Derivative spectrophotometric methods for the assay of Glibenclamide (An anti-diabetic agent)

 

Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna*, Palyam Bhanu, Kandula Venkat Navya

Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis & Quality Assurance, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management, GITAM Institute of Pharmacy, GITAM (Deemed to be University),

Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530045, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mannapurna.mukthinuthalapati@gitam.edu

 

ABSTRACT:

Glibenclamide is an anti-diabetic agent used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2. First derivative spectrophotometric techniques were developed for the assay of Glibenclamide tablet dosage forms in three different reagents and the methods were validated. Glibenclamide has shown linearity over the concentration range 1-80, 1-100 and 1-80 µg/ml respectively in phosphate buffer pH 2.0 (Method A), phosphate buffer pH 8.0 (Method B) and borate buffer pH 9.0 (Method C) respectively. The methods were validated by precision and accuracy studies and are suitable for the determining the assay of Glibenclamide tablets.

 

KEYWORDS: First order derivative spectroscopy, Glibenclamide, Phosphate buffers, Borate buffer, Validation, ICH guidelines.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Glibenclamide (Figure 1) also known as Glyburide is an oral hypoglycemic drug and it acts by stimulating the pancreatic beta cells and secretes insulin. Glibenclamide is chemically 5-chloro-N-(4-[N-(cyclo hexyl carbamoyl) sulphamoyl] phenethyl)-2-methoxy-benzamide. Glibenclamide is a sulphonylurea derivative consisting of two moieties such as a sulphonylurea moiety and a benzamide moiety1-2. In literature various analytical methods were found for the estimation of Glibenclamide in dosage forms. Spectrofluorimetry3, Spectrophotometry4-9, HPLC10-14 and LC-MS15 methods were developed for the assay of Glibenclamide as well as biological fluids16-18 and nano emulsions19-20. The present study summarizes three new validated21 first order derivative UV spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Glibenclamide in tablet dosage forms.

 

Figure 1: Chemical structure of Glibenclamide

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Glibenclamide is available as tables with brand names Afidex (Label claim: 2.5 mg) (Cadila pharmaceuticals Ltd) and Giclamide (Label claim: 5.0 mg) (Leben laboratories Pvt. Ltd). Model No. UV-1800 Shimadzu double beam UV-VIS spectrophotometer with quartz cells is used for the study and all the solutions were scanned (200-400 nm). 

 

Preparation of solutions

Solutions such as phosphate pH 2.0, phosphate pH 8.0 and borate buffer were prepared as per IP 2010. Stock solution of Glibenclamide was prepared by dissolving 25 mg of Glibenclamide in methanol (1000 µg/ml) in 25 ml volumetric flask and further dilutions were prepared using phosphate buffer pH 2.0 (Method A), phosphate buffer pH 8.0 (Method B) and borate buffer pH 9.0 (Method C) respectively.

 

Method validation

Linearity

A series of Glibenclamide solutions were prepared in phosphate buffer pH 2.0 (Method A), phosphate buffer pH 8.0 (Method B) and borate buffer pH 9.0 (Method C) (10-80 µg/ml for Method A and Method C; 10-100 µg/ml for Method B) from the stock solution and scanned (200-400 nm) against their reagent blanks. The absorption spectra obtained in Method A, Method B and Method C were transformed in to first order derivative spectra with the help of inbuilt software of the instrument. The resultant first derivative spectra has shown maxima and minima and therefore the amplitude was chosen for Method A (238.60-285.80) and Method B (238.80-286.0) for the calculation purpose whereas for Method C minima (238.20) was chosen for the spectral calculations.

 

Precision and accuracy studies

The intra-day and inter-day precision studies were performed at three different concentration levels (40, 60 and 80 µg/ml) and accuracy studies were carried out by standard addition method (50%, 100%, and 150%). The % recovery was calculated for all techniques Method A, B and C.

 

Assay of Glibenclamide tablets

Twenty tablets of Glibenclamide were weighed accurately, powdered and powder equivalent to 25 mg of Glibenclamide was extracted with methanol in a 25 ml volumetric flask and dilutions were made using phosphate buffer pH 2.0, phosphate buffer pH 8.0 and borate buffer pH 9.0 for Method A, Method B and Method C respectively. The assay was carried out using the above analytical procedures of Method A, Method B and Method C and the percentage recovery was calculated.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Three new first order derivative spectrophotometric methods have been developed for the assay of Glibenclamide. A review of published methods in the literature was given in Table 1.

 

Table 1: Review of spectrophotometric methods in the literature

Reagent

Linearity

(µg/ml)

λmax (nm)

References

Ethanol (Spectrofluorimetry)

1.4- 10

354

3

Methanol and Water (50:50, v/v)

10.0–70

308

4

Ethanol and Water (1:5)

2-14

230

5

Distilled water

1-5

276

6

Ethanol

3-15

229.5

7

Chloroform

5-30

242

8

Borate buffer pH 9.0

Phosphate buffer pH 8.0

Phosphate buffer pH 2.0

0.5-20

0.5-100

0.5-100

227

227

227

9

Phosphate buffer pH 2.0

Phosphate buffer pH 8.0

Borate buffer pH 9.0

10-80

10-100

10-80

 

Present work

(First derivative)

 

The first order derivative absorption spectra obtained in phosphate buffer pH 2.0, phosphate buffer pH 8.0 and borate buffer pH 9.0 for Method A, B and C respectively was shown in Figure 2. The calibration curves for Method A, B and C were shown in Figure 3. Beer-Lambert’s law was obeyed over the concentration range 10-80 µg/ml in Method A and C and 10-100 µg/ml Method B (Table 2). The percentage RSD in precision and accuracy studies was found to be less than 2 indicating that the methods are precise (Table 3) and accurate (Table 4). The characteristics and the assay results of Glibenclamide for all the three methods were given in Table 5.

 

 

 

Method A (Phosphate buffer pH 2.0)

 

 

Method B (Phosphate buffer pH 8.0)

 

 

Method C (Borate buffer pH 9.0)

Figure 2: Overlay first derivative spectra of Glibenclamide

 

 

 

 

 

Method A  (Phosphate buffer pH 2.0)

 

 

 

Method B  (Phosphate buffer pH 8.0)

 

 

 

Method C  (Borate buffer pH 9.0)

Figure 3: Calibration curves of Glibenclamide

 

 

 

 


Table 2: Linearity of Glibenclamide (First order derivative spectroscopy)

Conc. (µg/ml)

Method A (Amplitude)

Method B (Amplitude)

Method C (Minima)

0

0

0

0

10

0.012

0.01

0.007

20

0.024

0.02

0.017

40

0.048

0.038

0.033

60

0.07

0.055

0.049

80

0.085

0.072

0.065

100

-

0.090

-

 

 

Table 3: Precision study of Glibenclamide (First order derivative spectroscopy)

Interday precision study

Conc.

(µg/mL)

A

B

C

Statistical parameters: Mean ± Standard deviation(%RSD)

Amplitude

Amplitude

Minima

A

B

C

40

0.048

0.038

0.033

0.048  ± 0.00044 (0.93)

0.0318  ± 0.00031 (0.84)

0.033  ± 0.00023 (0.72)

60

0.07

0.055

0.049

0.075 ± 0.00082 (1.08)

0.059 ±0.00082 (1.38)

0.054 ±0.00082 (1.51)

80

0.095

0.072

0.065

0.098 ±0.00082 (0.83)

0.078 ±0.00082 (1.04)

0.071 ±0.00082 (1.14)

Intraday precision study

40

0.048

0.038

0.033

0.054  ± 0.00048 (0.89)

0.056  ± 0.00042 (0.75)

0.047  ± 0.00044 (0.94)

60

0.07

0.055

0.049

0.07±0.000816 (1.14)

0.055±0.000816 (1.48)

0.049±0.000816 (1.6)

80

0.095

0.072

0.065

0.095±0.000816 (0.85)

0.072±0.000816 (1.13)

0.065±0.000816 (1.2)

 

 

Table 3: Accuracy study of Glibenclamide (First order derivative spectroscopy)

Spiked Conc.

(μg/mL)

Formulation

(μg/mL)

Total Conc.

(μg/mL)

Conc. obtained (μg/mL) ± SD (% RSD) % Recovery

A

B

C

15 (50%)

30

30

30

45

45

45

44.87 ± 0.008165 (0.01)

(99.71%)

44.92 ± 0.01633 (0.03)

(99.82%)

44.95 ± 0.024944 (0.05)

(99.88%)

30 (100%)

30

30

30

60

60

60

59.87 ± 0.008165 (0.01)

(99.78%)

59.95 ± 0.01633 (0.02)

(99.91%)

59.92 ± 0.01633 (0.02)

(99.86%)

45 (150%)

30

30

30

75

75

75

74.85 ± 0.008165 (0.01)

(99.8%)

74.89 ± 0.02449 (0.03)

(99.85%)

74.95 ± 0.008165 (0.01)

(99.93%)

                                              

Table 5: Characteristic parameters of Glibenclamide (First order spectroscopy)

Parameters

A

B

C

Wave length (nm)

Amplitude 238.60-285.80

Amplitude 238.80-286

Minima 238.20

Linearity range (µg/ml)

10-80

10-100

10-80

Precision

(% RSD)

Interday

0.83-1.08

0.84-1.38

0.72-1.51

Intraday

0.85-1.14

0.75-1.48

0.94-1.60

Accuracy (% Recovery)

99.71-99.8

99.82-99.91

99.86-99.93

Assay (%)

99.81-99.89

99.84-99.93

99.81-99.97

 


CONCLUSION:

The three first order derivative spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Glibenclamide are found to be economical, simple, precise and accurate for the routine analysis of Glibenclamide tablets.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are grateful to M/s GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam for providing the research facilities Cadila pharmaceuticals Ltd (India) for supplying gift samples of Glibenclamide. There is no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.          Rehder S, Sakmann A, Rades T, Leopold CS. Thermal degradation of amorphous Glibenclamide”. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 80(1); 2012: 203-208.

2.          Christof Schaefer, Paul W.J. Peters and Richard K Mille Drugs during pregnancy and lactation: Hormones and hormone antagonists (Second Edition), 2007.

3.          Karim DK, Perween AH. Spectrofluorimetric method for the determination of Glibenclamide in pharmaceutical formulation. Baghdad Science Journal.  9(2); 2012:  296-300.

4.          Raja AP, Venkateshwar RJ. Design and validation of simple UV spectrophotometric method for the assay of Glibenclamide in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2(4); 2013: 52-56.

5.          Sidharth MP, Ramchandra NC, Vinod P. Validated simple and sensitive UV spectrophotometric method for estimation of Glibenclamide in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2(5); 2013: 2627-2634.

6.          Umadevi N, Mounika CH and Sudheer Babu I. Spectrophotometric method development and validation for the estimation of Glibenclamide in pure form and in dosage form. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 5(11); 2014: 4925-4928.

7.          Abida B, Kanwal R, Akash MSH, Khalid H, Ibrahim M and Syed SH. Development and validation of analytical method for qualitative and quantitative determination of Glibenclamide in different brands of tablet dosage form using UV-visible spectroscopy. Journal of Molecular and Genetic Medicine. 7(3); 2013: Article No. 1000080.

8.          Cicy Eapen, Prasanth V G and and Amita Rai. Development of UV Spectrometric method of Glibenclamide (Glyburide) in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. International Journal of Chem Tech Research 4(1); 2012: 356-360.

9.          Mukthinuthalapati Mathrusri Annapurna, Peethala Prathyusha and Siyyadri Durga Saranya. Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Glibenclamide. Acta Scientific Pharmaceutical Sciences. 3(8), 2019: 110-115.

10.        Harika KSL, Ravindra RY, Shamitha SR, Shiva T. Estimation of Glibenclamide present in tablets by RP-HPLC.  International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences.  2(2); 2011: 856-862.

11.        Narmada D, Murali Krishna PV, Yusuf SM, Ranganayakulu B, Uday PK and Raja AP. RP-HPLC method development and validation for estimation of Glibenclamide in tablet dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 4(3); 2014: 125-128.

12.        Nazrul H, Fars KA, Ibrahim AA, and Faiyaz S. Rapid analysis of Glibenclamide using an environmentally benign stability-indicating RP-HPLC Method. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research .13(3); 2014:  863-872.

13.        Parameswara RK, Ramana GV and Rao MC. Development and validation of sensitive RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Glibenclamide in pure and tablet dosage forms. Der Pharmacia Lettre. 8(15); 2016: 101-106.

14.        Jayanthi M, Thirunavukkarasu SV, Vijaya N, Elangovan S, Raja S. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for determination of Glibenclamide in pharmaceutical dosage forms. International Journal of ChemTech Research. 4(2); 2012:  593-601.

15.        Gulshan B, Manjeet S, Kaur Cj, Saranjit S. Ultraviolet-photodiode array and high-performance liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric studies on forced degradation behavior of Glibenclamide and development of a validated stability-indicating method. Journal of AOAC International. 91 (4); 2008: 709-719.

16.        Khalil I, Yousry M, Khalid A, Mohamed Y. High-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of Glibenclamide in human plasma.  Analytical Letters.  27(7): 1994: 1277-1293.

17.        Rajendran SD, Philip BK, Gopinath R and Suresh B. RP-HPLC method for the estimation of Glibenclamide in human serum. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 69(6); 2007:  796-799.

18.        El-Adl SM, El-Sadek ME and Hasan MH. Design and validation of stability indicating assay of Glibenclamide Using RP-HPLC technique in both bulk, pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma. Journal of Applied Pharmacy. 9(4); 2017:  Article No. 1000250.

19.        Mohammad W, Ashish KS and Aqil M. Development and validation of RP- HPLC method for estimation of Glibenclamide in nano emulsion formulation. World journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences. 4(11); 2015: 1579-1587.

20.        Abdul BM, Swathimutyam P, Padmanabha RA, Nalini S and Prakash VD. Development and validation of Glibenclamide in nano emulsion formulation by using RP-HPLC. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences. 8(8); 2011: 1-5.

21.        Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), International Conference on Harmonization, 2005.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 19.08.2019            Modified on 12.09.2019

Accepted on 02.10.2019           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2019; 12(10):4827-4830.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00835.7