According to the literature, olive and banana leaves is the most active in inhibiting polymerization of human chromosomes, hence the highest potential for inhibition of cancer cell formation6,7. The olive leaves restraining cell propagation in breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, SKBR-3, JIMT-1)8, and human liver cancer cells (HepG2)9. A banana plant (Musa acuminate), is vastly being consumed across the world and used is known for many pharmacological activities. Recent studies have highlighted that olive leaves (OL) and banana leaves (BL) contain a large number of polyphenols which have several beneficial effects on health: anti-hypertensive10, anti-diabetic11, anti-carcinogenic12, anti-atherosclerotic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antifungal activities13. The potential activity as antimicrobial action may be related to the compounds that can be used to inhibit the growth of forborne pathogens. Especially polyphenol oxidase which is used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disorder14

 

The objective of this study to examine and evaluate in vitro the chemical components of olive leaves and banana leaves in different solvent extracts and their antioxidant, antimicrobial and antitumor activities.

 

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals and reagents:

ABTS˙+ (2, 2’-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline- 6-sulfonic acid)), Folin–Ciocalteau reagents, Gallic acid, Quercetin, DPPH˙ ( 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), Ferrozine: (3-(2 - pyridyl)- 5, 6-bis- (4-phenylsulfonic acid)-1, 2, 4-triazine, BHT: Butyl Hydroxytoluene and, potassium ferricyanide, were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. ( St. Louis, MO, USA).

 

Plant materials:

Leaves of banana variety Maghrabi were obtained from the local market at Giza, Egypt. And leaves of olive variety kalamata (Olea europea L.) were obtained from the Nubaria farm (National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt).

 

Preparation of sample:

The banana and olive leaves were washed and air-dried for ten days followed by drying in an oven at 40ºC for three days until the stability of the weight, ground than stored in -20 ºC until extraction and analysis.

 

Preparation of banana and olive leaves extracts:

The dried samples of banana and olive leaves (10 g) were submersed separately in 100 ml of distilled water, 80% methanol, 80% ethanol, and 80% acetone for 24 h at room temperature using a shaker. Each mixture was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper and the extraction step was repeated three times. The filtrate was then concentrated to dryness at 40 °C in a rotary evaporator. The crude extracts were stored in a refrigerator until analysis.

 

 

Proximate analysis:

The moisture, ash, crude protein, total lipid, total carbohydrates, and macro-microelements were determined according to AOAC15.

 

Chemical Analysis:

Total phenolic content:

The total phenolic (TP) was determined according to Folin Ciocalteu reagent assay using Gallic acid as standard16. A suitable aliquot (1ml) of banana and olive leaves extracts were added to 25 ml volumetric flask, containing 9ml of distilled water. One milliliter of Folin Ciocalteu`s phenol reagent was added to the mixture and shaken. After 5 min. 10ml of 7 % Na2CO3 solution was added to the mixture. The solution was diluted to 25ml with distilled water and mixed. After incubation for 90 min. at room temperature, the absorbance was determined at 750nm with a spectrophotometer (Unicum UV 300) against prepared reagent as blank. A total phenolic content in samples was expressed as mg Gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g dry weight. All samples were analyzed in triplicates.

 

Total flavonoid content:

Total flavonoid (TF) was determined by the aluminum chloride method using quercetin as a standard17. One ml of banana and olive leaves extracts were added to 10 ml volumetric flask, containing 4ml of distilled water. To the flask 0.3ml 5% NaNO2 was added and after 5 min 0.3ml 10% AlCl3 was added. After a 6th min, 2ml 1M NaOH was added and the total volume was made up to 10ml with distilled water. The solutions were mixed well and the absorbance was measured against prepared reagent blank at 510nm by using a spectrophotometer (Unicum UV 300). Total flavonoids in the sample were expressed as mg quercetin equivalents (QE)/g dry weight. Samples were analyzed in triplicates.

 

Total tannins content:

Total tannin (TT) was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent18. One ml of banana and olive leaves extracts were added to 7.5ml distilled water (dH2O) then add 0.5ml of Folin reagent and 1ml of 35% sodium carbonate solution. The volume was made up for 10ml with distilled water and absorbance was measured against prepared reagent blank at 775nm by using a spectrophotometer (Unicom UV 300). Total tannins in the sample were expressed as mg tannic acid equivalent (TE)/g dry weight. All samples were analyzed in triplicates.

 

Identification of phenolic compounds by HPLC:

Phenolic compounds in banana and olive leave acetone extracts were identified using HPLC19. All chemicals and solvents used were HPLC spectral grade and obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, USA (and Merck –Shcuchrdt Munich, Germany). The HPLC system is Agilent 1100 series coupled with a DAD detector (G1315B) and (G1322A) DEGASSER. Sample injections of 5μl were made from an Agilent 1100 series auto-sampler. The chromatographic separations were performed on the ZORBAX-EclipseXDB-C18 column (4.6×250 mm, particle size 5 μm). A constant flow rate of 1ml/min was used with mobile phases: (A) 0.5% acetic acid in distilled water at pH 2.65; and solvent (B) 0.5% acetic acid in 99.5% acetonitrile. The elution gradient was linear starting with A and ending with B over 50 min, using a DAD detector set at wavelength 280nm. Phenolic compounds of banana and olive leave acetone extracts were identified by comparing their retention times with those of the standard mixture chromatogram. The concentration of an individual compound was calculated on the basis of peak area measurements and the results expressed as mg phenolic/100g dry weight.

 

Antioxidant Activity:

DPPH· Free radical scavenging activity:

Determination of DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging activity was measured spectrophotometrically20. 0.1mM of DPPH in methyl alcohol was prepared and 0.5ml of this solution was added to 1ml of banana leaves and olive leaves extracts at different concentrations (25, 50, 75, 100 µg/ml). Methanol was used as a blank. The mixture was shaken vigorously and allowed to stand at room temperature (for 30 min.). Butyl Hydroxytoluene (BHT, Sigma) was used as a positive control; and negative control contained the entire reaction reagent except for the extracts. Then the absorbance was measured at 515 nm against a blank. The capacity to scavenge the DPPH radical was calculated using the following equation:

 

DPPHscavenging activity % = [(Ac – As (/ Ac] × 100

Where: (Ac) was the absorbance of the negative control reaction and (As) the absorbance in the presence of the plant extracts. The results were expressed as IC50 (the concentration µg/ml of banana and olive leaves extracts that scavenge 50 % of DPPH radical).

 

ABTS˙+ scavenging activity:

ABTS˙+ assay was generated by oxidation of ABTS˙+ with potassium persulphate21. ABTS˙+ was dissolved in deionized water to 7.4mM concentration, and potassium persulphate added to a concentration of 2.6mM. The working solution was then prepared by mixing the two stock solutions in equal quantities and allowing them to react for 12-16 h at room temperature in the dark. The solution was then diluted by mixing 1ml ABTS•+ solution with 60ml methanol to obtain an absorbance of 1.1 ± 0.02 at 73nm using the spectrophotometer. Fresh ABTS˙+ solution was prepared for each assay. Banana leaves and olive leaves extracts (150µl) at different concentration (25, 50, 75, 100µg/ml) were allowed to react with 2850µl of the ABTS˙+ solution for 2 h in the dark. Then the absorbance was taken at 734nm using the spectrophotometer. Results were expressed as in comparison with standard BHT. The activity to scavenge the ABTS˙+ radical was calculated using the following equation: 

 

ABTS˙+ scavenging activity % = [(A0 – A1) /A0] ×100

 

Where: A0 is the ABTS˙+ absorbance of the control reaction and A1 is the ABTS˙+ absorbance in the presence of the sample. The results were expressed as IC50 (the concentration µg/ml of banana and olive leaves extracts that scavenge 50% of ABTS˙+ radical).

 

Reducing Power:

The reducing power was assayed spectrophotometrically22. One ml of Banana and olive leaves extracts at different concentrations (25, 50, 75, 100µg/ml) were mixed with 2.5ml of phosphate buffer (50mM, pH 7.0) and 2.5ml of 1% potassium ferricyanide. The mixture was then incubated at 50°C for 20 min. After the addition of 2.5ml of trichloroacetic acid (10%) to the mixture, centrifugation at 3000rpm for 10 min was performed. Finally, 1.25ml from the supernatant was mixed with 1.25ml of distilled water and 0.25ml FeCl3 solution (0.1%, w/v). The absorbance was measured at 700nm. BHT was used as a standard. The results were expressed as EC50 (the concentration µg/ml of banana and olive leaves extracts that provided the reading of 0.5 absorbances at 700nm).

 

Ferrous Chelating Activity:

Chelating activity on ferrous ions was carried out colorimetrically23. One ml of banana and olive leaves extracts or EDTA solution as a positive control at different concentrations (25, 50, 75, 100µg/ml) were spiked with 0.1ml of 2 mM FeCl2- 4H2O and 0.2ml of 5 mM ferrozine solution and 3.7ml methanol were mixed in a test tube and reacted for 10 min at room temperature then the absorbance was measured at 562nm. Mixture without extract was used as the control. A lower absorbance indicates a higher ferrous ion chelating capacity. The percentage of ferrous ion chelating ability was calculated using the following equation:

 

Chelating activity (Inhibition %) = [(Ac – As) / Ac] × 100

Where (Ac) was the absorbance of the control reaction and (As) the absorbance in the presence of the plant extracts. The results were expressed as IC50 (the concentration µg/ml of the banana and olive leaves extracts that chelate 50 % of Fe2+ ions).

 

 

 

In-vitro antimicrobial assay of ethanol and acetone banana and olive leaves extracts:

Different bacteria strains of gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis NRRL B-94 & Staphylococcus aureus NRRL B-313) and, gram-negative (Escherichia coli NRRL B-3703 & Pseudomonas aeruginosa NRRL B-32), Aspergillus flutes NRC as mold, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Candida albicans NRRL 477 strains as yeast, were used. The measurement of growth inhibition was carried out with agar diffusion tests24

 

Procedure:

The bacterial strains were cultured in a nutrient broth media while the fungi and yeast strains were cultured in a malt broth media and yeast broth media, respectively. For bacteria and yeast, the broth media were incubated for 24 h. As for molds, the broth media were incubated for 48 h, with subsequent filtering of the culture through a thin layer of sterile sintered Glass G2 to remove mycelia fragments before the solution containing the spores was used for inoculation. For plate preparation, 1 ml Tween 20 and 500µl of inocula were added to 50ml of agar media 50°C and mixed by simple inversion. Wells of 6mm diameter were then mode in the solidified agar using proper sterile tubes. Plates were undisturbed for 30 min to allow diffusion of the sample (200, 400, and 600µg/l) into the agar, then incubation inverted at 30ºC for 48 h for bacteria and 72 h for fungi. The microbial growth inhibition zones, clear microbial free inhibition zones, were measured after incubation at 30ºC, beginning within 24 h for yeast, 24-48 h for bacteria and 48-72 h for fungi. Antimicrobial activities were calculated as a mean of three repetitions.

 

In-vitro cytotoxicity of banana and olive leaves acetone extract on the human cell line (HePG2 – MCF7)

Cytotoxic effect on human cell line (hepatocellular carcinoma HePG2 – Caucasian breast adenocarcinoma MCF7) Cell viability was assessed by the mitochondrial-dependent reduction of yellow MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yr)-2,5- diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) to purple formazan25.

 

Procedure:

All the following procedures were done in a sterile area using a Laminar flow cabinet biosafety class II level (Baker, SG403INT, and Sanford, ME, USA). Cells were suspended in RPMI 1640 medium for HePG2 and - MCF7. The media are supplemented with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (10,000 U/ml Potassium Penicillin, 10,000 μg/ml Streptomycin Sulfate and 25μg/ml Amphotericin B), 1% L-glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum and kept at 37°C under 5% CO2. Cells were batch cultured for 10 days, then seeded at a concentration of 10x103 cells/well in fresh complete growth medium in 96-well microtiter plastic plates at 37°C for 24 h under 5% CO2 using a water-jacketed Carbon dioxide incubator (Sheldon, TC2323, Cornelius, OR, USA). Media was aspirated, fresh medium (without serum) was added and cells were incubated either alone (negative control) or with different concentrations of banana and olive leaves extracts to give a final concentration of (100-50-25-12.5-6.25-3.125-1.56 and 0.78μg/ml). After 48 h of incubation, the medium was aspirated, 40μl MTT salt (2.5μg/ml) was added to each well and incubated for a further four hours at 37°C under 5% CO2. To stop the reaction and dissolving the formed crystals, 200μl of 10% Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in deionized water was added to each well and incubated overnight at 37ºC. A positive control (Doxorubicin) 100μg/ml was used as a known cytotoxic natural agent who gives 100% lethality under the same conditions. The absorbance was then measured using a microplate multi-well reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., model 3350, Hercules, California, USA) at 595nm and a reference wavelength of 620nm. A statistical significance was tested between samples and negative control (cells with the vehicle) using an independent t-test by SPSS 11 program. DMSO is the vehicle used for the dissolution of banana and olive leaves extracts and its final concentration in the cells was less than 0.2%. The percentage of change in viability was calculated according to the formula: ((A sample / A control) -1) x 100

 

Where: A sample is the absorbance of treated cells with extract

A control is the absorbance of untreated cells. 

 

Statistical analysis:

Statistical analysis is carried out using SPSS computer program (version 8) combined with Costat statistical package data (ANOVA - complete randomize), where unshared letters are significant at P ≤ 0.05 according to Anonymous26.

 

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

3.1. Proximate Analysis:

The data of the chemical analysis of raw materials: banana and olive leaves are given in Table (1). The moisture content of raw materials was evaluated and was being 63.57 and 43.06% of fresh weight for banana and olive leaves respectively. The moisture content of banana leaves was less than that obtained by27 (89.32%). The highest crude protein content was found in banana leaves (14.98% of dry weight) which were higher than that found by28 (7.65%).

 

 


 

Table 1. Proximate analysis of leaves for banana and olive leaves

Sample

Moisture

(g/100g fresh weight)

Component (g/100g dry weight basis)

Crude protein

Total lipid

Total carbohydrate

Ash

Banana leaves

63.57 ± 0.36

14.98 ± 0.34

10.37 ± 0.99

60.71 ± 0. 24

13.85 ± 0.69

Olive leaves

43.06 ± 0.24

10.71 ± 0.84

15.04 ± 0.85

66.07 ± 0.20

8.14 ± 0.13

All values represented as mean ± S.D.

 


Furthermore, the results of moisture content and crude protein of olive leaves agreed with the results obtained by29, but crude protein content was different from that of30 (5.45%). The crude protein content of banana leaves (14.98%) is in a good agreement with that reported by31 (13.80%). High total lipid and carbohydrate contents were observed in olive leaves. The total lipid of olive leaves was similar with data of 32 but not with that of 33 which recorded 24.08%. However, lower total carbohydrate content for olive leaves was reported by 29,34. Among the tested raw materials, banana leaves showed the highest ash content (13.42 %). The present results showed that ash (13.85%), carbohydrate (60.71%) and fat (10.37%) were higher than those obtained by33 which were 7.20, 54.60 and 1.80%, respectively for banana leaves. Data in Table (2) show the macroelements composition of banana and olive leaves. Banana leaves have high potassium, calcium, sodium, phosphorus, and magnesium content (3800,1200,2000,1800 and 9500 ppm/DW respectively), while olive leaves have the highest calcium and sodium content (9800 and 2900 ppm/DW respectively) Similar results were reported by33,35,36 for banana and olive leaves. While low potassium and calcium content for banana and olive leaves were recorded by28,37. Differences may be ascribed to fertilization, soil type, and plant species. The microelements composition of raw materials is given also in Table (2).


 

Table 2. Macro and microelements composition of banana and olive leaves extracts (ppm/DW)

Samples

K

Ca

Na

P

Mg

Banana leaves

3800 ± 43.01

1200 ± 12.28

2000 ± 20.24

1800 ± 60.03

9500 ± 50.17

Olive leaves

2100 ± 25.07

9800 ± 90.01

2900 ± 80.36

1400 ±50.27

6100 ± 20.17

Samples

Fe

Cu

Zn

Mn

 

Banana leaves

277.82 ± 0.94

7.97 ± 0.94

32.23 ± 4.23

256.61 ± 39.10

 

Olive leaves

242.03 ± 14.52

8.15 ± 0.54

29.16 ± 1.29

36.19 ± 18.69

 

All values represented as mean +S.D.

 


The iron content of raw materials was high in banana and olive leaves 277.82 and 242.03ppm/DW respectively). Remarkable copper and zinc contents were lowest in banana and olive leaves. The results in the same table also showed proved that manganese reached the maximum for banana leaves (256.61µg/g) compared to olive leaves (36.19µg/g). The values were in the same range as that reported by37,38,39,40 for banana and olive leaves, respectively.

 

 

 

3.2. Secondary metabolites:

3.2.1. Total phenols (TP), flavonoids (TF) and tannins (TT) of banana and olive leave extracts:

The results of TP, TF, and TT in aqueous, 80% methanol, 80% ethanol and 80% acetone extracts are shown in Table (3). Data presented in Table (3) showed that acetone extract of banana leaves had the highest level of TP (27.95mg/g DW), TF (30.76mg/g DW) and TT (17.30mg/g DW). While the aqueous extract showed the lowest values of total phenol (13.19mg/g DW), total flavonoid (9.70mg/g DW) and total tannin (8.28mg/g DW).


Table 3. TP, TF, and TT of banana and olive leaves extracts

Sample

Extracts

Phenolics (mg GAE/g DW)

Flavonoids (mg QE/g DW)

Tannins (mg TE/g DW)

Banana leaves

Aqueous

13.19h ± 0.10

9.70g ± 0.25

8.28h ±  0.08

Methanol 80%

20.64g ± 0.07

20.50f ± 0.15

13.41f ±  0.06

Ethanol 80%

21.81f ± 0.05

21.39e ± 0.06

12.19g  ± 0.01

Acetone 80%

27.95e ± 0.14

30.76d ± 0.12

17.30e ± 0.06

Olive leaves

Aqueous

42.02d ± 0.48

31.22d ± 0.11

30.92d ± 0.28

Methanol 80%

85.50a ± 0.36

105.19a ± 0.46

51.03a ± 0.28

Ethanol 80%

78.22b ± 0.59

88.67b ± 0.11

48.39b ± 0.28

Acetone 80%

56.98c ± 0.47

68.00c ± 0.40

39.19c ± 0.17

LSD at 0.05

0.977

0.704

0.519

All values represented as mean ± S.D Means with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

 


However, remarkable increases in the values of phytochemicals of olive leaves (80% methanol extract) hence, the value of total phenol was 85.50mg/g DW, flavonoid was 105.19mg/g DW and tannin was 51.03 mg/g DW. However, the values were higher than that in aqueous extract (TP was 42.02, TF was 31.22 and TT was 30.92mg/kg DW). The present results are in accordance with that of13,41,42 for total phenol, flavonoid, and tannin of banana leaves. While the total phenols of banana leaves in methanol extract of the present study were 20.64mg/g DW which was higher than that obtained by43 (their values ranged from 2.09 to 5.55 mg/g DW). Also, the results of olive leaves are in agreement with those determined by44,45 for total phenol and flavonoid. The lower level of total phenol (ranged from 9.08 to 24.93 of mg/g DW) and flavonoid (6.23 to 21.47mg/g DW) reported by46. the lower content of total tannin for olive leaves was recorded by47,48.

 

3.2.2. Identification of phenolic compounds by HPLC:

Data presented in Table 4 shows that the concentration of individual phenolic compounds extracted by 80 % acetone extract.

 

Table 4. Quantification of the main phenolic compounds presents in acetone extracts (mg/kg crude extract) by HPLC.

Compounds

Banana leaves

Olive leaves

Gallic acid

-

343.19

Protocatechuic acid

109.37

7925.19

Gentisic acid

-

-

Catachine

686.33

688.74

Chlorogenic acid

314.40

-

Caffeic acid

650.83

840.98

Syringic acid

645.95

1378.95

Vanillic acid

1432.47

1175.45

Ferulic acid

1474.50

888.53

Sinapic acid

312.50

411.43

Coumarin

575.62

330.56

Rosmarinic acid

2712.83

216.80

Cinnamic acid

236.19

60.71

Chyrsin acid

145.28

5575.75

Ellagic acid

68.48

103.10

Tannic acid

-

5.69

Pyrogallol

3.41

-

Quercetin

68.25

70.16

Rutin

-

0.86

Acacetin

-

1.20

Oleuropein

-

247.97

 

The samples are identified and quantified by external standards being gallic, protocatechuic, gentisic, catechine, rosmarinic, chlorogenic, cinnamic, caffeic, syringic, ellagic, vanillic, tannic, ferulic and sinapic acids as well as coumarin, chyrsin, pyrogallol, quercetin, rutin, acacetin, and oleuropein. Results showed that all extracts contained different compositions and contents of phenolic compounds. It was observed from Table (4) that banana and olive leaves contain nearly a similar phenolic profile. In banana leaves acetone extract, vanillic, ferulic and Rosmarinic (1432.47, 1474.50 and 2712.83mg/kg crude extract are the major phenolic compounds) and pyrogallol was the minor phenolic compounds. Chlorogenic acid and pyrogallol were found only in banana leaves (314.40 and 3.41mg/kg crude extract, respectively). The results obtained are similar to those obtained by49. Among the phenolic profiles Gallic, oleuropein, tannic, acacetin and rutin were detected only in olive leaves which were 343.19, 247.79, 5.69, 1.20 and 0.86mg/kg of crude extract, respectively. While, protocatechuic, chyrsin, syringic acid and vanillic acid were mostly found in olive leaves with values of 7925.19, 5575.75, 1373.95 and 1175.45mg/kg crude extracts. Gentisic acid was not detected in all extracts tested as represented in Table (4). Similar results were found by48,50. The variety, environmental conditions, and agricultural practices greatly affect the structure and the concentration of phenolic compounds51. Nevertheless, the drying process may affect the components matrix structure and its bioactivity52. As previously reported that Oleuropein in olive leaf extract ranged from not detected to 539 mg/ Kg extract according to extraction conditions53.

 

3.3. Antioxidant capacities of banana and olive leave extracts using DPPH˙, ABTS˙+, Reducing Power (RP) and Fe+2 chelating:

The antioxidant activity of banana and olive leaves represented as IC50 are shown in Table (5). The DPPH˙ radical scavenging activity of the leaves extracts was measured and compared with that of BHT to evaluate the in vitro antioxidant activity of banana and olive leaves extracts. Regarding the DPPH˙ assay, the antioxidant capacity (IC50) is ranged from 17.97 to 44.50µg/ml. Olive leaves methanol extract had the highest DPPH˙ radical scavenging capacity (17.97µg/ml). While the lowest scavenging capacity (44.50µg/ml) was given in banana leaves aqueous extract. These results are in accordance with54,55 for olive leaves. Also, the results of banana leaves were similar to those reported by41,42. In the ABTS˙+ scavenging activity, the values of IC50 are varied significantly which ranged from 20.13 – 190.95 µg/ml. The highest value with olive leaves (20.13 µg/ml) was found in acetone extract, while the lowest value (190.95µg/ml) was found in olive leaves aqueous extract. Banana and olive leave extracts had the highest antioxidant activity by ABTS˙+ assay42,44. The antioxidant activity of plant materials is significantly correlated well with the presence and the content of their phenolic compounds56,57.


 

 

Table 5 Antioxidant activity (IC50) of various extracts from banana and olive leaves

Samples

Extracts

DPPHIC50

(µg / ml)

ABTS•+ IC50

(µg / ml)

Reducing Power EC50 (µg / ml)

Fe2+-chelating IC50 (µg / ml)

Banana

leaves

Aqueous

44.50 a ± 0.20

122.31c ± 0.54

290a ± 2.65

1626.35b ± 18.53

Methanol 80%

33.16 b ± 4.95

121.60 c ± 1.91

235b ± 1.94

759.52d ± 5.23

Ethanol 80%

40.63 a ± 1.70

134.62 b ± 1.58

233b ± 11.63

422.94e ± 10.87

Acetone 80%

27.81 c ± 0.27

45.76 e ± 0.50

110d ± 1.76

419.13e ± 11.29

Olive

leaves

Aqueous

41.64a ± 1.01

190.95 a ± 0.71

119cd ± 7.16

1747.88a ± 12.97

Methanol 80%

17.97 d ± 0.25

94.90d ± 0.43

90e ± 1.14

367.56f ± 8.82

Ethanol 80%

28.09 bc ± 0.38

95.82d ± 0.74

136c ± 7.86

375.24f ± 3.37

Acetone 80%

32.14 bc ± 0.22

20.13f ± 0.16

219b ± 12.34

1323.15c ± 7.42

BHT as standard

4.73 g ± 0.72

15.43g ± 0.19

31.43g ± 0.19

-

EDTA as standard

-

-

-

29.00f ± 0.72

LSD at 0.05

5.16

2.69

29.09

19.47

All values represented as mean ± S.D Means with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).

 


Antioxidants may be interpreted as reductant materials in the sample that cause the mitigation of the Fe3+ /ferricyanide complex to the ferrous form. Subsequently, Fe2+ may be monitored by measuring the formalization of Perl’s Prussian blue at 700 nm58. Reducing power will increase accordingly with the increase in absorbance59,60. The EC50 of reducing power assay, of various extracts of banana and olive leaves was ranged from 90 - 290µg/ml in methanolic extract of olive leaves and aqueous extract of banana leaves respectively. Similar results were observed by61,62 banana and olive leaves, respectively. On the other hand, banana leaves have stronger reducing power than that of ascorbic acid63. In the Fe+2 chelating assay, chelating capacity as IC50 in various extracts of banana and olive leaves was ranged 367.56 – 1747.88 µg/ml. Olive leaves methanol extract had the highest Fe+2 chelating capacity (367.56µg/ml), while olive leaves aqueous extract had the lowest ones (1747.88 µg/ml).  Our results of Fe+2 chelating antioxidant activity showed a good agreement with results by62,64. The presence of total phenolic compounds might contribute to antioxidant activity65. Phenolic acid might contribute to antioxidant activity. Phenylacetic acid and benzoic acid had lower antioxidant capacity than cinnamic acid66

 

3.4. Antimicrobial Activity:

The antimicrobial activities of banana and olive leave extracts are given in Table (6). All extracts showed zone of inhibition against gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and fungi (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans and Aspergillus flavus) at concentrations 400 and 600 µg/ml. Extract by 80% acetone showed higher antimicrobial activity than that of 80% ethanol extract.


 

Table 6. Antimicrobial activity of ethanol and acetone extracts of banana and olive leaves

Samples

Extracts

Conc.

µg/ml

Inhibition Zone (mm)

Bacteria

Fungi

Yeast

B. subtils

St. aureus

E. coli

P. aeruginosa

A. fluves

S. cerevisiae

C. albicans

Banana leaves

Ethanol 80%

200

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

400

11.55

10.86

09.87

10.75

12.77

11.67

10.63

600

17.70

16.54

16.16

16.78

17.54

15.66

15.79

Acetone 80%

200

09.00

09.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

400

16.96

15.73

13.23

14.33

12.23

12.80

13.69

600

21.32

22.00

18.15

19.35

18.54

16.80

17.15

Olive leaves

Ethanol 80%

200

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

00.00

400

13.50

13.55

11.73

10.53

10.20

11.47

11.47

600

20.50

18.60

17.25

18.55

17.75

18.60

16.70

Acetone 80%

200

09.00

08.50

00.00

00.00

00.00

08.10

09.34

400

15.73

16.15

14.87

13.70

11.33

13.80

14.55

600

20.75

21.20

18.73

19.46

17.85

17.87

19.86

 


The leave extracts of banana and olive exhibited the highest inhibitory effects which ranged from 16.54 to 22.00mm against gram-positive and 16.16 to 19.64mm against gram-negative and against fungus was 15.66 to 19.86mm at a concentration of 600µg/ml. These results are in agreement with that reported by61, who found that the average zone of inhibition of antibacterial was ranged from 6 to 22 mm at concentrations of 20 -200 µg/disc for banana leaves. Also, Ethanol and acetone extract of olive leaves showed inhibition zone 12.00mm against Escherichia coli and 7.00mm against Staphylococcus aureus. Additionally, olive leave extracts exhibited excellent antifungal activity against both Aspergillus terreus and Penicillium solitum32. The antimicrobial activity of tomato pomace extracts presented variable inhibition effects against pathogenic bacteria, and fungus60. The previous study demonstrated that the banana and olive leaves acetone extracts showed moderate inhibition effect to strong activity against A. flutes, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans.

 

3.5. In-vitro cytotoxic effect:

Two cancer cell lines (MCF-7 breast, HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells) were examined to define the cytotoxic effectiveness of banana and olive leave acetone extracts. Results were compared with Doxorubicin as a positive control. Results in Table 6 show the cytotoxic activity of banana and olive leaves extracts against two cancer cell lines. Banana leaves had the highest percentage of cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and HepG2 (48.60 and 33.50% respectively), followed by olive leaves (27.30 and 22.20% respectively). Results revealed that the potential activity of olive leaf extract as anti-proliferation against HepG2 cancer cell lines as recorded by 9.

 

Table 7. Cytotoxic effect of banana and olive leaves acetone extract (80%) at concentration (100µg/ml)

Samples

HePG-2 (%)

MCF-7 (% )

Banana leaves

33.50

48.60

Olive leaves

22.20

27.30

DMSO

1.00

1.00

Doxorubicin

100

100

HePG-2: Hepatocellular carcinoma cells

MCF- 7: Breast cell line

 

These results are in a good agreement with50,67 for olive leaves. Additionally, peanut byproduct (peel and skin) might be beneficial as a potent antioxidant and anticancer agents and effectively employed as an ingredient in food applications57. The tumor volume and weight reduced with treatment 150 and 225 mg/kg/day of olive leaves extract68. The chlorophyll possesses therapeutic properties due to the ability to prevent cancer and is being used in cancer therapy69. The oleuropein is the most abundant phenolic compound in olives.  The oleuropein, a powerful antioxidant, and anti-cancer agent. Oleuropein swirled cancer cells, irreversibly prohibiting their replication, motility, and invasiveness; irreversibly in normal cells, these effects were reversible as noticed by70. It has been found that colon carcinoma cell line and the anti-proliferative activity against two breast cancer cell lines, that is, MCF-7 and T-47D completely blocked the incursion of tumor cells and helped in tumor regression in presence of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol70 via arresting cell cycle progression, increasing cell mortality, and reducing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)71. Banana extracts were tested for their ability to inhibit the growth of HePG2 and MCF-7 tumor cell lines (Table7). The extracts showing 33.50% and 48.60% inhibition of cell proliferation were considered to be moderate cytotoxic effect extracts. The acetone extract of banana leaves had a moderate cytotoxic effect on tested cancer cell lines. Our results are disagreement with results obtained by banana hexane peel extract wherein significant activities were observed towards cancer cell lines72. Generally, the biological activities of the fruits are slightly attributed to their wide range of necessary micronutrients and phytochemicals. These bioactive components may prohibit cancer meanwhile diverse modes of action including antioxidant activity, inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, Inhibition of cell invasion and subcellular signaling pathways73,74.

 

4. CONCLUSION:

In-vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial and antitumor activities of olive and banana leaves. The plants displayed considerable antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity effects in an in vitro model. These results obviously motivate the employment of olive and banana leaves as a vigorous, prospective source for medicinal and industrial use. Additional studies are prerequisite to get the components which are responsible for these activities.

 

5. CONFLICT OF INTERESTS:

The author did not declare any conflict of interest.

 

6. REFERENCES:

1.     Lafka TI, Lazou A, Sinanoglou V, Lazos E. Phenolic extracts from wild olive leaves and their potential as edible oils antioxidants. Foods. 2013; 2(1): 18-31.

2.     Quirantes-Pine R, Zurek G, Barrajon-Catalan E, Babmann C, Micol V, Segura-Carretero A, Fernandez-Gutierrez A. A metabolite-profiling approach to assess the uptake and metabolism of phenolic compounds from olive leaves in SKBR3 cells by HPLC–ESI-QTOF-MS. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2013; 72: 121-126.

3.     Guinda A, Perez‐Camino MC, Lanzon A. Supplementation of oils with oleanolic acid from the olive leaf (Olea europaea). European journal of lipid science and technology. 2004; 106(1): 22-26.

4.     Tabera J, Guinda A, Ruiz-Rodriguez A, Senorans JF, Ibanez E, Albi T. Counter current supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation of high-added value compounds from a hexane extract of olive leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2004; 52: 4774-4779.

5.     Bahloul N, Kechaou N, Mihoubi NB. Comparative investigation of minerals, chlorophylls contents, fatty acid composition and thermal profiles of olive leaves (Olea europeae L.) as by-product. Grasas Y Aceites. 2014; 65(3): 107-116.

6.     Moyad MA, Carroll PR. Lifestyle recommendations to prevent prostate cancer, part II: time to redirect our attention?. The Urologic clinics of North America. 2004; 31(2): 301-311.

7.     Dossus L, Kaaks R. Nutrition, metabolic factors and cancer risk. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2008; 22(4): 551-571.

8.     Fu S, Arraez-Roman D, Segura-Carretero A, Menendez JA, Menendez-Gutierrez MP, Micol V, Fernandez-Gutierrez A. Qualitative screening of phenolic compounds in olive leaf extracts by hyphenated liquid chromatography and preliminary evaluation of cytotoxic activity against human breast cancer cells. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2010; 397(2): 643-654.

9.     Sun J, Chu YF, Wu X, Liu RH. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of common fruits. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2002; 50(25): 7449-7454.

10.   Shasha B, Leibowitz J. Oleuropeic acid: A new compound from Olea europaea. Nature. 1959; 184(4704): 2019-2020.

11.   Savournin C, Baghdikian B, Elias R, Dargouth-Kesraoui F, Boukef K, Balansard G. Rapid high-performance liquid chromatography analysis for the quantitative determination of oleuropein in Olea europaea leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001; 49(2): 618-621.

12.   Ansari M, Kazemipour M, Fathi S. Development of a simple green extraction procedure and HPLC method for determination of oleuropein in olive leaf extract applied to a multi-source comparative study. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society. 2011; 8(1): 38-47.

13.   Meenashree B, Vasanthi VJ, Mary RN. Evaluation of total phenolic content and antimicrobial activities exhibited by the leaf extracts of Musa acuminata (banana). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014; 3(5): 136-141.

14.   Chu HL, Yeh DB, Shaw JF. Production of L-DOPA by banana leaf polyphenol oxidase. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 1993; 34: 57-60.

15.   AOAC, 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemist International, AOAC, Virginia, USA, 2457 p.

16.   Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American journal of Enology and Viticulture. 1965; 16(3): 144-158.

17.   Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food chemistry. 1999; 64(4): 555-559.

18.   Polshettiwar SA, Ganjiwale RO, Wadher SJ, Yeole PG. Spectrophotometric estimation of total tannins in some ayurvedic eye drops. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2007; 69(4): 574-576.

19.   Ben-Hammouda M, Kremer RJ, Minor HC, Sarwar M. A chemical basis for differential allelopathic potential of sorghum hybrids on wheat. Journal of chemical ecology. 1995; 21(6): 775-786.

20.   Chu YH, Chang CL, Hsu HF. Flavonoid content of several vegetables and their antioxidant activity. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2000; 80(5): 561-566.

21.   Arnao MB, Cano A, Acosta M. The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry. 2001; 73(2): 239-244.

22.   Kuda T, Tsunekawa M, Goto H, Araki Y. Antioxidant properties of four edible algae harvested in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. Journal of food composition and analysis. 2005; 18(7): 625-633.

23.   Minotti G, Aust SD. An investigation into the mechanism of citrate-Fe2+-dependent lipid peroxidation. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1987; 3(6): 379-387.

24.   Greenwood D. 1983. Antimicrobial chemotherapy Part II. In: Laboratory Aspects of Antimicrobial Therapy, Bailliere Tindall, London, pp. 28-82.

25.   Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Journal of immunological methods. 1983; 65(1-2): 55-63.

26.   Anonymous, A. 1989. Costat user manual version 3.03, Berkeley CA, USA.

27.   Ezekoye VA. A comparative study of biogas production using plantain/almond leaves and pig dung, and its applications. International Journal of Physical Sciences. 2013; 8(23): 1291-1297.

28.   Mzengereza K, Msiska OV, Kapute F, Kangombe J, Singini W, Kamangira A. Nutritional Value of Locally Available Plants with Potential for Diets of Tilapia Rendalli in Pond Aquaculture in NkhataBay, Malawi. Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development. 2014; 5(6): 1-6.

29.   Cavalheiro CV, Picoloto RS, Cichoski AJ, Wagner R, de Menezes CR, Zepka LQ, Da Croce DM, Barin JS. Olive leaves offer more than phenolic compounds–Fatty acids and mineral composition of varieties from Southern Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products. 2015; 71: 122-127.

30.   Erbay Z, Icier F. Optimization of drying of olive leaves in a pilot-scale heat pump dryer. Drying Technology. 2009; 27(3): 416-427.

31.   Oliveira LN, Geraseev LC, Duarte ER, Abdalla AL. Chemical composition, degradability and methane emission potential of banana crop residues for ruminants. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2014; 17(2): 197–206.

32.   Lutfullah G, Tila H, Hussain A, Khan AA. Evaluation of plants extracts for proximate chemical composition, antimicrobial and antifungal activities. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural& Environmental Sciences. 2014; 14(10): 964-970.

33.   Okere, OS, Sangodele, JO, Adams, MD, Anyanwu, GO, Ifeonu, SC. Effect of ethanolic extract of Olea europaea on Plasmodium falciparum infected mice. International Journal of Biomedical Research, 2014; 5(6): 400-404.

34.   Boudhrioua N, Bahloul N, Slimen IB, Kechaou N. Comparison on the total phenol contents and the color of fresh and infrared dried olive leaves. Industrial crops and products. 2009; 29(2-3): 412-419.

35.   Mohapatra D, Mishra S, Sutar N. Banana and its by-product utilisation: an overview. Journal of scientific and industrial research. 2010; 69: 323-329.

36.   Paskovic I, Perica S, Pecina M, Hancevic K, Polic Paskovic M, Herak Custic M. Leaf mineral concentration of five olive cultivars grown on calcareous soil. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2013; 14(4): 1471-1478.

37.   Samadi-Maybodi A, Shariat MR. Characterization of elemental composition in kiwifruit grown in northern Iran. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2003; 51(10): 3108-3110.

38.   Nagarajaiah SB, Prakash J. Chemical composition and antioxidant potential of peels from three varieties of banana. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry. 2011; 4: 31-36.

39.   Okareh OT, Adeolu AT, Adepoju OT. Proximate and mineral composition of plantain (Musa Paradisiaca) wastes flour; a potential nutrients source in the formulation of animal feeds. African Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015; 6(2): 53-57.

40.   Bahloul N, Kechaou N, Mihoubi NB. Comparative investigation of minerals, chlorophylls contents, fatty acid composition and thermal profiles of olive leaves (Olea europeae L.) as by-product. Grasas y Aceites. 2014; 65(3): 035.

41.   Fidrianny I, Sefiany E, Ruslan K. Invitro antioxidant activities from three organs of white ambon banana (Musa AAA Group) and flavonoid, phenolic, carotenoid content. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research. 2015; 7(3): 590-596.

42.   Adhikary S, Panda S, Chatterjee A, Das PC, Adak K, Banerjee S, Ghosh S. Distribution Studies of Some Secondary Metabolites in Different Parts of Four Different Cultivars of Banana Plants and Their Correlation with Antioxidant Property. The International Journal of Science and Technology. 2015; 3(2): 18.

43.   Karuppiah P, Mustaffa M. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Musa sp. leaf extracts against multidrug resistant clinical pathogens causing nosocomial infection. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2013; 3(9): 737-742.

44.   Lee OH, Lee BY. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of individual and combined phenolics in Olea europaea leaf extract. Bioresource technology. 2010; 101(10): 3751-3754.

45.   Brahmi F, Mechri B, Dabbou S, Dhibi M, Hammami M. The efficacy of phenolics compounds with different polarities as antioxidants from olive leaves depending on seasonal variations. Industrial Crops and Products. 2012; 38: 146-152.

46.   Abaza L, Youssef NB, Manai H, Haddada FM, Methenni K and Zarrouk M. Chetoui olive leaf extracts: influence of the solvent type on phenolics and antioxidant activities. Grasas Y Aceites. 2011; 62(1): 96-104.

47.   Garcia AM, Moumen A, Ruiz DY and Alcaide EM. Chemical composition and nutrients availability for goats and sheep of two-stage olive cake and olive leaves. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2003; 107(1-4): 61-74.

48.   Dekanski D, Hudomal SJ, Tadic V, Markovic G, Arsic I, Mitrovic DM. Phytochemical analysis and gastroprotective activity of an olive leaf extract. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2009; 74(4): 367–377.

49.   Salawu SO, Boligon AA and Athayde ML. Evaluation of antioxidant potential and nutritional values of white skinned sweet potato-unripe plantain composite flour blends. International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products. 2014; 7(2):11–20.

50.   Morsy NFS and Abdel-Aziz ME. Efficiency of olive (Olea europium L.) leaf extract as antioxidant and anticancer agents. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies. 2014; 20(1): 46-53.

51.   Jin ZM, He JJ, Bi HQ, Cui XY, Duan CQ. Phenolic compound profiles in berry skins from nine red wine grape cultivars in northwest China. Molecules. 2009; 14(12): 4922-4935.

52.   Boudhrioua N, Bahloul N, Slimen IB, Kechaou N. Comparison on the total phenol contents and the color of fresh and infrared dried olive leaves. Industrial crops and products. 2009; 29(2-3): 412-419.

53.   Lalas S, Athanasiadis V, Gortzi O, Bounitsi M, Giovanoudis I, Tsaknis J, Bogiatzis F. Enrichment of table olives with polyphenols extracted from olive leaves. Food Chemistry. 2011; 127(4): 1521-1525.

54.   Herrero M, Castro-Puyana M, Rocamora-Reverte L, Ferragut JA, Cifuentes A, Ibáñez E. Formation and relevance of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in bioactive subcritical water extracts from olive leaves. Food research international. 2012; 47(1): 31-37.

55.   Lafka T, Lazou A, Sinanoglou V, Lazos E. Phenolic extracts from wild olive leaves and their potential as edible oils antioxidants. Foods. 2013; 2(1): 18-31.

56.   Skerget M, Kotnik P, Hadolin M, Hras AR, Simonic M, Knez Z. Phenols, proanthocyanidins, flavones and flavonols in some plant materials and their antioxidant activities. Food chemistry. 2005; 89(2): 191-198.

57.   Gaafar AA, Mahmoud KM, Salama ZA. Antioxidant potential activity and cytotoxicity effects of different parts of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2015a; 6(3): 19-32.

58.   Chung YC, Chang CT, Chao WW, Lin CF, Chou ST. Antioxidative activity and safety of the 50 ethanolic extract from red bean fermented by Bacillus subtilis IMR-NK1. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002; 50(8): 2454-2458.

59.   Jayaprakasha GK, Singh RP, Sakariah KK. Antioxidant activity of grape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro. Food chemistry. 2001; 73(3): 285-290.

60.   Gaafar AA, Asker MS, Salama ZA, Bagato O, Ali M. In-vitro, antiviral, antimicrobial and antioxidant potential activity of tomato pomace. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 2015b; 32(2): 262-272.

61.   Zafar IM, Saleha A, Hoque MM, Sohel RM. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties of different extracts of Musa sapientum L. subsp. sylvestris. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2011; 2(8): 62-65.

62.   Orak HH, Isbilir SS, Yagar H. Determination of antioxidant properties of lyophilized olive leaf water extracts obtained from 21 different cultivars. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2012; 21(4): 1065-1074.

63.   Sahaa RK, Acharyaa S, Shovon SS, Royb P. Medicinal activities of the leaves of Musa sapientum var. sylvesteris in vitro. Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine. 2013; 3(6): 476-482.

64.   Loganayaki N, Rajendrakumaran D, Manian S. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of different solvent extracts from banana (Musa paradisiaca) and mustai (Rivea hypocrateriformis). Food Science and Biotechnology. 2010; 19(5): 1251-1258.

65.   Ling LT, Palanisamy UD. Review: Potential antioxidants from tropical plants, in: Valdez, B., editor, Food industrial processes-methods, Kuala Lumpur: In Tech; 1999.  P.64-72.

66.   Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR, Bobilya DJ. Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 2002; 13(10): 572-584.

67.   Lim A, Subhan N, Jazayeri JA, John G, Vanniasinkam T, Obied HK. Plant phenols as antibiotic boosters: in vitro interaction of olive leaf phenols with ampicillin. Phytotherapy research. 2016; 30(3): 503-509.

68.   Milanizadeh S, Bigdeli MR, Rasoulian B, Amani D. The effects of olive leaf extract on antioxidant enzymes activity and tumor growth in breast cancer. Thrita. 2014; 3(1): 3–8.

69.   Inanc AL. Chlorophyll: Structural properties, health benefits and its occurrence in virgin olive oils. Academic Food Journal/Akademik GIDA. 2011; 9: 26-32.

70.   Hamdi HK, Castellon R. Oleuropein, a non-toxic olive iridoid, is an anti-tumor agent and cytoskeleton disruptor. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2005; 334(3): 769-778.

71.   Bulotta S, Corradino R, Celano M, D’Agostino M, Maiuolo J, Oliverio M, Procopio A, Iannone M, Rotiroti D, Russo D. Antiproliferative and antioxidant effects on breast cancer cells of oleuropein and its semisynthetic peracetylated derivatives. Food chemistry. 2011; 127(4): 1609-1614.

72.   Dahham SS, Mohamad TA, Tabana YM, Majid AM. Antioxidant activities and anticancer screening of extracts from banana fruit (Musa sapientum). Academic Journal of Cancer Research. 2015; 8(2):28-34.

73.   Liu RH. Potential synergy of phytochemicals in cancer prevention: mechanism of action. The Journal of nutrition. 2004; 134(12): 3479S-3485S.

74.   Nichenametla SN, Taruscio TG, Barney DL, Exon JH. A review of the effects and mechanisms of polyphenolics in cancer. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2006; 46(2):161-183.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 04.07.2019           Modified on 12.08.2019

Accepted on 10.09.2019          © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. And Tech 2020; 13(2):687-696.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00132.8