Solubility and Dissolution Improvement of Carbamazepine by Various Methods
Shreya, Ayesha Heena, Ranjitha, Amrutha A Shetty, Chetan H Mehta, Usha Y Nayak*, Srinivas Mutalik, K Girish Pai
Department of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India–576104
*Corresponding Author E-mail: usha.nayak@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
This work was aimed to improve solubility and dissolution rate of carbamazepine (CBZ), an antiepileptic, BCS class II drug by using different solubility enhancement techniques. Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) and solid dispersions of CBZ was attempted by spontaneous emulsification method and fusion method, respectively. The solubility studies of pure CBZ was performed in different oils, surfactants and co-surfactants. Very small amount of CBZ (20 mg) could be incorporated in SNEDDS, however the solid dispersion of CBZ using Soluplus® was successfully prepared with the required dose. The solid dispersion was characterized and evaluated for saturation solubility, in vitro dissolution studies, solid state characterization such as fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and powder X-ray diffraction studies (XRD). Based on the results, it can be concluded that the due to increased solubility and the dissolution, the bioavailability of CBZ could be improved by preparing solid dispersion.
KEYWORDS: Carbamazepine, self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system, solid dispersion, spontaneous emulsification method, fusion method.
INTRODUCTION:
Presently available anti-epileptic drugs are effective in controlling 70% of cases by inhibiting the abnormal discharge from the neurons of the brain thus prevent seizures but their use is limited due to their various side effects. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is first line therapy for the treatment of epilepsy which works by decreasing the nerve impulses that cause seizures and pain. It is used to treat trigeminal neuralgia and bipolar disorders. Based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), CBZ comes under BCS Class II i.e. low solubility and high permeability. CBZ is present in various crystalline forms which has different dissolution, solubility and bioavailability. It is primarily metabolized in the liver to its active state CBZ-10,11 epoxide which is potentially toxic. It is a lipophilic drug (Log P value 2.45) which is poorly water soluble with slower dissolution rate hence shows poor oral bioavailability. Hence, it is most appropriate to design a suitable formulation to enhance the solubility and hence improve the bioavailability of CBZ by using various solubility enhancement techniques. Currently, the oral dosage forms such as tablets, capsules, suspension, cocrystals etc. of CBZ are available4,5.
Majority of drugs discovered in the recent years belong to the category of BCS-II which poses the greatest challenge in formulation development owing to its poor solubility and hence poor absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. The rate and degree of retention of the medication is determined by the pace and degree of dissolution of drug from any solid dosage forms. For this process of drug absorption, dissolution is considered as the rate-limiting step as on account of inadequate water-soluble drugs. Numerous solubility enhancing techniques have been developed for improving the solubility and also for enhancing the dissolution qualities of marginally water dissolvable drugs for oral delivery. This includes size reduction of the drug by nanonization, cocrystal formation, conversion into inclusion complexes, solid dispersion techniques, self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, liposomes, emulsions and microemulsions but this has to be relevant to all other general drugs. Development of suitable formulation of drugs having poor solubility or poor permeability is one of the main problems nowadays6.
Self nano-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) is a lipophilic nano-carrier which is an isotropic mixture of oil, surfactant and co-surfactant spontaneously forming nano droplets upon coming in contact with body fluids7,8. SNEDDS shows great promise for enhancement of oral bioavailability. It also provides an interfacial region for the portioning between the oil and the gastrointestinal fluid9. These systems increase the bioavailability by increasing the drug solubility and maintaining the dissolved state of the drug in the form of oil droplets throughout its movement in the GIT10,11. Generally, the globule size of a nano-emulsion is obtained between 20 and 200nm when diluted. SNEDDS are more stable and easier to manufacture on a large scale11,12. Solid dispersion (SD) technique has been one of the attractive methods which involve the dispersion of drug within the carrier matrix constituting a polymer at the molecular level. The drug is dispersed in the matrix in its amorphous form, thus increasing the solubility of the drug, as an amorphous form of the drug shows a greater extent of solubility as compared to their crystalline counterparts. The presence of polymer also imparts stability to the system. Amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) technology has garnered significant attention over a few decades due to the ease of its preparation and the ability to hold a large amount of poorly soluble drug within them. Conversion of drugs into solid dispersion renders them amorphous in nature which is considered to be the reason for the higher magnitude of thermodynamic solubility of ASDs. Solvent evaporation, co-grinding and thermal fusion methods are the prime techniques for manufacturing solid dispersion13,14. CBZ supersaturatable self-microemulsifying and SD were attempted using PVP K3015, polyethylene glycol16,17 and phospholipid18 to improve its solubility. Djuris et al. and Lee et al., prepared CBZ-soluplus® and CBZ-soluplus®/ D-alpha-tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) based SD using hot melt extrusion respectively19,20. However cost effective self-nanoemulsifying system and SD of CBZ-soluplus® by fusion method are not attempted till date.
In the present study an attempt was made to formulate cost effective SNEDDS and SD of CBZ which will enhance its solubility and consequently improve the bioavailability for better absorption and therapeutic efficacy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials:
The gift sample of CBZ was obtained from Sun Pharma, Vadodara, Gujarat. Gattefosse India Pvt. Ltd. provided free gift samples of Labrafac, Labrasol and Transcutol HP. BASF India Limited provided free gift sample of Soluplus®. Sunflower oil, palm oil, isopropyl myristate and cinnamon oil were purchased from Genuine Chemicals Co., Mumbai. Tween 20, Tween 60 and Tween 80 were purchased from Nice Chemical Pvt. Ltd., Kerala. Lutrol 300, 400 and 600 were purchased from Signet Chemicals Co. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.
METHODS:
Preparation of SNEDDS:
SNEDDS of CBZ was prepared by mixing the different ratios of oil (cinnamon oil), surfactant (tween 80) and co-surfactant (Lutrol 400) to get nanoemulsion. Different ratios of surfactant to co-surfactant (Smix) and oil to Smix were tried. The ratio of 1:8 of oil and Smix (4:1) was optimized based on various trials (Table 1.)21.
Preparation of SD:
The solid dispersion of CBZ was prepared by fusion method. In this, CBZ and Soluplus® (Table 2.) was mixed uniformly and heated until it melted with vigorous stirring. The molten mixture was cooled and allowed to solidify. The obtained solid mass was crushed, pulverized and sieved. The product was stored in desiccator for future use22.
Evaluation of SD:
Solubility Studies:
The solubility studies of CBZ was carried out by adding excess amount of drug in oil, surfactant and cosurfactant separately in eppendorf (n=2) and mixed using vortex mixer. The eppendorfs were then kept at 37°C in water bath shaker for 48 h to reach equilibrium. The collected samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant was diluted with methanol which was analyzed using UV spectrophotometer at 285.6 nm.
Saturation Solubility Studies:
The saturation solubility studies of pure CBZ and CBZ-SD was carried out in water by adding excess amount of drug and formulation in the water separately in eppendorf (n=2) and mixed using vortex mixer. The eppendorfs were then kept at 37°C in water bath shaker for 72 h to reach equilibrium. The collected samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant was diluted with methanol which was analyzed using UV spectrophotometer at 285.6 nm. The saturation solubility studies of optimized formulation were carried out in different buffers such as 0.1 N hydrochloric acid buffer, pH 4.6 acetate buffer and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer using same conditions followed for above studies.
Solid State Characterization:
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR):
Infrared spectroscopy was performed using FTIR-8300 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu, Japan and the spectra were recorded in the region of 4000 cm-1 to 400 cm-1. The procedure consisted of dispersing the samples in potassium bromide and compressed into discs by applying a pressure of 5 tons for 5 min in a hydraulic press. The pellet was placed in light path and the spectrum was obtained.
Powder X-ray Diffraction Studies (XRD):
X- ray diffraction (XRD) pattern for pure CBZ and CBZ-SD were recorded on X-ray diffractomer (X’Pert Powder PAN analytical system, Almelo, the Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation generated at 40 mA and 35 kV.
Table 1. Composition of SNEDDS
Oils |
Surfactants |
Co-surfactants |
Oil to Smix ratio (Surfactant: co-surfactant) |
|
Labrafac |
Tween 20 |
Transcutol HP |
1:1 |
2:1, 3:1, 4:1, 3:5, 2:3, 5:7 |
1:2 |
3:1 |
|||
1:9 |
3:1, 5:7, 2:1, 4:1, 2:3, 3:5 |
|||
1:6 |
3:1, 2:1 |
|||
Sunflower oil |
Tween 20 |
Transcutol HP |
1:9 |
3:1, 5:7 |
Isopropyl myristate |
Tween 20 |
Transcutol HP |
1:9 |
3:1, 5:7 |
Labrafac |
Labrasol |
Transcutol HP |
1:9 |
1:0, 3:1, 5:7, 2:1 |
Palm oil |
Labrasol |
Transcutol HP |
1:3 1:8 1:9 |
2:1, 3:1 4:1 3:1 |
IPM |
Labrasol |
Lutrol 400 |
4:1 |
1:10, 1:8 |
Cinnamon oil |
Tween 80 |
Lutrol 400 |
1:2 1:4 1:6 1:8 1:10 |
2:1, 1:2, 4:1, 1:4 2:1, 4:1, 1:2, 1:4 2:1, 4:1, 1:2, 1:4 2:1, 1:4 2:1, 4:1, 1:2, 1:4 |
In Vitro Dissolution Studies:
In vitro release studies were carried out for pure CBZ and CBZ-SD in three different dissolution media (0.1N HCl, pH 4.6 acetate buffer and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer). 100 mg of pure drug and 500 mg of CBZ solid dispersion (SD3) was compressed in the form of discs/tablet (hardness 1.5 kg/cm2) and dissolution study was carried out using USP type II dissolution apparatus (paddle type) containing 900 ml of respective buffers. The paddle rotation speed was set at 75 rpm. The temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C by thermostatically controlled water bath. 5 mL of sample were withdrawn at predetermined intervals and the same was replaced with respective buffers. The withdrawn sample was filtered and analysed by UV spectrophotometer at 285.6 nm.
Table 2. Composition of solid dispersion
Sample No. |
CBZ (mg) |
Soluplus® (mg) |
SD1 (1:2) |
500 |
1000 |
SD2 (1:4) |
500 |
2000 |
SD3 (1:8) |
500 |
4000 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Preparation of SNEDDS:
Solubility Studies:
Solubility studies of CBZ were carried out in different oils, surfactant and co-surfactant, and the results are shown in Fig.1. CBZ showed maximum solubility in cinnamon oil followed by Labrafac and palm oil, surfactant Labrasol and co-surfactant Transcutol HP and Lutrol 400. Based on the results, cinnamon oil was chosen as the oil phase, Tween 80 and Lutrol 400 were chosen as surfactant and cosurfactant respectively. Since very less dose (20 mg) could be incorporated in CBZ nanoemulsion prepared using cinnamon oil (oil), tween 80 (surfactant) and Lutrol 400 (co-surfactant) in ratio of 1:8 of oil and Smix (4:1), they were not used for further optimization.
Fig. 1 Solubility profile of CBZ in different oil, surfactant and co-surfactants
Preparation of SD:
Saturation Solubility Studies:
The saturation solubility studies of pure CBZ and CBZ-SD were performed in water. The solubility of SD3 (1.22 mg/mL) was found to be higher as compared to SD1, SD2 and pure drug (i.e. 0.702±0.033, 0.918±0.076 and 0.228±0.05 mg/mL, respectively).The saturation solubility studies for the pure drug and the optimized batch of SD (SD3) was performed in different buffers such as 0.1 N hydrochloric acid buffer, pH 4.6 acetate buffer and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer and results were found to be0.142±0.002, 0.197±0.001 and 0.155±0.006 mg/mL, respectively for pure drug and 0.0192±0.003, 0.0212±0.002, 0.0237±0.004 for SD3.
Fig. 2 FTIR spectrum of pure CBZ, physical mixture of CBZ and Soluplus® and CBZ-solid dispersion
Fig.3 X-ray diffraction pattern for pure CBZ and CBZ solid dispersion
Solid State Characterization of CBZ-SD:
FTIR:
The FTIR spectra for pure CBZ, physical mixture of CBZ-Soluplus®, and CBZ-SD is shown in Fig. 2. Characteristic IR peaks for the samples are given in Table 3. The FTIR spectra of CBZ solid dispersion showed two bands at 3464.15, 3161.33 cm-1 corresponding to the symmetrical N-H stretching and aromatic CH stretching of CBZ, are replaced by a broaden band. This signifies that CBZ has been completely dispersed in Soluplus® in its amorphous state.
Table 3. Characteristic IR peaks for the sample
Sample |
Characteristic IR peaks (Wavenumber in cm-1) |
Pure CBZ |
3464.15, 3161.33, 1386.82, 765.74 |
CBZ- Soluplus® physical mixture |
3464.15, 3161.33, 765.74, 2935.86, 2787.14, 1685.79 |
CBZ-SD |
2860.43, 1739.79, 1685.79 |
Fig.4 Dissolution of profile of CBZ and CBZ-SD in different dissolution media
XRD:
Pure CBZ exhibited sharp characteristic peaks at 2θ of 12.7, 15.4, 24.5, and 27.1 degrees (Fig. 3.). Absence of sharp peaks in SD (Fig. 3.) signifies the conversion of CBZ from its crystalline state to amorphous nature during the formation of SD. This may be attributed to the hydrogen bond formation between C=O of CBZ and Soluplus® increasing the miscibility of CBZ in the polymer.
In Vitro Dissolution Study:
The in vitro dissolution profile for pure CBZ and SD3 batch is shown in Fig. 4. Pure CBZ showed a slower drug release in different dissolution media at end of 120 min. The dissolution profile of SD3 batch clearly indicates a higher drug release than that of pure CBZ. An improved solubility and hence dissolution were observed which may be due to the inherent amphiphilic nature and wetting property of Soluplus®. An enhanced dissolution rate of CBZ-SD could be attributed to the amorphous nature of CBZ dispersed within the matrix of Soluplus® and increased wettability due to the surface covering of the hydrophilic polymer.
CONCLUSION:
The present study was aimed at improving aqueous solubility of CBZ by using different solubility enhancement techniques. SNEDDS and solid dispersion of CBZ were attempted to improve the solubility and dissolution property of CBZ. However, during the trials it was observed that only a low dose of CBZ could be loaded into the formulation. Hence, SNEDDS were not subjected for further evaluation. The preparation of CBZ SD exhibited success in enhancing the poor aqueous solubility of CBZ, thus improving the dissolution and bioavailability.
ABBREVIATIONS:
CBZ - Carbamazepine,
SNEDDS – Self nano-emulsifying drug delivery system,
XRD - Powder X-ray diffraction studies,
FTIR - Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy,
SD – solid dispersion,
USP – United States Pharmacopoeia,
IR – Infrared,
UV – Ultra-violet,
IPM – Isopropyl myristate
REFERENCES:
1. Sander JW. The Natural History of Epilepsy in the Era of New Antiepileptic Drugs and Surgical Treatment. Epilepsia. 2003, 44(s1): 17–20.
2. Mills A. Global comparative assessments in the health sector: Disease burden, expenditures and intervention packages. Vol. 89, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Oxford University Press, 1995 [cited 2018 Nov 8]. p. 578.
3. Zybina A, Anshakova A, Malinovskaya J, Melnikov P, Baklaushev V, Chekhonin V, et al. Nanoparticle-based delivery of carbamazepine: A promising approach for the treatment of refractory epilepsy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2018, 547(1–2): 10–23.
4. Acharya SP, Pundarikakshudu K, Panchal A, Lalwani A. Preparation and evaluation of transnasal microemulsion of carbamazepine. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013, 8(1): 64–70.
5. Kou W, Cai C, Xu S, Wang H, Liu J, Yang D, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of novel immediate release carbamazepine tablets: Complexation with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin in the presence of HPMC. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2011, 409(1–2): 75–80.
6. Kalepu S, Nekkanti V. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2015, 5(5): 442–453.
7. Wang L, Dong J, Chen J, Eastoe J, Li X. Design and optimization of a new self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2009, 330(2): 443–448.
8. Park M-J, Ren S, Lee B-J. In vitro andin vivo comparative study of itraconazole bioavailability when formulated in highly soluble self-emulsifying system and in solid dispersion. Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition. 2007, 28(4): 199–207.
9. Jeevana Jyothi B, Sreelakshmi K. Design and Evaluation of Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System of Flutamide.Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2011, 3(1): 4–8.
10. Pouton CW. Lipid formulations for oral administration of drugs: non-emulsifying, self-emulsifying and “self-microemulsifying” drug delivery systems. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2000, 11 Suppl 2: S93-98.
11. Fatouros DG, Karpf DM, Nielsen FS, Mullertz A. Clinical studies with oral lipid based formulations of poorly soluble compounds. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2007, 3(4): 591–604.
12. Chakraborty S, Shukla D, Mishra B, Singh S. Lipid – An emerging platform for oral delivery of drugs with poor bioavailability. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2009, 73(1): 1–15.
13. Maulvi FA, Dalwadi SJ, Thakkar VT, Soni TG, Gohel MC, Gandhi TR. Improvement of dissolution rate of aceclofenac by solid dispersion technique. Powder Technology. 2011, 207(1–3): 47–54.
14. Shamsuddin, Fazil M, Ansari SH, Ali J. Development and evaluation of solid dispersion of spironolactone using fusion method. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2016, 6(1): 63–68.
15. Nan Z, Lijun G, Tao W, Dongqin Q. Evaluation of Carbamazepine (CBZ) Supersaturatable Self-Microemulsifying (S-SMEDDS) Formulation In-vitro and In-vivo. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2012, 11(1): 257–264.
16. Sethia S, Squillante E. Physicochemical Characterization of Solid Dispersions of Carbamazepine Formulated by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Conventional Solvent Evaporation Method. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2002, 91(9): 1948–1957.
17. Milović M, Djuriš J, Djekić L, Vasiljević D, Ibrić S. Characterization and evaluation of solid self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems with porous carriers as systems for improved carbamazepine release. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2012, 436(1–2): 58–65.
18. Biswas M, Akogyeram CO, Scott KR, Potti GK, Gallelli JF, Habib MJ. Development of carbamazepine: phospholipid solid dispersion formulations. Journal of Controlled Release. 1993, 23(3): 239–245.
19. Djuris J, Nikolakakis I, Ibric S, Djuric Z, Kachrimanis K. Preparation of carbamazepine–Soluplus® solid dispersions by hot-melt extrusion, and prediction of drug–polymer miscibility by thermodynamic model fitting. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2013, 84(1): 228–237.
20. Lee J-Y, Kang W-S, Piao J, Yoon I-S, Kim D-D, Cho H-J. Soluplus®/TPGS-based solid dispersions prepared by hot-melt extrusion equipped with twin-screw systems for enhancing oral bioavailability of valsartan. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2015, 9: 2745–2756.
21. Balakumar K, Raghavan CV, selvan NT, prasad RH, Abdu S. Self nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) of Rosuvastatin calcium: Design, formulation, bioavailability and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2013; 112: 337–343.
22. Medarević DP, Kachrimanis K, Mitrić M, Djuriš J, Djurić Z, Ibrić S. Dissolution rate enhancement and physicochemical characterization of carbamazepine-poloxamer solid dispersions. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology. 2016, 21(3): 268–276.
Received on 29.01.2019 Modified on 18.02.2019
Accepted on 11.04.2019 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(7): 3333-3337.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00562.6