Chemical constituents Analysis of Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata

 

Subhashree Singh1, Bhaskar Chandra Sahoo1, Subrat Kumar Kar2, Ambika Sahoo1, Sanghamitra Nayak1, Basudeba Kar1*, Suprava Sahoo1*

1Center For Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Kalinganagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar- 751003, Odisha, India.

2Regional Plant Resource Centre (RPRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: supi.sos2000@gmail.com, basu.cbt@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Introduction: Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata are two important medicinal plants having diverse therapeutic value. The objective of the present work was to analyze different bioactive constituents present in the methanolic leaf and rhizome extracts of A. galanga and A. calcarata Methods: Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis was carried out for determining the phytoconstituents present in both the plants. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) of these extracts were also determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu and aluminium chloride colorimetric method. Results: The major phytochemical constituents found in leaf extracts of A. galanga were benzenepropanal (37.35±0.5%) and 3-phenyl-2-butanone (20.49±0.6%) whereas, rhizome extract contain carotol (17.44±0.3%), Eucalyptol (13.89±0.2%), 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (11.28±0.3%) as major constituents. Similarly, major constituents of leaf extract in A. calcarata were olealdehyde (32.41±0.95%), hexadecanal (31.84±0.34%), phytol (11±0.52%), 9-hexadecenal (10.06±0.12%) whereas hydroquinone (44.17±0.36%) and pyranone (6.19±0.35%) were found to be maximum in rhizome extract. TPC and TFC of leaf extract of A. galanga was found to be highest (77.25±1.56mg GAE/g of the extract and 64.69±1.12 mg Quercetin equivalent/ g of extract respectively) in comparison with A. calcarata extracts. Conclusion: A. galanga and A. calcarata have furnished an array of phytoconstituents which could be responsible for a wide range of bioactivities. These findings could give new direction towards future pharmacological investigations.

 

KEYWORDS: GC-MS, methanolic extract, Alpinia galanga, Alpinia calcarata.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Medicinal plants play a key role in the treatment of many diseases in humans from ancient times and these are the vital part of the Indian traditional medical system, such as the Ayurveda and Siddha. Globally, an extensive activity of research is undergoing on diverse plant group and their remedial values. Scientifically, medicinal flora have proven to be a rich resource of biologically active compounds. India is the largest producer of medicinal herbs and is appropriately called the botanical garden of the world[1]. Genus Alpinia is a large genus of the Zingiberaceae family, which is widely distributed in many tropical regions of Asia, including China, India and Indonesia.

 

This genus consists of almost 250 species and these plants have been utilized as traditional medicines, food and spices in many countries such as China, Japan and India. Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata are two important plants of this genus.

 

Alpinia galanga L. is a rhizomatous plant which is cultivated in many countries like India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and China. Its rhizomes are also used as spices and condiment and flavouring agent. The rhizome has enough importance to treat many diseases like rheumatism, ulcers, colds, whooping cough, vomiting, throat infections, stomach ache and indigestion. The plant is reported to have antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiulcer, antitumour, anticalculi and anti-HIV properties[2-6]. Alpinia calcarata is a rhizomatous perennial herb, commonly used in the traditional medicinal systems. Rhizome is the economically important part, which is a major constituent of many formulations of the indigenous system of medicine. A. calcarata possesses antibacterial, anthelmintic, antifungal, antinociceptive, antioxidant, gastroprotective, aphrodisiac and antidiabetic[7,8]. This medicinal plant has enormous significance to treat throat inflammation, purifying blood, stimulating digestion, rheumatism, bronchitis and asthma .

 

In the last few years, gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has become one of the best technique for profiling of plant secondary metabolites, which are the key factor in therapeutics[9,10]. GC-MS studies are very much useful in identifying the phytochemical constitutes present in the plant parts. Knowledge of the chemical constituents of plants is desirable because such information will be valuable for the synthesis of complex chemical substances.

 

To the best of our knowledge, though the rhizome extracts of A.galanga and A. calcarata have been investigated, leaf extracts of A.calcarata have not studied through GC-MS analysis till date. Considering the importance of the plants and existing lacuna, the present study was aimed for phytochemical screening, evaluation of total phenolic and flavonoid content and GC-MS analysis of methanolic leaf and rhizome extracts of A.galanga and A. calcarata.

 

MATERIALS AND METHOD:

Plant Material:

The rhizomes of Alpinia galanga were collected from Cilviculture, Bhubaneswar, Odisha whereas Alpinia calcarata plants were collected from Phulbani district, Odisha. The samples were authenticated by Dr. P.C. Panda, Principal Scientist, taxonomy and conservation division, Regional Plant Resource Centre, Bhubaneswar and was grown in the medicinal plant garden of Centre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar.

 

Preparation of extracts:

The fresh leaves and rhizomes were washed and cut into small pieces followed by drying for 15-20 days under shade separately. Then the dried materials were grounded into coarse powder and were extracted with methanol for 12h in soxhlet apparatus. The extracts were filtered with Whatman 40 filter paper and then concentrated by using a rotary evaporator to give rise to a semi-solid mass. Each extraction method was repeated thrice for the purpose of accuracy. The residues obtained were stored in the refrigerator for further analysis.

 

Preliminary phytochemical screening

The leaf and rhizome extracts of A.galanga and A.calcarata were subjected to different chemical tests for the identification of different phytoconstituents[11,12].

 

Evaluation of Total phenolic content (TPC) and Total flavonoid content (TFC):

Total phenolic content of the leaf and rhizome extracts of both A. galanga and A. calcarata were determined by Folin-Ciocalteu method as described by Sahoo et al, 2013[13] using Gallic acid as a standard. The result was shown as mg Gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of extract. Likewise, total flavonoid content of leaf and rhizome extracts of both A.galanga and A.calcarata were estimated using aluminium chloride colorimetric method [13]. TFC was analyzed from the calibration curve obtained through Quercetin, which was represented as mg Quercetin equivalent/g of the extract. All the determinations were performed in triplicate for ensuring the result.

 

GC-MS analysis of plant extracts:

GC-MS (gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry) analysis was carried out on a 6890 series instrument (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with mass selective detector with quadrupole analyzer, MSD 5973. The electron ionization energy was 70 ev, ion source temperature 230°C and the interface temperature 280°C. A fused silica column HP-5 was used as the stationary phase. The oven was programmed as 50°C to 240°C at 4°C/min; then 240°C to 270°C at 15°C/min; held isothermal at 50°C for 1 min and at 270°C for 15 min. A sample of 1μl was injected through the mobile phase as helium with flow rate 1.0ml/min. The identification of compounds was performed by comparing their mass spectra with data from the US National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST, USA).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Phytochemical screening:

Preliminary phytochemical screening of the leaf and rhizome extract of A.galanga and A.calcarata revealed the presence of different phytoconstituents like alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, triterpenoids, tanins and saponins which are shown in table 1.


 

Table 1: Preliminary phytochemical screening of leaf and rhizome extract of Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata.

Phytoconstituents

Test performed

AG leaf

AG rhizome

AC leaf

AC rhizome

Alkaloids

Dragendroff’s test

-ve

-ve

-ve

+ve

Mayer’s test, Wagner’s test, Hager’s test

+ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

Steroids

Libermann Burchard test, Salkowski test

+ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

Flavonoids

Alkaline reagent test, Shinoda test

+ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

Triterpenoids

Libermann Burchard test, Salkowski test

+ve

+ve

+ve

-ve

Carbohydrates

Molisch’s test, Fehling’s test

-ve

-ve

-ve

-ve

Barfoed’s test, Benedict’s test

-ve

-ve

-ve

-ve

Tanins

FeCl2 test

+ve

+ve

-ve

-ve

Saponins

Foam test

+ve

-ve

-ve

-ve

Aminoacids

Millon’s test, Ninhydrin test

-ve

+ve

+ve

+ve

Glycosides

Killer-Kiliani test

-ve

-ve

-ve

+ve

Brontrager’s test

-ve

-ve

-ve

+ve

(+): Indicates the presence of chemical constituents, (-): Indicates the absence of chemical constituents

 


Evaluation of total phenolic and total flavonoid contents:

In our study, Total Phenolic Content (TPC) of leaf and rhizome extracts of A. galanga and A. calcarata was estimated by using modified Folin-Ciocalteu calorimetric method and represented in terms of GAE/g of the extract. It was calculated using the standard curve of Gallic acid (Standard curve equation: Y=0.004x+0.063, R2= 0.998). TPC of the leaf and rhizome extract of A.galanga was found to be 77.25±1.56 and 32.44±1.35 mg GAE/g of the extract respectively (Table 2). Similarly, in case of A. calcarata, TPC of the leaf extract was found to be higher (59.25±0.92mg GAE/g) than that of rhizome extract (37.75±0.95mg GAE/g) (Fig. 1).

 

Fig. 1: TPC and TFC value of both Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata

 

Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) of leaf and rhizome extract of both the plants was calculated using the standard curve of Quercetin (standard curve equation: Y= 0.013x+0.487, R2=0.886) and represented in terms of Quercetin equivalent/g of the extract. Alpinia galanga leaf extract possessed high flavonoid contents (64.69±1.12 mg Quercetin equivalent/ g of extract) in compared to A.calcarata extracts (Table 2).

 

Table 2 : Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) of leaf and rhizome extract of Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata.

Sl. No

Name of Plant extracts

TPC

TFC

1

A.galanga leaf

77.25±1.56

64.69±1.12

2

A.galanga rhizome

32.44±1.35

39.46±1.05

3

A.calcarata leaf

59.25±0.92

38.38±0.56

4

A.calcarata rhizome                                      

37.75±0.95

36.92±0.24

The plant secondary metabolites like phenolics and flavonoids are responsible for the plant antioxidant activity and consequently, it is pretty important to evaluate the total phenolic and total flavonoid content of plant extracts[14]. The phenolics, one of the major and most abundant groups of plant secondary metabolites, possess bioactivities like antiapoptosis, antiaging, anticarcinogen, antiinflammation, antiatherosclerosis, cardiovascular protection and cell proliferation activities [15]. These diverse groups of compounds serve as potential natural antioxidants in terms of their capability to work as radical scavengers.

 

GC-MS analysis of extracts:

The result concerning to Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis of the leaf and rhizome extracts of A. galanga lead to the identification of many chemical constituents. The various components present in the A.galanga extracts that were detected by the GC-MS are shown in (Table 3). Benzenepropanal (37.35±0.5%) and 3-phenyl-2-butanone (20.49±0.6%) were found to be the constituents of the leaf extract, whereas rhizome extract was found to contain carotol (17.44±0.3%), eucalyptol (13.89±0.2%), 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (11.28±0.3%) as major constituents (Table 3). The leaf and rhizome extract were rich in benzenepropanal and carotol respectively. Eucalyptol (13.89±0.2%) was also found in the rhizome extract. Carotol was reported in other Alpinia species like Alpinia nigra and Alpinia calcarata [16,17]. Antifungal activity of carotol has been reported by [18].

 

GC-MS analysis of A. calcarata leaf and rhizome extracts revealed the presence of 6 and 3 identified components accounting for 99.97% and 50.7% of the total peak area respectively. The major constituents of the leaf extract were olealdehyde (32.41±0.95%), hexadecanal (31.84±0.34%), phytol (11±0.52%), 9-hexadecenal (10.06±0.12%) whereas rhizome extract was found to contain hydroquinone (44.17±0.36%) and pyranone (6.19±0.35%) as major constituents. Detailed list of all the detected compounds with their chemical names, area percentages and retention time of each was given in (Table 3). The details including molecular formula, molecular weight and the structure of identified active principles were given in the table 4.


 

Table 3: Chemical constituents identified in leaf and rhizome extracts of Alpinia galanga and Alpinia calcarata.

S. No

Compound name

Peak Area (%) Mean±SD

Retention time (RT)

AG leaf

AG Rhizomes

AC Leaf

AC Rhizomes

1

Benzenepropanal

37.35±0.5

Nd

Nd

Nd

9.051

2

3-phenyl-2-butanone

20.49±0.6

Nd

Nd

Nd

11.880

3

Eucalyptol

Nd

13.89±0.2

Nd

Nd

5.470

4

Pyranone

Nd

7.74±0.3

Nd

Nd

9.174

5

α-Terpineol

Nd

9.09±0.3

Nd

Nd

10.519

6

Fenchyl acetate

Nd

5.44±0.1

Nd

Nd

11.508

7

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural

Nd

11.28±0.3

Nd

Nd

12.840

8

Cinnamic acid

Nd

3.82±0.1

Nd

Nd

17.957

9

Carotol

Nd

17.44±0.3

Nd

Nd

25.894

10

Palmitic acid

Nd

4.26±0.1

Nd

Nd

39.062

11

9-Hexadecenal

Nd

Nd

10.06±0.12

Nd

31.899

12

Hexadecanal

Nd

Nd

31.84±0.34

Nd

32.694

13

9,12-Octadecadienal

Nd

Nd

6.67±0.42

Nd

38.089

14

Olealdehyde

Nd

Nd

32.41±0.95

Nd

38.487

15

Octadecanal

Nd

Nd

7.99±0.63

Nd

39.155

16

Phytol

Nd

Nd

11.00±0.52

Nd

41.904

17

Pyranone

Nd

Nd

Nd

6.19±0.35

9.876

18

Hydroquinone

Nd

Nd

Nd

44.17±0.36

15.001

19

2-Deoxy-D-ribose

Nd

Nd

Nd

0.34±0.18

31.471

nd: not detected

 

Table 4: Details of identified phytoconstituents

S. No

Compound name

Molecular

Formula

Molecular

Weight

Structure

1

Benzenepropanal

C9H10O

134.1751

 

2

3-phenyl-2-utanone

C10H12O

148.2017

 

3

Eucalyptol

C10H18O

154.2493

 

4

Pyranone

C6H8O4

144.1253

 

5

α-Terpineol

C10H18O

154.2493

 

6

Fenchyl acetate

C12H20O2

196.2860

 

7

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural

C6H6O3

126.1100

 

8

Cinnamic acid

C9H8O2

148.1586

 

9

Carotol

C15H26O

222.3663

 

10

Palmitic acid

C16H32O2

256.4241

 

11

9-Hexadecenal

C16H30O

238.415

 

12

Hexadecanal

C16H32O

240.4247

 

13

9,12-Octadecadienal

C18H32O

264.4461

 

14

Olealdehyde

C18H34O

266.4620

 

15

Octadecanal

C18H36O

268.4778

 

16

Phytol

C20H40O

296.5310

 

17

Pyranone

C6H8O4

144.1253

 

18

Hydroquinone

C6H6O2

110.1106

 

19

2-Deoxy-D-ribose

C5H10O4

134.1305

 

 


GC-MS analysis has been done for determining the presence of possible bioactive chemical constituents present in the leaf and rhizome methanolic extracts. The presence of various bioactive compounds justifies the use of plant as medicine. The phytochemical profiling of the A. calcarata leaf still remains to be unexplored and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the GC/MS profiling of the leaf extract of A. calcarata.

 

CONCLUSION:

The results of GC–MS analysis of the methanol extract of A. galanga and A. calcarata have furnished an array of compounds which could be responsible for a wide range of bioactivities. The presence of various bioactive compounds in both of the plants validates their use by traditional practitioners. Further investigation may lead to isolation of bio-active compounds and their structural elucidation and screening of pharmacological activity will be helpful for further drug development.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are grateful to the Dean, Centre for Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan University for providing facilities to carry out this research work.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

There is no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Ahmedulla M., Nayar M.P (1999) Red data book of Indian plants. Peninsular India. Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India, 4.

2.      Mahae N., Chaiseri S (2009). Antioxidant activities and antioxidative components in extracts of Alpinia galanga (L.) Sw. Kasetsart. J Nat Sci. 43: 358-69.

3.      Rao K., Ch B., Narasu L.M., Giri A (2010). Antibacterial activity of Alpinia galanga (L) Willd crude extracts. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162(3): 871-84.

4.      Borthakur M.I., Hazarika J., Singh R.S (1998). A protocol for micropropagation of Alpinia galanga. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 55(3): 231-3.

5.      Subash K.R., Prakash G.B., Reddy K.V., Manjunath K., Rao K.U (2016). Anti-inflammatory activity of ethanolic extract of Alpinia galanga in carrageenan induced pleurisy rats. Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol. 6(5): 468.

6.      Ye Y., Li B (2006). 1′ S-1′-acetoxychavicol acetate isolated from Alpinia galanga inhibits human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by blocking Rev transport. J. Gen. Virol. 87(7): 2047-53.

7.      Rahman M.A., Islam M.S (2015). Alpinia calcarata Roscoe: A potential phytopharmacological source of natural medicine. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 9(17): 55.

8.      Arambewela L.S., Arawwawala L.D., Ratnasooriya W.D (2004). Antinociceptive activities of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Alpinia calcarata rhizomes in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 95: 311-6.

9.      Robertson D.G (2005). Metabonomics in toxicology: a review. Toxicol. Sci. 85(2): 809-22.

10.   Kell D.B., Brown M., Davey H.M., Dunn W.B., Spasic I., Oliver S.G (2005). Metabolic foot printing and systems biology: the medium is the message. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3: 557.

11.   Kokate C.K (1994). Practical Pharmacognosy, Vallabh Prakashan, 1st ed. New Delhi, India.

12.   Harborne J.B (1998). Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis, 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.

13.   Sahoo S., Ghosh G., Das D., Nayak S (2013). Phytochemical investigation and in vitro antioxidant activity of an indigenous medicinal plant Alpinia nigra B.L. Burtt. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 3, 871-876.

14.   Mathew S., Abraham T.E (2006). In vitro antioxidant activity and scavenging effects of Cinnamomum verum leaf extract assayed by different methodologies. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 44(2): 198-206.

15.   Singh R., Singh S., Kumar S., Arora S (2007). Evaluation of antioxidant potential of ethyl acetate extract/fractions of Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. A. Cunn. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 45(7): 1216-23.

16.   Kanjilal P.B., Kotoky R., Couladis M (2010). Essential Oil composition of leaf and rhizome oil of Alpinia nigra (Gaertner) BL Burtt. from Northeast India. J. Essent. Oil. Res. 22(4): 358-9.

17.   Bhuiyan M.N., Begum J (2011). Volatile constituents of essential oils isolated from different parts of Alpinia calcarata Rosc. Afr. J. Plant. Sci. 5(15): 887-9.

18.   Jasicka-Misiak I., Lipok J., Nowakowska E.M., Wieczorek P.P., Młynarz P., Kafarski P (2004). Antifungal activity of the carrot seed oil and its major sesquiterpene compounds. Z. Naturforsch. C Bio. Sci. 59: 791-6.

 

 

 

 

Received on 28.10.2019           Modified on 02.12.2020

Accepted on 05.03.2020         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(10):4735-4739.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00834.3