A Sensitive, Rapid Determination of Moxonidine in Plasma by LC-MS/MS, Application to Bioequivalence Study

 

Sambasiva Rao Puram1, Dr Nithya G1*

1Department of Chemistry, School of Basic Sciences, VISTAS, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: nithyaranju@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The objective of this work is to determine the plasma concentrations of Moxinidine by liquid chromatography coupled with triple quad mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) using internal method. Method development was conducted in such way that sufficient sensitivity achieved and no short term and long term matrix effects effect the method performance. Sensitivity found superior in positive ionization than negative ionization. Sum of multiple daughter ions were used as mass transactions for Moxonidine are 242.05/206.1 and 242.05/199.05 where as single mass transaction was used for Clonidine are 230.1/213.1. Chromatography was optimized using Acetonitrile: Buffer (10mmol Ammonium Acetate) (85:15) on Hypurity C8, 100 x 4.6 mm analytical column. Calibration curve found linear over the range 5.004 to 10345.023 pg/ml using 1/x2 as weighting factor. Method validation was conducted as per international method validation guidelines. The method is successfully applied to analyze 360 clinical study samples collected after administration of 25mg of Moxonidine in a IEC approved two phase clinical study. Incurred sample reanalysis was conducted and found method is reproducible.

 

KEYWORDS: Moxonidine, Moxonidine in plasma, Moxonidine by LC-MS/MS, Sum of multiple ions.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Moxonidine is new-generation centrally acting antihypertensive drug for the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. It may have role when thiazides, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers are not appropriate or have failed to control blood pressure. It demonstrates favorable effects on parameters of the insulin resistance syndrome, apparently independent of blood pressure reduction. Moxonidine is selective agonist at the imidazoline receptor subtype 1. This receptor subtype is found in both the rostral ventro-lateral pressor and ventromedial depressor areas of the medulla oblongata. Moxonidine therefore causes decrease in sympathetic nervous system activity and, therefore, a decrease in blood pressure. Compared to older central-acting antihypertensives, moxonidine binds with much greater affinity to imidazoline I1-receptor than to the α2-receptor1.

 

Moxonidine molecular formula is C9H12ClN5O with molecular weight is 241.677 g/mol. The bioequivalence studies under fasting conditions are in accordance with CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98 Note for Guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence2.

 

Moxonidine is rapidly absorbed after oral administration. In humans, 90% of oral dose is absorbed. Ingestion of food has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of Moxonidine. There is no first-pass metabolism and bioavailability is around 88%. About 7% of moxonidine is bound to human plasma proteins (Vdss = 1.8 ± 0.4 l/kg). Peak plasma levels of moxonidine are reached 30-180 minutes after administration of film-coated tablet. The mean plasma elimination half life is 2.2-2.3 hours and the renal half-life 2.6-2.8 hours3.

 

As per OGD, Single dose Bioequivalence fasting study to be conducted for new generic formulations in healthy population to enter into the USA market.

 

Highly sensitive (5pg/ml LOQ) and selective, rapid (3 min), MRM method has been developed and validated for the estimation of Moxonidine in human plasma (K2EDTA as an anticoagulant) by simple isocretic liquid chromatography with 10 microliter injection on tandam mass spectrometry system, method involves sample processing on solid phase extraction with very low matrix effects and highly selective and rapid, Clonidine used as internal standard. The method has successfully validated and applied to analyze bioequivalence study samples of ~360.

 

Moxonidine is a low molecular weight basic polar drug. Basic functional groups are active for extraction and ionization. Because of the drug polar in nature, we got matrix effect problems but clonidine (ISTD) is compensating those, IS normalized matrix factor is within limits. Recovery found ~40% due to matrix effects but recovery is consistent and reproducible. Selectivity, Precision and accuracy found acceptable.

 

No method is published on public domain for the estimation of Moxonidine in plasma by LC-MS/MS with 5pg/ml and 3 minutes run time. Minxia M. He and others, have reported a method with high duration gradient LC program for 27 minutes for 0.05 to 8 ng/ml CC range with Solid phase extraction method using unusual Trifluoroacetic acid in elution solvent on mass spectrometer operated with APCI and the sample was concentrated to 150micro liters and 125 micro liters injection volume4, this method involves high duration with many complex steps like gradient LC, trifluroacetic acid, APCI, 125 microliter injection. Stephen D Wise and others published a method which involves APCI with 0.25 ng/ml LOQ5, Luhia zhao and others have recently reported a LC-MS6, SIM methods are not sensitive and selective, LC-MS/MS methods got more advantages over SIM methods, Other methods reported are to estimate moxonidine in tablet dosage form which do not have direct comparison with the current method7-15.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Materials:

Moxonidine and Clonidine (ISTD) standards are received from VLS, Mumbai, India, Chemicals purchased from JT Baker Inc. USA. Positive pressure solid phase extraction manifold of Orochem, USA was utilized for processing. Bond elute Plexa (1CC 30mg) cartridges procured from Agilent technologies, USA whereas blank plasma received form the inhouse clinical department. Study protocol was reviewed and approved by Aavishkar Ethics Committee, Goa, India.

 

Methods:

1mg/ml stock solutions of Moxonidine and Clonidine were prepared in methanol, further stock dilutions and spiking solutions are prepared in 50% methanol in water solution, then stored in refrigerator. 5% spiking solutions were spiked in blank plasma to archive required CC and QC sample concentration. 8 point calibration curve over the range 5 to 10000pg/ml is selected whereas 4 Quality control levels are incorporated within the CC range. Spiked samples are stored at -700C until analysis.

 

Sample Extraction Procedure:

Add 50µl of IS Dilution to samples except Blank sample where add 50µl of diluent, Aliquot 0.500ml of sample and vortex, Add 0.500 ml of Water and vortex, Condition the SPE cartridges with 1.000ml methanol followed by 1.000ml water, Load the prepared sample in the SPE cartridges, Wash cartridges twice with 1.000ml of water followed by twice with 1.000ml of 5.00% methanol in water and dry the cartridges for ~2 min. Elute the samples with 0.200ml of the mobile phase. Centrifuge all samples at 4000rpm for 5 minutes at 4.0°C, Transfer the samples to autosampler vials for analysis.

 


Table 1: LC-MS/MS Conditions

Name

Q1 Mass

(amu)

Q3 Mass

(amu)

Dwell

(msec)

DP

(V)

EP

(V)

CE

(V)

CXP

(V)

Moxonidine

242.0

206.1

200

88

10

30

13

199.0

200

88

10

30

13

Clonidine

230.1

213.2

200

101

10

40

4

Column

Mobile Phase

Flow Rate

Injection Volume

Hypurity C8, 100 x 4.6 mm

Acetonitrile: 10mmol Ammonium Acetate) (85:15)

1.00mL/min

30µl

 


Data Processing:

Acquire the data and calculate the concentration of samples using linear regression analysis with weighing factor (1/ x * x). Concentrations are back calculated using the formulae y= m x + c, where y is the area ratio, m is the slope of curve, c is intercept of curve and x is the unknown sample concentration.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Method development:

Method development was initiated, aqueous and extracted CC standards (K2EDTA as an anticoagulant) (5 pg/ml to 10ng/ml) using LLE technique (ethyl acetate with basification) and found CC acceptable with LOQ area of ~2000 on API4000Qtrap, Acetonitril and 10 mmol ammonimum acetate was used as mobile phase in the ratio of 80:20 with 30µl injection on Inertsil ODS 150mm column, MRM was 242.05/206.1. Procedure tested and found acceptable over small duration but method performance is found lower over long period (more than 50 injections). LLE replaced with SPE and found suitable with no drop in the response but LLOQ response is between 1000 to 2000 hence we thought to introduce another daughter ion to use sum of multiple ions to get area for Std 1 minimum 2000. Blank chromatograms were presented as Figure 1 and 2.

 

 

Fig.1: Moxonidine Blank Chromatogram

 

 

Fig. 2: ISTD Blank Chromatogram

 

Selectivity of the method is tested using 6 plasma lots processed as blank and LLOQ and compared the blank response with that of LLOQ, no endogenous or exogenous interferences are found at the retention times. LLOQ chromatogram is presented as figure 3.

 

Fig. 3: Moxonidine LLOQ Chromatogram

Matrix factor for the method has been established using LQC and HQC level samples prepared in post extracted blanks and compared with that of unextracted pure samples, matrix factor found between 0.85 to 1.15 with maximum internal standard normalized matrix factor %CV of 11.5.

 

 

Intra and Inter day precision and accuracy along with ruggedness was tested by analyzing three precision and accuracy batches. Intra and Inter Precision and accuracy found acceptable. Recovery of the method found reproducible and consistent over the entire calibration curve range. ULOQ and ISTD chromatograms were presented as figure 4 and 5.

 

Fig. 4: Moxonidine ULOQ Chromatogram

 

Fig. 5: ISTD Chromatogram

 

 

Table 2: Precision and Accuracy results

Description

LLOQQC

LQC

MQC

HQC

Nominal

11.019

29.668

4262.66

7750.291

Observed

11.179

28.603

4370.51

7948.344

% Accuracy

101.5

96.4

102.5

102.6

% Precision

11

5

8

2

 

Calculations are done for simple weighing factor and regression selection using  three calibration curves data and linear regression with 1/X2 found to be simple, so was selected.

 

Stability of the method is tested different conditions.

 

Table 3: Stability durations

Stability Condition

Duration

Bench top stability at ambient temperature

6 hours

Freeze-Thaw stability

4 cycles

Wet Extract stability

25 hours

Long term stability in plasma

24 days

Autosampler stability

28 hours

 

Application to bioequivalence study sample analysis:

The above described method has been successfully applied to analyze a bioequivalence study consist of 12 volunteers dosed with 25mg of moxonidine as per IEC approved protocol. Screening was conducted to select volunteers as per inclusion and exclusion criteria, volunteers dosed after 10hours fasting in a crossover study design. Blood samples are collected at regular intervals. A total of 360 samples were collected before and after administration of Moxonidine, plasma separated and stored at -700C. These samples were analyzed under calibration curve along with QC samples. CC and QC during study analysis showed accuracy and precision within the acceptance limits stated in EMA guideline on Bioanalytical method validation. Study analysis is conducted under GLP regulated environment. Non compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis is conducted, Mean Graph is presented as figure 6.

 

 

Fig. 6: Pharmacokinetic mean graph for Moxonidine Tablets 25  mg test (PI) vs Reference formulation (PII).

 

CONCLUSION:

Moxonidine is a low molecular weight basic polar drug. Basic functional groups are active for extraction and ionization. Because of the drug polar in nature, we got matrix effect problems but clonidine (ISTD) is compensating those, IS normalized matrix factor is within limits. Method validation found acceptable. Method can be used for intended purpose.

 

Successfully developed and validated a simple, rapid Bioanalytical method for the estimation of Moxonidine in plasma by LC-MS/MS. Sample extraction using solid phase extraction while separation was achieved on hypurity C8 column, acquired in MRM mode and quantified using analyst 1.6.2 software. Method found selective, no endogenous or exogenous interfences found either at analyte or internal standard retention times. Matrix factor ratio found around 1 whereas recoverys found more than 40 % with within 20% CV. Signal to noise ratio found always more than 5. Precision and accuracy, ruggedness and all stability experiments found acceptable. Method is successfully applied to analyze unknown samples upto 360 and found reproducibility as well.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

The authors would like to thank the management and our mentor Dr Raman Batheja of VerGo clinicals, Goa, India, for supporting to conduct the research work.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors confirm that they do not have any conflict of interest in this report.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        http://wikipedia\moxonidine, encyclopedia, 2016 [Accessed: 20 Dec 2019).

2.        http://EMA, Note for guideline on the investigation of BA/BE, 2000 [Accessed: 20 Dec 2019).

3.        http://emc, Moxonidine Specific product characteristics, 2012 [Accessed: 20 Dec 2019).

4.        Minxia M. He, Trent. Abraham, Thomas J. Lindsay, Hans C. Schaefer, Isabelle J. Pouliquen, Chris Payne: The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Vol.31, no.3, 2003, 334-342.

5.        Stephen D Wise, Clark Chan, Hans G Schaefer, Minxia M He, Isabelle J Pouliquen, Malcolm I Mitchell: Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2002, 54(3), 251–254.

6.        Luhua Zhao, Li Ding, Xin Wei: Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2006, 40(1):95-9.

7.        Milovanović S, Otašević B, Zečević M, Zivanović L, Protić A: J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012, 5(59), 151-6.

8.        Rajendra Kakde, Kamlesh Gadpayale, M. Obaid Qureshi: International Journal of PharmTech Research, Vol.4, No.1, 2012, 358-363.

9.        http://EMA, Moxonidine, public assessment report, 2009 [Accessed: 20 Dec 2019).

10.      CUI, Han-ming, SUN, Hui-min, WANG, Wei, TIAN, Song-jiu: HPLC Determination of Dissolution of Moxonidine Hydrochloride Tablets, Chinese, Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Volume 23, Number 4, July 2003 pp. 315-316(2).

11.      Milovanović S, Otašević B, Zečević M, Zivanović L, Protić A: Development and validation of reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of moxonidine in the presence of its impurities, J Pharm Biomed Anal, Feb 2012, 59:151-6.

12.      Lena Brynne, John L McNay, Hans G Schaefer, Karl Swedberg, Curtis G Wiltse, and Mats O Karlsson: Pharmacodynamic models for the cardiovascular effects of moxonidine in patients with congestive heart failure, Br J Clin Pharmacol, Jan 2001, 51(1): 35–43.

13.      Rudolph M, Janssen W, Strassner M: Determination of moxonidine (BDF 5895) in plasma by gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry, J Pharm Biomed Anal, May 1992,10(5):323-8.

14.      Chazova I, Almazov VA, Shlyakhto E: Moxonidine improves glycaemic control in mildly hypertensive, overweight patients: a comparison with metformin, Diabetes Obes Metab, Jul 2006, 8(4):456-65.

15.   Slavica Filipic, Milica Elek, Marija Popović, Katarina Nikolic, and Danica Agbaba: Development of Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography Method for the Analysis of Moxonidine and Its Impurities, Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, Volume 2016 (2016).

 

 

 

 

Received on 24.02.2020           Modified on 30.04.2020

Accepted on 29.05.2020         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(12):5773-5776.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.01006.9